Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Rule of law

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

41 records in EU in 2019

All countriesUnited States · 6,472Austria · 2,116France · 2,068Netherlands · 1,535Ireland · 1,467European Union · 660Germany · 244United Kingdom · 176Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0297_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 December 2019.#Daniel Dragomir v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability — Rule of law — Independence of the judiciary — Right to a fair trial — Protection of personal data — Failure by the Commission to adopt measures to ensure that Romania fulfils its obligations — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-297/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 December 2019

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0297decided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 December 2019.#Daniel Dragomir v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability — Rule of law — Independence of the judiciary — Right to a fair trial — Protection of personal data — Failure by the Commission to adopt measures to ensure that Romania fulfils its obligations — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-297/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0493_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (neuvième chambre) du 4 décembre 2019.#UB contre VA e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Coopération judiciaire en matière civile – Procédures d’insolvabilité – Règlement (CE) no 1346/2000 – Article 3, paragraphe 1 – Actions qui dérivent directement de la procédure d’insolvabilité et qui s’y insèrent étroitement – Vente d’immeuble et constitution d’une hypothèque – Action en inopposabilité introduite par le syndic de la faillite – Article 25, paragraphe 1 – Compétence exclusive des juridictions de l’État membre d’ouverture de la procédure d’insolvabilité.#Affaire C-493/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0192_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 5 November 2019.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by EU law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of judges of the ordinary Polish courts — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond the newly set age, by authorisation of the Minister for Justice — Article 157 TFEU — Directive 2006/54/EC — Articles 5(a) and 9(1)(f) — Prohibition of discrimination based on sex in matters of pay, employment and occupation — Establishment of different retirement ages for men and women holding the position of judge of the ordinary Polish courts or of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) or that of public prosecutor in Poland.#Case C-192/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 November 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0558decided

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 24 September 2019.#Miasto Łowicz v Skarb Państwa – Wojewoda Łódzki and Prokurator Generalny v VX and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi and the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie.#References for a preliminary ruling – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law – Principle of judicial independence – Disciplinary regime applicable to national judges – Jurisdiction of the Court – Article 267 TFUE – Admissibility – Interpretation necessary for the referring court to be able to give judgment – Meaning.#Joined Cases C-558/18 and C-563/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0838_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 July 2019.#BP v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA).#Non-contractual liability — Access to documents — Partial refusal of access — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Regulations (EC) No 1049/2001 and No 45/2001 — Protection of personal data — Non-material damage — Material damage — Causal link.#Case T-838/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0838decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 July 2019.#BP v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA).#Non-contractual liability — Access to documents — Partial refusal of access — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Regulations (EC) No 1049/2001 and No 45/2001 — Protection of personal data — Non-material damage — Material damage — Causal link.#Case T-838/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0617decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 26 June 2019.#Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability — Instrument for pre-accession assistance — Third country — National public procurement — Devolved management — Decision of a national authority — Investigations by OLAF — Non-material damage — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2185/96 — Principle of sound administration — Legitimate expectations — Proportionality — Right to be heard.#Case T-617/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 June 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0619decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.#Case C-619/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 June 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0619_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 24 June 2019.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.#Case C-619/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 June 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0192decided

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 20 June 2019.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by EU law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of judges of the ordinary Polish courts — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond the newly set age, by authorisation of the Minister for Justice — Article 157 TFEU — Directive 2006/54/EC — Articles 5(a) and 9(1)(f) — Prohibition of discrimination based on sex in matters of pay, employment and occupation — Establishment of different retirement ages for men and women holding the position of judge of the ordinary Polish courts or of the Sąd Najwyższy (Supreme Court, Poland) or that of public prosecutor in Poland.#Case C-192/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0433_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 5 June 2019.#Bank Saderat plc v Council of the European Union.#Non-contractual liability — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Compensation for the damage allegedly sustained by the applicant following its inclusion and re-inclusion in the list of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures at issue — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-433/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0433decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 5 June 2019.#Bank Saderat plc v Council of the European Union.#Non-contractual liability — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Compensation for the damage allegedly sustained by the applicant following its inclusion and re-inclusion in the list of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures at issue — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-433/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0107_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 May 2019.#Frank Steinhoff and Others v European Central Bank.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – ECB – National central banks – Restructuring of the Greek public debt – Involvement of the private sector – Collective action clauses – Mandatory exchange of Greek bonds – Private creditors – Opinion of the ECB – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Principle of pacta sunt servanda – Article 17(1) and (2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Article 63(1) TFEU – Article 124 TFEU.#Case T-107/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 May 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0037decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 16 May 2019.#Bank Tejarat v Council of the European Union.#Non-contractual liability — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran — Freezing of funds — Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States — Compensation for the damage allegedly sustained by the applicant following its inclusion and re-inclusion in the list of persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures at issue — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-37/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 May 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0434decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 May 2019.#Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Non-contractual liability — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-434/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0553decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 May 2019.#Export Development Bank of Iran v Council of the European Union.#Non-contractual liability — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran — Freezing of funds — Compensation for the damage allegedly sustained by the applicant following the inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources at issue — Jurisdiction of the General Court — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals.#Case T-553/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2019

Resolution· RSP2019/2697(RSP)rdg1

Rule of law in Romania

European Union · European Parliament · 15 April 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0619decided

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 11 April 2019.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU — Rule of law — Effective judicial protection in the fields covered by Union law — Principles of the irremovability of judges and judicial independence — Lowering of the retirement age of Supreme Court judges — Application to judges in post — Possibility of continuing to carry out the duties of judge beyond that age subject to obtaining authorisation granted by discretionary decision of the President of the Republic.#Case C-619/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0201_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2019.#Printeos, SA v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Fines — Judgment partially annulling the decision — Reimbursement of the principal amount of the fine — Default interest — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Causal link — Damage — Article 266 TFEU — Second sentence of Article 90(4)(a) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012.#Case T-201/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0201decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 February 2019.#Printeos, SA v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Fines — Judgment partially annulling the decision — Reimbursement of the principal amount of the fine — Default interest — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals — Causal link — Damage — Article 266 TFEU — Second sentence of Article 90(4)(a) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1268/2012.#Case T-201/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 February 2019

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0373_SUMdecided

Ordonnance de la Cour (première chambre) du 31 janvier 2019.#Prosa – Produtos e Serviços Agrícolas SA contre Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Article 99 du règlement de procédure de la Cour – Impôts indirects frappant les rassemblements de capitaux – Directive 69/335/CEE – Articles 4 et 7 – Constitution d’une société de capitaux – Droit de timbre en vigueur au 1er juillet 1984 – Suppression de ce droit de timbre par la suite, puis réintroduction de celui‑ci.#Affaire C-373/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 31 January 2019