PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · Germany

Rule of law

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in DE

All countriesUnited States · 6,271Netherlands · 1,532Ireland · 1,455European Union · 660France · 367Germany · 241United Kingdom · 176Search this topic

Records

Question· Schriftliche Frage21/5159open

Compatibility of income-dependent assistance services for children with disabilities in school child care with the Basic Law and UN conventions

Germany · German Bundestag · 2 April 2026

Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> Hat sich die Bundesregierung eine Auffassung zu der Rechtsfrage gebildet, ob es mit dem subjektivöffentlichen Rechtsanspruch auf Schulkinderbetreuung nach § 24 des Achten Buches Sozialgesetzbuch ab dem Schuljahr 2026/2027 sowie mit Artikel 3 Absatz 3 Satz 2 des Grundgesetzes, der UN-Kinderrechtskonvention und der UN-Behindertenrechtskonvention vereinbar ist, wenn Assistenzleistungen für Kinder mit Behinderungen in Ferienzeiten und/oder anteiligen Zeiten der Schulkinderbetreuung als Leistungen nach § 113 des Neunten Buches Sozialgesetzbuch (SGB IX) statt nach § 112 SGB IX eingeordnet werden und dadurch einkommens- und vermögensabhängige Antragserfordernisse sowie ggf. daraus resultierende Kostenbeteiligungen der Eltern Voraussetzung der Teilnahme an der Schulkinderbetreuung werden, und wenn ja, wie lautet diese, und sieht sie diesbezüglich gesetzgeberischen Handlungsbedarf?

Question· Schriftliche Frage21/3685open

Criticism of the Pact for the Rule of Law

Germany · German Bundestag · 12 January 2026

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> Is the Federal Government aware of the criticism of the Pact for the Rule of Law, according to which, despite the provision of federal funds, essential structural problems, such as different salary systems in the federal states, slow digitalization and an increasing shortage of young talent, will continue to exist and will probably impair the effectiveness of the Pact (www.lto.de/recht/justiz/j/pakt-fuer-den-rechtsstaat-millionen-euro-2000-neue-richterstellen-staatsanwaelte-justiz-praedikatsjuristen; https://anwaltverein.de/newsroom/pm-32-25-neuer-pakt-fuer-denrechtsstaat-die-uhren-ticken), and how does she react to this?

Question· Mündliche Frage21/2666open

Anchoring the fundamental right to legal advice in the Basic Law

Germany · German Bundestag · 7 November 2025

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> Is the Federal Government aware of the Federal Bar Association's proposal to enshrine access to independent legal advice as a fundamental right in the Basic Law, and if so, how is it positioning itself in view of the fact that the defense and enforcement of the fundamental rights of people worldwide are coming under pressure, and is the Federal Ministry of Justice planning to do so? Consumer protection draft legislation to strengthen the fundamental rights of people in Germany (www.brak.de/newsroom/newsletter/nachrichten-aus-berlin/2025/issue-20-2025-v-1102025/brak-haupttreffen-beschliesst-zu-grundrecht-auf-anwaltlichen-beistand-und-zu-sammelanderkonton/)?

Question· Schriftliche Frage21/1164open

Involvement of the states in the implementation of the Pact for the Rule of Law

Germany · German Bundestag · 8 August 2025

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> How exactly should the states be involved in the question of the distribution of funds for the new “Pact for the Rule of Law” announced by the federal government? (www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article6886da460e680a76f4e97810/justizministerin-hubig-pakt-fuer-den-rechtsstaat-bundesregierung-plant-240-millionen-euro-fuerpersonalaufbau-der-justiz.html)?

Question· Schriftliche Frage21/982open

Compatibility of a “migration quota” in schools with the Basic Law

Germany · German Bundestag · 25 July 2025

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> Does the Federal Minister for Education, Family, Seniors, Women and Youth, Karin Prien, consider a “migration quota” at schools in the form that she described in the interview as a “conceivable model” (see www.tagesschau.de/inland/innenpolitik/prien-vorschlag-schulklasse-migration-100.html) to be compatible with the German Basic Law, and what definition does the Federal Minister give to her idea? based on which quotation would be made?

Report· Bericht, Gutachten, Programm20/15050open

Announcement of annual reports of political parties for the calendar year 2023 (Part 2 - other eligible parties, Volume I)

Germany · German Bundestag · 26 February 2025

Compilation of the income, expenses and assets of the following 9 parties not represented in the Bundestag: Free Voters (FREIE WÄHLER), Party for Labor, Rule of Law, Animal Welfare, Elite Promotion and Grassroots Democratic Initiative (The PARTEI), Volt Germany (Volt), Basic Democratic Party of Germany (dieBasis), Ecological Democratic Party (ÖDP), Family Party of Germany (FAMILY), Free Saxony (Free Saxony), Brandenburg United Citizens' Movement / Free Voters (BVB/FREIE WÄHLER), Action Party for Animal Protection - Animal Protection (ANIMAL PROTECTION here!)

Question· Mündliche Frage20/11319open

Selection of authors and editors for the Basic Law Commentary “Open Access to the Basic Law”

Germany · German Bundestag · 10 May 2024

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> To the knowledge of the Federal Government, who selected the editors and authors for the “Open Access to the Basic Law (OZUG)” project funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (www.jura.uni-hannover.de/de/forschung/forschungsbereich/einzelansicht/projects/offener-access-zum-grundgesetz-ozug), and according to which general principles, and were the authors selected for each every single article of the Basic Law?

Record· Enquete-Kommission20/11137rejected

Establishment of a study commission "Coronavirus - error analysis and development of better approaches for future pandemics"

Germany · German Bundestag · 23 April 2024

Establishment of a study commission with 15 representatives and 15 experts: Examination of possible conflict potential and appropriate measures in the context of future pandemics, in particular examining the Infection Protection Act in relation to fundamental rights, the limits of the intervention rights of federal and state governments in every Corona measure implemented and the abolition of fundamental rights by a simple parliamentary majority, Development of proposals for legal redesigns including clear definitions of terms, review of the problematic roles of relevant actors; Preventing future lockdowns and maintaining economic, societal and social life as much as possible, even in a pandemic; Answering a variety of questions regarding the scientific framework, the rule of law and democracy, the economy, society, health, education and research as well as families and children; Reporting before the parliamentary summer break in 2025

Question· Mündliche Frage20/11103open

Funding the project “Open Access to the Basic Law”

Germany · German Bundestag · 19 April 2024

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> For what reasons should be listed in detail, the Federal Government is of the opinion that the funding of the "Open Access to the Basic Law (OZUG)" project with 291,800.80 euros by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (www.jura.uni-hannover.de/de/forschung/forschungsbereich/einzelansicht/projects/offener-access-zum-grundgesetz-ozug) exceeds the limits of permissible state publicity. and information work and is also permissible under competition law?<br /> <br /> As part of the “Open Access to the Basic Law (OZUG)” project, which is funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research with 291,800.80 euros (www.jura.uni-hannover.de/de/forschung/forschungsbereich/einzelansicht/projects/offener-access-zum-grundgesetz-ozug), the diversity of opinions in the commentary on the Basic Law is ensured and sustained Impermissible state or (party) political influence on their content excluded?

Question· Schriftliche Frage20/10926open

Compatibility of right-wing ideology with the Basic Law

Germany · German Bundestag · 5 April 2024

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> Does the statement by the Federal Ministry of the Interior and Homeland (BMI) "The essential core idea of a 'right-wing' ideology is the assumption of inequality/unequal value of people" (the Federal Government's answer to my written question 34 on Bundestag printed matter 20/10791) mean that, in the BMI's opinion, a "right-wing" ideology or orientation is fundamentally not compatible with that Basic Law is compatible, regardless of whether it is “extremist” in the sense of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution’s definition given in the answer, or are there “right-wing” ideologies and orientations that, in the opinion of the BMI, are compatible with democracy and the Basic Law?

Report· Bericht, Gutachten, Programm20/10490open

Announcement of accounts of political parties for the calendar year 2022 (Part 2 - Other eligible parties, Volume I)

Germany · German Bundestag · 23 February 2024

Compilation of the income, expenditure and assets of the following 11 parties not represented in the Bundestag: FREIE WÄHLER (FREIE VÄHLER), Party for Labor, Rule of Law, Animal Welfare, Elite Promotion and Grassroots Democratic Initiative (Die PARTEI), Basic Democratic Party of Germany (dieBasis), Ecological Democratic Party (ÖDP), Family Party of Germany (FAMILY), Volt Germany (Volt), Pirate Party Germany (PIRATES), Brandenburg United Civil Movements / Free Voters (BVB/FREIE WÄHLER), Action Party for Animal Protection (TIERSCHUTZ here!), Bavaria Party (BP) and The Justice Party – Team Todenhöfer (Team Todenhöfer)

Question· Mündliche Frage20/10337open

Continuing and equipping the pact for the rule of law

Germany · German Bundestag · 16 February 2024

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> When will the federal government take self-announced measures and provide funds to consolidate and properly equip the pact for the rule of law (see coalition agreement between the SPD, ALLIANCE 90/THE GREENS and the FDP, S. 84, at: www.spd.de/fileadmin/Documents/Koalitionsvertrag/Koalitionsvertrag_2021-2025.pdf, accessed on February 15th 2024), also to reduce the additional burden on the judiciary and Law enforcement authorities, for example through the announced law on the controlled handling of cannabis and changes to other regulations (Cannabis Law - CanG) (see www.lto.de/fileadmin/files/artikel/2024/Januar/Auseffekten_Cannabislegalisierung.pdf, accessed February 15, 2024; www.drb.de/positionen/stellungnahme/stellungnahme/news/18-2023, accessed February 15 2024), to be taken into account?

Record· Verfahren vor dem Bundesverfassungsgericht20/8426open

Resolution recommendation and report of the Legal Committee (6th Committee) on the dispute proceedings before the Federal Constitutional Court 2 BvE 6/23 and 2 BvR 994/23

Germany · German Bundestag · 20 September 2023

Submission of a statement in the organ dispute proceedings of the "Party for Labor, Rule of Law, Animal Welfare, Elite Promotion and Grassroots Democratic Initiative (The PARTEI)" as well as submission of a statement and intervention in the constitutional complaint of the chairman of the PARTEI against the German Bundestag and the Bundesrat regarding the legislative resolution of the law approving the Council resolution to introduce a threshold clause in the European elections; Appointment of legal representation by the President of the Bundestag

Report· Bericht, Gutachten, Programm20/7841open

Announcement of annual reports of political parties for the calendar year 2021 (Part 2 - Other eligible parties, Volume I)

Germany · German Bundestag · 19 July 2023

Zusammenstellung der Einnahmen, Ausgaben und Vermögenswerte folgender 10 nicht im Bundestag vertretenen Parteien: FREIE WÄHLER (FREIE WÄHLER), Partei für Arbeit, Rechtsstaat, Tierschutz, Elitenförderung und basisdemokratische Initiative (Die PARTEI), Ökologisch-Demokratische Partei (ÖDP), Volt Deutschland (Volt), Familien-Partei Deutschlands (FAMILIE), Piratenpartei Deutschland (PIRATEN), Bayernpartei (BP), Brandenburger Vereinigte Bürgerbewegungen / Freie Wähler (BVB/FREIE WÄHLER), Team Todenhöfer &ndash; die Gerechtigkeitspartei (Team Todenhöfer), Aktion Partei für Tierschutz TIERSCHUTZ hier!)

Question· Schriftliche Frage20/5942open

Unblocking federal funds for the Pact for the Digital Rule of Law

Germany · German Bundestag · 10 March 2023

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> What is the current status of negotiations regarding the implementation of the requirements for lifting the ban from Chapter 0710, Title 532 03 - 059 in cooperation with the federal states on the Pact for the Digital Rule of Law, and which specific projects are intended for financing from Chapter 0710, Title 532 03 - 059 (please also state the amount of financing in each case)?<br /> <br /> Who is in the implementation of the requirements for lifting the ban from Chapter 0710 Title 532 03 - 059 in cooperation with the federal states on the Pact for the Digital Rule of Law as well as in the implementation of the projects i. S.v. Chapter 0710 Title 532 03 - 059 responsible for controlling (see my written question 121)?

Question· Schriftliche Frage20/3987open

Inclusion of urban development funding in the Basic Law

Germany · German Bundestag · 14 October 2022

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> What is the Federal Government's position on including urban development funding in the Basic Law so that urban development funding is guaranteed in the long term as a mandatory task of the federal government (in cooperation with the states and municipalities)?

Question· Schriftliche Frage20/3987open

Connection between the security checks of BMWK employees and their health condition

Germany · German Bundestag · 14 October 2022

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> According to the Federal Government's assessment, what proportion does the Federal Minister for Economic Affairs and Climate Protection, Dr. Robert Habeck, initiated checks on employees of the ministry by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution after they were suspected of Russian espionage due to their arguments that did not fit the official line of the federal government, but this was not the case in the investigations could not be confirmed, so that in the minutes of the crisis meeting that took place after the events became public, a ministry official explains: "If I express my expert opinion, then there is a possibility that I will be suspected of being a 'Russian understander'." Robert Habeck can be diagnosed as follows: "It's not bullshit that I'm telling you: people get sick. They have burnout, they get tinnitus. They can't do it anymore.", and how many employees of all federal ministries have been checked accordingly in the last 20 years (please break it down by year)?

Question· Mündliche Frage20/3858open

Continuing the Pact for the Rule of Law

Germany · German Bundestag · 7 October 2022

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> To what extent does the federal government plan to consolidate the pact for the rule of law and, in the process, also to launch the digital pact for the judiciary (S. 105) provided for in the coalition agreement between the SPD, ALLIANCE 90/THE GREENS and the FDP (https://rp-online.de.nrw/panorama/nrw-justizminister-ford-mehr-geld-fuer-digitalisierung_aid-77081109)?

Question· Schriftliche Frage20/2992open

Continuation and expansion of the “Pact for the Rule of Law”

Germany · German Bundestag · 5 August 2022

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> What steps is the federal government planning to take to consolidate the pact for the rule of law in accordance with the coalition agreement between the SPD, ALLIANCE 90/THE GREENS and the FDP and to expand it to include "a digital pact for the justice system", also against the background of the express request of the 2022 spring conference of justice ministers that "the Federal Ministry of Justice According to his announcement, concrete negotiations should now begin with the states on a new pact for the rule of law" (see www.justiz.nrw.de/JM/jumiko/beschluesse/2022/Fruehjahrskonzept_2022/top_i_14_-_pakt_ fuer_den_rechtsstaat.pdf), and when should these negotiations begin according to the federal government's planning?

Law· Gesetzgebung20/3446enacted

Law amending the Financial Equalization Act, the Stability Council Act and other laws

Germany · German Bundestag · 5 August 2022

Further increases or adjustments in the state share of the sales tax in 2022 and 2023 to fulfill the federal government's assurances regarding personnel reinforcements in the "Pact for the Rule of Law" and the "Pact for the Public Health Service", for the federal government to contribute to refugee-related costs, to compensate for the shortfall in income of states and municipalities through the child bonus, to compensate for the Adjustment of the special needs federal supplementary allocations to the eastern German states and as a transitional regulation for the final settlement of the horizontal tax distribution and the equalization of financial strength through updated population figures; Adaptation of the specifications for a restructuring program of the Stability Council in the event of impending budget emergencies to the new framework conditions of the debt brake; Clarifications and editorial Adjustments;<br /> Amendment to § 1 and § 11 as well as insertion of § 12a Financial Equalization Act, amendment to various §§ Stability Council Act, §§ 5a and 6 Municipal Finance Reform Act and § 15 Municipal Investment Promotion Act<br /> <br /> Reference: "Pact for the rule of law" of the heads of government of the federal and state governments of January 31, 2019 to improve staffing in the judiciary and the second report by the states of February 2022 on Job growth from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2021; “Pact for the Public Health Service” of the heads of government of the federal and state governments of September 29, 2020<br /> <br /> <strong>Recommendation of the committee:</strong> Support for states and municipalities by the federal government in the area of flight and migration with an additional 1.5 billion euros in 2022

Report· Bericht, Gutachten, Programm20/270open

Annual report 2020

Germany · German Bundestag · 23 December 2021

Overview of the focus of the work of the German Institute for Human Rights in 2020; Topics: human rights dimension of the corona pandemic, companies' duty of care, sexual violence, implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, working conditions in home care, rights of older people, inclusive libraries, protection of refugee children, human rights at the EU's external borders, climate and sustainability, UN human rights protection system, rule of law, human rights education

Report· Bericht, Gutachten, Programm20/280open

Report on the development of the human rights situation in Germany in the period July 2020 to June 2021

Germany · German Bundestag · 23 December 2021

Germany in the human rights protection system, democratic constitutional state - racism and right-wing extremism, social rights - regulation of corporate due diligence in supply chains, protection against discrimination - the question of triage, asylum, flight and migration - family reunification, children's rights, people with disabilities - legal support, global vaccination equity

Report· Bericht, Gutachten, Programm20/326open

Announcement of accounts of political parties for the calendar year 2020 (Part 2 - Other eligible parties, Volume I)

Germany · German Bundestag · 20 December 2021

Compilation of the income, expenses and assets of the following 3 parties not represented in the Bundestag: Party for Labor, Constitutional State, Animal Welfare, Elite Promotion and Grassroots Democratic Initiative (The PARTEI), Volt Germany (Volt) and South Schleswig Voters' Association SSW

Report· Bericht, Gutachten, Programm19/25701open

Announcement of annual reports of political parties for the calendar year 2019 (Part 2 - Other eligible parties, Volume I)

Germany · German Bundestag · 5 January 2021

Compilation of the income, expenses and assets of the following 3 parties not represented in the Bundestag: Party for Labor, Constitutional State, Animal Welfare, Elite Promotion and Grassroots Democratic Initiative (The PARTEI), Volt Germany (Volt) and South Schleswig Voters' Association (SSW)

Motion· Antrag19/23980rejected

The rule of law and democracy in the corona pandemic

Germany · German Bundestag · 4 November 2020

Presentation of a bill with numerous detailed, temporary individual measures in anticipation of a fundamental reform of the Infection Protection Act (IfSG) by the Bundestag due to the lack of a constitutional basis for combating pandemics, specification of the powers to issue regulations regarding requirements and powers, in particular with regard to encroachments on fundamental rights and the principle of proportionality, immediate establishment of a interdisciplinary pandemic council to develop concrete recommendations for modernizing the IfSG and supporting the parliamentary legislative process; The German Bundestag's request to the state governments and parliaments to consider specific measures before the law comes into force: formulation of justifications for regulations and general orders and measures to alleviate democratic political problems when enacted of regulations<br />

Question· Mündliche Frage19/23604open

Replacement of the word “race” in the Basic Law

Germany · German Bundestag · 23 October 2020

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> What specific replacement for the word "race" in Article 3 Paragraph 3 of the Basic Law have the members of the Federal Government agreed on for the announced draft law to amend the Basic Law (www.deutschlandfunk.de/bundesregierung-rasse-konzept-soll-im-grundgesetz-geaendert.1766.de.html?dram:article_id=486177), and to what extent should science, Migrant organizations and opposition factions should be included?

Question· Schriftliche Frage19/22675open

Completion of negotiations on the Commission's draft "Strengthening the rule of law within the Union - a blueprint for action"

Germany · German Bundestag · 18 September 2020

Original text of the question(s):<br /> <br /> In which Council working groups and by when (please list the schedule or dates) does the Federal Government want to conclude the negotiations on the Commission's draft "Strengthening the rule of law within the Union A blueprint for action" (COM(2019) 343 final, see question 32 on Bundestag printed matter 19/21672)?

Page 1 of 2Next