Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

101 records in EU in 2019

All countriesUnited States · 41,745Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,706France · 4,098Netherlands · 3,840Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0095decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 July 2019.#Bruno Gollnisch v European Parliament.#Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums unduly paid — Complaint — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Error of fact.#Case T-95/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0285decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 July 2019.#Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken having regard to the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-285/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0416_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 July 2019.#Mykola Yanovych Azarov v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds and economic resources — List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name — Decision by an authority of a third State — Council’s obligation to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case C-416/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0274_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 July 2019.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-274/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0274decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 July 2019.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-274/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0416decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 11 July 2019.#Mykola Yanovych Azarov v Council of the European Union.#Appeal — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds and economic resources — List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name — Decision by an authority of a third State — Council’s obligation to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case C-416/18 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0244decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 July 2019.#Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-244/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0244_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 July 2019.#Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-244/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0888_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 July 2019.#BP v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA).#Civil service — Members of the contract staff — FRA — Fixed-term contract — Decision not to renew — New decision adopted following an annulment by the General Court — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration — Obligation to state reasons — Liability.#Case T-888/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0289decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 11 July 2019.#Artem Viktorovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted with regard to the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Obligation on the Council to check that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in observance of the rights of the defence and of the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-289/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0888decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 11 July 2019.#BP v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA).#Civil service — Members of the contract staff — FRA — Fixed-term contract — Decision not to renew — New decision adopted following an annulment by the General Court — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration — Obligation to state reasons — Liability.#Case T-888/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 July 2019

Record· TOCELEX 62018TO0687(01)decided

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 10 July 2019.#Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank.#Action for annulment — Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Suspension measures taken by the national supervisory authority — Appointment of a contact person — Limited communication with the ECB — Procedural defects — Intermediary or preparatory measures — Rights of defence — Inadmissibility.#Case T-687/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 July 2019

Report· XGCELEX 52019XG0628(01)open

The following information is brought to the attention of AL NASSER Abdelkarim Hussein Mohamed, AL-YACOUB Ibrahim Salih Mohammed, IZZ-AL-DIN Hasan, MOHAMMED Khalid Shaikh, SHAHLAI Abdul Reza, SHAKURI Ali Gholam, Abu Nidal Organisation (ANO), BABBAR KHALSA, Hizballah Military Wing, Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine -General Command, ‘Devrimci Halk Kurtuluș Partisi Cephesi’ — ‘DHKP/C’, ‘Teyrbazen Azadiya Kurdistan’ — ‘TAK’ — persons and groups included on the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism and to Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (see Annexes to Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/25 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/24 of 8 January 2019)

European Union · Council of the European Union · 28 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0135decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 June 2019.#Csanád Szegedi v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions — Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Travel expenses — Parliamentary assistance expenses — Recovery of sums unduly paid — Rights of defence — Disclosure of evidence — Obligation to state reasons — Error of fact — Proportionality.#Case T-135/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 June 2019

Record· TOCELEX 62018TO0230(01)decided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 June 2019.#Ryszard Czarnecki v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions — Member of the European Parliament — Statements made against another Member of Parliament — Early termination of the term of office and duties of the Vice-President of the Parliament — Rights of the defence — Misuse of powers — Equal treatment.#Case T-230/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0614decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 June 2019.#Laurence Bonnafous v Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.#Civil service — Contract staff — Dismissal at the end of the probationary period — Normal probationary conditions — Psychological harassment — Principle of sound administration — Duty of care — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Manifest error of assessment — Misuse of powers — Liability.#Case T-614/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 June 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0189decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 5 June 2019.#Glencore Agriculture Hungary Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatósága.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC– Articles 167 and 168 — Right to deduct VAT — Refusal — Fraud — Taking of evidence — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Access to the file — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Effective judicial review — Principle of equality of arms — Inter partes principle — National legislation or practice according to which, when checking the right to deduct VAT exercised by a taxable person, the tax authorities are bound by the findings of fact and the legal classifications which they have made in the context of related administrative procedures to which that taxable person was not a party.#Case C-189/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0273decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 5 June 2019.#Belén Bernaldo de Quirós v European Commission.#Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary measures — Disciplinary procedure — Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service — Administrative investigation — Mandate given to IDOC — Principle of impartiality — Principle of good administration — Rights of the defence — Disciplinary procedure — Principle of equality of arms — Disciplinary penalty of a reprimand — Proportionality — Non-material damage.#Case T-273/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 June 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0604_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 May 2019.#European Road Transport Telematics Implementation Coordination Organisation - Intelligent Transport Systems & Services Europe (Ertico - ITS Europe) v European Commission.#Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Decision of the Commission’s Validation Panel on qualification as a micro, small and medium-sized business — Request for review under sections 1.2.6 and 1.2.7 of the Annex to Decision 2012/838/EU, Euratom — No administrative appeal within the meaning of Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Res judicata — Criteria for the definition of micro, small and medium-sized businesses in EU policies — Concept of an ‘enterprise’ — Concept of an ‘economic activity’ — Criterion of independence — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-604/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 May 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0604decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 22 May 2019.#European Road Transport Telematics Implementation Coordination Organisation - Intelligent Transport Systems & Services Europe (Ertico - ITS Europe) v European Commission.#Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities — Recommendation 2003/361/EC — Decision of the Commission’s Validation Panel on qualification as a micro, small and medium-sized business — Request for review under sections 1.2.6 and 1.2.7 of the Annex to Decision 2012/838/EU, Euratom — No administrative appeal within the meaning of Article 22 of Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Res judicata — Criteria for the definition of micro, small and medium-sized businesses in EU policies — Concept of an ‘enterprise’ — Concept of an ‘economic activity’ — Criterion of independence — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-604/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 May 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0089decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 14 May 2019.#Ramón Guiral Broto v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Applications for the EU word and figurative marks Café del Sol and CAFE DEL SOL — Earlier national figurative mark Café del Sol — Proof of the existence, validity and scope of protection of the earlier mark — Translation — Rights of the defence — Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Cases T-89/18 and T-90/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 May 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0185decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.#Lucchini SpA in AS v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for concrete reinforcing bars in bars or coils — Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Partial annulment of the Commission decision — Rejection of a request for reimbursement of a fine paid pursuant to a decision annulled in part — Rejection of a request to be allowed to participate in the administrative procedure that was reopened following the partial annulment of the decision — Rights of the defence — Non-existent act — Non-contractual liability — Limitation.#Case T-185/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2019

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0723decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.#EV v Inspectoratul General al Poliţiei Române – Brigada Autostrăzi şi misiuni speciale – Biroul de Poliţie Autostrada A1 Râmnicu Vâlcea – Deva (IGPR).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Orăştie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 48 — Presumption of innocence and defence rights — Road traffic offences — Burden of proof — Failure to implement EU law — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-723/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0230decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2019.#PI v Landespolizeidirektion Tirol.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Tirol.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 49 TFEU — Article 15(2) and Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Freedom of establishment and freedom to provide services — Restriction — Decision to immediately close a commercial enterprise — No statement of reasons — Overriding reasons in the public interest –Prevention of criminal offences against persons engaged in prostitution — Protection of public health — Proportionality of the restriction on the freedom of establishment — Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Effectiveness of judicial review — Rights of defence — General principle of the right to good administration.#Case C-230/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0300_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 April 2019.#Jindal Saw Ltd and Jindal Saw Italia SpA v European Commission.#Subsidies — Imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron originating in India — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/387 — Imposition of a definitive countervailing duty — Indian scheme establishing an export tax on iron ore and a dual railway freight charge placing the transport of iron ore for export at a disadvantage — Article 3(1)(a)(iv) of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 (replaced by Regulation (EU) 2016/1037) — Financial contribution — Provision of goods — Action consisting of ‘entrusting’ a private body to carry out a function constituting a financial contribution — Article 4(2)(a) of Regulation No 597/2009 — Specificity of a subsidy — Article 6(d) of Regulation No 597/2009 — Calculation of benefit — Injury to the Union industry — Calculation of price undercutting and the injury margin — Causal link — Access to confidential data of the subsidy investigation — Rights of the defence.#Case T-300/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0301_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 April 2019.#Jindal Saw Ltd and Jindal Saw Italia SpA v European Commission.#Dumping — Imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron originating in India — Implementing regulation (EU) 2016/388 — Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (replaced by Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Dumping margin — Determination of the export price — Association between exporter and importer — Reliable export price — Construction of the export price — Reasonable margin for selling, general and administrative costs — Reasonable margin for profit — Injury to the Union industry — Calculation of price undercutting and the injury margin — Causal link — Access to confidential data of the anti-dumping investigation — Rights of the defence.#Case T-301/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0301decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 April 2019.#Jindal Saw Ltd and Jindal Saw Italia SpA v European Commission.#Dumping — Imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron originating in India — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/388 — Regulation (EC) No 1255/2009 (replaced by Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) — Dumping margin — Determination of the export price — Association between an exporter and an importer — Reliable export price — Construction of the export price — Reasonable margin for selling, general and administrative costs — Reasonable margin for profit — Injury to the Union industry — Calculation of price undercutting and the injury margin — Causal link — Access to confidential data of the anti-dumping investigation — Rights of the defence.#Case T-301/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0300decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 10 April 2019.#Jindal Saw Ltd and Jindal Saw Italia SpA v European Commission.#Subsidies — Imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron originating in India — Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/387 — Imposition of a definitive countervailing duty — Indian scheme establishing an export tax on iron ore and a dual railway freight charge placing the transport of iron ore for export at a disadvantage — Article 3(1)(a)(iv) of Regulation (EC) No 597/2009 (replaced by Regulation (EU) 2016/1037) — Financial contribution — Provision of goods — Action consisting of ‘entrusting’ a private body to carry out a function constituting a financial contribution — Article 4(2)(a) of Regulation No 597/2009 — Specificity of a subsidy — Article 6(d) of Regulation No 597/2009 — Calculation of benefit — Injury to the Union industry — Calculation of price undercutting and the injury margin — Causal link — Access to confidential data of the subsidy investigation — Rights of the defence.#Case T-300/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0005_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 April 2019 (Extracts).#Ammar Sharif v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Proportionality — Damage to reputation.#Case T-5/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0005decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 April 2019 (Extracts).#Ammar Sharif v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property — Proportionality — Damage to reputation.#Case T-5/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 April 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0611decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 29 March 2019.#All Star CV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Three-dimensional EU trade mark — Shape of a shoe sole — Well-known facts — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(3) and Article 52(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(3) and Article 59(2) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Rejection of the request to hold a hearing before the Board of Appeal — Article 77 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 96(1) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-611/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 March 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0582decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 March 2019.#Évariste Boshab and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common Foreign and Security Policy — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo — List of persons and entities subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and to the prohibition of entry and transit — Inclusion of the names of the applicants on the list — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-582/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 March 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0465_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (troisième chambre) du 21 mars 2019.#Falck Rettungsdienste GmbH et Falck A/S contre Stadt Solingen.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Passation des marchés publics – Directive 2014/24/UE – Article 10, sous h) – Exclusions spécifiques pour les marchés de services – Services de défense civile, de protection civile et de prévention des risques – Organisations ou associations à but non lucratif – Services ambulanciers de transport de patients – Transport en ambulance qualifié.#Affaire C-465/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 March 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0038decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bot delivered on 14 March 2019.#Criminal procedure against Massimo Gambino and Shpetim Hyka.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Bari.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in criminal matters — Directive 2012/29/EU — Minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime — Articles 16 and 18 — Examination of the victim by a criminal court of first instance — Alteration of the composition of the panel of judges — Fresh examination of the victim at the request of one of the parties to the proceedings — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 47 and 48 — Right to a fair trial and rights of the defence — Principle of immediacy — Scope — Victim’s right to protection during criminal proceedings.#Case C-38/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 March 2019

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2019-001324answered

EU cyber-defence corps

European Union · European Parliament · 13 March 2019

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2019-001323answered

EU cyber-defence corps

European Union · European Parliament · 13 March 2019

PreviousPage 2 of 3Next