Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · EU

Transport

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

151 records in EU in 2021

All countriesSearch this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0665decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 June 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – German air transport market – Public loan guaranteed by Germany to Condor Flugdienst in the context of the COVID‑19 pandemic – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Assessment of damages – Causal link – Obligation to state reasons – Maintenance of the effects of the decision.#Case T-665/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0665_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 June 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – German air transport market – Public loan guaranteed by Germany to Condor Flugdienst in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic – Decision not to raise any objections – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Article 107(2)(b) TFEU – Assessment of damages – Causal link – Obligation to state reasons – Maintenance of the effects of the decision.#Case T-665/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2021

Decision· DCELEX 32021D0935in force

Council Decision (EU) 2021/935 of 3 June 2021 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the 13th meeting of the Committee of Technical Experts of the Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail regarding the adoption of amendments to the uniform technical prescriptions concerning locomotives and passenger rolling stock, freight wagons, accessibility of the rail system for persons with disabilities and persons with reduced mobility, the adoption of the uniform technical prescriptions applicable to train composition and route compatibility checks and to the subsystem infrastructure, the updating of references to the technical documents referred to in Appendix I of the uniform technical prescription concerning telematic applications for freight, and regarding the revision of ATMF with regard to entities in charge of maintenance

European Union · EUR-Lex · 3 June 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0120_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 May 2021.#X v College van burgemeester en wethouders van de gemeente Purmerend.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Inland transport of dangerous goods – Directive 2008/68/EC – Article 5(1) – Concept of ‘construction requirement’ – Prohibition on laying down more stringent construction requirements – Authority of a Member State requiring a service station to be supplied with liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) only from road tankers fitted with a particular heat-resistant lining not provided for by the European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR) – Unlawfulness – Decision legally unchallengeable by a category of persons – Strictly limited possibility of obtaining the annulment of such a decision where there is clear conflict with EU law – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of effectiveness.#Case C-120/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 May 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0120decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 May 2021.#X v College van burgemeester en wethouders van de gemeente Purmerend.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Inland transport of dangerous goods – Directive 2008/68/EC – Article 5(1) – Concept of ‘construction requirement’ – Prohibition on laying down more stringent construction requirements – Authority of a Member State requiring a service station to be supplied with liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) only from road tankers fitted with a particular heat-resistant lining not provided for by the European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR) – Unlawfulness – Decision legally unchallengeable by a category of persons – Strictly limited possibility of obtaining the annulment of such a decision where there is clear conflict with EU law – Principle of legal certainty – Principle of effectiveness.#Case C-120/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 May 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0465_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 May 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Portuguese air transport market – Aid provided by Portugal to TAP owing to the COVID-19 pandemic – State loan – Decision not to raise any objections – Point 22 of the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty – Company belonging to a group – Intrinsic difficulties not resulting from an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group – Difficulties which are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself – Duty to state reasons – Maintenance of the effects of the decision.#Case T-465/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 May 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0465decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 May 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Portuguese air transport market – Aid provided by Portugal to TAP owing to the COVID-19 pandemic – State loan – Decision not to raise any objections – Point 22 of the Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty – Company belonging to a group – Intrinsic difficulties not resulting from an arbitrary allocation of costs within the group – Difficulties which are too serious to be dealt with by the group itself – Duty to state reasons – Maintenance of the effects of the decision.#Case T-465/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 May 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0070_SUMdecided

Wyrok Trybunału (czwarta izba) z dnia 12 maja 2021 r.#YL przeciwko Altenrhein Luftfahrt GmbH.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Transport lotniczy – Konwencja montrealska – Artykuł 17 ust. 1 – Odpowiedzialność przewoźnika lotniczego za szkodę z tytułu wypadku – Pojęcie „wypadku” – Twarde lądowanie mieszczące się w zakresie normalnej eksploatacji statku powietrznego – Uszkodzenie ciała, jakiego miał doznać pasażer w trakcie tego lądowania – Brak wystąpienia wypadku.#Sprawa C-70/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 May 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0070decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 12 May 2021.#YL v Altenrhein Luftfahrt GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Montreal Convention – Article 17(1) – Air carrier liability in the event of accidents – Concept of ‘accident’ – Hard landing made within the normal operating range of an aircraft – Bodily injury allegedly sustained by a passenger during such a landing – No accident.#Case C-70/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 May 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0428decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 6 May 2021.#OL and Others v Rapidsped Fuvarozási és Szállítmányozási Zrt.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gyulai Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Directive 96/71/EEC – Article 1(1) and Articles 3 and 5 – Posting of workers in the framework of the provision of services – Drivers working in international road transport – Compliance with the minimum rates of pay of the country of posting – Daily allowance – Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 – Article 10 – Remuneration paid to employees according to fuel consumption.#Case C-428/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 May 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0819decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 6 May 2021.#Stichting Cartel Compensation and Equilib Netherlands BV v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Articles 81, 84 and 85 EC – Article 53 of the EEA Agreement – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Conduct of undertakings in the context of air transport between the European Economic Area (EEA) and third countries that occurred under Articles 84 and 85 EC – Claim for compensation for damage suffered – Jurisdiction of national courts to apply Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.#Case C-819/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 May 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0056_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 April 2021.#AR v Stadt Pforzheim.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Driving licences – Mutual recognition – Withdrawal of the licence in the territory of a Member State other than the issuing Member State – Affixing of an endorsement to the driving licence indicating that it is not valid within that Member State.#Case C-56/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 April 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0047decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 April 2021.#F. v Stadt Karlsruhe.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Driving licences – Withdrawal of the licence in the territory of a Member State other than the issuing Member State – Renewal of the licence by the issuing Member State after the withdrawal decision – No automaticity of mutual recognition.#Case C-47/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 April 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0056decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 April 2021.#AR v Stadt Pforzheim.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof Baden-Württemberg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Transport – Driving licences – Mutual recognition – Withdrawal of the licence in the territory of a Member State other than the issuing Member State – Affixing of an endorsement to the driving licence indicating that it is not valid within that Member State.#Case C-56/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 April 2021

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0592_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 April 2021.#NT and Others v British Airways plc.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 2(b) and Article 7(1) – Compensation for long delays at the final destination of a connecting flight – Connecting flight with several flight segments – Single booking – Cancellation of a flight segment by a carrier other than the one with which the single booking was made – Operating air carrier – Distance to be taken into account for the purpose of determining the amount of compensation.#Case C-592/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 April 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0826decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 April 2021.#WZ v Austrian Airlines AG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesgericht Korneuburg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 6 – Delayed flight – Article 8(3) – Diversion of a flight to an airport serving the same town, city or region – Concept of ‘cancellation’ – Extraordinary circumstances – Compensation to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights in arrival – Obligation to bear the cost of transferring passengers from the actual airport of arrival to the airport for which the booking was made.#Case C-826/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 April 2021

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0592decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 April 2021.#NT and Others v British Airways plc.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 2(b) and Article 7(1) – Compensation for long delays at the final destination of a connecting flight – Connecting flight with several flight segments – Single booking – Cancellation of a flight segment by a carrier other than the one with which the single booking was made – Operating air carrier – Distance to be taken into account for the purpose of determining the amount of compensation.#Case C-592/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 April 2021

Proposal· PCCELEX 52021PC0178open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the 13th meeting of the Committee of Technical Experts of the Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail (OTIF) for the adoption of modifications to UTP locomotives and passenger rolling stock, UTP rolling stock – freight wagons, UTP concerning accessibility of the rail system for persons with disabilities and persons with reduced mobility, the adoption of the UTP applicable to train composition and route compatibility checks and the UTP applicable to the subsystem infrastructure, the upgrade of the references to the Technical Documents of TAF TSI listed in Appendix I of UTP TAF, and for the revision of ATMF with regard to Entities in Charge of Maintenance (ECM)

European Union · European Commission · 15 April 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0378_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 April 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Danish air transport market – Aid granted by Denmark to an airline amid the Covid-19 pandemic – Guarantee – Decision not to raise any objections – Commitments as a condition to make the aid compatible with the internal market – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Freedom of establishment – Free provision of services – Equal treatment – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-378/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0388_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 April 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Finnish air-transport market – Aid granted by Finland to Finnair amid the Covid‑19 pandemic – State guarantee on a loan – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Failure to weigh up the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition – Equal treatment – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-388/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0379_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 April 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Swedish air transport market – Aid granted by Sweden to an airline amid the Covid-19 pandemic – Guarantee – Decision not to raise any objections – Commitments as a condition to make the aid compatible with the internal market – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Freedom of establishment – Free provision of services – Equal treatment – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-379/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0379decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 April 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Swedish air transport market – Aid granted by Sweden to an airline amid the Covid-19 pandemic – Guarantee – Decision not to raise any objections – Commitments as a condition to make the aid compatible with the internal market – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Freedom of establishment – Free provision of services – Equal treatment – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-379/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0388decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 April 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Finnish air-transport market – Aid granted by Finland to Finnair amid the Covid‑19 pandemic – State guarantee on a loan – Decision not to raise any objections – Temporary Framework for State aid measures – Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State – Failure to weigh up the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition – Equal treatment – Freedom of establishment – Freedom to provide services – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-388/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0378decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 14 April 2021.#Ryanair DAC v European Commission.#State aid – Danish air transport market – Aid granted by Denmark to an airline amid the Covid-19 pandemic – Guarantee – Decision not to raise any objections – Commitments as a condition to make the aid compatible with the internal market – Aid intended to make good the damage caused by an exceptional occurrence – Freedom of establishment – Free provision of services – Equal treatment – Duty to state reasons.#Case T-378/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62020CC0144decided

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 25 March 2021.#AS „LatRailNet” and „Latvijas dzelzceļš” VAS v Valsts dzelzceļa administrācija.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administratīvā rajona tiesa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Articles 32 and 56 – Railway infrastructure charging – Independence of the infrastructure manager – Functions of the regulatory body – Concept of ‘optimal competitiveness of rail market segments’ – Exclusive right on a rail segment – Public service operator.#Case C-144/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 March 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0870decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#Prefettura Ufficio territoriale del governo di Firenze v MI and TB.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Recording equipment in road transport – Regulation (EEC) No 3821/85 – Article 15(7) – Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 – Control proceedings – Administrative penalty – Failure to produce the record sheets for the tachograph relating to the current day and the previous 28 days – Single or multiple infringement.#Joined Cases C-870/19 and C-871/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 March 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0771decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 March 2021.#NAMA Symvouloi Michanikoi kai Meletites A.E. – LDK Symvouloi Michanikoi A.E. and Others v Archi Exetasis Prodikastikon Prosfigon (AEPP) and Attiko Metro AE.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Procurement contracts in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors – Directive 92/13/EEC – Review procedures – Pre-contractual stage – Assessment of bids – Rejection of a technical bid and acceptance of the bid of a competitor – Suspension of the implementation of that measure – Legitimate interest of the unsuccessful tenderer in challenging the legality of the bid of the successful tenderer.#Case C-771/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 March 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0028_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 23 March 2021.#Airhelp Ltd v Scandinavian Airlines System Denmark – Norway – Sweden.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Pilots’ strike organised within a legal framework – Circumstances that are ‘internal’ and ‘external’ to the operating air carrier’s activity – Articles 16, 17 and 28 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – No impairment of the air carrier’s freedom to conduct a business, right to property and right of negotiation.#Case C-28/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 March 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0028decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 23 March 2021.#Airhelp Ltd v Scandinavian Airlines System Denmark – Norway – Sweden.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Attunda tingsrätt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 5(3) – Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of cancellation or long delay of flights – Exemption from the obligation to pay compensation – Concept of ‘extraordinary circumstances’ – Pilots’ strike organised within a legal framework – Circumstances that are ‘internal’ and ‘external’ to the operating air carrier’s activity – Articles 16, 17 and 28 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – No impairment of the air carrier’s freedom to conduct a business, right to property and right of negotiation.#Case C-28/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 March 2021

PreviousPage 3 of 4Next