Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,301 records in EU in 2023

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0617_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 March 2023.#B&Bartoni spol. s r.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing an electrode to insert into a torch – Ground for invalidity – Article 4(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Component part of a complex product.#Case T-617/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0306_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 March 2023.#Fun Factory GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark love you so much – Earlier EU figurative mark I LOVE YOU SINCE FOREVER – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-306/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0750decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 22 March 2023.#Beauty Biosciences LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark BIO-BEAUTÉ – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Article 52(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 75, first sentence of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94(1), first sentence of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-750/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0005decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 March 2023.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing a band with an acute angle – Earlier EU and national figurative marks representing a band – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-5/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0750_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 22 March 2023.#Beauty Biosciences LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark BIO-BEAUTÉ – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Distinctive character acquired through use – Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Article 52(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 75, first sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94(1), first sentence, of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-750/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0408_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 March 2023.#adp Merkur GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark SEVEN SEVEN 7 – Earlier EU word mark Seven – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No genuine use – Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-408/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0366_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 March 2023.#Coinbase, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark coinbase – Absolute ground for invalidity – Bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-366/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 March 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0788_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 21 March 2023.#Louis Vuitton Malletier v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-788/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 March 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0788decided

Order of the Court of 21 March 2023.#Louis Vuitton Malletier v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-788/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 March 2023

Decision· DCELEX 32023D0676in force

Council Decision (EU) 2023/676 of 20 March 2023 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Chile pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union

European Union · EUR-Lex · 20 March 2023

Decision· DCELEX 32023D0684in force

Council Decision (EU) 2023/684 of 20 March 2023 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, and provisional application of the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America, of the first part, the European Union and its Member States, of the second part, Iceland, of the third part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the fourth part, and on the signing, on behalf of the Union, and provisional application of the Ancillary Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the first part, Iceland, of the second part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the third part, on the application of the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America, of the first part, the European Union and its Member States, of the second part, Iceland, of the third part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the fourth part

European Union · EUR-Lex · 20 March 2023

Proposal· PCCELEX 52023PC0144open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union in the Group of Experts of the European Agreement concerning the work of crews of vehicles engaged in international road transport (AETR), in the Working Party on Road Transport of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and, as appropriate, in relation to the notification by the UN Secretary-General pursuant to Article 21(1) of the AETR.

European Union · European Commission · 20 March 2023

Decision· DCELEX 32023D0683in force

Council Decision (EU) 2023/683 of 17 March 2023 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, within the Cooperation Council established by the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Iraq, of the other part, in relation to the setting up of a Sub-Committee on Development Cooperation and the adoption of its terms of reference

European Union · EUR-Lex · 17 March 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0696_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 March 2023.#GABO:mi Gesellschaft für Ablauforganisation:milliarium mbH & Co. KG v European Commission.#Appeal – Arbitration clause – Sixth and seventh framework programmes for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006 and 2007-2013) – ‘Horizon 2020’ Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) – Eligible costs – Set-off of claims – Claim for reimbursement – Admissibility of the application – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of the European Union – Requirement of clarity and precision.#Case C-696/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 March 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0696decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 March 2023.#GABO:mi Gesellschaft für Ablauforganisation:milliarium mbH & Co. KG v European Commission.#Appeal – Arbitration clause – Sixth and seventh framework programmes for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006 and 2007-2013) – ‘Horizon 2020’ Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) – Eligible costs – Set-off of claims – Claim for reimbursement – Admissibility of the application – Article 76(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of the European Union – Requirement of clarity and precision.#Case C-696/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 March 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0439_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 March 2023.#European Commission v Jiangsu Seraphim Solar System Co. Ltd and Council of the European Union v Jiangsu Seraphim Solar System Co. Ltd.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from China – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2146 withdrawing the acceptance of the undertaking for two exporting producers under Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU – Admissibility of the action at first instance – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Criterion of direct concern – Article 277 TFEU – Plea of illegality – Admissibility – Interest in bringing proceedings against the acts which served as the legal basis for the contested measure – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 8(9) – Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 – Article 13(9) – Consequences of the withdrawal by the European Commission of acceptance of an undertaking – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 – Article 3 – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 – Article 2 – Loss of entitlement to exemption from duties – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2146 – Article 2 – Invalidation of the undertaking invoices – Chargeability of duties on all the transactions concerned – Lack of retroactivity.#Joined Cases C-439/20 P and C-441/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 March 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0439decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 March 2023.#European Commission v Jiangsu Seraphim Solar System Co. Ltd and Council of the European Union v Jiangsu Seraphim Solar System Co. Ltd.#Appeal – Dumping – Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (i.e. cells) originating in or consigned from China – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2146 withdrawing the acceptance of the undertaking for two exporting producers under Implementing Decision 2013/707/EU – Admissibility of the action at first instance – Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU – Criterion of direct concern – Article 277 TFEU – Plea of illegality – Admissibility – Interest in bringing proceedings against the acts which served as the legal basis for the contested measure – Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 – Article 8(9) – Regulation (EU) 2016/1037 – Article 13(9) – Consequences of the withdrawal by the European Commission of acceptance of an undertaking – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1238/2013 – Article 3 – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1239/2013 – Article 2 – Loss of entitlement to exemption from duties – Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/2146 – Article 2 – Invalidation of the undertaking invoices – Chargeability of duties on all the transactions concerned – Lack of retroactivity.#Joined Cases C-439/20 P and C-441/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 March 2023

Regulation· RCELEX 32023R0657in force

Regulation (EU) 2023/657 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2023 laying down rules for the exercise of the Union’s rights in the implementation and enforcement of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part

European Union · EUR-Lex · 15 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0178_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#FA World Entertainment Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark FUCKING AWESOME – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-178/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0175_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#Novartis AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark BREZTRI – Earlier EU word marks ONBREZ, BREZILIZER and BREEZHALER – No likelihood of confusion – Lack of enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier marks – Article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 27(3)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-175/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0727_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#TO v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Action for annulment and for damages – Civil service – Temporary staff – Recruitment – External vacancy notice [confidential] 2 Confidential information hidden. – Decision not to extend the validity of a reserve list – Time limit for complaints – Publication on the internet – No excusable error – Inadmissibility.#Case T-727/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0089_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#Homy Casa Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a chair – Earlier design – Ground for invalidity – Disclosure of the earlier design – Disclosure via the Internet – Identification of the earlier design – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Article 63(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-89/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0178decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#FA World Entertainment Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark FUCKING AWESOME – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-178/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0089decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#Homy Casa Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a chair – Earlier design – Ground for invalidity – Disclosure of the earlier design – Disclosure via the Internet – Identification of the earlier design – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Article 63(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-89/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0727decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#TO v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Action for annulment and for damages – Civil service – Temporary staff – Recruitment – External vacancy notice [confidential] 2 Confidential information hidden. – Decision not to extend the validity of a reserve list – Time limit for complaints – Publication on the internet – No excusable error – Inadmissibility.#Case T-727/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0175decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 March 2023.#Novartis AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark BREZTRI – Earlier EU word marks ONBREZ, BREZILIZER and BREEZHALER – No likelihood of confusion – Lack of enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier marks – Article 60(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 27(3)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-175/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 March 2023

PreviousPage 26 of 27Next