Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.
Records
Question· Written questionUIN 14055answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, to what extent their Department makes use of artificial intelligence in the implementation of its policies; and how much was spent from their Department’s budget on artificial in
Question· Written questionUIN 14056answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, to what extent their Department makes use of artificial intelligence in the implementation of its policies; and how much was spent from their Department’s budget on artificial intelligence in each of the last thr
Question· Written questionUIN 14047answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, to what extent their Department makes use of artificial intelligence in the implementation of its policies; and how much was spent from their Department’s budget on artificial intelligence in each
Question· Written questionUIN 14043answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, to what extent their Department makes use of artificial intelligence in the implementation of its policies; and how much was spent from their Department’s budget on artificial intellig
Question· Written questionUIN 14044answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for International Trade, to what extent their Department makes use of artificial intelligence in the implementation of its policies; and how much was spent from their Department’s budget on artificial intelligence in each of
Question· Written questionUIN 14049answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, to what extent their Department makes use of artificial intelligence in the implementation of its policies; and how much was spent from their Department’s budget on artificia
Question· Written questionUIN 14041answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 10 June 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, to what extent their Department makes use of artificial intelligence in the implementation of its policies; and how much was spent from their Department’s budget on artificial intelligen
Bill· SS. 2024 (117th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 10 June 2021
Filter Bubble Transparency Act This bill establishes requirements for large online platforms that use algorithms applying artificial intelligence or machine learning to user-specific data to determine the manner in which content is displayed to users. Specifically, if an online platform applies such techniques to user-specific data that is not expressly provided by the user, the platform must (1) notify users that the platform uses such data, and (2) make a version of the platform available that uses only user-specific data that has been expressly provided by the user and which enables users to switch between the two platforms. These requirements do not apply to search engines operated by downstream providers with fewer than 1,000 employees and that have an agreement to access an index of web pages from an upstream provider. However, the bill requires such upstream providers to make their algorithm available to downstream providers as part of such an agreement.
Record· Brief regering2021Z10411concluded
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 10 June 2021
Voortgang AI en algoritmen
Question· Written questionUIN 13184answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 June 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, whether the Government is seeking international regulatory standards and safeguards on the development of artificial intelligence.
Question· Written questionUIN 13183answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 June 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether he is taking steps to review intellectual property legislation as it relates to the protection of (a) artificial intelligence technology and (b) inventions made by artific
Question· Written questionUIN 13182answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 June 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, whether the Government has a strategy to help ensure that the UK becomes a world leader in (a) research and development, (b) regulation and (c) safe adoption of artificial intelli
Question· Written questionUIN 12179answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 8 June 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, for which social security benefits her Department is using artificial intelligence to assist in the (a) processing and (b) auditing of applications; and what plans she has to extend the use of artificia
Question· Written questionUIN 12270answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 8 June 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to understand the impact artificial intelligence may have to civil liberties of people within the UK.
Question· Written questionUIN 12180answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 8 June 2021
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, for which taxes artificial intelligence is being used to assist in (a) processing and (b) auditing returns; and what plans he has to extend its use to other taxes.
Bill· COD2021/0106(COD)voted
European Union · European Parliament · 7 June 2021
Bill· HRH.R. 3723 (117th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 4 June 2021
Consumer Safety Technology Act This bill requires various agencies to explore the use of emerging technologies in the context of consumer products and safety. First, the Consumer Product Safety Commission must consult with relevant stakeholders, such as data scientists and product manufacturers, and use artificial intelligence in a pilot program for a least one of the following processes: (1) tracking trends in injuries involving consumer products, (2) identifying consumer product hazards, (3) monitoring the sale of recalled consumer products, or (4) identifying consumer products that do not meet specified importation requirements related to product safety. Additionally, the Department of Commerce must consult with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and other relevant agencies to study potential applications of blockchain technology (i.e., the technology that supports digital currencies such as Bitcoin), including the use of such technology to address fraud and other unfair or deceptive practices. Finally, the FTC must report on its efforts to address unfair or deceptive trade practices related to digital tokens (i.e., transferable units of a digital currency).
Question· Question écrite37860open
France · National Assembly · 3 June 2021
Mme Marie-France Lorho interroge M. le ministre de l'éducation nationale, de la jeunesse et des sports sur les publicités douteuses émises par le Planning familial. Le Planning familial, confédération nationale de 75 associations départementales et 13 fédérations régionales, dispose d'une généreuse contribution de l'État visant selon lui à « accéder à une information juste et complète sur les droits reproductifs et sexuels ». Les subventions allouées à cet organisme s'élèvent à plusieurs centaines de milliers d'euros, tant à l'échelle nationale qu'à l'échelle régionale. Le 23 mars 2021, le Planning familial affichait fièrement sur les réseaux sociaux une campagne de publicité particulièrement douteuse. « Savoir que j'ai le droit de jouer dans la cour de récré, c'est bien. Savoir que j'ai le droit d'avoir plusieurs amoureux.euses ( sic ) aussi. #MonEducSex », indique ainsi cette institution. Outre l'usage d'une écriture inclusive malvenue, la promotion de la sensualité voire la sexualité des enfants proposée dans cet encart publicitaire soulève des interrogations quant à la mission de cet organisme ultra-subventionné. À l'heure où des affaires particulièrement graves ont révélé l'horreur des effets de la sexualisation des enfants, elle lui demande s'il entend condamner cette campagne publicitaire scandaleuse. Enfin, elle souhaite savoir s'il entend indiquer au Planning familial que la dilapidation de l'argent public des Français ne devrait avoir pour effet la promotion de la sexualité infantile.
Question· writtenPQ 59asked
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 3 June 2021
59. Deputy James Lawless asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment the initiatives his Department is taking in the area of artificial intelligence; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [30042/21]
Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-9-2021-002937answered
European Union · European Parliament · 2 June 2021
Record· Brief regering2021Z09341concluded
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 31 May 2021
Fiche: Mededeling Bevorderen Europese aanpak inzake Kunstmatige Intelligentie
Record· Brief regering2021Z09343concluded
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 31 May 2021
Fiche: Verordening betreffende Kunstmatige Intelligentie
Bill· SS. 1849 (117th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 26 May 2021
Leadership in Global Tech Standards Act of 2021 This bill requires the Small Business Administration (SBA) to establish a program that supports the participation of U.S. small businesses in meetings and proceedings of standards development organizations to develop voluntary technical standards. To carry out this program, the SBA must award grants to small businesses for the reasonable costs of participation in standards development organizations. These grants may only be awarded to small businesses that (1) demonstrate technical expertise in key emerging technologies and technical standards (e.g., artificial intelligence), (2) commit personnel with such expertise to regular participation in international bodies responsible for developing standards for those technologies, and (3) agree to coordinate between the public and private sectors to ensure protection of national security interests in the setting of international standards.
Bill· SS. 1868 (117th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 26 May 2021
American Indian and Alaska Native Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, the AI/AN Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, or the AI/AN CAPTA This bill establishes additional resources to assist tribal communities with preventing and treating child abuse and neglect. First, the bill requires the Government Accountability Office to report on child abuse and neglect in tribal communities for the purpose of making recommendations to Congress regarding these issues. Additionally, the Department of Health and Human Services must include Indian tribes and tribal organizations in its equitable distribution of assistance for programs and projects related to child abuse prevention and treatment.
Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-9-2021-002761answered
European Union · European Parliament · 25 May 2021
Question· writtenPQ 163asked
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 20 May 2021
163. Deputy Thomas Pringle asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if his attention has been drawn to the fact that the proposed directive on artificial intelligence and the Digital Services Act would render Ireland the EU’s super enforcer of these new regulations for technology companies based here; if he is concerned that the current delays in enforcing GDPR decisions by the Data Protection Commissioner will undermine the potential for further investment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27322/21]
Question· writtenPQ 159asked
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 20 May 2021
159. Deputy Patrick Costello asked the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment if his attention has been drawn to the fact that the proposed directive on artificial intelligence and Digital Services Act would render Ireland the EU’s super enforcer of these new regulations for technology companies based here; his views on whether the current delays in enforcing GDPR decisions by the DPC will undermine the potential for further investment; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [27181/21]
Bill· HRH.R. 3426 (117th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 20 May 2021
Democracy Technology Partnership Act This bill establishes the International Technology Partnership Office, led by the Special Ambassador for Technology, in the Department of State. The office shall advance U.S. technology policy through the creation of an International Technology Partnership with specified foreign countries. Specifically, the office must create a partnership of democratic countries to develop technology governance regimes, with a focus on key technologies such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, 5G telecommunications, semiconductor chip manufacturing, biotechnology, and quantum computing. Partner countries must be democratic countries with advanced technology sectors that have a demonstrated record of trust or an expressed interest in international cooperation and coordination with the United States on defense and intelligence matters. The bill also establishes the International Technology Partnership Fund in the Department of the Treasury. The State Department may use amounts from this fund to support joint research projects from International Technology Partnership member countries and technology investments in third-country markets. The State Department must submit (1) a report on the activities of the office, including information on any cooperative activities, initiatives, or partnerships pursued with U.S. allies and partners; and (2) a national strategy for technology and national security.
Bill· SS. 1776 (117th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 20 May 2021
Artificial Intelligence for the Military Act of 2021 This bill requires the implementation of training and education related to emerging technologies and artificial intelligence for certain military personnel. The bill requires expansion of the curriculum for military junior leader education to incorporate training material related to focuses that include problem definition and curation and a conceptual understanding of the artificial intelligence life cycle. Such training and education should include the use of existing artificial intelligence-enabled systems and tools. The Department of Defense (DOD) must ensure that the curriculum for professional military education is revised in each of the military services to incorporate periodic courses on militarily significant emerging technologies. DOD must establish a short course on emerging technologies for general and flag officers and senior executive-level civilian leaders. The course must be taught on an iterative, two-year cycle and address the most recent and relevant technologies and the application of these technologies to military and business outcomes in DOD. DOD must ensure that the military services code appropriate billets to be filled by emerging technology-qualified officers and develop a process for qualification of officers in emerging technologies. The process for qualifying officers for emerging technology-coded billets must be modeled on a streamlined version of the joint qualification process and may include credit for serving in emerging technology-focused (1) fellowships, (2) talent exchanges, (3) government positions, and (4) education courses.
Bill· SS. 1705 (117th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 19 May 2021
Artificial Intelligence Capabilities and Transparency Act of 2021 or the AICT Act of 2021 This bill addresses artificial intelligence capabilities related to national defense and security. The bill requires the Department of Defense (DOD) to designate a chief digital recruiting officer within the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness to oversee a digital recruiting office. The office must be responsible for (1) identifying DOD needs for specific types of digital talent, (2) recruiting technologists, (3) integrating federal scholarship for service programs into DOD civilian recruiting, and (4) partnering with human resource teams in the military services and DOD components to use direct-hire authorities to accelerate hiring. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Department of Energy must also designate chief digital recruiting officers to be responsible for the same objectives in those departments. DOD must carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of establishing the Artificial Intelligence Development and Prototyping Fund. DOD must plan for the development of a modern digital ecosystem to enable development, testing, fielding, and continuous update of artificial intelligence-powered applications at speed and scale from headquarters to the tactical edge. The National Institute of Standards and Technology within the Department of Commerce must establish a program to provide accreditation to organizations that are determined to be competent at evaluating the specified effects of artificial intelligence systems used by persons in DOD, an element of the intelligence community, or the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Bill· HRH.R. 3284 (117th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 17 May 2021
Next Generation Computing Research and Development Act of 2021 This bill provides for the support of advanced scientific computing programs and activities at the Department of Energy (DOE). The DOE Office of Science shall carry out a research and development program to advance computational and networking capabilities to analyze and predict complex phenomena relevant to the development of new energy technologies and U.S. competitiveness. DOE shall establish a program to implement a strategy for achieving computing systems with capabilities beyond exascale computing systems; support a program of fundamental research and development of energy efficient computing technologies relevant to advanced computing applications in high performance computing, artificial intelligence, and scientific machine learning; and provide for an upgrade to the Energy Sciences Network user facility in order to meet federal research needs for highly reliable data transport capabilities optimized for the requirements of large-scale science. The DOE Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research shall support the development of a computational science workforce. The DOE Office of Science shall maintain a balanced portfolio within the advanced scientific computing research and development program that supports robust investment in applied mathematical, computational, and computer sciences research needs relevant to DOE's mission; and associated high-performance computing hardware and facilities.
Question· Question écrite41677open
France · National Assembly · 9 May 2021
M. Jean-Jacques Gaultier appelle l'attention de M. le ministre de l'économie, des finances et de la relance sur le projet « Foncier innovant » actuellement en phase d'expérimentation dans 9 départements. En effet, cette expérience inclut la participation d'entreprises privées dans l'élaboration et l'exploitation de nouveaux outils dématérialisés, dont l'objectif est de pouvoir détecter des éléments n'ayant pas été retranscrits sur les plans cadastraux. Ainsi, l'arrivée de ces entreprises privées dans la gestion de ce qui était jusqu'alors exclusivement une mission de service public suscite des interrogations. Aussi, il souhaite connaître les conditions d'attribution et d'application de cette expérimentation.
Report· HearingH.Hrg.117published
United States · United States House of Representatives · 7 May 2021
Bill· HRH.R. 3011 (117th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 7 May 2021
Holding Chinese Military Companies Accountable Act This bill expands the definition of a Communist Chinese military company and addresses related issues. (Current law authorizes the President to exercise certain economic powers, such as investigating or prohibiting payments, involving a person designated a Communist Chinese military company.) Under this bill, the Department of Defense (DOD) shall apply the designation to a person (i.e., an individual or entity) with significant investments in certain technology sectors, such as fifth-generation wireless communications or artificial intelligence, if the person is owned by, controlled by, or affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party or any person who has ever been a delegate to the National People's Congress. The bill also requires DOD to continue making periodic determinations regarding such designations until December 31, 2026.
Record· QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITYP-9-2021-002444open
European Union · European Parliament · 6 May 2021
Proposal· Proposition de loi ordinaireDLR5L15N42265open
France · National Assembly · 4 May 2021
Bill· SS. 1444 (117th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 29 April 2021
Mind Your Own Business Act of 2021 This bill requires assessments, periodic reporting, and the development of an opt-out process for specified commercial entities that operate high-risk information systems or automated-decision systems, such as those that use artificial intelligence or machine learning. An automated-decision system or information system is considered high risk if it (1) raises security or privacy concerns; (2) involves the personal information of a significant number of people; or (3) systematically monitors a large, publicly-accessible physical location. An automated-decision system is also considered high risk if it (1) may contribute to inaccuracy, bias, or discrimination; or (2) facilitates decision-making about sensitive aspects of consumers' lives by evaluating their behavior. Covered commercial entities must assess such high-risk systems and evaluate the extent to which they protect against the risk of exposing personal information. The bill further requires certain larger commercial entities to submit an annual report for which corporate officers must certify that the entity is in compliance with the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) implementing regulations. A failure to comply with the reporting requirements is subject to criminal penalties and excise tax. Among other provisions, the bill requires the FTC to create a web portal for consumers to opt out of data sharing and view their opt-out status. Opting out prevents covered commercial entities from sharing personal information with third parties. The bill increases the civil penalties for unfair trade practices, which the bill modifies to include practices that involve noneconomic impacts or create a significant risk of exposing personal information.
Question· Written questionUIN 187144answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 26 April 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps the Government is taking to tackle gender disparities in artificial intelligence technology.
Question· Written questionUIN 187146answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 26 April 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that (a) gender and (b) racial discrimination is not incorporated into the development of artificial intelligence systems.
Bill· SS. 1353 (117th)open
United States · United States Congress · 22 April 2021
Advancing American AI Act This bill requires specified federal agencies to take steps to promote artificial intelligence (AI) while aligning with U.S. values, such as the protection of privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties. The Office of Management and Budget must establish mechanisms to continually refine guidance issued to agencies regarding AI as best practices evolve, issue a memorandum to each agency that articulates the method by which the agency shall make public information about the agency's use of AI, and identify at least five new use cases for the application of cross-enterprise AI-enabled systems to support modernization initiatives across agencies. The Office of Federal Procurement Policy and the Chief Acquisition Officers Council or a council working group shall develop a process to ensure that contracts involving AI align with agency guidance and address protection of privacy. The Department of Homeland Security shall revise the legal and approval processes for the procurement and use of AI-enabled systems to ensure that full consideration is given to the privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties impacts of such systems. The bill revises and extends pilot programs regarding the acquisition of innovative commercial items and certain research and development projects.
Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0826_SUMdecided
European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 April 2021
Bill· HRH.R. 2731 (117th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 21 April 2021
Endless Frontier Act This bill establishes a Directorate for Technology and Innovation in the National Science Foundation (NSF) and establishes various programs and activities. The goals of the directorate shall be, among other things, the strengthening of U.S. leadership in critical technologies through basic research in key technology focus areas, such as artificial intelligence, high performance computing, and advanced manufacturing, and the commercialization of those technologies to businesses in the United States. The bill gives the NSF the authority to provide for the widest practicable and appropriate dissemination of information within the United States concerning the NSF’s activities and the results of those activities. The Office of Science and Technology Policy shall annually develop a strategy for the federal government to improve national competitiveness in science, research, and innovation to support the national security strategy. The Department of Commerce shall (1) establish a supply chain resiliency and crisis response program to address supply chain gaps and vulnerabilities in critical industries, (2) designate regional technology hubs to facilitate activities that support regional economic development that diffuses innovation around the United States, and (3) award grants to facilitate development and implementation of comprehensive regional technology strategies. The bill extends through FY2026 the Manufacturing USA Program and expands such program to support innovation and growth in domestic manufacturing.
Record· QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITYP-9-2021-002167open
European Union · European Parliament · 21 April 2021
Proposal· EU-voorstel2021Z06637concluded
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 21 April 2021
EU-voorstel: Een Europese aanpak van kunstmatige intelligentie COM (2021) 06 (Engelstalige versie).
Report· DCCELEX 52021DC0205open
European Union · European Commission · 21 April 2021
Proposal· PCCELEX 52021PC0206open
European Union · European Commission · 21 April 2021
Bill· SS. 1260 (117th)open
United States · United States Congress · 20 April 2021
Endless Frontier Act This bill establishes a Directorate for Technology and Innovation in the National Science Foundation (NSF) and establishes various programs and activities. The goals of the directorate shall be, among other things, the strengthening of U.S. leadership in critical technologies through basic research in key technology focus areas, such as artificial intelligence, high performance computing, and advanced manufacturing, and the commercialization of those technologies to businesses in the United States. The bill gives the NSF the authority to provide for the widest practicable and appropriate dissemination of information within the United States concerning the NSF’s activities and the results of those activities. The Office of Science and Technology Policy shall annually develop a strategy for the federal government to improve national competitiveness in science, research, and innovation to support the national security strategy. The Department of Commerce shall (1) establish a supply chain resiliency and crisis response program to address supply chain gaps and vulnerabilities in critical industries, (2) designate regional technology hubs to facilitate activities that support regional economic development that diffuses innovation around the United States, and (3) award grants to facilitate development and implementation of comprehensive regional technology strategies. The bill extends through FY2026 the Manufacturing USA Program and expands such program to support innovation and growth in domestic manufacturing.
Bill· SS. 1257 (117th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 20 April 2021
AI Scholarship-for-Service Act This bill establishes a federal artificial intelligence (AI) scholarship-for-service program to recruit and train AI professionals to lead and support AI in federal, state, local, and tribal governments. Specifically, the National Science Foundation must establish criteria to designate qualified institutions of higher education (IHEs) as eligible to participate in the program. Such criteria must include (1) measures of an IHE's demonstrated excellence in the education of students in AI; and (2) measures of an IHE's ability to attract and retain a diverse and nontraditional student population in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Further, the program must (1) provide scholarships through qualified IHEs to students who are enrolled in programs of study related to AI, (2) provide scholarship recipients with internship opportunities, (3) prioritize the employment placement of scholarship recipients in executive agencies, (4) identify opportunities to promote multidisciplinary programs of study that integrate basic or advanced AI training with other fields of study, and (5) support education research programs to train AI researchers and practitioners. Additionally, the post-award employment obligations of a scholarship recipient must include three years of work for an executive agency; Congress; an interstate agency; a state, local, or tribal government; or a government-affiliated nonprofit that is considered to be critical infrastructure. A scholarship recipient who completes less than the required three years of service must repay the scholarship, or the scholarship must be treated as a Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford Loan that is subject to repayment.
Question· Written questionUIN 179368answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 12 April 2021
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what progress has been made on the work programme of the Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence; what the UK's contribution is to that partnership; and if he will make a statement
Record· QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITYP-9-2021-001850open
European Union · European Parliament · 7 April 2021