Records
18 records where Christine Le Nabour is listed as a sponsor, author, or other actor. Search with topics and years
Question· Question écrite23697open
France · National Assembly
Mrs Christine Cloarec-Le Nabour questions the Minister of Labor on the application of the law for the freedom to choose one's professional future and in particular on the increase in the costs of remuneration of apprentices for companies with fewer than 11 employees. Indeed, for contracts concluded from January 1, 2019, a new single flat-rate aid from the State replaces the various apprenticeship aid mechanisms. Two of the four Existing aid concerned companies with fewer than 11 employees: VSE young apprentice aid (4,400 euros in the first year) and the apprenticeship bonus (2,200 euros over two years). From now on, the amount of this single aid, for the conclusion of a two-year apprenticeship contract, amounts to a maximum of 4,125 euros in the first year and a maximum of 2,000 euros in the second year. Furthermore, the social security financing law for 2019 also profoundly reformed the terms of exemptions from contributions and social security contributions applicable to apprentices. Concretely, and as an example, for a young person between 16 and 17 years old having prepared a CAP-Boucher under an apprenticeship contract (between 2016 and 2018), the net cost for the employer over two years was around 1,336 euros. For the same contract signed on September 1, 2019, the net cost would now be around 6 110 euros for two years. While the Government has made the development and promotion of apprenticeships a strong focus, it seems that companies with fewer than 11 employees will have to face a significant increase in the cost of welcoming an apprentice. She would therefore like to know if the Government intends to make corrections to this measure which penalizes small food businesses in particular and if so in what way. deadline.
Question· Question écrite22873open
France · National Assembly
Ms. Christine Cloarec-Le Nabour questions the Minister of the Economy and Finance on the evolution of taxation applied to the production of veal calves, of which the department of Ille-et-Vilaine is the leading producer in the country. The sustainability of any activity requires fair remuneration. However, for several years, in a context of reduced meat consumption and stricter regulations (animal welfare, health safety), veal calf breeders see their remuneration decrease. As a result, their investment capacities in breeding facilities are affected. Furthermore, while for a long time their remuneration essentially depended on the aid received (up to 40% of income under the common agricultural policy in 2014, for example), this is no longer the case today. Today almost 90% of veal producers work under an integration contract. These “integrated breeders” are more subject to the capital gains tax regime than other operators. Indeed, in order to ensure fiscal neutrality between the different types of farms, the general tax code in its article 69 provides that “receipts from breeding or cultivation operations involving animals or products belonging to third parties are multiplied by five. If, when it was established, this multiplier coefficient was justified by the fact that the amounts of revenue received by farmers were, for the same income, much lower than that of farmers who sell their production, the gap has now narrowed. This coefficient, applicable to revenues received within the framework of integration, therefore no longer seems adapted to current production conditions and the initial objectives of the regulation. She would like to know if the Government is considering a review of the taxation system for these farms and in particular that of the multiplier coefficient.
Question· Question écrite13934open
France · National Assembly · 31 March 2026
Ms. Christine Le Nabour draws the attention of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industrial, Energy and Digital Sovereignty to the growing difficulties encountered by households in terms of residential mobility, in particular due to the impossibility of transferring a property loan from one property to another. Indeed, in a context of a significant increase in interest rates since 2022, many owners are today find themselves forced to abandon plans to move or adapt their homes, at the risk of suffering a significant deterioration in their purchasing power. Thus, borrowers who have taken out credit under historically favorable conditions are subject to significantly higher rates in the event of a new purchase, generating a significant and dissuasive additional monthly cost. Furthermore, this situation contributes to a greater blockage overall real estate market, characterized by a drop in the number of transactions and increased difficulties in accessing credit. As highlighted in a bill tabled in 2024, the generalization of the portability clause for real estate loans would make the market more fluid, secure residential pathways and limit the negative effects of rate fluctuations. This device would in fact offer the possibility to borrowers to maintain the initial conditions of their loan when acquiring a new property, while simplifying procedures and avoiding certain financial penalties. In this context, she asks him what the Government's intentions are regarding the resumption or support of a legislative initiative aimed at generalizing the portability of real estate loans and what measures it intends to take to remove the obstacles current residential mobility and support household purchasing power.
Question· Question écrite13893answered
France · National Assembly · 31 March 2026
Ms. Christine Le Nabour questions the Minister of Health, Families, Autonomy and People with Disabilities on Decree No. 2025-304 relating to the care of young children, which is scheduled to come into force on September 1, 2026. Early childhood professionals are warning about the consequences of this text, which would impose major human, organizational and financial constraints on micro-crèches. The evolution of the regulations regarding staff qualification as well as detached management time equivalent to 0.5 FTE per structure raise particular concern, in a context of national shortage of qualified professionals; these obligations seem difficult to apply in the short term, professionals underline the risk of closures of structures, therefore a reduction in the number of places available for families, in a situation that we already know is tense. These new obligations come into play in a degraded economic context for managers, marked by a continuous increase in constrained costs (salaries, energy, etc.), which weakens the financial balance of structures. In view of this feedback from the field, she questions him on the modalities of implementation of this decree and on possible support measures which would allow these structures to comply on time and failing that, if a postponement was considered; she emphasizes that these structures today constitute an essential link in the provision of care for young children, particularly in rural areas.
Question· Question écrite11443open
France · National Assembly · 9 December 2025
Mme Christine Le Nabour interroge M. le ministre du travail et des solidarités sur les conséquences de l'arrêté du 25 février 2025 relatif à l'évaluation des avantages en nature pour le calcul des cotisations de sécurité sociale des salariés affiliés au régime général et des salariés affiliés au régime agricole. Ce dernier augmente substantiellement les pourcentages d'évaluation forfaitaires des véhicules mis à disposition par l'employeur : 15 % du coût d'achat pour un véhicule de moins de 5 ans acheté (au lieu de 9 auparavant), 10 % du coût d'achat pour un véhicule de plus de 5 ans acheté (au lieu de 6 auparavant), 50 % du coût global annuel pour un véhicule loué (contre 30 % auparavant). Cette évolution entraîne une augmentation des charges salariales et de la fiscalité sur le revenu sans aucune augmentation de salaire dans les faits, ce qui se traduit par une baisse importante du pouvoir d'achat pour de nombreux commerciaux en France. L'attention de Mme la députée a été appelée sur des pertes significatives allant jusqu'à 1 800 euros par an. Elle rappelle que si l'utilisation de véhicules de fonction par certaines catégories professionnelles peut être interrogée, celle des commerciaux - bien que ne pouvant être que professionnelle - l'est principalement de fait. Par ailleurs, Mme la députée souligne que nombre de ces commerciaux ne pourront, à court terme, bénéficier de l'augmentation de l'abattement pour les véhicules électriques prévue dans ce même arrêté (70 % plafonné à 4 582 euros par an depuis le 1er février 2025, contre 50 % plafonné à 2000,30 euros par an auparavant - sous conditions d'éco-score) ; en effet, au vu des limites techniques qui sont celles des véhicules électriques aujourd'hui (autonomie, présence/disponibilité des bornes de recharges, temps de recharges, etc.) et ce malgré les progrès notables observés ces dernières années, les entreprises dont les commerciaux peuvent faire de 400 à 700 km par jour ne peuvent proposer ces véhicules verts à leurs salariés. Particulièrement sensible aux enjeux environnementaux, Mme la députée sait pouvoir compter sur l'engagement du Gouvernement pour s'inscrire dans une action efficace visant à lutter contre le réchauffement climatique ; si le verdissement des flottes d'entreprises est un objectif qu'elle partage, elle s'interroge sur une incitation qui se ferait aux dépens des salariés qui travaillent dans ces entreprises, lesquels ne disposent pas, de plus, d'un quelconque pouvoir de décision. Elle souligne que cette mesure, si elle devait être maintenue en l'état et au vu des éléments ci-dessus exposés, viendrait à être contreproductive à terme, quant au consentement à l'impôt comme à la vision constructive qui doit être celle de la France pour relever collectivement les défis environnementaux ; elle viendrait également en contradiction avec l'action gouvernementale menée depuis 2017, visant à toujours plus valoriser le travail. Mme la députée interroge donc M. le ministre sur une évolution règlementaire visant à corriger ces effets qui contreviennent à l'esprit des lois votées depuis 2017 et auxquelles elle a apporté sa voix.
Question· Question écrite11369answered
France · National Assembly · 2 December 2025
Mrs. Christine Le Nabour draws the attention of the Minister of Labor and Solidarity to the situation of the draft decree modifying article D. 5212-23 of the Labor Code, intended to perpetuate the deductibility of expenses incurred by companies within the framework of partnerships, by membership or agreement, with associations working on the training, guidance and professional integration of people with disabilities. This text, validated according to the information communicated by the general directorate of employment and professional training by the various consultative bodies planned (Acoss, CCMSA, CNNCEFP, CNCPH), was to come into force on January 1, 2025. However, despite a completed regulatory circuit and the absence of substantial modifications for several months, its signature remains pending without formal justification with the stakeholders concerned. This delay has a very concrete impact. The Arpejeh association, recognized as being of general interest and approved by the national education system, has noted since the beginning of the year the suspension or cessation of partnerships by more than 30 member companies representing 15.8% of its resources, or 172,000 euros. This contraction directly weakens the actions allowing each year more than 4,000 young people with disabilities to access internships, work-study contracts, job discovery forums and recruitment support. She asks him the reasons for blocking this text, although it is scheduled to come into force on January 1, 2025. She also wishes to know the firm timetable for its signature and publication in order to secure the continuity of integration actions as quickly as possible.
Question· Question écrite10415open
France · National Assembly · 21 October 2025
Ms. Christine Le Nabour draws the attention of the Minister Delegate to the Minister of Health, Families, Autonomy and Disabled People, responsible for autonomy and disabled people, to the disparities observed in the application of the rules relating to the allowance for disabled adults (AAH) and complementary solidarity health insurance (C2S) by the family allowance funds (CAF). The legal and regulatory framework sets yet precise allocation criteria: for the AAH, articles L. 821-1 et seq. of the social security code define the eligibility conditions relating to the recognition of a level of incapacity, the resource ceiling and the terms of reduction, while for the C2S, articles L. 861-1 et seq. provide for automatic opening of the right depending on residence and resources, reinforced by decree no. 2025-588 of June 28, 2025 which establishes that any beneficiary of the AAH is automatically eligible for it. However, in the field, it is noted that certain CAFs use different reference periods for the examination of resources, switching more or less quickly from year N-2 to year N, that the application of the reductions provided for by the texts is treated in a heterogeneous manner and that the automatic link between the AAH and the C2S is not systematically respected, some funds still requiring additional supporting documents which are not provided for by law. These discrepancies lead to breakdowns in equality between beneficiaries depending on their place of residence, with direct consequences on access to the rights of people with disabilities, which undermines the principle of equality before the law and weakens the readability of social law. She asks him what measures the Government intends to implement to guarantee national harmonization of practices and uniform interpretation of texts, whether clear and binding instructions have been transmitted by the national family allowance fund, how their compliance is monitored and whether regulatory or legislative clarification is envisaged in order to definitively secure the rights of AAH beneficiaries and their automatic access to C2S, in accordance with the spirit of the 2025 decree.
Question· Question écrite10383open
France · National Assembly · 21 October 2025
Ms. Christine Le Nabour draws the attention of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Industrial, Energy and Digital Sovereignty to the consequences of the recent case law of the Council of State of April 26, 2024 (No. 476025), relating to the determination of the rental value of commercial premises. By this decision, the Council of State ruled that exterior surfaces, when accessible to the public and allocated for sale, must be fully integrated into the weighted surface area used to calculate the cadastral rental value, without application of a reduction coefficient, even when they are neither covered nor closed. This interpretation leads to a reclassification of numerous exterior areas, such as materials yards, exhibition spaces or outdoor sales areas, as commercial spaces in their own right. The tax consequences are particularly burdensome for DIY stores, materials merchants, garden centers and even car dealerships, whose business property contribution (CFE) and property tax may be significantly increased following this revaluation. Many establishments are currently undergoing significant tax adjustments, even though these exterior surfaces do not offer the same operating conditions or profitability than an indoor sales area. She asks him if the Government intends to take measures to mitigate the effects of this case law for the companies concerned, or to specify, by regulatory or doctrinal means, the methods for taking into account exterior surfaces in the calculation of the rental value, in order to avoid tax distortions between businesses with covered surfaces and those whose activity is carried out in the open air.
Question· Question écrite5525answered
France · National Assembly · 1 April 2025
Ms. Christine Le Nabour draws the attention of the Minister of Labor, Health, Solidarity and Families to the economic difficulties encountered by the sector of integration through economic activity (IAE), exacerbated by the integration of CDDIs within the Ségur perimeter. If the salary increase of IAE professionals is a crucial issue to improve the attractiveness of these professions, it has not been compensated by the authorities public, despite repeated requests from federations and unions. This situation resulted in an additional cost of nearly 19 million euros for structures that responded to a national survey, threatening their economic viability, with forecast losses of up to 1.97 million euros. The extension of salary increases to employees on permanent contracts, without financial compensation, aggravates this situation and endangers permanent jobs and services provided to people in integration. Faced with this crisis, certain structures are considering job cuts, changes to collective agreements, or even the cessation of activity. The question of remuneration of employees on permanent contracts must be addressed in a global approach, taking into account the economic balance of the structures and their specificities. He therefore asks her what measures she taken to guarantee compensation for the salary increase and financially secure the sector, especially since the last budget has already led to a reduction in allocated credits.
Question· Question écrite5235answered
France · National Assembly · 25 March 2025
Ms. Christine Le Nabour draws the attention of the Minister Delegate to the Prime Minister, responsible for equality between women and men and the fight against discrimination, to the opening of the number 3919 to male victims of domestic violence. Since 2014, the 3919 number has been a listening and guidance system for women victims of domestic violence. This service, accessible 24/7, has been an essential tool to support victims in the context of a health crisis, with more than 112,000 calls received in 2023, including nearly 74% for violence against women. However, although women constitute the majority of victims of domestic violence, it is also essential to recognize the reality of violence against men, whether it is violence within a heterosexual or homosexual couple. According to ministry data from the inside, in 2022, around 14% of victims of domestic violence were men, a figure which cannot be ignored in the overall treatment of domestic violence. The 3919 number plays a crucial role as the first point of contact for victims, allowing rapid referral to suitable solutions. However, in its current state, it does not support male victims of domestic violence, creating thus a form of imbalance in the support of victims. In order to ensure a comprehensive response to domestic violence, it seems essential to extend this system to men and to integrate into its governance associations specializing in their support, in addition to appropriate training for listeners. As part of the 2025 finance bill, the MP tabled an amendment to this effect. She questions him therefore on its desire to extend the number 3919 to men victims of domestic violence, in the interest of equal listening and support.
Question· Question écrite17890open
France · National Assembly · 21 May 2024
Ms. Christine Le Nabour questions the Minister of Labor, Health and Solidarity on the implementation of financial assistance dedicated to professional high school students to finance their driving license. This aid, equivalent to 500 euros, is already accessible to apprentices and is very successful. This is why the Government announced in June 2023 that this initiative would be extended to vocational high schools. However, several months after this announcement, the decree necessary for the application of this measure has still not been published. In addition, vocational high schools have not received any concrete instructions for its implementation, thus leaving families and establishments uncertain about the procedure to follow. The MP therefore requests clarification from the Government on the steps to be taken so that high school students professionals can benefit from this driving license assistance. In addition, she wishes to obtain clarification on the date of application of this measure, due to an apparent contradiction in communications from the Government, which mentions different dates for the 2023 and 2024 academic years.
Question· Question écrite15088answered
France · National Assembly · 13 February 2024
Ms. Christine Le Nabour draws the attention of the Minister of National Education and Youth to a problem hindering the participation of children with disabilities in school activities, particularly in connection with the inconsistency concerning the approval requirement for parents wishing to take on the role of volunteer chaperone. It is noted that on many occasions, refusal of approval prevents parents from contributing to the inclusion of their disabled child in certain aquatic school activities, despite the fact that this approval is normally intended for accompanying persons managing a group in the water. Furthermore, reading the memo of February 28, 2022 reveals that “adult volunteers providing support for collective life, but not involved in a teaching activity, are not subject to prior approval national education services. However, their participation is subject to prior authorization from the school principal. In any case, a volunteer chaperone cannot find himself isolated with a student. » This provision makes it impossible for the child to participate in collective activity. The MP requests clarification from the Official Bulletin on this point, since parents only intervene with their child may now be subject to the need for approval. This gap creates a situation of inconsistency and a form of discrimination. With a view to an inclusive society for which the Government has been working since 2017 through a proactive policy in which the MP is fully involved, she questions the measures envisaged to resolve this inconsistency and guarantee fair access to activities. educational opportunities for all children, regardless of their disability, making it possible to put an end to what can legitimately appear as discrimination.
Question· Question écrite705answered
France · National Assembly · 9 August 2022
Ms. Christine Le Nabour draws the attention of the Secretary of State to the Minister of the Armed Forces and the Minister of National Education and Youth, responsible for youth and universal national service, to the exceptional aid of 200 euros for the certificate of aptitude for facilitator functions (BAFA). This aid was communicated as a deduction from the registration fees for an in-depth or qualification session at the BAFA, carried out between January 1 and December 31, 2022; aid granted without means conditions. Families challenged the MP in her constituency, telling her that it had not been deducted, forcing them to advance the promised 200 euros. Ultimately and after various exchanges with approved training organizations as well as with the competent decentralized State services, the Member wonders about the adequacy between the envelope allocated to the concrete implementation of this aid and the real needs in the territories. She underlines that behind these needs, there are as many young people who wish to get involved in this sector, quickly operational, to respond to a known demand: from 53,000 BAFA holders in 2011, France had only 43,000 in 2019. A drop to which was added the covid crisis which prevented the holding of sessions training. This results in recruitment difficulties for a majority of employing structures, particularly in animation. The MP will remind you that this certificate is essential to work in a leisure center or summer camp. In view of this feedback, it would like to know what measures are being considered to ensure the concrete implementation of this promise and correct the situations already impacted.
Question· Question écrite36987open
France · National Assembly · 2 September 2021
Ms. Christine Cloarec-Le Nabour draws the attention of the Minister of the Economy, Finance and Recovery to the allocation of the solidarity fund to businesses and in particular to restaurateurs and traders regarding their eligibility in relation to two criteria: turnover and the number of businesses owned by the said business manager. Indeed, in the constituency of the MP, two restaurateurs and two traders are find themselves in a very difficult financial situation, jeopardizing the sustainability of their businesses following government measures taken to stop the spread of the coronavirus. In this case, the two restaurants were never able to open and therefore recorded no turnover. They are therefore, today, not eligible for the solidarity fund, despite expenses incurred and loans to be repaid. Another case, a The trader of a bar-grocery store recorded a drop in turnover but it was insufficient to benefit from this same fund, even though the margin generated by the grocery store is much lower than that of the bar activity which has been banned for 4 months. He therefore sees himself today obliged to subscribe to an EMP to fill this gap. Latest example, a trader with six clothing sales outlets only received the solidarity fund for his company alone, i.e. 1,500 euros per month during the first confinement, and 10,000 euros in October 2020. Although the latter has evolved as a percentage of turnover since December 2020, the low amounts paid over these 3 months weaken its structure over time. She would like to know whether, in view of these situations, it may be possible to adapt certain measures, to make them retroactive under conditions, or whether aid financial are envisaged in order to allow these companies which have invested in the territories to continue their activity after the crisis.
Question· Question écrite12042open
France · National Assembly · 8 November 2018
Ms. Christine Cloarec-Le Nabour questions the Minister of Solidarity and Health about the care of patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis, more commonly called chronic fatigue syndrome. Recognized by the World Health Organization as a serious neurological disease since 1992, myalgic encephalomyelitis is an orphan condition which affects between 150 and 300,000 people in France, the majority of whom are women. For the affected people, this syndrome causes many difficulties: great mental and physical fatigue after each effort, even permanent fatigue, pain in the muscles and bones, headaches, short-term memory problems, discomfort after low-intensity effort, or even difficulty concentrating. On May 27, 2018, the first national day of action for the recognition of this disease took place. Organized by an alliance of associations, this event aimed to raise awareness and give visibility to the suffering of patients. It was also a question of promoting biomedical research and clinical trials in favor of this rare disease, without treatment, unknown to caregivers and which puts lives on hold (professional careers stopped, family lives disrupted). Faced with the difficulties encountered in their daily, and in the absence of a health protocol recognized in France, that is to say in the absence of appropriate care and structures, she would like to know how the public authorities plan to support patients and their loved ones.
Question· Question écrite391open
France · National Assembly · 7 January 2017
Mrs Christine Cloarec-Le Nabour questions the Secretary of State, attached to the Prime Minister, responsible for disabled people, on the weakening of the financial situation of disabled people who move. Indeed, the application of article L. 122-2 of the social action and families code leads to a breakdown in the care of the people concerned. During a waiting period of three months of habitual residence or acquisition of emergency home, in the installation department, disabled people cannot benefit from payment of the disability compensation benefit or from the release of housing development aid. The fight against precariousness and the improvement of the daily lives of disabled people being a stated priority of the President of the Republic and the Government, she wishes to know whether a revision of this provision is envisaged.
Question· Question écrite389open
France · National Assembly · 7 January 2017
Ms. Christine Cloarec-Le Nabour alerts the Secretary of State, attached to the Prime Minister, responsible for disabled people, to the difficulties encountered by people with disabilities in organizing their travel when they are outside their usual place of residence. The requirement of domicile in the territory of the financier to be able to travel in transport on demand, in transport for people with reduced mobility door-to-door or alternative transport (on regular lines not made accessible due to proven technical impossibility) constitutes a barrier to their mobility. She asks him if changes are being considered for the benefit of disabled people.
Question· Question écrite388open
France · National Assembly · 7 January 2017
Ms. Christine Cloarec-Le Nabour alerts the Secretary of State, attached to the Prime Minister, responsible for disabled people, to the drop in the number of territorial medical advisors examining applications for compensation for disability - human aid. In the Pays de Vitré-Porte de Bretagne (department of Ille-et-Vilaine), only one doctor is responsible for this mission, compared to two previously. This situation forces nurses to gerontology to compensate for this lack of personnel even though this does not fall within their missions and they do not always have the necessary qualifications to properly assess requests. She asks him for his opinion on this matter.