Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects

Rule of law

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

101 records in 2022

All countriesUnited States · 6,477France · 4,394Austria · 2,313Netherlands · 1,543Ireland · 1,470European Union · 675Germany · 256United Kingdom · 182Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Question· Question écrite45294open

Question 45294 — Union européenne

France · National Assembly · 3 December 2022

Mme Marie-France Lorho interroge M. le ministre de l'Europe et des affaires étrangères sur l'opportunité des mesures de rétorsion prises contre la Hongrie par la Commission européenne. Au lendemain d'élections législatives qui ont vu triompher la position de M. Viktor Orbán, la Commission européenne a jugé opportun de lancer un mécanisme de « conditionnalité » destinant à priver la Hongrie de fonds européens s'il y était constaté des violations de l'état de droit. Mme la députée s'interroge sur le calendrier utilisé par Ursula von der Leyen pour sanctionner le pays. Alors qu'elle aurait pu lancer cette procédure dès le 18 février 2022, la présidente a préféré l'activer au lendemain de la réélection, ce qui pourrait s'apparenter, pour le peuple hongrois, à une pure et simple sanction par rapport à son vote souverain. La victoire de M. Orbán, qui refuse que l'autorité de l'Union européenne se substitue à l'ordre national, est aussi celle du peuple hongrois, n'en déplaise à la Commission. Par ailleurs, Mme la députée s'inquiète que la Commission européenne active cette sanction du fait de la position hongroise dans le conflit russo-ukrainien. Que la Hongrie décide, une fois encore de manière souveraine, d'user de diplomatie et de ne pas céder aux sirènes de sanctions qui pourraient mettre à mal le fonctionnement de son pays est son droit le plus strict. Elle lui demande quel regard la France porte sur ces mesures de rétorsion contre la Hongrie.

Record· scrutin public solennel664rejeté

la motion de censure déposée en application de l'article 49, alinéa 3, de la Constitution par Mme Mathilde Panot, M. Boris Vallaud, Mme Cyrielle Chatelain, M. André Chassaigne et 144 membres de l'Assemblée.

France · National Assembly · 2 December 2022

la motion de censure déposée en application de l'article 49, alinéa 3, de la Constitution par Mme Mathilde Panot, M. Boris Vallaud, Mme Cyrielle Chatelain, M. André Chassaigne et 144 membres de l'Assemblée.

Record· Brief regering2022Z24008concluded

Indexering griffierechten

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 2 December 2022

Indexering griffierechten

Question· writtenPQ 97asked

97. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Defence if he intends to bring a proposal to Dáil Éireann in advance of Irish Defence Forces personnel participating in the European Union Assistance Mission Ukraine in order to comply with Article 28 of the Constitution which sets out that "the State shall not participate in any war save with the assent of Dáil Éireann". [59588/22]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 30 November 2022

97. Deputy Paul Murphy asked the Minister for Defence if he intends to bring a proposal to Dáil Éireann in advance of Irish Defence Forces personnel participating in the European Union Assistance Mission Ukraine in order to comply with Article 28 of the Constitution which sets out that "the State shall not participate in any war save with the assent of Dáil Éireann". [59588/22]

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0401_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 November 2022.#KN v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Member of the EESC – Discharge procedure in respect of the implementation of the budget of the EESC for the financial year 2019 – Parliament resolution designating the applicant as the perpetrator of psychological harassment – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Action for damages – Protection of personal data – Presumption of innocence – Obligation of confidentiality – Principle of good administration – Proportionality – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-401/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0401decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 November 2022.#KN v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Member of the EESC – Discharge procedure in respect of the implementation of the budget of the EESC for the financial year 2019 – Parliament resolution designating the applicant as the perpetrator of psychological harassment – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility – Action for damages – Protection of personal data – Presumption of innocence – Obligation of confidentiality – Principle of good administration – Proportionality – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals.#Case T-401/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 November 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62016TO0379(02)_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 November 2022.#Basicmed Enterprises Ltd and Others v Council of the European Union and Others.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Stability support programme for Cyprus – Decision of the Governing Council of the ECB on the provision of emergency liquidity following a request by the Central Bank of Cyprus – Eurogroup statements of 25 March, 12 April, 13 May and 13 September 2013 concerning Cyprus – Decision 2013/236/EU – Implementing Decision 2013/463/EU – Memorandum of Understanding of 26 April 2013 on specific economic policy conditions between Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Admissibility – Formal requirements – Exhaustion of domestic remedies – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Right to property – Legitimate expectations – Equal treatment – Action brought in part before a court which manifestly lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine the case, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-379/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 November 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62016TO0379(02)decided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 November 2022.#Basicmed Enterprises Ltd and Others v Council of the European Union and Others.#Non-contractual liability – Economic and monetary policy – Stability support programme for Cyprus – Decision of the Governing Council of the ECB on the provision of emergency liquidity following a request by the Central Bank of Cyprus – Eurogroup statements of 25 March, 12 April, 13 May and 13 September 2013 concerning Cyprus – Decision 2013/236/EU – Implementing Decision 2013/463/EU – Memorandum of Understanding of 26 April 2013 on specific economic policy conditions between Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Admissibility – Formal requirements – Exhaustion of domestic remedies – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Right to property – Legitimate expectations – Equal treatment – Action brought in part before a court which manifestly lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine the case, in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-379/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 November 2022

Question· writtenPQ 327asked

327. Deputy Michael McNamara asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he sought advice on whether the differentiation between male and female TAMS applicants aged 41-55 years of age is permissible under the Constitution of Ireland. [58557/22]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 24 November 2022

327. Deputy Michael McNamara asked the Minister for Agriculture, Food and the Marine if he sought advice on whether the differentiation between male and female TAMS applicants aged 41-55 years of age is permissible under the Constitution of Ireland. [58557/22]

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0275_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 November 2022.#Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for prestressing steel – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Suspension of the obligation to provide a bank guarantee – Payment by instalments on a provisional basis – Judgment annulling in part the decision and setting a fine in an amount identical to the amount of the fine originally imposed – Application of payments made on a provisional basis – Default interest – First paragraph of Article 266 TFEU – Unjust enrichment – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Recovery of undue payments – No legal basis – Unlawfulness.#Case T-275/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 November 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0275decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 November 2022.#Westfälische Drahtindustrie GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – European market for prestressing steel – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Suspension of the obligation to provide a bank guarantee – Payment by instalments on a provisional basis – Judgment annulling in part the decision and setting a fine in an amount identical to the amount of the fine originally imposed – Application of payments made on a provisional basis – Default interest – First paragraph of Article 266 TFEU – Unjust enrichment – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Recovery of undue payments – No legal basis – Unlawfulness.#Case T-275/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 November 2022

Bill· Selbständiger Antrag2999/Aselbständiger antrag

Erneuerbaren-Ausbau-Gesetz, Änderung

Austria · National Council · 18 November 2022

Antrag der Abgeordneten Tanja Graf, Ing. Martin Litschauer, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Erneuerbaren-Ausbau-Gesetz geändert wird

Bill· Selbständiger Antrag2981/Aselbständiger antrag

Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz, Verwaltungsrechtliches COVID-19-Begleitgesetz u.a., Änderung

Austria · National Council · 18 November 2022

Antrag der Abgeordneten Mag. Wolfgang Gerstl, Mag. Agnes Sirkka Prammer, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz, das Verwaltungsrechtliche COVID-19-Begleitgesetz geändert und das COVID-19 Begleitgesetz Vergabe werden <br><br>Titeländerung:<br><br>Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz, das Verwaltungsrechtliche COVID-19-Begleitgesetz und das COVID-19 Begleitgesetz Vergabe geändert werden

Bill· Selbständiger Antrag2979/Aselbständiger antrag

E-Control-Gesetz, Änderung

Austria · National Council · 18 November 2022

Antrag der Abgeordneten Tanja Graf, Ing. Martin Litschauer, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesgesetz, mit dem das E-Control-Gesetz geändert wird

Bill· HRH.R. 9350 (117th)referred

To restore ability of the people of American Samoa to approve amendments to the territorial constitution based on majority rule in a democratic act of self-determination, as authorized pursuant to Act of Congress delegating administration of Federal territorial law in the territory to the President, and to the Secretary of the Interior under Executive Order 10264, dated June 29, 1951, under which the Constitution of American Samoa was approved and may be amended without requirement for further Congressional action, subject to the authority of Congress under the Territorial Clause in article IV, section 3, clause 2 of the United States Constitution.

United States · United States Congress · 18 November 2022

This bill repeals the statute that prevents the people of American Samoa from approving amendments or modifications to the constitution of that territory.

Resolution· HRESH.Res. 1481 (117th)referred

Urging United States policy toward Guatemala to support the rule of law and address challenges of kleptocracy, organized crime, private and public sector corruption, illicit campaign financing, criminalization of and attacks on justice operators, journalists, and human rights defenders, and restrictions resulting in the closure of civic space.

United States · United States Congress · 16 November 2022

This resolution condemns attacks and abuses perpetrated against Guatemalan society, including judges, anticorruption prosecutors, human rights defenders, and indigenous communities. It also affirms support for, and calls on the federal government to take actions to advance, the rule of law and democracy in Guatemala.

Bill· Selbständiger Antrag2919/Aselbständiger antrag

Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz, Änderung

Austria · National Council · 15 November 2022

Antrag der Abgeordneten Dr. Nikolaus Scherak, MA, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz (B-VG) geändert wird

Question· writtenPQ 244asked

244. Deputy Carol Nolan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the procedures and protocols that apply to the issuing of invitations to foreign Heads of State to visit Ireland; the legislation or provisions of the Constitution that pply to the decision to issue such invitations; if such invitations require a Government decision; if he can issue them on behalf of the State; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [56019/22]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 10 November 2022

244. Deputy Carol Nolan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the procedures and protocols that apply to the issuing of invitations to foreign Heads of State to visit Ireland; the legislation or provisions of the Constitution that pply to the decision to issue such invitations; if such invitations require a Government decision; if he can issue them on behalf of the State; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [56019/22]

Record· Brief regering2022Z21507concluded

Rapport van de procureur-generaal van de Hoge Raad over 'Onderzoek in een geautomatiseerd werk – over de toepassing van opsporingsbevoegdheden als bedoeld in de artikelen 126nba lid1, 126uba lid 1 en 126zpa lid 1 van het Wetboek van Strafvordering door het Openbaar Ministerie'

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 9 November 2022

Rapport van de procureur-generaal van de Hoge Raad over 'Onderzoek in een geautomatiseerd werk – over de toepassing van opsporingsbevoegdheden als bedoeld in de artikelen 126nba lid1, 126uba lid 1 en 126zpa lid 1 van het Wetboek van Strafvordering door het Openbaar Ministerie'

Question· writtenPQ 328asked

328. Deputy Catherine Connolly asked the Minister for Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media further to Parliamentary Question No. 215 of 20 October 2022, the reasons for the delay in ensuring that all online streaming services provided by Irish broadcasters are accessible to those with sight and hearing difficulties, in light of the fact that EU law has made it clear that they should be; the reason that these accessibility measures will only come into force following the constitution of the Coimisiún na Meán, rather than being implemented via the legislation; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [54105/22]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 8 November 2022

328. Deputy Catherine Connolly asked the Minister for Tourism, Culture, Arts, Gaeltacht, Sport and Media further to Parliamentary Question No. 215 of 20 October 2022, the reasons for the delay in ensuring that all online streaming services provided by Irish broadcasters are accessible to those with sight and hearing difficulties, in light of the fact that EU law has made it clear that they should be; the reason that these accessibility measures will only come into force following the constitution of the Coimisiún na Meán, rather than being implemented via the legislation; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [54105/22]

PreviousPage 2 of 3Next