Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

851 records in EU

All countriesUnited States · 41,749Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,716France · 4,100Netherlands · 3,841Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0834decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber, Extended Composition) of 23 February 2022.#United Parcel Service, Inc. v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Competition – Markets for international express small package delivery services in the EEA – Concentration – Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market – Annulment of the decision by a judgment of the Court – Rights of the defence – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Causal link.#Case T-834/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 February 2022

Report· XGCELEX 52022XG0301(01)open

Common Military list of the European Union adopted by the Council on 21 February 2022 (equipment covered by Council Common Position 2008/944/CFSP defining common rules governing the control of exports of military technology and equipment) (updating and replacing the Common Military List of the European Union adopted by the Council on 17 February 2020 (OJ C 85, 13.3.2020, p. 1.)) (CFSP) 2022/C 100/03

European Union · Council of the European Union · 21 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0740_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Taminco BVBA and Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance thiram – Non-renewal of approval – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 – Rights of the defence – Procedural irregularity – Manifest error of assessment – Competence of EFSA – Proportionality – Precautionary principle – Equal treatment.#Case T-740/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0317_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#AMVAC Netherlands BV v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance ethoprophos – Non-renewal of approval – Regulation No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation No 844/2012 – Rights of the defence – Manifest error of assessment – Legal certainty – Proportionality – Precautionary principle.#Case T-317/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0317decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#AMVAC Netherlands BV v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance ethoprophos – Non-renewal of approval – Regulation No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation No 844/2012 – Rights of the defence – Manifest error of assessment – Legal certainty – Proportionality – Precautionary principle.#Case T-317/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0740decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 9 February 2022.#Taminco BVBA and Arysta LifeScience Great Britain Ltd v European Commission.#Plant protection products – Active substance thiram – Non-renewal of approval – Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 – Rights of the defence – Procedural irregularity – Manifest error of assessment – Competence of EFSA – Proportionality – Precautionary principle – Equal treatment.#Case T-740/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0027_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 February 2022.#Pilatus Bank plc and Pilatus Holding ltd. v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Indictment of the main shareholder in a third country – Criterion of good repute – Perception of good repute by the market – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Rights of the defence.#Case T-27/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0399_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 February 2022.#Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Gas markets of central and eastern Europe – Decision rejecting a complaint – No EU interest – State action defence – Obligation to conduct a diligent examination – Procedural rights under Regulation (EC) No 773/2004.#Case T-399/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0536decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#LU v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Dignity at Work Policy – Psychological harassment – Investigation procedure – Action for annulment – Final report of the investigation panel – Preparatory act – Inadmissibility – Decision rejecting the complaint – Act adversely affecting an official – Admissibility – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Liability.#Case T-536/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0536_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 February 2022.#LU v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Dignity at Work Policy – Psychological harassment – Investigation procedure – Action for annulment – Final report of the investigation panel – Preparatory act – Inadmissibility – Decision rejecting the complaint – Act adversely affecting an official – Admissibility – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard – Obligation to state reasons – Liability.#Case T-536/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0399decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 February 2022.#Polskie Górnictwo Naftowe i Gazownictwo S.A. v European Commission.#Competition – Abuse of dominant position – Gas markets of central and eastern Europe – Decision rejecting a complaint – No EU interest – State action defence – Obligation to conduct a diligent examination – Procedural rights under Regulation (EC) No 773/2004.#Case T-399/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0027decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 February 2022.#Pilatus Bank plc and Pilatus Holding ltd. v European Central Bank.#Economic and monetary policy – Prudential supervision of credit institutions – Specific supervisory tasks conferred on the ECB – Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation – Indictment of the main shareholder in a third country – Criterion of good repute – Perception of good repute by the market – Presumption of innocence – Proportionality – Rights of the defence.#Case T-27/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 February 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0757decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 January 2022.#Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA - Loutraki AE - Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE v European Commission.#State aid – Greek casinos – System providing for a levy of 80% on admission fees of different amounts – Differentiation between public and private casinos – Complaint – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery – Annulment of the decision by a decision of the General Court – Decision finding no State aid – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Admissibility – Rights of the defence.#Case T-757/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 January 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0757_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 January 2022.#Koinopraxia Touristiki Loutrakiou AE OTA - Loutraki AE - Klab Otel Loutraki Kazino Touristikes kai Xenodocheiakes Epicheiriseis AE v European Commission.#State aid – Greek casinos – System providing for a levy of 80% on admission fees of different amounts – Differentiation between public and private casinos – Complaint – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering its recovery – Annulment of the decision by a decision of the General Court – Decision finding no State aid – Action for annulment – Challengeable act – Admissibility – Rights of the defence.#Case T-757/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 January 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0195_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-195/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0263(01)decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia-Kosakowo sp. z o.o. v European Commission.#State aid – Airport infrastructure – Public funding by the municipalities of Gdynia and Kosakowo for setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Advantage – Market economy operator principle – Effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Recovery – Withdrawal of a decision – Failure to re-open the formal investigation procedure – Procedural rights of the interested parties – Rights of the defence – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-263/15 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0263(01)_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Gmina Miasto Gdynia and Port Lotniczy Gdynia-Kosakowo sp. z o.o. v European Commission.#State aid – Airport infrastructure – Public funding by the municipalities of Gdynia and Kosakowo for setting up the Gdynia-Kosakowo Airport – Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery – Advantage – Market economy operator principle – Effect on trade between Member States – Adverse effect on competition – Recovery – Withdrawal of a decision – Failure to re-open the formal investigation procedure – Procedural rights of the interested parties – Rights of the defence – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-263/15 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0195decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 21 December 2021.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-195/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 December 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0256_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 November 2021 (Extracts).#Bashar Assi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – Errors of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to pursue an economic activity – Misuse of powers – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair trial.#Case T-256/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 November 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0259_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 November 2021 (Extracts).#Aman Dimashq JSC v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against Syria – Freezing of funds – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to pursue an economic activity – Misuse of powers – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair trial – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-259/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 November 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0743(01)decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 November 2021.#CX v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary measure – Removal from post – OLAF investigation – Unauthorised and clandestine negotiation of a contract – Conflict of interests – Certification of a non-compliant invoice – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard – Repeated absence of the applicant and his lawyer from the disciplinary hearing – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Proportionality – Reasonable time – Principle ne bis in idem – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-743/16 RENV II.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 November 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0743(01)_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 November 2021.#CX v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary measure – Removal from post – OLAF investigation – Unauthorised and clandestine negotiation of a contract – Conflict of interests – Certification of a non-compliant invoice – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard – Repeated absence of the applicant and his lawyer from the disciplinary hearing – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations – Proportionality – Reasonable time – Principle ne bis in idem – Manifest error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-743/16 RENV II.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 November 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0258_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 November 2021.#Samer Foz v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to pursue an economic activity – Misuse of powers – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair trial.#Case T-258/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 November 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0160_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 November 2021.#European Political Subdivision of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken with a view to combating terrorism – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, groups and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list – Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds – Error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-160/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 November 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0160decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 November 2021.#European Political Subdivision of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken with a view to combating terrorism – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, groups and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list – Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds – Error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-160/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 November 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0259decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 November 2021 (Extracts).#Aman Dimashq JSC v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures against Syria – Freezing of funds – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to pursue an economic activity – Misuse of powers – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair trial – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-259/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 November 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0256decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 November 2021 (Extracts).#Bashar Assi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – Errors of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to pursue an economic activity – Misuse of powers – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair trial.#Case T-256/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 November 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0258decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 November 2021.#Samer Foz v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to pursue an economic activity – Misuse of powers – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair trial.#Case T-258/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 November 2021

PreviousPage 17 of 18Next