Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

401 records in EU in 2022

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 88Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Decision· DCELEX 32022D1994in force

Council Decision (EU) 2022/1994 of 17 October 2022 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Sub-Committee on Geographical Indications established by the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part, as regards the adoption of its rules of procedure

European Union · EUR-Lex · 17 October 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0383decided

Order of the Court of 17 October 2022.#SFD S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-383/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0055decided

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 October 2022.#Patrick Swords v European Commission and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.#Action for annulment – Public health – Measures introduced in the European Union in the fight against the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic – Risk assessment reports drawn up by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) – Acts not open to challenge – European Commission communication and coordinated approach published on the basis of the risk assessment reports drawn up by the ECDC – Plea of illegality – Inadmissibility.#Case T-55/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0055_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 October 2022.#Patrick Swords v European Commission and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.#Action for annulment – Public health – Measures introduced in the European Union in the fight against the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic – Risk assessment reports drawn up by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) – Acts not open to challenge – European Commission communication and coordinated approach published on the basis of the risk assessment reports drawn up by the ECDC – Plea of illegality – Inadmissibility.#Case T-55/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0383_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 17 October 2022.#SFD S.A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-383/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2022

Decision· DCELEX 32022D1952in force

Council Decision (EU) 2022/1952 of 13 October 2022 on the position to be taken on behalf of the Union within the Special Committee on Geographical Indications and Trade in Wines and Spirits established by the Economic Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the SADC EPA States, of the other part, as regards the adoption of the rules of procedure of the Special Committee

European Union · EUR-Lex · 13 October 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0001_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 October 2022.#MC v Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ Veliko Tarnovo pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 273 – Measures to ensure the correct collection of VAT – Article 325(1) TFEU – Obligation to counter illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the European Union – VAT debts of a taxable legal person – National legislation which provides for the joint and several liability of the non-taxable manager of the legal person – Transfers made in bad faith by the manager – Depletion of the legal person’s assets leading to insolvency – Failure to pay the amounts of VAT payable by the legal person within the prescribed time limits – Default interest – Proportionality.#Case C-1/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 October 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0698_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 October 2022.#Gmina Wieliszew v Syndyk masy upadłości Spółdzielczego Banku Rzemiosła Rzemiosła i Rolnictwa w Wołominie w upadłości likwidacyjnej.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Structural Funds – European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Cohesion Fund – Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 – Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 – European Union funding – European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 – Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Grant agreement – Funds paid to a beneficiary into an account in an insolvent bank – National legislation not excluding those funds from the insolvency estate of that bank.#Case C-698/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 October 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0698decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 October 2022.#Gmina Wieliszew v Syndyk masy upadłości Spółdzielczego Banku Rzemiosła Rzemiosła i Rolnictwa w Wołominie w upadłości likwidacyjnej.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Structural Funds – European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) – Cohesion Fund – Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 – Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 – European Union funding – European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 – Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Grant agreement – Funds paid to a beneficiary into an account in an insolvent bank – National legislation not excluding those funds from the insolvency estate of that bank.#Case C-698/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 October 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0001decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 October 2022.#MC v Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ Veliko Tarnovo pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Veliko Tarnovo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 273 – Measures to ensure the correct collection of VAT – Article 325(1) TFEU – Obligation to counter illegal activities affecting the financial interests of the European Union – VAT debts of a taxable legal person – National legislation which provides for the joint and several liability of the non-taxable manager of the legal person – Transfers made in bad faith by the manager – Depletion of the legal person’s assets leading to insolvency – Failure to pay the amounts of VAT payable by the legal person within the prescribed time limits – Default interest – Proportionality.#Case C-1/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 October 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0349decided

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 13 October 2022.#HYA and Othersprokuratura.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Telecommunications sector – Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy – Directive 2002/58 – Article 15(1) – Restriction of the confidentiality of electronic communications – Judicial decision authorising the interception, recording and storage of telephone conversations of persons suspected of having committed a serious intentional offence – Practice whereby the decision is drawn up in accordance with a pre-drafted template text that does not contain individualised reasons – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-349/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 October 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0435decided

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 13 October 2022.#Criminal proceedings against HF.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Principle ne bis in idem – Extradition agreement between the European Union and the United States of America – Extradition of a third-country national to the United States under a bilateral treaty concluded by a Member State – National who has been convicted by final judgment for the same acts and has served his sentence in full in another Member State.#Case C-435/22 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0222_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 October 2022 (Extracts).#Shopify Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – EU figurative mark Shoppi – Earlier EU word mark SHOPIFY – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom (Brexit).#Case T-222/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0460_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#MCO (IP) Holdings Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for European Union figurative mark C2 CYPRUS CASINOS – Earlier national figurative mark C8 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Interdependence of factors – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-460/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0496_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#Ángel Vasallo Andrés v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Petitions Committee of the Parliament – Petition concerning the disciplinary regime for public employees in Spain – Question not coming within the scope of activity of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons – Conflict of interest – Effect of posting the status of a petition on the Parliament’s Internet petitions portal.#Case T-496/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0496decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#Ángel Vasallo Andrés v European Parliament.#Institutional law – Petitions Committee of the Parliament – Petition concerning the disciplinary regime for public employees in Spain – Question not coming within the scope of activity of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons – Conflict of interest – Effect of posting the status of a petition on the Parliament’s Internet petitions portal.#Case T-496/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0222decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 October 2022 (Extracts).#Shopify Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Cancellation proceedings – EU figurative mark Shoppi – Earlier EU word mark SHOPIFY – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union and from Euratom (Brexit).#Case T-222/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0656decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#H/2 Credit Manager LP v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark H/2 CAPITAL PARTNERS – Earlier EU figurative mark HCapital – Relative ground for refusal – Relevant public – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-656/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0656_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#H/2 Credit Manager LP v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark H/2 CAPITAL PARTNERS – Earlier EU figurative mark HCapital – Relative ground for refusal – Relevant public – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Similarity of the services – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-656/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0652decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#L. Oliva Torras, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a coupling for connecting refrigeration or air-conditioning equipment to a motor vehicle – Grounds for invalidity – Novelty – Individual character – Articles 5 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Scope of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Earlier design produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Article 28(1)(b)(i), (v) and (vi) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002.#Case T-652/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0460decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#MCO (IP) Holdings Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for European Union figurative mark C2 CYPRUS CASINOS – Earlier national figurative mark C8 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Interdependence of factors – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-460/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0652_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 12 October 2022.#L. Oliva Torras, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a coupling for connecting refrigeration or air-conditioning equipment to a motor vehicle – Grounds for invalidity – Novelty – Individual character – Articles 5 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Disclosure of the earlier design – Article 7 of Regulation No 6/2002 – Scope of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Earlier design produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Article 28(1)(b)(i), (v) and (vi) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002.#Case T-652/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 October 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0241_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 6 October 2022.#I. L. v Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 15(1) – Detention – Grounds for detention – General criterion based on the risk that the effective enforcement of the removal would be compromised – Risk that the person concerned would commit a criminal offence – Consequences of the establishment of the offence and the imposition of a penalty – Complication of the removal process – Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Restriction of the fundamental right to liberty – Requirement of a legal basis – Requirements of clarity, predictability and accessibility – Protection against arbitrariness.#Case C-241/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 October 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0241decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 6 October 2022.#I. L. v Politsei- ja Piirivalveamet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 2008/115/EC – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Article 15(1) – Detention – Grounds for detention – General criterion based on the risk that the effective enforcement of the removal would be compromised – Risk that the person concerned would commit a criminal offence – Consequences of the establishment of the offence and the imposition of a penalty – Complication of the removal process – Article 6 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Restriction of the fundamental right to liberty – Requirement of a legal basis – Requirements of clarity, predictability and accessibility – Protection against arbitrariness.#Case C-241/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 October 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0268decided

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 6 October 2022.#Norra Stockholm Bygg AB v Per Nycander AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 6(3) and (4) – Lawfulness of processing – Production of a document containing personal data in civil court proceedings – Article 23(1)(f) and (j) – Protection of judicial independence and judicial proceedings – Enforcement of civil law claims – Requirements to be complied with – Having regard to the interests of the data subjects – Balancing of the opposing interests involved – Article 5 – Minimisation of personal data – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 7 – Right to respect for private life – Article 8 – Right to protection of personal data – Article 47 – Right to effective judicial protection – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-268/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0711decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark CMS Italy – Earlier international figurative marks representing a feline bounding towards the left and earlier international figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Similarity of the signs – Proof of reputation – Overall assessment.#Case T-711/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2022

PreviousPage 8 of 9Next