Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

351 records in EU in 2025

Records

Decision· DCELEX 32025D2128in force

Council Decision (EU) 2025/2128 of 13 October 2025 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, within the EEA Joint Committee concerning the amendment to Annex X (Services in general), Annex XI (Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society) and Protocol 37 (containing the list provided for in Article 101) to the EEA Agreement (Data Governance Act) (Text with EEA relevance)

European Union · EUR-Lex · 13 October 2025

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0044decided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 October 2025.#Grzegorz Wyrębski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark BLUE BRAND CHICKEN – Form of a blue and white rectangular box – Absolute ground for invalidity – No bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law – Res judicata.#Case T-44/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 October 2025

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0045_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 October 2025.#Grzegorz Wyrębski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark RED BRAND CHICKEN – Form of a red and white rectangular box – Absolute ground for invalidity – No bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) 207/2009 – Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law – Res judicata.#Case T-45/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 October 2025

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0044_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 October 2025.#Grzegorz Wyrębski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark BLUE BRAND CHICKEN – Form of a blue and white rectangular box – Absolute ground for invalidity – No bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law – Res judicata.#Case T-44/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 October 2025

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0045decided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 October 2025.#Grzegorz Wyrębski v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Three-dimensional EU trade mark RED BRAND CHICKEN – Form of a red and white rectangular box – Absolute ground for invalidity – No bad faith – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) 207/2009 – Decision adopted following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision – Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law – Res judicata.#Case T-45/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 October 2025

Decision· DCELEX 32025D2125in force

Council Decision (EU) 2025/2125 of 10 October 2025 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Amending Protocol to the Agreement between the European Union and the Principality of Monaco on the exchange of financial account information to improve international tax compliance in accordance with the Standard for Automatic Exchange of Financial Account Information in Tax Matters developed by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD)

European Union · EUR-Lex · 10 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0540decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Cabris lnvestments Ltd v Revetas Capital Advisors LLP.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Handelsgericht Wien.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Scope – Article 25 – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Parties to a contract established in the same third State – Jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State to settle disputes arising from that contract – International element – Consequences of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union.#Case C-540/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0540_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 October 2025.#Cabris lnvestments Ltd v Revetas Capital Advisors LLP.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters – Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 – Scope – Article 25 – Agreement conferring jurisdiction – Parties to a contract established in the same third State – Jurisdiction of the courts of a Member State to settle disputes arising from that contract – International element – Consequences of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union.#Case C-540/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0562_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Capella EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark COLORATURA – Earlier national word mark COLORATURA – Priority claim – Concept of ‘first application’ – Article 34(1) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Reasonable time.#Case T-562/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0585_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Related to a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity – Article 91(2) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-585/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0586_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-586/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0585decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Related to a counterclaim for a declaration of invalidity – Article 91(2) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-585/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0556decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 October 2025.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European platform for the imbalance netting process – Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator – ACER decision amending the Implementation Framework for the platform – Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal – Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals – Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Direct and individual concern.#Case T-556/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0586decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Doors Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing doors – Late filing of the statement setting out the grounds of appeal before the Board of Appeal – Calculation of time limits – Action inadmissible – Article 57 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 51(2) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Restitutio in integrum – Failure to pay the fee – Article 67(3) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-586/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0562decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 October 2025.#Capella EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark COLORATURA – Earlier national word mark COLORATURA – Priority claim – Concept of ‘first application’ – Article 34(1) and (4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Legal certainty – Reasonable time.#Case T-562/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0558decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 October 2025.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with automatic activation – Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator – Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal – Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals – Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Lack of direct concern – Plea of illegality.#Case T-558/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0557decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 October 2025.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with manual activation – Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator – Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal – Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals – Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Lack of direct concern – Plea of illegality.#Case T-557/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0558_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 October 2025.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with automatic activation – Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator – Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal – Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals – Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Lack of direct concern – Plea of illegality.#Case T-558/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0557_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 October 2025.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Article 1(6) and (7) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with manual activation – Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator – Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal – Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals – Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Lack of direct concern – Plea of illegality.#Case T-557/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0556_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 October 2025.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Energy – Internal market for electricity – Guideline on electricity balancing – Article 1 of Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European platform for the imbalance netting process – Non-participation of the Swiss Transmission System Operator – ACER decision amending the Implementation Framework for the platform – Appeal brought before the ACER Board of Appeal – Specific conditions and arrangements for appeals – Article 28 of Regulation (EU) 2019/942 – Inadmissibility for lack of standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Direct and individual concern.#Case T-556/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 October 2025

Decision· DCELEX 32025D2023in force

Council Decision (EU) 2025/2023 of 2 October 2025 on the position to be taken, on behalf of the European Union, within the Association Council established by the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part, as regards the amendment of Protocol 4 to that Agreement concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation

European Union · EUR-Lex · 2 October 2025

Decision· DCELEX 32025D2022in force

Council Decision (EU) 2025/2022 of 2 October 2025 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, and provisional application of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco on the amendment of Protocols 1 and 4 to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part

European Union · EUR-Lex · 2 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0243_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 October 2025.#WV v European External Action Service.#Appeal – Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Removal from post without reduction of entitlement to a pension – Unjustified absences – Composition of the General Court of the European Union – Alleged lack of impartiality – Errors of assessment – Substitution of the reasoning – Burden of proof – Proportionality – Res judicata.#Case C-243/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0306_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 October 2025.#Robin Messiaen and Ferenc Ballegeer v Council of the European Union and European Parliament.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Condition according to which an applicant must be individually concerned – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-306/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0306decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 October 2025.#Robin Messiaen and Ferenc Ballegeer v Council of the European Union and European Parliament.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Approximation of laws – Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 – Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Article 263, fourth paragraph, TFEU – Condition according to which an applicant must be individually concerned – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-306/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1047_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 1 October 2025.#AF v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Administrative investigation – Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Disciplinary proceedings without consultation of the Disciplinary Board – Warning – Principle of impartiality – Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 – Protection of personal data – Reimbursement of costs – Article 21 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Liability – Non-material damage.#Case T-1047/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1175_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 October 2025.#Siemens Healthineers AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark teamplay – Earlier national word mark TEAMPLAY – Relative ground for invalidity – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 57(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 – Independent subcategory of goods and services – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity between the goods and services – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-1175/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0566_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 1 October 2025.#Group Pack sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark LUX 1991 – Earlier EU figurative mark LUX TOOLS – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-566/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0044_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 1 October 2025.#Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-44/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2025

PreviousPage 7 of 8Next