Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · EU

Agriculture

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

37 records in EU in 2019

All countriesSearch this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0360_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 19 décembre 2019.#Cargill Deutschland GmbH contre Hauptzollamt Krefeld.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Règlement (UE) no 1360/2013 – Agriculture – Organisation commune des marchés – Secteur du sucre – Cotisation à la production – Effet utile – Droit au remboursement des sommes indûment payées – Applicabilité des règles nationales relatives aux délais de prescription – Principe d’effectivité.#Affaire C-360/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0477_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Exportslachterij J. Gosschalk en Zn. BV and Others v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#References for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 — Article 27(1) and (4) — Points 1 and 2 of Annex VI — Official controls on feed and food — Financing — Fees payable in relation to official controls — Calculation — Concept of ‘staff involved in the official controls’ — Inclusion of administrative and support staff — Possibility of charging for quarter-hour periods requested by the slaughterhouse for the purposes of official controls but not worked — Conditions.#Joined Cases C-477/18 and C-478/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0386_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Coöperatieve Producentenorganisatie en Beheersgroep Texel UA v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common fisheries policy — Regulations (EU) Nos 1303/2013, 1379/2013 and 508/2014 — Fishery and aquaculture producer organisations — Production and marketing plans — Financial support for the preparation and implementation of those plans — Conditions of eligibility of costs — Discretion of the Member States — No possibility under national law to apply for financial support.#Case C-386/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0360decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Cargill Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Krefeld.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 1360/2013 — Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Sugar sector — Production levy — Effectiveness — Right to reimbursement of sums unduly paid — Applicability of national rules on limitation periods — Principle of effectiveness.#Case C-360/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0386decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Coöperatieve Producentenorganisatie en Beheersgroep Texel UA v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common fisheries policy — Regulations (EU) Nos 1303/2013, 1379/2013 and 508/2014 — Fishery and aquaculture producer organisations — Production and marketing plans — Financial support for the preparation and implementation of those plans — Conditions of eligibility of costs — Discretion of the Member States — No possibility under national law to apply for financial support.#Case C-386/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0477decided

Arrest van het Hof (Vierde kamer) van 19 december 2019.#Exportslachterij J. Gosschalk en Zn. BV tegen Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Verordening (EG) nr. 882/2004 – Artikel 27, leden 1 en 4 – Bijlage VI, punten 1 en 2 – Officiële controles op diervoeders en levensmiddelen – Financiering – Vergoedingen die verschuldigd zijn voor officiële controles – Berekening – Begrip ‚personeel dat betrokken is bij de officiële controles’ – Administratief en ondersteunend personeel daaronder begrepen – Mogelijkheid om door het slachthuis ten behoeve van officiële controles aangevraagde maar niet-gewerkte kwartieren in rekening te brengen – Voorwaarden.#Zaak C-477/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0423_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 17 octobre 2019.#Südzucker AG contre Hauptzollamt Karlsruhe.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Agriculture – Organisation commune des marchés – Règlement (CE) no 967/2006 – Article 3, paragraphe 2 – Sucre – Prélèvement sur l’excédent – Délai de communication du prélèvement total à payer – Délai maximal pour une rectification a posteriori – Principes de proportionnalité, de sécurité juridique et de protection de la confiance légitime.#Affaire C-423/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0189_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 16 octobre 2019.#Glencore Agriculture Hungary Kft. contre Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Taxe sur la valeur ajoutée (TVA) – Directive 2006/112/CE – Articles 167 et 168 – Droit à déduction de la TVA – Refus – Fraude – Administration des preuves – Principe du respect des droits de la défense – Droit d’être entendu – Accès au dossier – Article 47 de la charte des droits fondamentaux de l’Union européenne – Contrôle juridictionnel effectif – Principe d’égalité des armes – Principe du contradictoire – Réglementation ou pratique nationale selon laquelle, lors d’une vérification du droit à déduction de la TVA exercé par un assujetti, l’administration fiscale est liée par les constatations de fait et les qualifications juridiques qui ont été effectuées par elle dans le cadre de procédures administratives connexes auxquelles cet assujetti n’était pas partie.#Affaire C-189/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0189decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 October 2019.#Glencore Agriculture Hungary Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC– Articles 167 and 168 — Right to deduct VAT — Refusal — Fraud — Taking of evidence — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Access to the file — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Effective judicial review — Principle of equality of arms — Inter partes principle — National legislation or practice according to which, when checking the right to deduct VAT exercised by a taxable person, the tax authorities are bound by the findings of fact and the legal classifications which they have made in the context of related administrative procedures to which that taxable person was not a party.#Case C-189/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0335_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 October 2019.#Help - Hilfe zur Selbsthilfe eV v European Commission.#Arbitration clause — Food security programme for very food insecure farming households in Zimbabwe (ECHO/ZWE/BUD/2009/02002) — Reclassification of the action — Audit reports — Audit report of the Court of Auditors — OLAF Report — Reimbursement of the sums paid — Proportionality — Legitimate expectations.#Case T-335/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 October 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0335decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 October 2019.#Help - Hilfe zur Selbsthilfe eV v European Commission.#Arbitration clause — Food security programme for very food insecure farming households in Zimbabwe (ECHO/ZWE/BUD/2009/02002) — Reclassification of the action — Audit reports — Audit report of the Court of Auditors — OLAF Report — Reimbursement of the sums paid — Proportionality — Legitimate expectations.#Case T-335/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 October 2019

Report· DCCELEX 52019DC0433open

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL On the exercise of the power to adopt delegated acts conferred on the Commission pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008, Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 637/2008 and Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009, Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007

European Union · European Commission · 27 September 2019

Report· DCCELEX 52019DC0436open

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL On the exercise of the power to adopt delegated acts conferred on the Commission pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 228/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 March 2013 laying down specific measures for agriculture in the outermost regions of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 247/2006 and pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 229/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 March 2013 laying down specific measures for agriculture in favour of the smaller Aegean islands and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1405/2006

European Union · European Commission · 27 September 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0785decided

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 26 September 2019.#GAEC Jeanningros v Institut national de l’origine et de la qualité (INAO) and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs — Protected designation of origin ‘Comté’ — Minor amendment to a product specification — Action before national courts contesting an application for an amendment — Case-law of the national courts according to which the action becomes devoid of purpose when the European Commission has approved the amendment — Effective judicial protection — Obligation to rule on the action.#Case C-785/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 September 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0477decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 18 September 2019.#Exportslachterij J. Gosschalk en Zn. BV and Others v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven.#References for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 — Article 27(1) and (4) — Points 1 and 2 of Annex VI — Official controls on feed and food — Financing — Fees payable in relation to official controls — Calculation — Concept of ‘staff involved in the official controls’ — Inclusion of administrative and support staff — Possibility of charging for quarter-hour periods requested by the slaughterhouse for the purposes of official controls but not worked — Conditions.#Joined Cases C-477/18 and C-478/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 September 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0360decided

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 29 July 2019.#Cargill Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Krefeld.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 1360/2013 — Agriculture — Common organisation of the markets — Sugar sector — Production levy — Effectiveness — Right to reimbursement of sums unduly paid — Applicability of national rules on limitation periods — Principle of effectiveness.#Case C-360/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 July 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0262decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 July 2019.#RM and SN v Agrotiki Trapeza Ellados.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Polymeles Protodikeio Athinon.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State aid — Granting of mortgages guaranteeing bank loans awarded to farmers — National legislation imposing a cap on the amount for which mortgages may be granted — Insufficient explanation of the reasons which led the referring court to question the interpretation of EU law — Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-262/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0386decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 26 June 2019.#Coöperatieve Producentenorganisatie en Beheersgroep Texel UA v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common fisheries policy — Regulations (EU) Nos 1303/2013, 1379/2013 and 508/2014 — Fishery and aquaculture producer organisations — Production and marketing plans — Financial support for the preparation and implementation of those plans — Conditions of eligibility of costs — Discretion of the Member States — No possibility under national law to apply for financial support.#Case C-386/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 June 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0505_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 13 juin 2019.#Copebi SCA contre Établissement national des produits de l'agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Aides d’État – Décision 2009/402/CE – Plans de campagne dans le secteur des fruits et légumes mis à exécution par la République française – Constat de l’incompatibilité de l’aide – Ordre de récupération – Champ d’application de la décision – Comités économiques agricoles.#Affaire C-505/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0505decided

Arrêt de la Cour (cinquième chambre) du 13 juin 2019.#COPEBI SCA contre Etablissement national des produits de l'agriculture et de la mer (FranceAgriMer).#Renvoi préjudiciel – Aides d’État – Décision 2009/402/CE – Plans de campagne dans le secteur des fruits et légumes mis à exécution par la République française – Constat de l’incompatibilité de l’aide – Ordre de récupération – Champ d’application de la décision – Comités économiques agricoles.#Affaire C-505/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0189decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 5 June 2019.#Glencore Agriculture Hungary Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC– Articles 167 and 168 — Right to deduct VAT — Refusal — Fraud — Taking of evidence — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Access to the file — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Effective judicial review — Principle of equality of arms — Inter partes principle — National legislation or practice according to which, when checking the right to deduct VAT exercised by a taxable person, the tax authorities are bound by the findings of fact and the legal classifications which they have made in the context of related administrative procedures to which that taxable person was not a party.#Case C-189/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 June 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0614_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 2 mai 2019.#Fundación Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Protegida Queso Manchego contre Industrial Quesera Cuquerella SL et Juan Ramón Cuquerella Montagud.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Agriculture – Règlement (CE) no 510/2006 – Article 13, paragraphe 1, sous b) – Protection des indications géographiques et des appellations d’origine des produits agricoles et des denrées alimentaires – Fromage manchego (“queso manchego”) – Utilisation de signes pouvant évoquer la région à laquelle est liée l’appellation d’origine protégée (AOP) – Notion de “consommateur moyen normalement informé et raisonnablement attentif et avisé” – Consommateurs européens ou consommateurs de l’État membre où le produit visé par l’AOP est fabriqué et majoritairement consommé.#Affaire C-614/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 May 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0614decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 May 2019.#Fundación Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Protegida Queso Manchego v Industrial Quesera Cuquerella SL and Juan Ramón Cuquerella Montagud.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 — Article 13(1)(b) — Protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs — Manchego cheese (‘queso manchego’) — Use of signs capable of evoking the region with which a protected designation of origin (PDO) is associated — Concept of the ‘average consumer who is reasonably well informed and reasonably observant and circumspect’ — European consumers or consumers of the Member State in which the product covered by the PDO is made and mainly consumed.#Case C-614/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 May 2019

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2019-001118answered

EU agriculture policy

European Union · European Parliament · 28 February 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0497_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 February 2019.#Oeuvre d’assistance aux bêtes d’abattoirs (OABA) v Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 13 TFEU — Animal welfare — Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 — Protection of animals at the time of killing — Particular methods of slaughter prescribed by religious rites — Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 — Articles 3 and 14(1)(b)(viii) — Compatibility with organic production — Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 — First paragraph of Article 57 — Organic production logo of the European Union.#Case C-497/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0497decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 February 2019.#Oeuvre d’assistance aux bêtes d’abattoirs (OABA) v Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d'appel de Versailles.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 13 TFEU — Animal welfare — Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 — Protection of animals at the time of killing — Particular methods of slaughter prescribed by religious rites — Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 — Articles 3 and 14(1)(b)(viii) — Compatibility with organic production — Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 — First paragraph of Article 57 — Organic production logo of the European Union.#Case C-497/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0614decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 10 January 2019.#Fundación Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Protegida Queso Manchego v Industrial Quesera Cuquerella SL and Juan Ramón Cuquerella Montagud.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 — Article 13(1)(b) — Protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs — Manchego cheese (‘queso manchego’) — Use of signs capable of evoking the region with which a protected designation of origin (PDO) is associated — Concept of the ‘average consumer who is reasonably well informed and reasonably observant and circumspect’ — European consumers or consumers of the Member State in which the product covered by the PDO is made and mainly consumed.#Case C-614/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 January 2019