Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

94 records in EU in 2015

All countriesUnited States · 41,745Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,706France · 4,098Netherlands · 3,840Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0397decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 May 2015.#Diputación Foral de Bizkaia v European Commission.#State aid — Construction — Aid provided by the Spanish authorities to the company Habidite — Agreements concluded with a view to the establishment of a factory manufacturing construction modules and the delivery of modular houses manufactured by that factory –– Decision declaring the aid unlawful –– Decision declaring the aid partly compatible and partly incompatible with the internal market — No prior notification — Rights of the defence — Obligation to give reasons.#Case T-397/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 May 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0433decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 May 2015.#Petropars Iran Co. and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Error of assessment — Plea of illegality — Right to conduct business — Right to property — Protection of public health, security and the environment — Precautionary principle — Proportionality — Rights of defence.#Case T-433/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 May 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0134decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 April 2015.#Polynt SpA and Sitre Srl v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).#REACH — Identification of certain respiratory sensitisers as substances of very high concern — Equivalent level of concern — Action for annulment — Whether directly concerned — Admissibility — Rights of the defence — Proportionality.#Case T-134/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0135decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 30 April 2015.#Hitachi Chemical Europe GmbH and Others v European Chemicals Agency (ECHA).#REACH — Identification of certain respiratory sensitisers as substances of very high concern — Equivalent level of concern — Action for annulment — Whether directly concerned — Admissibility — Rights of the defence — Proportionality.#Case T-135/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0009decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 April 2015.#The National Iranian Gas Company v Council of the European Union.#Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Objection of illegality — Error of law — Proportionality — Right to property — Jurisdiction of the Council — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Review of the restrictive measures adopted — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment.#Case T-9/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 April 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62013TJ0010decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 April 2015.#Bank of Industry and Mine v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran to prevent nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Action for annulment — Time-limit for bringing an action — Admissibility — Plea of illegality — Error of law — Proportionality — Right to property — Powers of the Council — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Reconsideration of restrictive measures adopted — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment.#Case T-10/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 April 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0190decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 April 2015.#Johannes Tomana and Others v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures imposed on certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Zimbabwe — Restrictions on entry into and transit through the European Union — Freezing of funds — Legal basis — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Fundamental rights — Proportionality.#Case T-190/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 April 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62009TJ0527decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 April 2015.#Chafiq Ayadi v European Commission.#Referral back after setting aside — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban — Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 — Freezing of funds and economic resources of a person included on a list drawn up by a United Nations body — Inclusion of the name of that person in the list contained in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 — Action for annulment — Fundamental rights — Rights of defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to respect for property.#Case T-527/09 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0563decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber), 25 March 2015.#Central Bank of Iran v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment — Right to property — Right to reputation — Proportionality.#Case T‑563/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 March 2015

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0286decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 March 2015.#Dole Food Company, Inc. and Dole Fresh Fruit Europe v European Commission.#Appeals — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European banana market — Coordination in the setting of quotation prices — Obligation to state reasons — Belated statement of reasons — Belated submission of evidence — Rights of defence — Principle of equality of arms — Principles governing the establishment of the facts — Distortion of the facts — Assessment of the evidence — Market structure — Requirement for the Commission to specify those aspects of the exchange of information which constitute a restriction of competition by object — Burden of proof — Calculation of the fine — Whether sales made by subsidiaries not involved in the infringement are to be taken into account — Sales of the same bananas counted twice.#Case C-286/13 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 March 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62009TJ0089decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber), 17 March 2015.#(publication by extracts) Pollmeier Massivholz GmbH & Co. KG v European Commission.#State aid — State measures concerning the establishment of a sawmill in the Land of Hessen — Action for annulment — Letter sent to the complainants — Act not amenable to review — Inadmissibility — Decision finding no State aid — Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure — Serious difficulties — Calculation of the aid element of State guarantees — Commission Notice on State aid in the form of guarantees — Undertaking in difficulty — Sale of public land — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T‑89/09.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 March 2015

Record· FJCELEX 62013FJ0073decided

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 17 March 2015.#AX v European Central Bank.#Civil service — ECB staff — Disciplinary proceedings — Disciplinary measure — Dismissal — Rights of the defence — Access to the disciplinary file — Access to information and documents on other divisions — Reasonable time — Lawfulness of the composition of the Disciplinary Committee — Advisory role of the Disciplinary Committee — Stricter disciplinary measure than that recommended — Obligation to state reasons — Management of a division — Manifest error of assessment — Proportionality of the disciplinary measure — Extenuating circumstances — Aggravating circumstances — Objection of illegality.#Case F-73/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 March 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0385decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 February 2015.#Orange, anciennement France Télécom v European Commission.#State aid — Pensions — Aid for the reform of the arrangements for financing the retirement pensions of civil servants working for France Télécom — Reduction of the compensation to be paid to the State by France Télécom — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market under certain conditions — Advantage — Selective nature — Adverse effect on competition — Rights of the defence.#Case T‑385/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 February 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0509decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 January 2015.#Mohammad Makhlouf v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Duty to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Right to privacy — Proportionality.#Case T‑509/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 January 2015

Record· TJCELEX 62009TJ0127decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber), 14 January 2015.#Abdulbasit Abdulrahim v Council of the European Union and European Commission.#Referral back after setting aside of order — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with Usama bin Laden, the Al-Qaida network and the Taliban — Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 — Freezing of funds and economic resources of a person named in a list drawn up by a body of the United Nations — Naming of that person in the list in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Exceeded — Excusable error — Fundamental rights — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to respect for property — Right to respect for private and family life.#Case T‑127/09 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2015

PreviousPage 2 of 2