Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 3209 (102nd)

Federal Employee Reservist Benefit Extension Act of 1992

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

2 August 1991

Last action

20 March 1992 · Introduced

Status

Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.

Sponsors

Rep. Ackerman, Gary L. [D-NY-5], Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL], Rep. Hayes, Charles A. [D-IL-1], Rep. McCloskey, Frank [D-IN-8], Rep. Morella, Constance A. [R-MD-8], Rep. Oakar, Mary Rose [D-OH-20], Rep. Sawyer, Tom [D-OH-14], Rep. Schroeder, Patricia [D-CO-1], Rep. Sikorski, Gerry E. [D-MN-6], Rep. McNulty, Michael R. [D-NY-23], Rep. Jontz, Jim [D-IN-5], Del. de Lugo, Ron [D-VI-At Large], Del. Blaz, Ben G. [R-GU-At Large], Rep. Neal, Richard E. [D-MA-1], Rep. Rangel, Charles B. [D-NY-15], Rep. Roybal, Edward R. [D-CA-25], Rep. Moran, James P. [D-VA-8], Rep. Jefferson, William J. [D-LA-2], Rep. McMillen, Thomas [D-MD-4], Rep. Towns, Edolphus [D-NY-10], Rep. Kaptur, Marcy [D-OH-9], Rep. Frost, Martin [D-TX-24], Del. Norton, Eleanor Holmes [D-DC-At Large], Rep. Johnson, Nancy L. [R-CT-5], Rep. Boucher, Rick [D-VA-9], Rep. Hoyer, Steny H. [D-MD-5], Rep. Gilman, Benjamin A. [R-NY-20], Rep. Peterson, Douglas (Pete) [D-FL-2], Rep. Moody, Jim [D-WI-5], Rep. Andrews, Thomas H. [D-ME-1], Rep. Espy, Mike [D-MS-2], Rep. Martinez, Matthew G. [D-CA-31], Rep. Traxler, Bob [D-MI-8], Rep. Kildee, Dale E. [D-MI-5]

Subjects

Defence

Source updated

14 January 2025

Defence

Summary

Federal Employee Reservist Benefit Extension Act of 1991 - Entitles civilian employees of the Federal Government ordered to active duty as a member of a reserve component of the armed forces during the Persian Gulf Conflict to special pay equal to the amount by which their civilian pay exceeds their military pay. Provides that if a career Senior Executive Service appointee performs any military service for which such special pay is applicable, that period of military service shall be disregarded in determining: (1) the due date for meeting recertification requirements; (2) the period for meeting recertification after being conditionally certified; and (3) the period permitted for filing appeals of certification questions with the Merit Systems Protection Board. Permits such employees to elect to participate in, and to make retroactive contributions to, the Thrift Savings Plan. Outlines other rights and benefits, including continued eligibility for life insurance and health benefits.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 2 August 1991

    Introduced

    Referred to the House Committee on Post Office and Civil Service.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 2 August 1991

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 2 August 1991

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 12 August 1991

    Referred

    Referred to the Subcommittee on Compensation and Employee Benefits.

    Source: Committee

  5. 14 August 1991

    Committee

    Executive Comment Requested from OMB, OPM.

    Source: Committee

  6. 22 October 1991

    Committee

    Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    Source: Committee

  7. 22 October 1991

    Committee

    Forwarded by Subcommittee to Full Committee (Amended).

    Source: Committee

  8. 13 November 1991

    Committee

    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

    Source: Committee

  9. 13 November 1991

    Reported

    Ordered to be Reported (Amended).

    Source: Committee

  10. 28 January 1992

    Calendars

    Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 252.

    Source: Calendars

  11. 28 January 1992

    Reported

    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. H. Rept. 102-426.

    Source: Committee

  12. 28 January 1992

    Reported

    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service. H. Rept. 102-426.

    Source: Committee

  13. 17 March 1992

    Vote

    At the conclusion of debate, the Yeas and Nays were demanded and ordered. Pursuant to the provisions of clause 5, rule I, the chair announced that further proceedings on the motion would be postponed until March 18.

    Source: Floor

  14. 17 March 1992

    Floor

    DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate.

    Source: Floor

  15. 17 March 1992

    Floor

    Considered under suspension of the rules.

    Source: Floor

  16. 17 March 1992

    Floor

    Mr. Ackerman moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

    Source: Floor

  17. 18 March 1992

    Passed

    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

    Source: Floor

  18. 18 March 1992

    Vote

    On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays (2/3 required): 354 - 57 (Roll No. 51).

    Source: Floor

  19. 18 March 1992

    Vote

    Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays (2/3 required): 354 - 57 (Roll No. 51).

    Source: Floor

  20. 18 March 1992

    Floor

    Considered as unfinished business.

    Source: Floor

  21. 20 March 1992

    Introduced

    Received in the Senate and read twice and referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs.

    Source: IntroReferral

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

Documents

6 official files

Reported in House (text)

View fileDownload file

This file cannot be previewed here. Use View or Download.

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Reported in House (text)

    Reported in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

  • Referred in Senate (text)

    Referred in Senate · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House (text)

    Introduced in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Engrossed in House (text)

    Engrossed in House · EN

    ViewDownloadOpen at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Passed House amended

    summary · EN · 18 March 1992

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

  • Introduced in House

    summary · EN · 2 August 1991

    Open at official source

    Leesvertaling

    Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

    Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.