Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,351 records in EU in 2022

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773France · 7,181Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778Germany · 305Austria · 222United States · 141Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0160decided

Arrest van het Hof (Grote kamer) van 22 februari 2022.#Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd e.a. tegen Staatssecretaris van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Richtlijn 2014/40/EU – Productie, presentatie en verkoop van tabaksproducten – Producten die niet voldoen aan de maximumemissieniveaus – Verbod op het in de handel brengen – Meetmethode – Filtersigaretten met ventilatiegaatjes – Meting van de emissies volgens ISO-normen – Normen die niet zijn bekendgemaakt in het Publicatieblad van de Europese Unie – Verenigbaarheid met de bekendmakingsvereisten van artikel 297, lid 1, VWEU, gelezen in het licht van het rechtszekerheidsbeginsel – Verenigbaarheid met het transparantiebeginsel.#Zaak C-160/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0679decided

Order of the Court of 22 February 2022.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-679/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0562decided

Arrest van het Hof (Grote kamer) van 22 februari 2022.#X tegen Openbaar Ministerie.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Prejudiciële spoedprocedure – Justitiële samenwerking in strafzaken – Europees aanhoudingsbevel – Kaderbesluit 2002/584/JBZ – Artikel 1, lid 3 – Procedures van overlevering tussen de lidstaten – Voorwaarden voor tenuitvoerlegging – Handvest van de grondrechten van de Europese Unie – Artikel 47, tweede alinea – Grondrecht op een eerlijk proces voor een onafhankelijk en onpartijdig gerecht dat vooraf bij wet is ingesteld – Structurele of fundamentele gebreken – Tweestappentoets – Toepassingscriteria – Verplichting voor de uitvoerende rechterlijke autoriteit om concreet en nauwkeurig na te gaan of er zwaarwegende en op feiten berustende gronden bestaan om aan te nemen dat de persoon tegen wie een Europees aanhoudingsbevel is uitgevaardigd in geval van overlevering een reëel gevaar loopt dat zijn grondrecht op een eerlijk proces voor een onafhankelijk en onpartijdig gerecht dat vooraf bij wet is ingesteld zal worden geschonden.#Zaak C-562/21 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0679_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 22 February 2022.#Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-679/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2022

Decision· DCELEX 32022D0442in force

Council Decision (EU) 2022/442 of 21 February 2022 authorising the opening of negotiations with Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein with a view to concluding agreements between the European Union and those countries on supplementary rules in relation to the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy, as part of the Integrated Border Management Fund

European Union · EUR-Lex · 21 February 2022

Report· XGCELEX 52022XG0301(01)open

Common Military list of the European Union adopted by the Council on 21 February 2022 (equipment covered by Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing the control of exports of military technology and equipment) (updating and replacing the Common Military List of the European Union adopted by the Council on 17 February 2020 (OJ C 85, 13.3.2020, p. 1.)) (CFSP) 2022/C 100/03

European Union · Council of the European Union · 21 February 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0157_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 16 February 2022.#Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – General regime of conditionality for the protection of the European Union budget – Protection of the Union budget in the case of breaches of the principles of the rule of law in the Member States – Legal basis – Article 322(1)(a) TFEU – Article 311 TFEU – Article 312 TFEU – Alleged circumvention of Article 7 TEU and Article 269 TFEU – Alleged infringements of Article 4(1), Article 5(2) and Article 13(2) TEU, of the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU, of Protocol (No 2) on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and of the principles of conferral, legal certainty, proportionality and equality of the Member States before the Treaties – Alleged misuse of powers.#Case C-157/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 February 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0156_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 16 February 2022.#Hungary v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – General regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget – Protection of the Union budget in the case of breaches of the principles of the rule of law in the Member States – Legal basis – Article 322(1)(a) TFEU – Alleged circumvention of Article 7 TEU and Article 269 TFEU – Alleged infringements of Article 4(1), Article 5(2) and Article 13(2) TEU and of the principles of legal certainty, proportionality and equality of Member States before the Treaties.#Case C-156/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 February 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0157decided

Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 16 February 2022.#Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – General regime of conditionality for the protection of the European Union budget – Protection of the Union budget in the case of breaches of the principles of the rule of law in the Member States – Legal basis – Article 322(1)(a) TFEU – Article 311 TFEU – Article 312 TFEU – Alleged circumvention of Article 7 TEU and Article 269 TFEU – Alleged infringements of Article 4(1), Article 5(2) and Article 13(2) TEU, of the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU, of Protocol (No 2) on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality and of the principles of conferral, legal certainty, proportionality and equality of the Member States before the Treaties – Alleged misuse of powers.#Case C-157/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 February 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0156decided

Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 16 February 2022.#Hungary v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2020/2092 – General regime of conditionality for the protection of the Union budget – Protection of the Union budget in the case of breaches of the principles of the rule of law in the Member States – Legal basis – Article 322(1)(a) TFEU – Alleged circumvention of Article 7 TEU and Article 269 TFEU – Alleged infringements of Article 4(1), Article 5(2) and Article 13(2) TEU and of the principles of legal certainty, proportionality and equality of Member States before the Treaties.#Case C-156/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 February 2022

Decision· DCELEX 32022D0220in force

Commission Decision (EU) 2022/220 of 15 February 2022 on the position to be taken by the European Union in the Joint Committee established under the Memorandum of Cooperation between the European Union and the International Civil Aviation Organization providing a framework for enhanced cooperation, on the adoption of a Working Arrangement regarding the cooperation in the area of accident and incident reporting in civil aviation, and appointing a chairperson of the European Union in the Joint Committee

European Union · EUR-Lex · 15 February 2022

Decision· DCELEX 32022D0614in force

Council Decision (EU) 2022/614 of 11 February 2022 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, and provisional application of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius concerning the extension of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius

European Union · EUR-Lex · 11 February 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62021TO0459decided

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 February 2022.#Calrose Rice v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Sunwhite – Earlier national figurative mark Sunwhite – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-459/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 February 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62021TO0459_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 February 2022.#Calrose Rice v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Sunwhite – Earlier national figurative mark Sunwhite – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-459/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 February 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0219decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 February 2022.#LM v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Hartberg-Fürstenfeld.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Freedom to provide services – Posting of workers – Directive 96/71/EC – Article 3(1)(c) – Terms and conditions of employment – Remuneration – Article 5 – Penalties – Limitation period – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 41 – Right to good administration – Article 47 – Effective judicial protection.#Case C-219/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 February 2022

Proposal· PCCELEX 52022PC0036open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the World Forum for Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulations of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe as regards the proposals for modifications to UN Regulations Nos 0, 9, 10, 13, 39, 46, 51, 53, 55, 63, 78, 79, 90, 107, 108, 109, 116, 117, 121, 125, 141, 142, 148, 149, 152, 154, 160, 161, 162 and 163, as regards the proposal for a new UN Regulation on studded tyres, as regards the proposal for a new UN Global Technical Regulation (GTR) on in-vehicle battery durability for electric vehicles, as regards the proposal for amendments to Consolidated Resolution R.E.5, as regards the proposal for authorisation to develop amendment 4 to UN GTR No 3, and as regards the proposal for authorisation to develop a new UN GTR on brake particulate emissions

European Union · European Commission · 10 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0589decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Calzaturificio Emmegiemme Shoes Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark MAIMAI MADE IN ITALY – Earlier EU word mark YAMAMAY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Admissibility of new evidence – Alteration of the distinctive character.#Case T-589/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0589_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Calzaturificio Emmegiemme Shoes Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark MAIMAI MADE IN ITALY – Earlier EU word mark YAMAMAY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Admissibility of new evidence – Alteration of the distinctive character.#Case T-589/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0520_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Heitec AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark HEITEC – No account taken of evidence submitted before the Cancellation Division and before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No genuine use of the trade mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Rule 40(5) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625).#Case T-520/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0520decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Heitec AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark HEITEC – No account taken of evidence submitted before the Cancellation Division and before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No genuine use of the trade mark – Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Rule 40(5) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625).#Case T-520/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 February 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0672_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 4 February 2022.#Eos Products Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-672/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 February 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0672decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 4 February 2022.#Eos Products Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-672/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 February 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62021TO0067decided

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 4 February 2022.#ultra air GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Proceedings for invalidity and revocation – European Union word mark ultrafilter international – Request for conversion to a national trade mark application – Revocation proceedings devoid of purpose – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-67/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 February 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62021TO0067_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 4 February 2022.#ultra air GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Proceedings for invalidity and revocation – European Union word mark ultrafilter international – Request for conversion to a national trade mark application – Revocation proceedings devoid of purpose – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-67/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 February 2022

Proposal· PCCELEX 52022PC0029open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Technical Committees on Customs Valuation and on Rules of Origin, established under the auspices of the World Customs Organization, with regard to, respectively, the adoption of advisory opinions, commentaries, explanatory note, case studies, studies and similar acts concerning the valuation of imported goods for customs purposes under the Agreement on Implementation of Article VII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, and the adoption of advisory opinions, information and advice and similar acts on the determination of the origin of goods under the Agreement on Rules on Origin

European Union · European Commission · 4 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0616_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 February 2022.#Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of a dominant position – Gas markets of central and eastern Europe – Decision to make binding the individual commitments proposed by an undertaking – Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Whether the commitments are adequate in the light of the competition concerns initially identified in the statement of objections – Commission decision not to require commitments in relation to some of the initial concerns – Principle of sound administration – Transparency – Obligation to state reasons – Energy-policy objectives of the European Union – Principle of energy solidarity – Misuse of powers.#Case T-616/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0202_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#Vita Zahnfabrik H. Rauter GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark VITABLOCS TriLuxe forte – Earlier EU word mark TRILUX – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-202/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0116decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#Maternus GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark WILD – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 52(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(a) and Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-116/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0616decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 February 2022.#Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of a dominant position – Gas markets of central and eastern Europe – Decision to make binding the individual commitments proposed by an undertaking – Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Whether the commitments are adequate in the light of the competition concerns initially identified in the statement of objections – Commission decision not to require commitments in relation to some of the initial concerns – Principle of sound administration – Transparency – Obligation to state reasons – Energy-policy objectives of the European Union – Principle of energy solidarity – Misuse of powers.#Case T-616/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0694decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#Maria Alexandra Canisius v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CCLABELLE VIENNA – Earlier EU word mark LABELLO – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-694/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0694_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#Maria Alexandra Canisius v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark CCLABELLE VIENNA – Earlier EU word mark LABELLO – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-694/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2022

PreviousPage 27 of 28Next