Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,351 records in EU in 2023

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773France · 7,181Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778Germany · 298Austria · 222United States · 141Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0611_SUMdecided

Order of the President of the Court of 10 March 2023.#Illumina Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Second paragraph of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Interest in the result of the case – Competition – Concentrations – Pharmaceutical industry market – European Commission decision to examine a merger referred by the competition authority of a Member State – Commission decision accepting that the initial referral request be joined by other Member States – An association of undertakings active in the relevant sector with the purpose of defending the interests of its members – Allowed.#Case C-611/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 March 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0625decided

Order of the President of the Court of 10 March 2023.#Grail LLC v European Commission and Illumina Inc.#Appeal – Intervention – Second paragraph of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Interest in the result of the case – Competition – Concentrations – Pharmaceutical industry market – European Commission decision to examine a merger referred by the competition authority of a Member State – Commission decision accepting that the initial referral request be joined by other Member States – Professional association not representative of the sector concerned – Rejected.#Case C-625/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 March 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0611decided

Order of the President of the Court of 10 March 2023.#Illumina Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Second paragraph of Article 40 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Interest in the result of the case – Competition – Concentrations – Pharmaceutical industry market – European Commission decision to examine a merger referred by the competition authority of a Member State – Commission decision accepting that the initial referral request be joined by other Member States – An association of undertakings active in the relevant sector with the purpose of defending the interests of its members – Allowed.#Case C-611/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 March 2023

Proposal· PCCELEX 52023PC0138open

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT pursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the position of the Council on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on amending Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (KosovoMT:Style_footnote reference,Superscript,Style>*_x0009_This designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence.)

European Union · European Commission · 10 March 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0693_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#Intermarché Casino Achats v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Decision of the European Commission ordering an inspection – Remedies against the conduct of the inspection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 19 – Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 – Article 3 – Recording of interviews conducted by the Commission during its investigations – Starting point of the Commission’s investigation.#Case C-693/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 March 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0682_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises SAS v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Decision of the European Commission ordering an inspection – Remedies against the conduct of the inspection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 19 – Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 – Article 3 – Recording of interviews conducted by the Commission during its investigations – Starting point of the Commission’s investigation.#Case C-682/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 March 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0690_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#Casino, Guichard-Perrachon and Achats Marchandises Casino SAS (AMC) v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Decision of the European Commission ordering an inspection – Remedies against the conduct of the inspection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 19 – Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 – Article 3 – Recording of interviews conducted by the Commission during its investigations – Starting point of the Commission’s investigation.#Case C-690/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 March 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0046_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators v Aquind Ltd.#Appeal – Energy – Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 – Article 17 – Request for exemption relating to an electrical interconnector – Refusal decision from the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Regulation (EC) No 713/2009 – Article 19 – Board of Appeal of ACER – Intensity of the review.#Case C-46/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 March 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0690decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#Casino, Guichard-Perrachon and Achats Marchandises Casino SAS (AMC) v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Decision of the European Commission ordering an inspection – Remedies against the conduct of the inspection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 19 – Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 – Article 3 – Recording of interviews conducted by the Commission during its investigations – Starting point of the Commission’s investigation.#Case C-690/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 March 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0046decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators v Aquind Ltd.#Appeal – Energy – Regulation (EC) No 714/2009 – Article 17 – Request for exemption relating to an electrical interconnector – Refusal decision from the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Regulation (EC) No 713/2009 – Article 19 – Board of Appeal of ACER – Intensity of the review.#Case C-46/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 March 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0693decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#Intermarché Casino Achats v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Decision of the European Commission ordering an inspection – Remedies against the conduct of the inspection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 19 – Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 – Article 3 – Recording of interviews conducted by the Commission during its investigations – Starting point of the Commission’s investigation.#Case C-693/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 March 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0001decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 9 March 2023.#X and Others v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Border controls, asylum and immigration – Immigration policy – Directive 2003/86/EC – Right to family reunification – Article 5(1) – Submission of an application for entry and residence for the purposes of exercising the right to family reunification – Legislation of a Member State requiring the sponsor’s family members to submit the application in person to the competent diplomatic post of that Member State – Impossibility or excessive difficulty to reach that post – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7 and 24.#Case C-1/23 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 March 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0682decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 March 2023.#Les Mousquetaires and ITM Entreprises SAS v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Decision of the European Commission ordering an inspection – Remedies against the conduct of the inspection – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 19 – Regulation (EC) No 773/2004 – Article 3 – Recording of interviews conducted by the Commission during its investigations – Starting point of the Commission’s investigation.#Case C-682/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0093_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Emmanuel Ramazani Shadary v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Change of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-93/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0095_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Célestin Kanyama v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-95/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0212decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Violetta Prigozhina v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Family of a person responsible for actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, or stability or security in Ukraine – Concept of ‘association’ – Error of assessment.#Case T-212/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0090_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Alex Kande Mupompa v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-90/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0100_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Maria del Carmen Sánchez-Gavito León v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#International Cotton Advisory Committee – Decision (EU) 2017/876 – Staff of an international organisation to which the European Union has acceded – Agreement on the applicant’s conditions of departure – Actions for failure to act – Absence in part of invitation to act – No standing to bring proceedings – Inadmissibility – Liability – Causal link.#Case T-100/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0098_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-98/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0605_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 8 March 2023.#Hijos de Moisés Rodríguez González, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-605/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0372_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Sympatex Technologies GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Sympathy Inside – Earlier EU word mark INSIDE. – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) – No alteration of distinctive character.#Case T-372/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0172_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Salim Selahaddin Gönenç v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TERMORAD ALUMINIUM PANEL RADIATOR – Earlier Benelux word mark THERMRAD – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-172/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0093decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Emmanuel Ramazani Shadary v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Change of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-93/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0092_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Gabriel Amisi Kumba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-92/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0098decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-98/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0100decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Maria del Carmen Sánchez-Gavito León v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#International Cotton Advisory Committee – Decision (EU) 2017/876 – Staff of an international organisation to which the European Union has acceded – Agreement on the applicant’s conditions of departure – Actions for failure to act – Absence in part of invitation to act – No standing to bring proceedings – Inadmissibility – Liability – Causal link.#Case T-100/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0172decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Salim Selahaddin Gönenç v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TERMORAD ALUMINIUM PANEL RADIATOR – Earlier Benelux word mark THERMRAD – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-172/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0094decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Kalev Mutondo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Change of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-94/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0096decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Ilunga Kampete v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-96/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0372decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Sympatex Technologies GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Sympathy Inside – Earlier EU word mark INSIDE. – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now point (a) of the second subparagraph of Article 18(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) – No alteration of distinctive character.#Case T-372/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0092decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Gabriel Amisi Kumba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-92/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0090decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Alex Kande Mupompa v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-90/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0759decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Société des produits Nestlé SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark A 2 – Earlier international registration – Figurative mark THE a2 MILK COMPANY THE a2 MILK COMPANY – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-759/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0091decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Éric Ruhorimbere v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-91/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0095decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Célestin Kanyama v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-95/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0096_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 8 March 2023.#Ilunga Kampete v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-96/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 March 2023

PreviousPage 27 of 28Next