Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · EU

Agriculture

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

37 records in EU in 2020

All countriesSearch this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0490_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Syndicat interprofessionnel de défense du fromage Morbier v Société Fromagère du Livradois SAS.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs – Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 – Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 – Article 13(1)(d) – Practice liable to mislead the consumer as to the true origin of the product – Reproduction of the shape or appearance of a product which has a protected name – Protected designation of origin (PDO) ‘Morbier’.#Case C-490/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2020

Record· TOCELEX 62020TO0350_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Lukáš Wagenknecht v European Commission.#Action for failure to act – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Combating fraud – Meetings of the College of European Commissioners and its President with the representative of the Czech Republic – Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027 – Financial regulation – Direct payments from the EU budget in favour of farmers – Alleged conflict of interest of the Prime Minister of the Czech Republic – Alleged failure to act by the Commission – Article 130(1) of the Rules of Procedure – Interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Definition of the Commission’s position – Inadmissibility.#Case T-350/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0216decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#WQ v Land Berlin.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes – Basic payment scheme – First sentence of Article 24(2) – Concept of ‘eligible hectare at the farmer’s disposal’ – Unlawful use of the area concerned by a third party – Article 32(2)(b)(ii) – Application for activation of payment entitlements for an afforested area – Concept of ‘area which gave a right to payments in 2008’ – Single payment scheme or single area payment scheme.#Case C-216/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0128decided

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 17 December 2020.#Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale di Catania v Assessorato della Salute della Regione Siciliana.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Agriculture sector – Slaughtering of animals affected by infectious diseases – Compensation for farmers – Notification and standstill requirements – Article 108(3) TFEU – Concepts of ‘existing aid’ and ‘new aid’ – Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 – Exemptions by categories of aid – Regulation (EU) No 702/2014 – De minimis aid – Regulation (EU) No 1408/2013.#Case C-128/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2020

Record· TOCELEX 62020TO0350decided

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Lukáš Wagenknecht v European Commission.#Action for failure to act – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Combating fraud – Meetings of the College of European Commissioners and its President with the representative of the Czech Republic – Multiannual Financial Framework 2021-2027 – Financial regulation – Direct payments from the EU budget in favour of farmers – Alleged conflict of interest of the Prime Minister of the Czech Republic – Alleged failure to act by the Commission – Article 130(1) of the Rules of Procedure – Interest in bringing proceedings – Locus standi – Definition of the Commission’s position – Inadmissibility.#Case T-350/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0490decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 December 2020.#Syndicat interprofessionnel de défense du fromage Morbier v Société Fromagère du Livradois SAS.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs – Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 – Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 – Article 13(1)(d) – Practice liable to mislead the consumer as to the true origin of the product – Reproduction of the shape or appearance of a product which has a protected name – Protected designation of origin (PDO) ‘Morbier’.#Case C-490/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 December 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0815decided

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 9 December 2020.#Natumi GmbH v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture and fisheries – Organic production and labelling of organic products – Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 – Article 19(2) – Articles 21 and 23 – Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 – Article 27(1) – Article 28 – Annex IX, point 1.3 – Processing of organic food – Non-organic ingredients of agricultural origin – Lithothamnium calcareum alga – Powder obtained by cleaning, grinding and drying the sediment of that alga – Classification – Use in organic foodstuffs for the purpose of calcium enrichment – Authorisation – Conditions.#Case C-815/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 December 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0361decided

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 25 November 2020.#De Ruiter vof v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common agricultural policy – Support scheme for farmers – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 97(1) and Article 99(1) – Direct payments – Reductions and exclusions in the event of non-compliance with the cross-compliance rules – Determination of the year to be taken into account in order to calculate the percentage reduction – Proportionate, effective and dissuasive penalties – Implementing Regulation (EU) No 809/2014 – Article 73(4), first subparagraph, point (a).#Case C-361/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 November 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0526_SUMdecided

Presuda Suda (treće vijeće) od 1. listopada 2020.#Entoma SAS protiv Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances i Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation.#Zahtjev za prethodnu odluku – Sigurnost hrane – Nova hrana i sastojci nove hrane – Uredba (EZ) br. 258/97 – Članak 1. stavak 2. točka (e) – Pojam ,sastojci hrane izolirani iz životinja’ – Stavljanje na tržište – Cijeli kukci namijenjeni za prehranu ljudi.#Predmet C-526/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0526decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 October 2020.#Entoma SAS v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances and Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Food safety – Novel foods and novel food ingredients – Regulation (EC) No 258/97 – Article 1(2)(e) – Concept of ‘food ingredients isolated from animals’ – Placing on the market – Whole insects intended for human consumption.#Case C-526/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 October 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0212_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 17 septembre 2020.#Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation contre Compagnie des pêches de Saint-Malo.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Aides d’État – Notion – Naufrage du navire pétrolier Erika – Régime d’aides en faveur d’entreprises d’aquaculture et de pêche – Décision déclarant le régime d’aides en partie incompatible avec le marché commun et ordonnant la récupération des aides versées – Appréciation de validité Examen d’office Recevabilité Défaut d’introduction d’un recours en annulation par la défenderesse au principal Allègement de charges sociales – Cotisations salariales – Avantage – Détermination du débiteur de l’obligation de restitution.#Affaire C-212/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 September 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0212decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 17 September 2020.#Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation v Compagnie des pêches de Saint-Malo.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Concept – Wreck of the oil tanker Erika – Aid scheme for aquaculture and fisheries undertakings – Decision declaring the aid scheme partly incompatible with the common market and ordering the recovery of the aid paid out – Assessment of validity – Examination of the Court’s own motion – Admissibility – Failure to bring an action for annulment by the defendant in the main proceedings – Reduction in social security contributions – Employees’ contributions – Advantage – Question of who is liable for repayment.#Case C-212/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 September 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0626_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 September 2020.#Republic of Slovenia v European Commission.#Agriculture – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Designations of origin in the wine sector – Wine labelling – Use of the name of a wine grape variety which contains or consists of a protected designation of origin – Prohibition – Exception – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1353 – Inclusion of the name of the ‘Teran’ wine grape variety in the list set out in Part A of Annex XV to Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 – Retroactive effect from the date of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union – Slovenian protected designation of origin ‘Teran’ – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Proportionality – Right to property – Act concerning the conditions of accession of Croatia to the European Union – Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making – Institutional balance.#Case T-626/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 September 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0626decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 September 2020.#Republic of Slovenia v European Commission.#Agriculture – Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Designations of origin in the wine sector – Wine labelling – Use of the name of a wine grape variety which contains or consists of a protected designation of origin – Prohibition – Exception – Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1353 – Inclusion of the name of the ‘Teran’ wine grape variety in the list set out in Part A of Annex XV to Regulation (EC) No 607/2009 – Retroactive effect from the date of the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union – Slovenian protected designation of origin ‘Teran’ – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Proportionality – Right to property – Act concerning the conditions of accession of Croatia to the European Union – Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making – Institutional balance.#Case T-626/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 September 2020

Record· TOCELEX 62018TO0755_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 August 2020.#FL Brüterei M-V GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Organic farming – Livestock production – Exceptional production rules applicable in case of non-availability of organic farm inputs – Use of non-organic animals – Extension of the period of application of the exceptional production rules – Lack of direct concern – No sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-755/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 August 2020

Record· TOCELEX 62018TO0755decided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 20 August 2020.#FL Brüterei M-V GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment and for damages – Organic farming – Livestock production – Exceptional production rules applicable in case of non-availability of organic farm inputs – Use of non-organic animals – Extension of the period of application of the exceptional production rules – Lack of direct concern – No sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-755/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 August 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0526decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 9 July 2020.#Entoma SAS v Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances and Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Food safety – Novel foods and novel food ingredients – Regulation (EC) No 258/97 – Article 1(2)(e) – Concept of ‘food ingredients isolated from animals’ – Placing on the market – Whole insects intended for human consumption.#Case C-526/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0707decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Tilly-Sabco v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Agriculture – Export refunds – Poultrymeat – Regulation (EU) 2018/1277 adopted following the annulment of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 689/2013 by a judgment of the Court of Justice – Competence of the author of the act – Abuse of process – Obligation to state reasons – Non-contractual liability – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Damage.#Case T-707/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 April 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0707_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 April 2020.#Tilly-Sabco v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Agriculture – Export refunds – Poultrymeat – Regulation (EU) 2018/1277 adopted following the annulment of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 689/2013 by a judgment of the Court of Justice – Competence of the author of the act – Abuse of process – Obligation to state reasons – Non-contractual liability – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Damage.#Case T-707/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 April 2020

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-9-2020-001450answered

Urban agriculture

European Union · European Parliament · 9 March 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0212decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pitruzzella delivered on 5 March 2020.#Ministre de l'Agriculture et de l'Alimentation v Compagnie des pêches de Saint-Malo.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Concept – Wreck of the oil tanker Erika – Aid scheme for aquaculture and fisheries undertakings – Decision declaring the aid scheme partly incompatible with the common market and ordering the recovery of the aid paid out – Assessment of validity – Examination of the Court’s own motion – Admissibility – Failure to bring an action for annulment by the defendant in the main proceedings – Reduction in social security contributions – Employees’ contributions – Advantage – Question of who is liable for repayment.#Case C-212/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 March 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0785_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 29 janvier 2020.#GAEC Jeanningros contre Institut national de l’origine et de la qualité (INAO) e.a.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Agriculture – Protection des indications géographiques et des appellations d’origine des produits agricoles et des denrées alimentaires – Appellation d’origine protégée “Comté” – Modification mineure du cahier des charges d’un produit – Demande de modification faisant l’objet d’un recours devant les juridictions nationales – Jurisprudence des juridictions nationales selon laquelle le recours devient sans objet lorsque la Commission européenne a approuvé la modification – Protection juridictionnelle effective – Obligation de statuer sur le recours.#Affaire C-785/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 January 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0785decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 January 2020.#GAEC Jeanningros v Institut national de l’origine et de la qualité (INAO) and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs — Protected designation of origin ‘Comté’ — Minor amendment to a product specification — Action before national courts contesting an application for an amendment — Case-law of the national courts according to which the action becomes devoid of purpose when the European Commission has approved the amendment — Effective judicial protection — Obligation to rule on the action.#Case C-785/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 January 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0814_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (septième chambre) du 22 janvier 2020.#Ursa Major Services BV contre Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Politique commune de la pêche – Règlement (CE) no 1198/2006 – Article 55, paragraphe 1 – Contribution financière du Fonds européen pour la pêche (FEP) – Éligibilité des dépenses – Condition – Dépense ayant été effectivement payée par les bénéficiaires – Notion.#Affaire C-814/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 January 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0814decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 January 2020.#Ursa Major Services BV v Minister van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common fisheries policy — Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 — Article 55(1) — Financial contribution by the European Fisheries Fund (EFF) — Eligibility of expenditure — Condition — Expenditure actually paid by the beneficiaries — Meaning.#Case C-814/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 January 2020