Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,401 records in EU

All countriesUnited States · 41,750Ireland · 23,761United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,721France · 4,100Netherlands · 3,841Austria · 3,578European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0633decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 November 2017.#Dominique Bilde v European Parliament.#Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums wrongfully paid — Power of the Secretary-General — Electa una via — Rights of the defence — Burden of proof — Obligation to state reasons — Legitimate expectations — Political rights — Equal treatment — Misuse of power — Independence of the Members — Error of fact — Proportionality.#Case T-633/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 November 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0634decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 29 November 2017.#Sophie Montel v European Parliament.#Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament — Parliamentary assistance allowance — Recovery of sums wrongfully paid — Power of the Secretary-General — Electa una via — Rights of the defence — Burden of proof — Obligation to state reasons — Legitimate expectations — Political rights — Equal treatment — Misuse of power — Independence of the Members — Error of fact — Proportionality.#Case T-634/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 November 2017

Record· CJCELEX 62016CJ0481decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 November 2017.#European Commission v Hellenic Republic.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — State aid — Aid declared unlawful and incompatible with the internal market — Obligation to recover — Obligation to provide information — Non-implementation — Pleas in defence — Absolute impossibility of implementation.#Case C-481/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2017

Record· CJCELEX 62016CJ0298decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 November 2017.#Teodor Ispas and Anduţa Ispas v Direcţia Generală a Finanţelor Publice Cluj.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — General principles of EU law — Right to good administration and rights of the defence — National tax rules providing for the right to be heard and the right to be informed during an administrative tax procedure — Decision to levy value added tax issued by the national tax authorities without giving the taxpayer access to the information and the documents upon which that decision was based.#Case C-298/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 November 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0245decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 November 2017.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list — Duty to state reasons — Legal basis — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of defence — Right to property — Right to reputation — Proportionality — Protection of fundamental rights equivalent to that guaranteed in the European Union — Plea of illegality.#Case T-245/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 November 2017

Record· CJCELEX 62016CJ0457decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 October 2017.#Global Steel Wire, SA and Others v European Commission.#Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European prestressing steel market — Infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Attributability of unlawful conduct of subsidiaries to their parent company — Definition of ‘undertaking’ — Evidence for the finding of an economic unit — Presumption of actual exercise of decisive influence — Successive undertakings — Amount of the fine — Ability to pay — Conditions — Observance of the rights of the defence.#Joined Cases C-457/16 P and C-459/16 P to C-461/16 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 October 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0502decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 October 2017.#Kingdom of Spain v European Commission.#EAGF and EAFRD — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by Spain — Flat-rate financial corrections — Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EU) No 1306/2013 — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Proportionality — Rights of defence.#Case T-502/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 October 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0386decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 October 2017.#Falegnameria Universo dei F.lli Priarollo Snc v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU figurative mark silente PORTE & PORTE — Genuine use — Place of use — Nature of use — Use by third parties — Declaration of revocation — Right of defence — Articles 75 and 76 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.#Case T-386/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 October 2017

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2017-005999answered

Common defence policy

European Union · European Parliament · 27 September 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0327decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 19 September 2017.#Hellenic Republic v European Commission.#EAGGF — Guidance Section — Reduction of financial assistance — Operational programme — Legal basis — Transitional provisions — Application of financial corrections after the programming period concerned — Infringement of essential procedural requirements — Failure to comply with the time-limit for adopting a decision — Rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Ne bis in idem — Proportionality.#Case T-327/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 September 2017

Record· CJCELEX 62015CJ0588decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 September 2017.#LG Electronics, Inc. v European Commission.#Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Global market for cathode ray tubes for television sets and computer monitors — Agreements and concerted practices relating to prices, markets sharing, customer allocation and production limitation — Rights of the defence — Sending of the statement of objections only to the parent companies of a joint venture and not to the joint venture itself — Fine — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Point 13 — Determining the value of sales relating to an infringement — Intragroup sales of the relevant product outside the European Economic Area (EEA) — Account to be taken of the sales within the EEA of final products in which the relevant product has been installed — Equal treatment.#Case C-588/15 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 September 2017

Report· CCCELEX 62016CC0298decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 7 September 2017.#Teodor Ispas and Anduţa Ispas v Direcţia Generală a Finanţelor Publice Cluj.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — General principles of EU law — Right to good administration and rights of the defence — National tax rules providing for the right to be heard and the right to be informed during an administrative tax procedure — Decision to levy value added tax issued by the national tax authorities without giving the taxpayer access to the information and the documents upon which that decision was based.#Case C-298/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 September 2017

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0270decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 10 August 2017.#Openbaar Ministerie v Tadas Tupikas.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Surrender procedures between Member States — Conditions for execution — Reasons for optional non-execution — Article 4a(1) introduced by Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA — Arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence or a detention order — ‘Trial resulting in the decision’ — Person concerned having appeared in person at first instance — Appeal proceedings involving a re-examination of the substance of the case — Arrest warrant providing no information making it possible to check whether the rights of the defence of the person convicted were upheld during the appeal proceedings.#Case C-270/17 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 August 2017

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0270decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 26 July 2017.#Openbaar Ministerie v Tadas Tupikas.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Surrender procedures between Member States — Conditions for execution — Reasons for optional non-execution — Article 4a(1) introduced by Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA — Arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence or a detention order — ‘Trial resulting in the decision’ — Person concerned having appeared in person at first instance — Appeal proceedings involving a re-examination of the substance of the case — Arrest warrant providing no information making it possible to check whether the rights of the defence of the person convicted were upheld during the appeal proceedings.#Case C-270/17 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2017

Report· CCCELEX 62016CC0358decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 26 July 2017.#UBS Europe SE and Alain Hondequin and Others v DV and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative (Luxembourg).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Directive 2004/39/EC — Article 54(1) and (3) — Scope of the obligation of professional secrecy on national financial supervisory authorities — Finding of the absence of good repute — Cases covered by criminal law — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 47 and 48 — Rights of the defence — Access to the file.#Case C-358/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 July 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0619decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 July 2017.#Bureau d'achat de diamant Centrafrique (Badica) and Kardiam v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in the Central African Republic — Freezing of funds — Initial listing decision — List of persons and entities to which the freezing of funds and economic resources applies — Inclusion of the applicants’ names — Implementation of a UN resolution — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of defence — Presumption of innocence — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-619/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 July 2017

Record· QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITYP-8-2017-004723open

European Defence Fund

European Union · European Parliament · 12 July 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0221decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 July 2017.#Sergej Arbuzov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Retention of the applicant’s name on the list — Principle of sound administration — Rights of defence — Duty to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Right to property.#Case T-221/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0215decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 July 2017.#Mykola Yanovych Azarov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine — Freezing of funds — List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources — Maintaining the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons — Rights of defence — Right to property — Right to pursue an economic activity — Proportionality — Misuse of powers — Principle of good administration — Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-215/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2017

Record· CJCELEX 62016CJ0180decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 July 2017.#Toshiba Corporation v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in gas insulated switchgear projects — Decision taken by the European Commission following annulment in part of the initial decision by the General Court of the European Union — Amendment of fines — Rights of the defence — No adoption of a new statement of objections — Equal treatment — Joint venture — Calculation of the starting amount — Extent of contribution to the infringement — Res judicata.#Case C-180/16 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 July 2017

Record· QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITYP-8-2017-004570open

Common defence policy

European Union · European Parliament · 5 July 2017

Record· TJCELEX 62015TJ0262decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 June 2017.#Dmitrii Konstantinovich Kiselev v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening Ukraine — Freezing of funds — Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States — Natural person actively supporting or implementing actions undermining or threatening Ukraine — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Freedom of expression — Proportionality — Rights of defence.#Case T-262/15.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 June 2017

Decision· DCELEX 32017D0971in force

Council Decision (EU) 2017/971 of 8 June 2017 determining the planning and conduct arrangements for EU non-executive military CSDP missions and amending Decisions 2010/96/CFSP on a European Union military mission to contribute to the training of Somali security forces, 2013/34/CFSP on a European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian armed forces (EUTM Mali) and (CFSP) 2016/610 on a European Union CSDP military training mission in the Central African Republic (EUTM RCA)

European Union · EUR-Lex · 8 June 2017

PreviousPage 28 of 29Next