Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

151 records in EU in 2021

All countriesUnited States · 41,749Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,712France · 4,098Netherlands · 3,840Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0267_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 July 2021.#Sergej Arbuzov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation of the Council to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-267/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0268_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 July 2021.#Artem Viktorovych Pshonka v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of the persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Retention of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation of the Council to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-268/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 July 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0355_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 June 2021 (Extracts).#CE v Comittee of the Regions.#Civil Service – Temporary staff – Article 2(c) of the CEOS – Contract for an indefinite period – Early termination with notice – Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS – Breakdown in the relationship of trust – Terms of notice – Abuse of process – Right to be heard – Principle of sound administration – Rights of the defence – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-355/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0415decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#KT v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Summary dismissal for grave misconduct – Rights of the defence – Hearing of witnesses – Delegation of power – Preparation of the contested decision – Reasonable period of time – Impartiality – Protection of personal data – Proportionality.#Case T-415/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0586decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#PL v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Career development report – 2017 assessment exercise – Appointment of the assessor – Article 22a of the Staff Regulations – General implementing provisions for Article 43 of the Staff Regulations – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Reasonable time – Principle of impartiality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Obligation to state reasons – Article 26 of the Staff Regulations – Rights of the defence.#Case T-586/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0415_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#KT v European Investment Bank.#Civil service – EIB staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Summary dismissal for grave misconduct – Rights of the defence – Hearing of witnesses – Delegation of power – Preparation of the contested decision – Reasonable period of time – Impartiality – Protection of personal data – Proportionality.#Case T-415/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0355decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 June 2021 (Extracts).#CE v Comittee of the Regions.#Civil Service – Temporary staff – Article 2(c) of the CEOS – Contract for an indefinite period – Early termination with notice – Article 47(c)(i) of the CEOS – Breakdown in the relationship of trust – Terms of notice – Abuse of process – Right to be heard – Principle of sound administration – Rights of the defence – Manifest error of assessment.#Case T-355/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0586_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 16 June 2021.#PL v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Career development report – 2017 assessment exercise – Appointment of the assessor – Article 22a of the Staff Regulations – General implementing provisions for Article 43 of the Staff Regulations – Duty to have regard for the welfare of officials – Reasonable time – Principle of impartiality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Obligation to state reasons – Article 26 of the Staff Regulations – Rights of the defence.#Case T-586/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0303decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-303/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0302decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-302/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0303_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-303/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0302_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 June 2021.#Oleksandr Viktorovych Yanukovych v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Council’s obligation to verify that the decision of an authority of a third State was taken in accordance with the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection.#Case T-302/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2021

Report· XGCELEX 52021XG0520(01)open

The following information is brought to the attention of ABDOLLAHI Hamed, AL-NASSER, Abdelkarim Hussein Mohamed, AL YACOUB, Ibrahim Salih Mohammed, ARBABSIAR Manssor, BOUYERI, Mohammed, IZZ-AL-DIN, Hasan, MOHAMMED, Khalid Shaikh, SHAHLAI Abdul Reza, SHAKURI Ali Gholam, COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE PHILIPPINES, including New People’s Army (NPA), HIZBALLAH MILITARY WING, EJÉRCITO DE LIBERACIÓN NACIONAL (‘National Liberation Army’), POPULAR FRONT FOR THE LIBERATION OF PALESTINE (PFLP), POPULAR FRONT FOR THE LIBERATION OF PALESTINE – General Command, and SENDERO LUMINOSO – ‘SL’ (‘Shining Path’) persons and groups included on the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Council Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism and to Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (see Annexes to Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/142 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/138) 2021/C 193/02

European Union · Council of the European Union · 20 May 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0254_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 May 2021.#China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products and Others v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain cast iron articles originating in China – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Association – Standing to bring proceedings – Interest in bringing proceedings – Injury determination – Calculation of the import volume – Macroeconomic and microeconomic indicators – Sampling – Calculation of the EU industry’s cost of production – Prices charged intra-group – Causal link – Attribution and non-attribution analysis – No assessment of injury by segment – Assessment of the significance of undercutting – Confidential treatment of information – Rights of the defence – PCN-by-PCN methodology – Product comparability – Calculation of the normal value – Analogue country – Adjustment for VAT – Determination of the selling, general and administrative costs and profit.#Case T-254/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 May 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62018TJ0254decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 19 May 2021.#China Chamber of Commerce for Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products and Others v European Commission.#Dumping – Imports of certain cast iron articles originating in China – Definitive anti-dumping duty – Action for annulment – Admissibility – Association – Standing to bring proceedings – Interest in bringing proceedings – Injury determination – Calculation of the import volume – Macroeconomic and microeconomic indicators – Sampling – Calculation of the EU industry’s cost of production – Prices charged intra-group – Causal link – Attribution and non-attribution analysis – No assessment of injury by segment – Assessment of the significance of undercutting – Confidential treatment of information – Rights of the defence – PCN-by-PCN methodology – Product comparability – Calculation of the normal value – Analogue country – Adjustment for VAT – Determination of the selling, general and administrative costs and profit.#Case T-254/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 May 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0789_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 May 2021.#Tom Moerenhout and Others v European Commission.#Law governing the institutions – European citizens’ initiative – Trade with territories under military occupation – Refusal of registration – Manifest lack of powers of the Commission – Article 4(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 – Common commercial policy – Article 207 TFEU – Common foreign and security policy – Article 215 TFEU – Obligation to state reasons – Article 4(3) of Regulation No 211/2011.#Case T-789/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 May 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0789decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 May 2021.#Tom Moerenhout and Others v European Commission.#Law governing the institutions – European citizens’ initiative – Trade with territories under military occupation – Refusal of registration – Manifest lack of powers of the Commission – Article 4(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 – Common commercial policy – Article 207 TFEU – Common foreign and security policy – Article 215 TFEU – Obligation to state reasons – Article 4(3) of Regulation No 211/2011.#Case T-789/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 May 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62019CC0791decided

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 6 May 2021.#European Commission v Republic of Poland.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Disciplinary regime applicable to judges – Rule of law – Independence of judges – Effective legal protection in the fields covered by Union law – Second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Disciplinary offences resulting from the content of judicial decisions – Independent disciplinary courts or tribunals established by law – Respect for reasonable time and the rights of the defence in disciplinary proceedings – Article 267 TFEU – Restriction of the right of national courts to submit requests for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice and of their obligation to do so.#Case C-791/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 May 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0260_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#Mazen Al-Tarazi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Rights of defence – Right to property – Right to exercise an economic activity – Right to respect for private and family life – Proportionality.#Case T-260/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0285_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#SGI Studio Galli Ingegneria Srl v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Grant agreement – The MARSOL Project – Eligible costs – OLAF investigation report finding certain expenses incurred to be ineligible – Repayment of sums paid – Burden of proof – Principle of good faith – Right to be heard – Principle of sound administration – Rights of the defence – Proportionality.#Case T-285/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0260decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#Mazen Al-Tarazi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Rights of defence – Right to property – Right to exercise an economic activity – Right to respect for private and family life – Proportionality.#Case T-260/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62019TJ0285decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 April 2021.#SGI Studio Galli Ingegneria Srl v European Commission.#Arbitration clause – Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) – Grant agreement – The MARSOL Project – Eligible costs – OLAF investigation report finding certain expenses incurred to be ineligible – Repayment of sums paid – Burden of proof – Principle of good faith – Right to be heard – Principle of sound administration – Rights of the defence – Proportionality.#Case T-285/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0152_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 March 2021.#Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Slovak market for broadband internet access services – Regulatory obligation on the part of operators with significant market power to grant access to the local loop – Conditions laid down by the incumbent operator for unbundled access by other operators to the local loop – Indispensability of the access – Imputability of a subsidiary’s conduct to the parent company – Rights of the defence.#Case C-152/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 March 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0165_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 March 2021.#Slovak Telekom, a.s. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Slovak market for broadband internet access services – Regulatory obligation on the part of operators with significant market power to grant access to the local loop – Conditions laid down by the incumbent operator for unbundled access by other operators to the local loop – Indispensability of the access – Margin squeeze – Costs – Competitor at least as efficient as the dominant undertaking – Rights of the defence.#Case C-165/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 March 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0152decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 March 2021.#Deutsche Telekom AG v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Slovak market for broadband internet access services – Regulatory obligation on the part of operators with significant market power to grant access to the local loop – Conditions laid down by the incumbent operator for unbundled access by other operators to the local loop – Indispensability of the access – Imputability of a subsidiary’s conduct to the parent company – Rights of the defence.#Case C-152/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 March 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0165decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 25 March 2021.#Slovak Telekom, a.s. v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Article 102 TFEU – Abuse of dominant position – Slovak market for broadband internet access services – Regulatory obligation on the part of operators with significant market power to grant access to the local loop – Conditions laid down by the incumbent operator for unbundled access by other operators to the local loop – Indispensability of the access – Margin squeeze – Costs – Competitor at least as efficient as the dominant undertaking – Rights of the defence.#Case C-165/19 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 March 2021

Record· CJCELEX 62016CJ0611decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 March 2021.#Xellia Pharmaceuticals ApS and Alpharma, LLC, anciennement Zoetis Products LLC v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Pharmaceutical products – Market for antidepressants (citalopram) – Settlement agreements relating to disputes concerning process patents concluded by a manufacturer of originator medicines who is the holder of those patents and manufacturers of generic medicines – Article 101 TFEU – Potential competition – Restriction by object – Characterisation – Calculation of the amount of the fine – Rights of the defence – Reasonable time – Loss of documents due to the passage of time – General duty of care – Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Second subparagraph of Article 23(2) – Maximum amount of the fine – Taking into account the business year preceding that in which the European Commission’s decision was adopted – Last full year of normal economic activity.#Case C-611/16 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 March 2021

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0546decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 18 March 2021.#FN and Others v Übernahmekommission.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Company law – Takeover bids – Directive 2004/25/EC – Article 5 – Mandatory bid – Article 4 – Supervisory authority – Final decision making a finding of infringement of the obligation to make a takeover bid – Binding effect of that decision in subsequent proceedings for an administrative sanction initiated by the same authority – EU law principle of effectiveness – General principles of EU law – Rights of the defence – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 47 and 48 – Right to silence – Presumption of innocence – Access to an independent and impartial tribunal.#Case C-546/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 March 2021

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0719_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 17 March 2021.#FMC Corporation v European Commission.#Plant-protection products – Active substance flupyrsulfuron-methyl – Non-renewal of inclusion in the Annex to Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011 – Assessment procedure – Proposed classification of an active substance – Precautionary principle – Rights of defence – Legal certainty – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality – Principle of non-discrimination – Principle of sound administration – Legitimate expectations.#Case T-719/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 March 2021

PreviousPage 3 of 4Next