Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

351 records in EU

All countriesUnited States · 41,749Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,713France · 4,100Netherlands · 3,841Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0244_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#P and Others v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced person – Directive 2001/55/EC – Articles 4 and 7 – Invasion of Ukraine by Russian armed forces – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/382 – Article 2(3) – Option for a Member State to grant temporary protection to displaced persons who are not referred to in that decision – Point in time when a Member State that has granted such persons temporary protection may terminate that protection – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 6 – Return decision – Point in time when a Member State may issue a return decision – Illegal stay.#Joined Cases C-244/24 and C-290/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0244decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 December 2024.#P and Others v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Asylum policy – Temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons – Directive 2001/55/EC – Articles 4 and 7 – Invasion of Ukraine by Russian armed forces – Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/382 – Article 2(3) – Option for a Member State to apply temporary protection to displaced persons not covered by that decision – Point in time when a Member State which has granted temporary protection to such persons may terminate that protection – Return of illegally staying third-country nationals – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 6 – Return decision – Point in time when a Member State may adopt a return decision – Illegal stay.#Joined Cases C-244/24 and C-290/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0134_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2024.#Institut Jožef Stefan v European Commission.#Award of grants in the field of defence – EDF – Funding of research actions – Call for proposals EDF‑2021-MCBRN-R – Rejection of the applicant’s proposal on account of non-compliance with the admissibility conditions and criteria – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of sound administration – Right to be heard – Error of assessment.#Case T-134/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0732_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2024.#Oleg Vladimirovich Deripaska v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Retention of the of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ – Concept of ‘businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(a) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection and rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to be heard.#Case T-732/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0134decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2024.#Institut Jožef Stefan v European Commission.#Award of grants in the field of defence – EDF – Funding of research actions – Call for proposals EDF‑2021-MCBRN-R – Rejection of the applicant’s proposal on account of non-compliance with the admissibility conditions and criteria – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of sound administration – Right to be heard – Error of assessment.#Case T-134/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0732decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2024.#Oleg Vladimirovich Deripaska v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Retention of the of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ – Concept of ‘businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(a) and (g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Right to effective judicial protection and rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to be heard.#Case T-732/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0587decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2024.#DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA).#Appeal – Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Annex IX – Article 3 – Compliance with the judgments of the Civil Service Tribunal and of the General Court of the European Union – Annulment of the decisions of the appointing authority – Discretion – Obligation to resume the proceedings at the very point at which the illegality occurred – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard – Article 29 – Compensation for the harm suffered.#Case C-587/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0587_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2024.#DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights.#Appeal – Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Annex IX – Article 3 – Compliance with the judgments of the Civil Service Tribunal and of the General Court of the European Union – Annulment of the decisions of the appointing authority – Discretion – Obligation to resume the proceedings at the very point at which the illegality occurred – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard – Article 29 – Compensation for the harm suffered.#Case C-587/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 December 2024

Report· XGCELEX 52024XG07047open

Notice for the attention of the person, entities and ports subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2894 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1529, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2896 concerning restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region

European Union · Council of the European Union · 19 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0632_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, anciennement Sberbank Europe AG v European Central Bank.#Access to documents – Decision 2004/258/EC – ECB’s assessment that Sberbank banka was failing or likely to fail – Refusal to grant access – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Admissibility – Article 22(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Article 32(1) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 – Supervised entity – Shareholders’ rights of defence – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right of access to the ECB’s file.#Case T-632/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0632decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 November 2024.#MeSoFa Vermögensverwaltungs AG, formerly Sber Vermögensverwaltungs AG, initially Sberbank Europe AG v European Central Bank.#Access to documents – Decision 2004/258/EC – ECB’s assessment that Sberbank banka was failing or likely to fail – Refusal to grant access – Action for annulment – Act not open to challenge – Admissibility – Article 22(2) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 – Article 32(1) of Regulation (EU) No 468/2014 – Supervised entity – Shareholders’ rights of defence – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Right of access to the ECB’s file.#Case T-632/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 November 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0480decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Vladimir Gheorghe Plahotniuc v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of actions destabilising Moldova – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Criminal investigations and prosecutions initiated by the authorities of a third State – Obligation to verify that that decision observes the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-480/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0480_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 23 October 2024.#Vladimir Gheorghe Plahotniuc v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of actions destabilising Moldova – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the lists – Criminal investigations and prosecutions initiated by the authorities of a third State – Obligation to verify that that decision observes the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-480/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0201_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 October 2024.#Communications Regulatory Authority (CRA) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Iran – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Proportionality – Misuse of powers.#Case T-201/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0201decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 16 October 2024.#Communications Regulatory Authority (CRA) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Iran – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Proportionality – Misuse of powers.#Case T-201/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 October 2024

Report· XGCELEX 52024XG06279open

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2023/1532, as amended by Council Decision (CFSP) 2024/2698 and in Council Regulation (EU) 2023/1529, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2697 concerning restrictive measures in view of Iran’s military support of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and to armed groups and entities in the Middle East and the Red Sea region

European Union · Council of the European Union · 15 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0029_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Ferriera Valsabbia SpA and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for concrete reinforcing bars – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Decision adopted following the annulment of earlier decisions – Holding of a new hearing attended by the competition authorities of the Member States – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Requirement of impartiality – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons.#Joined Cases C-29/23 P and C-30/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0029decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Ferriera Valsabbia SpA and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for concrete reinforcing bars – Decision of the European Commission finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Decision adopted following the annulment of earlier decisions – Holding of a new hearing attended by the competition authorities of the Member States – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Requirement of impartiality – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons.#Joined Cases C-29/23 P and C-30/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0031decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 October 2024.#Ferriere Nord SpA v European Commission.#Appeal – Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Market for concrete reinforcing bars – European Commission Decision finding an infringement of Article 65 CS after the expiry of the ECSC Treaty on the basis of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 – Decision adopted following the annulment of earlier decisions – Holding of a new hearing attended by the competition authorities of the Member States – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Requirement of impartiality – Reasonable time – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Ne bis in idem principle – Plea of illegality – Aggravating circumstances – Repeated infringement – Mitigating circumstances – Equal treatment.#Case C-31/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0589_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024.#Silgan Holdings, Inc. and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Metal packaging market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Cooperation between the Commission and the national competition authorities – Initiation of an investigation procedure by the Commission at the request of a national competition authority – Period for re-allocation – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Principle of subsidiarity – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Principle of good administration – Counterclaim for re-evaluation of the amount of the fine following a settlement procedure.#Case T-589/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0669_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#IP v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Termination of the contract without notice – OLAF investigation – Reimbursement of medical expenses – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to implement a judgment of the General Court – Measures necessary to implement a judgment delivered in an action for annulment – Res judicata – Procedural defect – Article 12 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Consultation of the Disciplinary Board – Rights of the defence – Liability – Material and non-material damage.#Case T-669/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0669decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#IP v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the contract staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Termination of the contract without notice – OLAF investigation – Reimbursement of medical expenses – Article 266 TFEU – Decision adopted to implement a judgment of the General Court – Measures necessary to implement a judgment delivered in an action for annulment – Res judicata – Procedural defect – Article 12 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations – Consultation of the Disciplinary Board – Rights of the defence – Liability – Material and non-material damage.#Case T-669/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0587decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#Crown Holdings, Inc. and Crown Cork & Seal Deutschland Holdings GmbH v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Metal packaging market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Cooperation between the Commission and the national competition authorities – Initiation of an investigation procedure by the Commission at the request of a national competition authority – Period for re-allocation – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Principle of subsidiarity – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Principle of good administration – Counterclaim for re-evaluation of the amount of the fine following a settlement procedure.#Case T-587/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0589decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024.#Silgan Holdings, Inc. and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Metal packaging market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Cooperation between the Commission and the national competition authorities – Initiation of an investigation procedure by the Commission at the request of a national competition authority – Period for re-allocation – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Principle of subsidiarity – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Principle of good administration – Counterclaim for re-evaluation of the amount of the fine following a settlement procedure.#Case T-589/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0587_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 2 October 2024 (Extracts).#Crown Holdings, Inc. and Crown Cork & Seal Deutschland Holdings GmbH v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Metal packaging market – Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU – Cooperation between the Commission and the national competition authorities – Initiation of an investigation procedure by the Commission at the request of a national competition authority – Period for re-allocation – Obligation to state reasons – Legitimate expectations – Principle of subsidiarity – Rights of the defence – Proportionality – Principle of good administration – Counterclaim for re-evaluation of the amount of the fine following a settlement procedure.#Case T-587/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 2 October 2024

PreviousPage 7 of 8Next