Artificial intelligence

Auffassung der Rede des UN-Generalsekretärs Ban Ki-Moon zum Syrien-Konflikt

Germany · German Bundestag · 21 September 2012

Originaltext der Frage(n):<br /> <br /> Teilt die Bundesregierung die in den Medien vielfach zum Ausdruck gebrachte Auffassung, dass UN-Generalsekretär Ban Ki-moon in seiner Rede vor der UN-Vollversammlung am 4. September 2012 dem &bdquo;Sicherheitsrat . . . in ungewöhnlich deutlichen Worten Untätigkeit im Syrien-Konflikt&ldquo; vorwarf (http://bazonline. ch/ausland/naher-osten-und-afrika/Paris-unterstuetzt-von-Rebellen-gehaltene-Staedte/story/ 29470568) und geäußert hätte, dass &bdquo;[d]ie Lähmung des Gremiums . . . nicht nur den Menschen in Syrien, sondern auch der Reputation des Sicherheitsrates&ldquo; schade und &bdquo;das Konzept der Vereinten Nationen zum Schutz von Zivilisten in Konfliktgebieten&ldquo; schwäche, oder teilt die Bundesregierung die Auffassung, dass seine Rede im veröffentlichten Wortlaut (www.un.org/apps/news/infocus/sgspeeches/statments_full,asp?statID=1640) vielmehr einen Appell an alle Mitgliedstaaten enthielt (mehr humanitäre Hilfe bereitstellen, Waffenlieferungen an beide Seiten einstellen, beide Seiten zum Gewaltverzicht und einer Verhandlungslösung aufrufen), wobei sich sein Appell an den Sicherheitsrat lediglich darauf beschränkte, eine &bdquo;gemeinsame Grundlage zu finden, damit dem syrischen Volk dabei geholfen werden kann, einen Weg zu einer inklusiven, friedlichen und Demokratischen Transition&ldquo; zu beschreiten&ldquo;?

Stand van zaken inzake een besmetting van vogelgriep (AI) op een legpluimveebedrijf in Hagestein in de provincie Utrecht

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 15 August 2012

Stand van zaken inzake een besmetting van vogelgriep (AI) op een legpluimveebedrijf in Hagestein in de provincie Utrecht

Pamela Ki Mai Chen, of New York, to be United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, vice Raymond J. Dearie, retired.

United States · United States Senate · 2 August 2012

JUDGMENT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL (Second Chamber) 11 July 2012.#AI v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Internal competition — Elimination from the competition in consequence of the result obtained in the first written test — Re-examination — Equal treatment — Reclassification of a fixed-term employment contract as a contract for an indefinite period — Non-renewal of a fixed term contract as a member of the temporary staff — Action for annulment — Action for damages.#Case F‑85/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2012

297 Deputy Willie Penrose asked the Minister for Social Protection in relation to the commission which she set up to investigate the position of self employed persons who find themselves out of work and cannot avail of the welfare system, due to the fact that they only contributed SI contributions, if the objective of extending the contribution rate of AI to the self employed whether on a compulsory or voluntary basis has been explored; if the recommendations of the commission will soon be published; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [30646/12]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 26 June 2012

297 Deputy Willie Penrose asked the Minister for Social Protection in relation to the commission which she set up to investigate the position of self employed persons who find themselves out of work and cannot avail of the welfare system, due to the fact that they only contributed SI contributions, if the objective of extending the contribution rate of AI to the self employed whether on a compulsory or voluntary basis has been explored; if the recommendations of the commission will soon be published; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [30646/12]

Sentenza della Corte (Sesta Sezione) del 15 marzo 2012. # Giuseppe Sibilio contro Comune di Afragola. # Domanda di pronuncia pregiudiziale: Tribunale di Napoli - Italia. # Politica sociale - Accordo quadro CES, UNICE e CEEP sul lavoro a tempo determinato - Direttiva 1999/70/CE - Clausola 2 - Nozione di "un contratto o un rapporto di lavoro definito dalla legge, dai contratti collettivi o dalla prassi in vigore di ciascun Stato membro" - Ambito di applicazione dell’accordo quadro - Clausola 4, punto 1 - Principio di non discriminazione - Persone che svolgono "lavori socialmente utili" presso amministrazioni pubbliche - Normativa nazionale che esclude l’esistenza di un rapporto di lavoro - Normativa nazionale che prevede una differenza tra l’indennità pagata ai lavoratori socialmente utili e la retribuzione percepita dai lavoratori a tempo determinato e/o indeterminato assunti dalle stesse amministrazioni e che svolgono le medesime attività. # Causa C-157/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 March 2012