Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,401 records in EU in 2024

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773France · 7,181Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778Austria · 331Germany · 305United States · 141Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0597_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 2 February 2024.#Apart sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-597/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0598_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 2 February 2024.#Apart sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-598/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0598decided

Order of the Court of 2 February 2024.#Apart sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-598/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0597decided

Order of the Court of 2 February 2024.#Apart sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-597/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0251decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 1 February 2024.#Scania AB and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Truck market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and of Article 53 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA) – Agreements and concerted practices in relation to the prices of trucks, the timing for the introduction of emission technologies required by Euro 3 to Euro 6 standards and the passing on of the costs of those technologies to customers – Single and continuous infringement – Geographic scope of that infringement – ‘Hybrid procedure’ leading successively to the adoption of a settlement decision and a decision at the end of a standard procedure – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to good administration – Impartiality of the European Commission – Assessment of the geographic scope of a concerted practice – Relevant evidence – Classification of a series of acts as a ‘single and continuous infringement’ – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Article 25 – Power of the Commission to impose a fine – Limitation.#Case C-251/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 February 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0173_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 31 January 2024.#Simpson Performance Products, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark BANDIT – Earlier non-registered word mark BANDIT – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 2(2)(g) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Identification of the goods and services on which the opposition is based.#Case T-173/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 January 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0056_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 31 January 2024.#United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Conformity clearance procedure – Action for annulment – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom – Representation by a lawyer authorised to practise before a court of a Member State or of another State which is a party to the EEA Agreement – Locus standi – Admissibility – Active farmer – Concept of ‘group of natural or legal persons’.#Case T-56/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 January 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0188_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 31 January 2024.#IU Internationale Hochschule GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark IU International University of Applied Sciences – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-188/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 January 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0056decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 31 January 2024.#United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD – Expenditure excluded from financing – Conformity clearance procedure – Action for annulment – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom – Representation by a lawyer authorised to practise before a court of a Member State or of another State which is a party to the EEA Agreement – Locus standi – Admissibility – Active farmer – Concept of ‘group of natural or legal persons’.#Case T-56/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 January 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0188decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 31 January 2024.#IU Internationale Hochschule GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark IU International University of Applied Sciences – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-188/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 January 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0044open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the EU-UK Specialised Committee on Energy established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, on the adoption of the guidance on frameworks for cooperation

European Union · European Commission · 31 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0471_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#Agentsia „Patna infrastruktura“ v Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa „Transport“ 2007-2013 i direktor na direktsia „Koordinatsia na programi i proekti“ v Ministerstvo na transporta (RUO).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Union Cohesion Funds – Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 – Articles 99 and 101 – Financial corrections in connection with detected irregularities – Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 – Article 104 – Financial corrections made by the Commission – Commission decision annulling in part a contribution from that fund – Validity – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 41 – Right to good administration – Article 47, first subparagraph – Right to an effective remedy before a tribunal.#Case C-471/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0118decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#NG v Direktor na Glavna direktsia ‘Natsionalna politsia’ pri Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti – Sofia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data for the purpose of combating crime – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 4(1)(c) and (e) – Data minimisation – Limitation of storage – Article 5 – Appropriate time limits for erasure or for a periodic review of the need for the storage – Article 10 – Processing of biometric and genetic data – Strict necessity – Article 16(2) and (3) – Right to erasure – Restriction of processing – Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Natural person convicted by final judgment and subsequently legally rehabilitated – Storage of data until death – No right to erasure or restriction of processing – Proportionality.#Case C-118/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0471decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#Agentsia „Patna infrastruktura“ v Rakovoditel na Upravlyavashtia organ na Operativna programa „Transport“ 2007-2013 i direktor na direktsia „Koordinatsia na programi i proekti“ v Ministerstvo na transporta (RUO).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – European Union Cohesion Funds – Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 – Articles 99 and 101 – Financial corrections in connection with detected irregularities – Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 – Article 104 – Financial corrections made by the Commission – Commission decision annulling in part a contribution from that fund – Validity – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 41 – Right to good administration – Article 47, first subparagraph – Right to an effective remedy before a tribunal.#Case C-471/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 January 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0614decided

Order of the Court of 30 January 2024.#Markus Schneider v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-614/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0118_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 January 2024.#NG v Direktor na Glavna direktsia ‘Natsionalna politsia’ pri Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti – Sofia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data for the purpose of combating crime – Directive (EU) 2016/680 – Article 4(1)(c) and (e) – Data minimisation – Limitation of storage – Article 5 – Appropriate time limits for erasure or for a periodic review of the need for the storage – Article 10 – Processing of biometric and genetic data – Strict necessity – Article 16(2) and (3) – Right to erasure – Restriction of processing – Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Natural person convicted by final judgment and subsequently legally rehabilitated – Storage of data until death – No right to erasure or restriction of processing – Proportionality.#Case C-118/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 January 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0614_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 January 2024.#Markus Schneider v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170(b) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-614/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 January 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0057open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION establishing the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Joint Committee established by the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community as regards the amendment of the Decision No 1/2023 of the Joint Committee of 24 March 2023 laying down arrangements relating to the Windsor Framework

European Union · European Commission · 30 January 2024

Decision· DCELEX 32024D0435in force

Council Decision (EU) 2024/435 of 29 January 2024 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the CETA Joint Committee established under the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada, of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part, as regards the adoption of an Interpretation of Article 8.10, Annex 8-A, Article 8.9 and Article 8.39 thereof in accordance with its Article 26.1.5(e)

European Union · EUR-Lex · 29 January 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0266_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark puma soundproofing – Earlier EU figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – No injury to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-266/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0058_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#Criminal proceedings against NR.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Principle ne bis in idem – Criminal proceedings brought in rem – Order that no further action be taken adopted by a public prosecutor – Admissibility of subsequent criminal proceedings brought in personam for the same facts – Conditions that must be satisfied in order for a person to be regarded as having been finally acquitted or convicted – Requirement for a detailed investigation – No interview of a possible witness – No interview of the person concerned in the capacity of ‘suspect’.#Case C-58/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0553decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 25 January 2024.#CEDC International sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-553/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0277decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#Global NRG Kereskedelmi és Tanácsadó Zrt. v Magyar Energetikai és Közmű-szabályozási Hivatal.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market in natural gas – Directive 2009/73/EC – Article 41(17) – Natural gas transmission system – National regulatory authority – Fixing of system usage charges and connection fees – Fixing of remuneration for any services provided by the system operator – Concept of ‘a party affected by a decision of a regulatory authority’ – Appeal against that decision – Right to an effective remedy – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-277/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0160decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 25 January 2024.#European Commission v HB.#Appeal – Public supply contracts – Irregularities in the procedure for the award of a public contract – European Commission recovery decision adopted after the signature of the contract – Legal nature – Decision not having effects exclusively in the context of that contract – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Administrative measures – Exercise of powers as a public authority – Action for annulment – Article 263 TFEU – Jurisdiction of the EU judicature.#Joined Cases C-160/22 P and C-161/22 P.#European Commission v HB.#Appeal – Public supply contracts – Irregularities in the contract award procedure – Decision to recover sums unduly paid – Enforceable decision – Article 299 TFEU – Jurisdiction of the EU judicature.#Case C-597/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0058decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 25 January 2024.#Criminal proceedings against NR.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Craiova.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Principle ne bis in idem – Criminal proceedings brought in rem – Order that no further action be taken adopted by a public prosecutor’s office – Admissibility of later criminal proceedings brought in personam in respect of the same facts – Conditions to be satisfied for it to be held that a person has been finally acquitted or convicted – Requirement for a detailed investigation – No interview of a potential witness – No interview of the person concerned as a ‘suspect’.#Case C-58/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2024

PreviousPage 28 of 29Next