Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,051 records in EU

All countriesUnited States · 41,749Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,716France · 4,100Netherlands · 3,841Austria · 3,578European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0189decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 December 2020.#Maen Haikal v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken against Syria – Freezing of funds – Rights of the defence – Right to a fair hearing – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection – Error of assessment – Right to property – Proportionality – Right to carry on an economic activity – Right to respect for private and family life.#Case T-189/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0286_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 December 2020.#Mykola Yanovych Azarov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-286/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 December 2020

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0356decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 December 2020.#AL v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Special adviser – Mission to represent the European Union in an international partnership body – Mission subsequently entrusted to another person – Action for annulment and for damages – Infringement of the rights of the defence – Distortion of facts and evidence – Insufficient and contradictory statement of reasons – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-356/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 December 2020

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0356_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 December 2020.#AL v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Special adviser – Mission to represent the European Union in an international partnership body – Mission subsequently entrusted to another person – Action for annulment and for damages – Infringement of the rights of the defence – Distortion of facts and evidence – Insufficient and contradictory statement of reasons – Appeal manifestly unfounded.#Case C-356/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 December 2020

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0259_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 December 2020.#João Miguel Barata v European Parliament.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Certification procedure – 2016 promotion exercise – Exclusion of the appellant from the final list of officials entitled to take part in the training programme – Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Equal treatment – Rights of the defence.#Case C-259/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 December 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0072decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 December 2020.#Suzanne Saleh Thabet and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Egypt – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicants’ names – Decision of an authority of a third State – Obligation of the Council of the European Union to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons.#Joined Cases C-72/19 P and C-145/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 December 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0072_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 December 2020.#Suzanne Saleh Thabet and Others v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Egypt – Freezing of funds and economic resources – List of the persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicants’ names – Decision of an authority of a third State – Obligation of the Council of the European Union to verify that that decision was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons.#Joined Cases C-72/19 P and C-145/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 December 2020

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0259decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 December 2020.#João Miguel Barata v European Parliament.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Certification procedure – 2016 promotion exercise – Exclusion of the appellant from the final list of officials entitled to take part in the training programme – Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Equal treatment – Rights of the defence.#Case C-259/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 December 2020

Report· XGCELEX 52020XG1130(02)open

The following information is brought to the attention of: ABDOLLAHI Hamed, AL NASSER, Abdelkarim Hussein Mohamed, AL-YACOUB, Ibrahim Salih Mohammed, ARBABSIAR Manssor, BOUYERI, Mohammed, IZZ-AL-DIN, Hasan, SHAHLAI Abdul Reza, SHAKURI Ali Gholam, COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE PHILIPPINES, including NEW PEOPLES ARMY (NPA), Hizballah Military Wing, EJÉRCITO DE LIBERACIÓN NACIONAL (‘National Liberation Army’), ‘SENDERO LUMINOSO’ – ‘SL’ (‘Shining Path’) and ‘TEYRBAZEN AZADIYA KURDISTAN’ – ‘TAK’ – persons and groups included on the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism and to Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (see Annexes to Council Decision (CFSP) 2020/1132 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1128) 2020/C 412/07

European Union · Council of the European Union · 30 November 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0107_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Alliance of Conservatives and Reformists in Europe (ACRE) v European Parliament.#Institutional law – European Parliament – Decision declaring certain expenses of a political party ineligible for a grant for the year 2017 – Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 – Prohibition of the funding of a national political party – Contribution or donation by a national political party – Principle of sound administration – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Decision granting a contribution to a political party for 2019 and making pre-funding of 100% of the maximum amount of the contribution subject to certain prior repayments – Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 – Rights of defence.#Case T-107/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 November 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0107decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 25 November 2020.#Alliance of Conservatives and Reformists in Europe (ACRE) v European Parliament.#Institutional law – European Parliament – Decision declaring certain expenses of a political party ineligible for a grant for the year 2017 – Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 – Prohibition of the funding of a national political party – Contribution or donation by a national political party – Principle of sound administration – Legal certainty – Equal treatment – Decision granting a contribution to a political party for 2019 and making pre-funding of 100% of the maximum amount of the contribution subject to certain prior repayments – Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1141/2014 – Rights of defence.#Case T-107/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 November 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0238decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 November 2020.#EZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Hannover.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Conditions for granting refugee status – Refusal to perform military service – Article 9(2)(e) – Law of the country of origin which does not provide for the right to conscience objection – Protection of persons who have fled their country of origin after the expiry of the period for suspending military service – Article 9(3) – Connection between the reasons mentioned in Article 10 of that directive and the prosecution and punishment referred to in Article 9(2)(e) of that directive – Evidence.#Case C-238/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0151_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 October 2020.#Slim Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Ali v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Tunisia – Measures taken against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and associated persons and entities – List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to adjudicate within a reasonable time – Sufficient factual basis – Time limits for bringing proceedings – Legal aid – Suspensive effect – Admissibility – Conditions.#Case T-151/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 October 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0151decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 28 October 2020.#Slim Ben Tijani Ben Haj Hamda Ben Ali v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Tunisia – Measures taken against persons responsible for misappropriation of State funds and associated persons and entities – List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to adjudicate within a reasonable time – Sufficient factual basis – Time limits for bringing proceedings – Legal aid – Suspensive effect – Admissibility – Conditions.#Case T-151/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 October 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0307decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 October 2020.#Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel originating in China – Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty – Rights of the defence – Calculation of the dumping margin – Analogue country – Injury – Causal link.#Case T-307/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0307_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 October 2020.#Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain seamless pipes and tubes of stainless steel originating in China – Imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty – Rights of the defence – Calculation of the dumping margin – Analogue country – Injury – Causal link.#Case T-307/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2020

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-9-2020-005427answered

Trade defence instruments

European Union · European Parliament · 5 October 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0380_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 October 2020 (Extracts).#HeidelbergCement AG and Schwenk Zement KG v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Market for grey cement in Croatia – Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement – Undertakings concerned – Relevant market – Substantial part of the internal market – Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition – Commitments – Rights of the defence – Partial referral to the national authorities.#Case T-380/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0380decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 October 2020 (Extracts).#HeidelbergCement AG and Schwenk Zement KG v European Commission.#Competition – Concentrations – Market for grey cement in Croatia – Decision declaring the concentration incompatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement – Undertakings concerned – Relevant market – Substantial part of the internal market – Assessment of the effects of the transaction on competition – Commitments – Rights of the defence – Partial referral to the national authorities.#Case T-380/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0087decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 October 2020.#Jon Broughton v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Deferment of advancement to a higher step for a period of six months – Annulment of reclassification in the higher grade – Ability to work in a third language – Administrative investigation – Duty to act in good faith – Impartiality – Rights of the defence – Equality of arms – Obligation to state reasons – Articles 11 and 12 of the Staff Regulations.#Case T-87/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0087_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 October 2020.#Jon Broughton v European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Deferment of advancement to a higher step for a period of six months – Annulment of reclassification in the higher grade – Ability to work in a third language – Administrative investigation – Duty to act in good faith – Impartiality – Rights of the defence – Equality of arms – Obligation to state reasons – Articles 11 and 12 of the Staff Regulations.#Case T-87/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0292_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Artem Viktorovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-292/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 September 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0289_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Sergej Arbuzov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State respected the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-289/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 September 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0289decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Sergej Arbuzov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State respected the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-289/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 September 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0291decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-291/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 September 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0292decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Artem Viktorovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-292/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 September 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0291_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 September 2020.#Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-291/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 September 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0386_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2020.#Hamas v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Fight against terrorism – Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Article 1(4) and (6) – Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 – Article 2(3) – Retention of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts – Conditions – Competent authority equivalent to a judicial authority – Sentencing decision – Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case C-386/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2020

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0386decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 September 2020.#Hamas v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Fight against terrorism – Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities – Freezing of funds – Common Position 2001/931/CFSP – Article 1(4) and (6) – Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 – Article 2(3) – Retention of an organisation on the list of persons, groups and entities involved in terrorist acts – Conditions – Competent authority equivalent to a judicial authority – Sentencing decision – Ongoing risk of involvement in terrorist activities – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection.#Case C-386/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2020

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0152decided

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 9 September 2020.#Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Slovak market for broadband internet access services – Regulatory obligation on the part of operators with significant market power to grant access to the local loop – Conditions laid down by the incumbent operator for unbundled access by other operators to the local loop – Indispensability of the access – Imputability of a subsidiary’s conduct to the parent company – Rights of the defence.#Case C-152/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 September 2020

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0131_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 2 September 2020.#IR v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Rights and obligations of officials – Secondment in the interests of the service – Article 37, first paragraph, heading (a), first indent, of the Staff Regulations – Article 38 of the Staff Regulations – Refusal to extend a secondment – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Rights of the defence.#Case T-131/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 September 2020

Record· TOCELEX 62019TO0613decided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 2 September 2020.#European Network on Independent Living Brussels Office (ENIL Brussels Office) and Others v European Commission.#Action for annulment – ERDF – Operational programme ‘Regions in Growth’ – Priority Axis 5 (Regional social infrastructure) – Grant intended to support the deinstitutionalisation of services for elderly people and people with disabilities – Refusal to suspend the call for proposals at the request of organisations for the defence and representation of people with disabilities – Act not open to challenge – Inadmissibility.#Case T-613/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 September 2020

PreviousPage 21 of 22Next