Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

301 records in EU in 2019

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 493Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 88Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0417_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – Institutional law – Obligation to award the translation services required for EUIPO’s functioning to the CdT – Termination of the arrangement between the CdT and EUIPO – Publication of a call for tenders for translation services – Plea of inadmissibility – No interest in bringing proceedings – No need to adjudicate in part – Partial inadmissibility.#Case T-417/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0560decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Atos Medical GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a medical plaster — Disclosure of the earlier designs — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-560/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0041decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#MSI Svetovanje, marketing, d.o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark nume — Earlier EU word mark numederm — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-41/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0559decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Atos Medical GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a medical plaster — Disclosure of the earlier designs — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-559/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0058decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Ramona Mahr v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Xocolat — Earlier EU word mark LUXOCOLAT — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Reasoned statement in the notice of opposition — Rule 15(3)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 2(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625).#Case T-58/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0601decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Rubik's Brand Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a cube with surfaces having a grid structure — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods necessary to obtain a technical result — Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Second sentence of Article 75(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now the second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Article 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-601/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0333decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Austrian Power Grid AG and Vorarlberger Übertragungsnetz GmbH v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy — Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER — Determination of the capacity calculation regions — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissible in part — Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 — ACER’s competence.#Case T-333/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0708decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#ZPC Flis sp.j. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark FLIS Happy Moreno choco — Earlier national figurative marks MORENO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Substitution of the list of goods covered by the earlier national figurative marks — Rectification of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Article 102(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Legal basis — Previous decision-making practice — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations.#Case T-708/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0332decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Energie-Control Austria für die Regulierung der Elektrizitäts- und Erdgaswirtschaft (E-Control) v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy — Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER — Determination of the capacity calculation regions — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissible in part — Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 — ACER’s competence.#Case T-332/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0560_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Atos Medical GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a medical plaster — Disclosure of the earlier designs — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-560/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0041_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#MSI Svetovanje, marketing, d.o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark nume — Earlier EU word mark numederm — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-41/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0559_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Atos Medical GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a medical plaster — Disclosure of the earlier designs — Ground for invalidity — Individual character — Informed user — Degree of freedom of the designer — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-559/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0599_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 October 2019.#Rietze GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Community design — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed– Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-599/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0601_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Rubik's Brand Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a cube with surfaces having a grid structure — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods necessary to obtain a technical result — Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Second sentence of Article 75(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now the second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Article 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-601/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0599decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 October 2019.#Rietze GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Community design — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed– Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-599/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0333_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Austrian Power Grid AG and Vorarlberger Übertragungsnetz GmbH v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy — Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER — Determination of the capacity calculation regions — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissible in part — Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 — ACER’s competence.#Case T-333/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0614decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 October 2019.#Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Community design — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-614/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0417decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Action for annulment – Institutional law – Obligation to award the translation services required for EUIPO’s functioning to the CdT – Termination of the arrangement between the CdT and EUIPO – Publication of a call for tenders for translation services – Plea of inadmissibility – No interest in bringing proceedings – No need to adjudicate in part – Partial inadmissibility.#Case T-417/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0498decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#ZPC Flis sp.j. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Happy Moreno choco — Earlier national figurative marks MORENO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Substitution of the list of goods covered by the earlier national figurative marks — Rectification of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Article 102(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Legal basis — Previous decision-making practice — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations.#Case T-498/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0332_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Energie-Control Austria für die Regulierung der Elektrizitäts- und Erdgaswirtschaft (E-Control) v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy — Decision of the Board of Appeal of ACER — Determination of the capacity calculation regions — Action for annulment — Interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissible in part — Regulation (EU) 2015/1222 — ACER’s competence.#Case T-332/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0708_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#ZPC Flis sp.j. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark FLIS Happy Moreno choco — Earlier national figurative marks MORENO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Substitution of the list of goods covered by the earlier national figurative marks — Rectification of the decision of the Board of Appeal — Article 102(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Legal basis — Previous decision-making practice — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations.#Case T-708/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0058_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Ramona Mahr v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Xocolat — Earlier EU word mark LUXOCOLAT — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Reasoned statement in the notice of opposition — Rule 15(3)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 2(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625).#Case T-58/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0613decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 24 October 2019.#Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Community design — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed– Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-613/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0383decided

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 October 2019.#Hilary Elizabeth Walker and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Interlocutory proceedings — Area of freedom, security and justice — Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 — Loss of EU citizenship — Application for interim measures — Manifest inadmissibility of the main action — Inadmissibility.#Case T-383/19 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 October 2019

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0383_INFdecided

Order of the President of the General Court of 23 October 2019.#Hilary Elizabeth Walker and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Interlocutory proceedings — Area of freedom, security and justice — Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 — Loss of EU citizenship — Application for interim measures — Manifest inadmissibility of the main action — Inadmissibility.#Case T-383/19 R.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0582_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 October 2019.#Holzer y Cia, SA de CV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue of law with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed).#Case C-582/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0058decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 October 2019.#Mykola Yanovych Azarov v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds and economic resources — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the appellant’s name — Decision by an authority of a third State — Obligation of the Council of the European Union to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection — Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-58/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0582decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 22 October 2019.#Holzer y Cia, SA de CV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue of law with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed).#Case C-582/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0058_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 October 2019.#Mykola Yanovych Azarov v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds and economic resources — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the appellant’s name — Decision by an authority of a third State — Obligation of the Council of the European Union to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection — Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-58/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0279_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 October 2019.#Alliance Pharmaceuticals Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark AXICORP ALLIANCE — Earlier EU word and figurative marks ALLIANCE — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks — Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Interpretation of the description of the goods reproduced in the alphabetical list accompanying the Nice Classification.#Case T-279/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0628decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 October 2019.#Viomichania mpiskoton kai eidon diatrofis E.I. Papadopoulos SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for European Union figurative mark fripan VIENNOISERIE CAPRICE Pur Beurre — Earlier EU figurative mark Caprice — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-628/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0628_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 October 2019.#Viomichania mpiskoton kai eidon diatrofis E.I. Papadopoulos SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for European Union figurative mark fripan VIENNOISERIE CAPRICE Pur Beurre — Earlier EU figurative mark Caprice — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-628/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0766decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 17 October 2019.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Opposition — Article 8(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Criteria for assessment — Applicability in the case of an earlier collective mark — Interdependence between the similarity of the trade marks at issue and that of the goods or services covered by those marks.#Case C-766/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0177decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 17 October 2019.#Almudena Baldonedo Martín v Ayuntamiento de Madrid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo de Madrid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 4 — Principle of non-discrimination — Clause 5 — Measures to prevent abuse arising from the use of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships — Compensation if the employment relationship is terminated — Articles 151 and 153 TFEU — Articles 20 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Applicability — Difference of treatment based on whether a public or private regime, within the meaning of national law, governs the employment relationship.#Case C-177/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0279decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 October 2019.#Alliance Pharmaceuticals Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark AXICORP ALLIANCE — Earlier EU word and figurative marks ALLIANCE — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks — Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Interpretation of the description of the goods reproduced in the alphabetical list accompanying the Nice Classification.#Case T-279/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0189decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 October 2019.#Glencore Agriculture Hungary Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC– Articles 167 and 168 — Right to deduct VAT — Refusal — Fraud — Taking of evidence — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Access to the file — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Effective judicial review — Principle of equality of arms — Inter partes principle — National legislation or practice according to which, when checking the right to deduct VAT exercised by a taxable person, the tax authorities are bound by the findings of fact and the legal classifications which they have made in the context of related administrative procedures to which that taxable person was not a party.#Case C-189/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0128_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 October 2019.#Dumitru-Tudor Dorobantu.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — European arrest warrant — Grounds for refusal of execution — Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment — Conditions of detention in the issuing Member State — Assessment by the executing judicial authority — Criteria.#Case C-128/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0582_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 15 October 2019.#Boxer Barcelona, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark XBOXER BARCELONA — Earlier EU figurative mark representing the letter ‘x’ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Evidence — Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Restriction of the application for registration before the Board of Appeal — Article 49(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-582/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2019

PreviousPage 6 of 7Next