Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,251 records in EU in 2024

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773France · 7,181Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778Germany · 305Austria · 222United States · 141Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0301decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2024.#Vía Atlántica Adegas e Viñedos, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark VIA ATLÁNTICA – Earlier EU figurative mark ATLÂNTICO – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-301/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0652decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 March 2024.#Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU trade mark consisting in a shade of orange – Absolute ground for invalidity – Graphic representation that is sufficiently clear and precise – Article 4 and Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 4 and Article 7(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-652/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0258_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 March 2024.#AAT Byelorussian Steel Works - management company of ‘Byelorussian Metallurgical Company’ holding (BSW - management company of ‘BMC’ holding) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Prohibitions on the import, purchase and transport of products as well as on the provision of services in the sector for iron and steel products originating from Belarus – Obligation to state reasons – Equal treatment – Misuse of powers – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T-258/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0258decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 March 2024.#AAT Byelorussian Steel Works - management company of ‘Byelorussian Metallurgical Company’ holding (BSW - management company of ‘BMC’ holding) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Prohibitions on the import, purchase and transport of products as well as on the provision of services in the sector for iron and steel products originating from Belarus – Obligation to state reasons – Equal treatment – Misuse of powers – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T-258/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0639decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 March 2024.#VF International Sagl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark GEOGRAPHICAL NORWAY EXPEDITION – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Relative ground for invalidity – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-639/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0639_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 March 2024.#VF International Sagl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark GEOGRAPHICAL NORWAY EXPEDITION – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Relative ground for invalidity – Damage to reputation – Article 8(5) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-639/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0059decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 March 2024.#DEC Technologies BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark DEC FLEXIBLE TECHNOLOGIES and EU figurative mark representing a square with curves – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Cases T-59/23 and T-68/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0259decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 6 March 2024.#AAT Mostovdrev v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus – Prohibitions on the import, purchase and transport of products as well as on the provision of services in the sector for wood products originating from Belarus – Obligation to state reasons – Equal treatment – Misuse of powers – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T-259/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 March 2024

Report· XGCELEX 52024XG01945R(01)open

Corrigendum to Common Military List of the European Union adopted by the Council on 19 February 2024 (equipment covered by Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing the control of exports of military technology and equipment) (updating and replacing the Common Military List of the European Union adopted by the Council on 20 February 2023 (1)) (CFSP) (Official Journal of the European Union C, C/2024/1945, 1 March 2024)

European Union · Council of the European Union · 6 March 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0700_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 5 March 2024.#Cayago Tec GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – Community design – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-700/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0588decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 March 2024.#Public.Resource.Org, Inc. and Right to Know CLG v European Commission.#Appeal – Access to documents of the institutions of the European Union – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 4(2) – Exceptions – Refusal to grant access to a document whose disclosure would undermine the protection of commercial interests of a natural or legal person, including intellectual property – Overriding public interest in disclosure – Harmonised standards adopted by the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) – Protection deriving from copyright – Principle of the rule of law – Principle of transparency – Principle of openness – Principle of good governance.#Case C-588/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0755_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 March 2024.#Marián Kočner v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol).#Appeal – Law enforcement cooperation – Regulation (EU) 2016/794 – Article 49(3) and Article 50 – Protection of personal data – Unlawful data processing – Criminal proceedings brought in Slovakia against the appellant – Expert’s report drawn up by the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) for the purposes of the investigation – Retrieval of data from a mobile phone and a USB storage device belonging to the appellant – Disclosure of those data – Non-material damage – Actions for damages – Nature of non-contractual liability.#Case C-755/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0755decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 March 2024.#Marián Kočner v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol).#Appeal – Law enforcement cooperation – Regulation (EU) 2016/794 – Article 49(3) and Article 50 – Protection of personal data – Unlawful data processing – Criminal proceedings brought in Slovakia against the appellant – Expert’s report drawn up by the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) for the purposes of the investigation – Retrieval of data from a mobile phone and a USB storage device belonging to the appellant – Disclosure of those data – Non-material damage – Actions for damages – Nature of non-contractual liability.#Case C-755/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0588_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 March 2024.#Public.Resource.Org, Inc. and Right to Know CLG v European Commission.#Appeal – Access to documents of the institutions of the European Union – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Article 4(2) – Exceptions – Refusal to grant access to a document whose disclosure would undermine the protection of commercial interests of a natural or legal person, including intellectual property – Overriding public interest in disclosure – Harmonised standards adopted by the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) – Protection deriving from copyright – Principle of the rule of law – Principle of transparency – Principle of openness – Principle of good governance.#Case C-588/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0234decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 March 2024.#Défense Active des Amateurs d’Armes ASBL and Others v Conseil des ministres.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 91/477/EEC – Control of the acquisition and possession of weapons – Firearms prohibited or subject to authorisation – Semi-automatic firearms – Directive 91/477, as amended by Directive (EU) 2017/853 – Article 7(4a) – Power of Member States to confirm, renew or prolong authorisations – Presumed impossibility of using that power in respect of semi-automatic firearms converted to fire blanks or into salute or acoustic weapons – Validity – Article 17(1) and Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.#Case C-234/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0234_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 March 2024.#Défense Active des Amateurs d’Armes ASBL and Others v Conseil des ministres.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Directive 91/477/EEC – Control of the acquisition and possession of weapons – Firearms prohibited or subject to authorisation – Semi-automatic firearms – Directive 91/477, as amended by Directive (EU) 2017/853 – Article 7(4a) – Power of Member States to confirm, renew or prolong authorisations – Presumed impossibility of using that power in respect of semi-automatic firearms converted to fire blanks or into salute or acoustic weapons – Validity – Article 17(1) and Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of the protection of legitimate expectations.#Case C-234/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 March 2024

Decision· DCELEX 32024D0851in force

Council Decision (EU) 2024/851 of 4 March 2024 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the 12th session of the Preparatory Commission for the establishment of the International Registry for Railway Rolling Stock and at the first session of the Supervisory Authority established pursuant to the Luxembourg Protocol to the Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment on Matters specific to Railway Rolling Stock

European Union · EUR-Lex · 4 March 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0096open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Agreement between the European Union, Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein and the Kingdom of Norway on an EEA Financial Mechanism for the period May 2021 - April 2028, the Agreement between the Kingdom of Norway and the European Union on a Norwegian Financial Mechanism for the period May 2021 - April 2028, the Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway and the Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Iceland

European Union · European Commission · 4 March 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0097open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Agreement between the European Union, Iceland, the Principality of Liechtenstein and the Kingdom of Norway on an EEA Financial Mechanism for the period May 2021 - April 2028, the Agreement between the Kingdom of Norway and the European Union on a Norwegian Financial Mechanism for the period May 2021 - April 2028, the Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway and the Additional Protocol to the Agreement between the European Economic Community and Iceland

European Union · European Commission · 4 March 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0013_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 February 2024.#cdVet Naturprodukte GmbH v Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (LA-VES).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Food safety – Feed additives – Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 – Authorisation procedure – Ban on placing on the market without authorisation – Status of existing products – Validity in the light of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Principle of proportionality – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/758 – Withdrawal from the market of grapefruit extract – Feedingstuffs containing grapefruit seed and grapefruit peel extract.#Case C-13/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0437_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 February 2024.#R.M. and E.M. v Eesti Vabariik (Põllumajanduse Registrite ja Informatsiooni Amet).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Article 7 – Administrative measures and penalties – Regulation No 1306/2013 – Articles 54 and 56 – Delegated Regulation No 640/2014 – Article 35 – Recovery of sums unduly paid to persons who have taken part in the irregularity – Concept of ‘beneficiary’.#Case C-437/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0392_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 February 2024.#X v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Application for international protection – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 4 – Risks of inhuman or degrading treatment – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 3(2) – Scope of the obligations of the Member State which has sought to have the applicant taken back by the Member State responsible and wishes to transfer the applicant to the latter Member State – Principle of mutual trust – Evidence and standard of proof of the real risk of inhuman or degrading treatment, resulting from systemic flaws – Practices of pushback to a third country and detention at border control posts.#Case C-392/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 February 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0623decided

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 29 February 2024.#Belgian Association of Tax Lawyers and Others v Premier ministre/ Eerste Minister.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour constitutionnelle (Belgium).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation – Mandatory automatic exchange of information in relation to reportable cross-border arrangements – Directive 2011/16/EU, as amended by Directive (EU) 2018/822 – Article 8ab(1) – Reporting obligation – 8ab(5) – Subsidiary obligation to notify – Legal professional privilege – Validity – Articles 7, 20 and 21, and Article 49(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for private life – Principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination – Principle of legality in criminal proceedings – Principle of legal certainty.#Case C-623/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0437decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 February 2024.#R.M. and E.M. v Eesti Vabariik (Põllumajanduse Registrite ja Informatsiooni Amet).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – Support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Article 7 – Administrative measures and penalties – Regulation No 1306/2013 – Articles 54 and 56 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 – Article 35 – Recovery of sums unduly paid to persons who have taken part in the irregularity – Concept of ‘beneficiary’.#Case C-437/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0392decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 February 2024.#X v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats 's-Hertogenbosch.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common policy on asylum and immigration – Application for international protection – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 4 – Risks of inhuman or degrading treatment – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining the application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Article 3(2) – Scope of the obligations of the Member State which has sought to have the applicant taken back by the Member State responsible and wishes to transfer the applicant to the latter Member State – Principle of mutual trust – Evidence and standard of proof of the real risk of inhuman or degrading treatment, resulting from systemic flaws – Practices of pushback to a third country and detention at border control posts.#Case C-392/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0013decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 February 2024.#cdVet Naturprodukte GmbH v Niedersächsisches Landesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (LA-VES).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Osnabrück.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Food safety – Feed additives – Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 – Authorisation procedure – Ban on placing on the market without authorisation – Status of existing products – Validity in the light of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom to conduct a business – Right to property – Principle of proportionality – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/758 – Withdrawal from the market of grapefruit extract – Feedingstuffs containing grapefruit seed and grapefruit peel extract.#Case C-13/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0747_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#BIW Invest AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative mark Compton – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Lack of descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-747/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0279_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#Sumol + Compal Marcas SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark smål – Earlier EU figurative mark and earlier national word mark SUMOL – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Identity of the goods – Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier marks through use – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-279/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0098_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#Atomico Investment Holdings Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark atomic fund – Earlier EU word mark ATOMICO – Lack of evidence of the reputation of the earlier mark – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Remittal of the case to the Opposition Division.#Case T-98/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0746_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#BIW Invest AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Word mark COMPTON – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Lack of descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-746/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0184_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 February 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark BERTRAND PUMA La griffe boulangère – Earlier EU figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Link between the marks at issue.#Case T-184/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 February 2024

PreviousPage 25 of 26Next