Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

401 records in EU in 2019

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 493Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 88Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0586decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeal may proceed) of 7 October 2019.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-586/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0590decided

Order of the Court of 7 October 2019.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-590/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0586_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeal may proceed) of 7 October 2019.#L'Oréal v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-586/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 October 2019

Decision· DCELEX 32019D1763in force

Council decision (EU) 2019/1763 of 4 October 2019 establishing the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Committee of Technical Experts of the Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail (OTIF) as regards certain modifications to the National Vehicle Registers (NVR) specification and the Uniform Technical Prescriptions — Telematics applications for freight services (UTP TAF)

European Union · EUR-Lex · 4 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0652_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#SZ v Mitnitsa Burgas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Controls of cash entering or leaving the European Union — Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 — Article 3(1) — Infringement of the obligation to declare — Article 9(1) — Penalties provided for by national law — National legislation — Fine and confiscation of the undeclared sum by the State — Proportionality.#Case C-652/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0666decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#6Minutes Media GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Figurative mark ad pepper — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-666/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0533decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#Wanda Films, SL and Wanda Visión, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark WANDA FILMS — Earlier EU word mark WANDA — Relative ground for refusal — Restriction of the application for registration — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-533/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0491decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#Vafo Praha s.r.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Meatlove — Earlier EU word mark carnilove — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-491/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0500_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark MG PUMA — Earlier EU word mark GINMG — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-500/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0491_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#Vafo Praha s.r.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Meatlove — Earlier EU word mark carnilove — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-491/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0542decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#Wanda Films, SL and Wanda Visión, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark wanda films — Earlier EU word mark WANDA — Relative ground for refusal — Restriction of the application for registration — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-542/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0668decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#6Minutes Media GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Word mark ADPepper — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) and Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-668/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0668_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#6Minutes Media GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Word mark ADPepper — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) and Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-668/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0666_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#6Minutes Media GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Figurative mark ad pepper — Genuine use of the trade mark — Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-666/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 October 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0070decided

Arrest van het Hof (Eerste kamer) van 3 oktober 2019.#Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid tegen A e.a.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Associatieovereenkomst EEG-Turkije – Besluit nr. 2/76 – Artikel 7 – Besluit nr. 1/80 – Artikel 13 – Standstillbepalingen – Nieuwe beperking – Afname, vastlegging en bewaring van biometrische gegevens van Turkse onderdanen in een centraal bestand – Dwingende redenen van algemeen belang – Doelstelling van voorkoming en bestrijding van identiteits‑ en documentfraude – Artikelen 7 en 8 van het Handvest van de grondrechten van de Europese Unie – Recht op eerbiediging van het privéleven – Recht op bescherming van persoonsgegevens – Evenredigheid.#Zaak C-70/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0652decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 3 October 2019.#SZ v Mitnitsa Burgas.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad - Haskovo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Controls of cash entering or leaving the European Union — Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 — Article 3(1) — Infringement of the obligation to declare — Article 9(1) — Penalties provided for by national law — National legislation — Fine and confiscation of the undeclared sum by the State — Proportionality.#Case C-652/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0293_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 October 2019.#Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the figurative mark containing the word element Djili — Earlier national word mark containing the word element GILLY — Relative ground for refusal.#Case C-293/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0293decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 October 2019.#Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the figurative mark containing the word element Djili — Earlier national word mark containing the word element GILLY — Relative ground for refusal.#Case C-293/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0460decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 1 October 2019.#Stada Arzneimittel AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Application not demonstrating the significance of an issue of law with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-460/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0448open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion of the Agreement in the form of an exchange of letters between the European Union and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania concerning the extension of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania, expiring on 15 November 2019

European Union · European Commission · 1 October 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0447open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania on an extension to the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Islamic Republic of Mauritania, expiring on 15 November 2019

European Union · European Commission · 1 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0461_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 September 2019.#All Star CV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue of law with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-461/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 September 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0461decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 30 September 2019.#All Star CV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate the significance of an issue of law with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-461/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 September 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0277decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 September 2019.#R. D. and A. D. v Raiffeisenbank St. Stefan-Jagerberg-Wolfsberg eGen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Zadru.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Credit agreements for consumers — Agreements antedating the accession of the Republic of Croatia of the European Union — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-277/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 September 2019

Record· TOCELEX 62018TO0663decided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 September 2019.#Nissin Foods Holdings Co. Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative mark Soba JAPANESE FRIED NOODLES — Absolute ground for invalidity — Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-663/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 September 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0556decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 September 2019.#European Commission v Kingdom of Spain.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — European Union water policy — Directive 2000/60/EC — Article 13(1) and (7) and Article 15(1) — Failure to adopt, publish and communicate to the European Commission revised and updated river basin management plans for Lanzarote, Fuerteventura, Gran Canaria, Tenerife, La Gomera, La Palma and El Hierro (Spain) — Article 14 — Failure to inform and consult the public relating to the revision and the updating.#Case C-556/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 September 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0011decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 26 September 2019.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds and economic resources — List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the appellant’s name — Decision by an authority of a third State — Council’s obligation to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection — Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-11/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 September 2019

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0728decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 September 2019.#EM Research Organization, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Word mark EM — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 7(1)(c) — Grounds for invalidity — Word mark which consists exclusively of signs or indications which may serve to designate the characteristics of goods or services — Trade mark consisting of an abbreviation.#Case C-728/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 September 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0278decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 September 2019.#Mas Que Vinos Global, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the word mark EL SEÑORITO — Rejection of the application for registration — Genuine use of the earlier mark.#Case C-278/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 September 2019

Record· TOCELEX 62018TO0451decided

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 September 2019.#Panagiotis Triantafyllopoulos and Others v European Central Bank.#Action for damages — Harm allegedly caused to the applicants due to the absence of supervision of the Achaiki Cooperative Bank by the National Bank of Greece and the ECB — Limitation period — Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Causal link — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded in law.#Case T-451/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 September 2019

Record· TOCELEX 62018TO0451_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 25 September 2019.#Panagiotis Triantafyllopoulos and Others v European Central Bank.#Action for damages — Harm allegedly caused to the applicants due to the absence of supervision of the Achaiki Cooperative Bank by the National Bank of Greece and the ECB — Limitation period — Article 46 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Causal link — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded in law.#Case T-451/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 September 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0430open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Association Council established by the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Lebanon, of the other part, as regards the amendment of Protocol 4 to that Agreement concerning the definition of the concept of 'originating products' and methods of administrative cooperation

European Union · European Commission · 25 September 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0013_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#Crédit Mutuel Arkéa v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Crédit Mutuel – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – No distinctive character – Distinctive character acquired through use – Cross-claim – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 59(1)(a) and Article 59(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-13/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0261_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#Roxtec AB v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU figurative trade mark depicting a black square containing seven concentric blue circles — Absolute ground for refusal — Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result — Article 7(1)(e)(ii), of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-261/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0136_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#GC and Others v Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Personal data — Protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data contained on websites — Directive 95/46/EC — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Search engines on the internet — Processing of data appearing on websites — Special categories of data referred to in Article 8 of Directive 95/46 and Articles 9 and 10 of Regulation 2016/679 — Applicability of those articles to operators of a search engine — Extent of that operator’s obligations with respect to those articles — Publication of data on websites solely for journalistic purposes or the purpose of artistic or literary expression — Effect on the handling of a request for de-referencing — Articles 7, 8 and 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-136/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0219_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2019.#Piaggio & C. SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a moped – Earlier Community design – Ground for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Informed user – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Interpretation of Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002 in conformity with EU law – No use of an unregistered earlier national three-dimensional mark in the registered design – Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation No 6/2002 – No unauthorised use of a work protected under the copyright law of a Member State in the registered design – Article 25(1)(f) of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-219/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2019

PreviousPage 8 of 9Next