United States · Bill · HR
H.R. 1236 (101st)
Price Fixing Prevention Act of 1989
Introduced
2 March 1989
Last action
17 May 1990 · Committee
Status
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 556.
Sponsors
Rep. Brooks, Jack B. [D-TX-9], Rep. Glickman, Dan [D-KS-4], Rep. Feighan, Edward F. [D-OH-19], Rep. Smith, Lawrence [D-FL-16], Rep. Staggers, Harley O., Jr. [D-WV-2], Rep. Synar, Mike [D-OK-2], Rep. Schroeder, Patricia [D-CO-1], Rep. Edwards, Don [D-CA-10], Rep. Frank, Barney [D-MA-4], Rep. Hyde, Henry J. [R-IL-6], Rep. Porter, John Edward [R-IL-10], Rep. Kastenmeier, Robert W. [D-WI-2], Rep. McDade, Joseph M. [R-PA-10], Rep. Gallo, Dean A. [R-NJ-11], Rep. Neal, Stephen L. [D-NC-5], Rep. Walgren, Doug [D-PA-18], Rep. Bryant, John W. [D-TX-5], Rep. Goodling, William F. [R-PA-19], Rep. Sangmeister, George E. [D-IL-4], Rep. Smith, Christopher H. [R-NJ-4], Rep. Morrison, Bruce A. [D-CT-3], Rep. Hughes, William J. [D-NJ-2], Rep. Crockett, George W., Jr. [D-MI-13], Rep. Berman, Howard L. [D-CA-28], Sen. Cardin, Benjamin L. [D-MD], Sen. Schumer, Charles E. [D-NY], Rep. Conyers, John, Jr. [D-MI-13], Sen. Smith, Bob [R-NH], Rep. Henry, Paul B. [R-MI-5], Rep. Boucher, Rick [D-VA-9], Rep. Jones, Walter B. [D-NC-1], Rep. Penny, Timothy J. [D-MN-1], Rep. Hertel, Dennis M. [D-MI-14], Rep. Slaughter, Louise McIntosh [D-NY-25], Rep. Wilson, Charles [D-TX-2], Rep. Stokes, Louis [D-OH-11], Rep. Rahall, Nick J., II [D-WV-3], Rep. Kleczka, Gerald D. [D-WI-4], Rep. Traficant, James A., Jr. [D-OH-17], Rep. Clinger, William F., Jr. [R-PA-5], Rep. Martinez, Matthew G. [D-CA-31], Rep. Williams, Pat [D-MT-At Large], Rep. Ravenel, Arthur, Jr. [R-SC-1], Rep. Slattery, Jim [D-KS-2], Rep. Wylie, Chalmers P. [R-OH-15], Rep. Wolpe, Howard E. [D-MI-3], Rep. Lipinski, William O. [D-IL-3], Sen. Torricelli, Robert G. [D-NJ]
Subjects
Discovery layer
Source updated
10 August 2026
Summary
Price Fixing Prevention Act of 1989 - Provides that in any civil action alleging a contract, combination, or conspiracy to set, change, or maintain prices (other than a maximum price) under the Sherman Antitrust Act: (1) evidence that a person who sells a good or service to the claimant for resale received from a competitor a communication regarding price competition by the claimant and in response terminated the claimant as a buyer (or refused to supply such goods or services) shall be sufficient to raise the inference that such person and such competitor engaged in concerted action to set, change, or maintain prices in violation of such Act (in such case, a termination or refusal to supply is in response to a communication if such communication is a substantial contributing cause of such termination or refusal to supply); (2) the fact that the seller and the purchaser of a good or service entered into an agreement shall be sufficient to constitute a violation of such Act; and (3) an agreement between the seller and the purchaser to terminate another purchaser as a dealer or to refuse to supply such other purchaser because of that purchaser's pricing policies shall constitute a violation of such Act, whether or not a specific price level is agreed upon.
This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.
Timeline
2 March 1989
Introduced
Referred to the House Committee on Judiciary.
Source: IntroReferral
2 March 1989
Introduced
Introduced in House
Source: IntroReferral
2 March 1989
Introduced
Introduced in House
Source: IntroReferral
20 March 1989
Referred
Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic and Commercial Law.
Source: Committee
23 March 1989
Committee
Executive Comment Requested from Justice.
Source: Committee
14 April 1989
Committee
Executive Comment Received from Justice.
Source: Committee
15 June 1989
Committee
Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Source: Committee
15 June 1989
Committee
Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee.
Source: Committee
20 June 1989
Committee
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
Source: Committee
20 June 1989
Reported
Ordered to be Reported.
Source: Committee
29 March 1990
Calendars
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 270.
Source: Calendars
29 March 1990
Reported
Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 101-438.
Source: Committee
29 March 1990
Reported
Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 101-438.
Source: Committee
3 April 1990
Reported
Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 373 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1236 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments.
Source: Floor
18 April 1990
Floor
The Speaker designated the Honorable David E. Skaggs to act as Chairman of the Committee.
Source: Floor
18 April 1990
Floor
House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 373 and Rule XXIII.
Source: Floor
18 April 1990
Floor
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 373.
Source: Floor
18 April 1990
Passed
Rule H. Res. 373 passed House.
Source: Floor
18 April 1990
Passed
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Source: Floor
18 April 1990
Vote
On passage Passed by recorded vote: 235 - 157 (Roll No. 74).
Source: Floor
18 April 1990
Vote
Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by recorded vote: 235 - 157 (Roll No. 74).
Source: Floor
18 April 1990
Failed
On motion to recommit Failed by voice vote.
Source: Floor
18 April 1990
Floor
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Source: Floor
18 April 1990
Floor
Mr. Fish moved to recommit to Judiciary.
Source: Floor
18 April 1990
Passed
The House adopted the amendment as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
Source: Floor
18 April 1990
Floor
The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1236.
Source: Floor
18 April 1990
Floor
Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1236 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit. Measure will be read by section. Bill is open to amendments.
Source: Floor
19 April 1990
Introduced
Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
Source: IntroReferral
17 May 1990
Calendars
Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 556.
Source: Calendars
17 May 1990
Discharge
Senate Committee on Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.
Source: Discharge
17 May 1990
Committee
Senate Committee on Judiciary discharged by Unanimous Consent.
Source: Committee
Votes
No vote records are attached yet.
Versions
- Engrossed in House · — · Download file
- Introduced in House · — · Download file
- Placed on Calendar Senate · — · Download file
- Referred in Senate · — · Download file
- Reported in House · — · Download file
Documents
7 official files
Reported in House (text)
This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Reported in House (text)
Reported in House · EN
Referred in Senate (text)
Referred in Senate · EN
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Placed on Calendar Senate (text)
Placed on Calendar Senate · EN
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Introduced in House (text)
Introduced in House · EN
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Engrossed in House (text)
Engrossed in House · EN
ViewDownloadOpen at official source
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Passed House amended
summary · EN · 18 April 1990
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Introduced in House
summary · EN · 2 March 1989
Leesvertaling
Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.
Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.
Sponsors
- Rep. Brooks, Jack B. [D-TX-9] · D · Sponsor
- Rep. Glickman, Dan [D-KS-4] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Feighan, Edward F. [D-OH-19] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Smith, Lawrence [D-FL-16] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Staggers, Harley O., Jr. [D-WV-2] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Synar, Mike [D-OK-2] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Schroeder, Patricia [D-CO-1] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Edwards, Don [D-CA-10] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Frank, Barney [D-MA-4] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Hyde, Henry J. [R-IL-6] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Porter, John Edward [R-IL-10] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Kastenmeier, Robert W. [D-WI-2] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. McDade, Joseph M. [R-PA-10] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Gallo, Dean A. [R-NJ-11] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Neal, Stephen L. [D-NC-5] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Walgren, Doug [D-PA-18] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Bryant, John W. [D-TX-5] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Goodling, William F. [R-PA-19] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Sangmeister, George E. [D-IL-4] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Smith, Christopher H. [R-NJ-4] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Morrison, Bruce A. [D-CT-3] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Hughes, William J. [D-NJ-2] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Crockett, George W., Jr. [D-MI-13] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Berman, Howard L. [D-CA-28] · D · Cosponsor
- Sen. Cardin, Benjamin L. [D-MD] · D · Cosponsor
- Sen. Schumer, Charles E. [D-NY] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Conyers, John, Jr. [D-MI-13] · D · Cosponsor
- Sen. Smith, Bob [R-NH] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Henry, Paul B. [R-MI-5] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Boucher, Rick [D-VA-9] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Jones, Walter B. [D-NC-1] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Penny, Timothy J. [D-MN-1] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Hertel, Dennis M. [D-MI-14] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Slaughter, Louise McIntosh [D-NY-25] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Wilson, Charles [D-TX-2] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Stokes, Louis [D-OH-11] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Rahall, Nick J., II [D-WV-3] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Kleczka, Gerald D. [D-WI-4] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Traficant, James A., Jr. [D-OH-17] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Clinger, William F., Jr. [R-PA-5] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Martinez, Matthew G. [D-CA-31] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Williams, Pat [D-MT-At Large] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Ravenel, Arthur, Jr. [R-SC-1] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Slattery, Jim [D-KS-2] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Wylie, Chalmers P. [R-OH-15] · R · Cosponsor
- Rep. Wolpe, Howard E. [D-MI-3] · D · Cosponsor
- Rep. Lipinski, William O. [D-IL-3] · D · Cosponsor
- Sen. Torricelli, Robert G. [D-NJ] · D · Cosponsor
Showing 48 of 74 sponsors and actors.
Related records
- related to → Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 1236) to establish evidentiary standards for Federal civil antitrust claims based on resale price fixing.
- amends ← An amendment to eliminate the provisions of the bill which change the evidentiary standards necessary to obtain a jury trial in price fixing cases. Under the bill, sufficient evidence for a jury trial exists if a plaintiff can demonstrate that a communication concerning price competition was received by a supplier from a retailer and that in response to the communication, the supplier terminated a supply contract with a rival retailer. The amendment would also eliminate the language of the bill making price restraints automatically illegal regardless of whether or not a specific minimum price has been set and would let stand recentSupreme Court decisions holding that in order to obtain a jury trial, a plaintiff must provide direct or circumstantial evidence that a supplier and retailer consciously intended to maintain resale price levels and that a specific minimum price agreement must be established for a per se violation of price fixing laws to exist.
- amends ← And amendment to specify that the provisions of the bill would only apply to cases filed prior to the enactment of the bill. The provisions of the bill declaring price fixing to be automatically illegal would apply to both current and prospective cases.
- amends ← An amendment to change the provisions of the bill regarding the circumstances for obtaining a jury trial in price fixing litigation. The amendment would require a plaintiff to show evidence of a conspiracy to fix prices and that price was the major factor for the termination of a supply contract between a supplier and a retailer before a jury trial could be obtained.
- amends ← An amendment to exempt small businesses from the provisions of the bill if the market share of a business is inadequate to constitute an impediment to competitive pricing.
Sources
PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.
- Official source: https://www.congress.gov/bill/101st-congress/house-bill/1236
- Open data entity: https://api.congress.gov/v3/bill/101/hr/1236
- us · 101-hr-1236 · source updated 10 August 2026