PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects

Digitalisation

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

567 records

All countriesNetherlands · 461United States · 51European Union · 45Germany · 9United Kingdom · 1Search this topic

Records

Motion· Motie2025Z13711adopted

Motion by members Buijsse en Kathmann over komen tot een stelsel van financiële administratie bij departementen waarin digitalisering is meegenomen

Original: Motie van de leden Buijsse en Kathmann over komen tot een stelsel van financiële administratie bij departementen waarin digitalisering is meegenomen

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 22 April 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by members Buijsse en Kathmann over komen tot een stelsel van financiële administratie bij departementen waarin digitalisering is meegenomen

Record· Verzoek bij commissie-regeling van werkzaamheden2026Z04275concluded

Verzoek van de leden MOORMAN en KATHMANN (GroenLinks-PvdA) om, voorafgaand aan het commissiedebat Digitalisering, leermiddelen en ondersteuningsstructuur in het funderend onderwijs d.d. 9 april 2026, een rondetafelgesprek te organiseren over AI in het funderend onderwijs

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 9 April 2026

Verzoek van de leden MOORMAN en KATHMANN (GroenLinks-PvdA) om, voorafgaand aan het commissiedebat Digitalisering, leermiddelen en ondersteuningsstructuur in het funderend onderwijs d.d. 9 april 2026, een rondetafelgesprek te organiseren over AI in het funderend onderwijs

Motion· Motie2026Z04032rejected

Motion by members Kathmann en Van den Berg over met Prinsjesdag 2026 een voorstel presenteren on the financiële bijdrage van de Rijksoverheid aan de Nederlandse Digitaliseringsstrategie

Original: Motie van de leden Kathmann en Van den Berg over met Prinsjesdag 2026 een voorstel presenteren over de financiële bijdrage van de Rijksoverheid aan de Nederlandse Digitaliseringsstrategie

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 10 March 2026

Translated from Dutch

Motion by members Kathmann en Van den Berg over met Prinsjesdag 2026 een voorstel presenteren on the financiële bijdrage van de Rijksoverheid aan de Nederlandse Digitaliseringsstrategie

Bill· SS. 1396 (119th)referred

Content Origin Protection and Integrity from Edited and Deepfaked Media Act of 2025

United States · United States Congress · 23 February 2026

Content Origin Protection and Integrity from Edited and Deepfaked Media Act of 2025 This bill requires certain tools used to create or modify digital content, including artificial intelligence (AI), to allow users to embed in such content information documenting its origin and history. This is known as content provenance information . The bill also prohibits the removal or alteration of content provenance information in certain circumstances. Specifically, tools used for the primary purpose of creating or significantly modifying content via algorithms, or creating or substantially modifying digital representations of copyrighted work, must allow users to include content provenance information in the resulting digital content. Further, the bill prohibits certain large websites and applications (e.g., social media applications) from removing, altering, tampering with, or disabling content provenance information; and it prohibits any individual or entity from taking such actions in furtherance of an unfair or deceptive act in commerce. Finally, the bill prohibits certain commercial uses of digital representations of copyrighted work that has associated content provenance information without the consent of the work’s owner. Specifically, such representations may not be used to (1) train a system that uses AI or an algorithm, or (2) create algorithmically generated or modified content. The bill provides for enforcement by the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general (or other authorized state officials). Owners of digital representations of copyrighted content with associated content provenance information may also bring suit to enforce violations related to their content.

Bill· SS. 1896 (117th)referred

Algorithmic Justice and Online Platform Transparency Act

United States · United States Congress · 21 January 2026

Algorithmic Justice and Online Platform Transparency Act This bill establishes requirements for certain commercial online platforms (e.g., social media sites) that withhold or promote content through algorithms and related computational processes that use personal information. The platforms must make disclosures about their collection and use of personal information and their content moderation practices; retain specified records that describe how the algorithms use personal information and assess whether the algorithms produce disparate outcomes based on race and other demographic factors in terms of access to housing, employment, financial services, and related matters; employ algorithms safely and effectively; and allow users to access and transfer their personal information. If a platform uses algorithms to publish or sell advertising, it must maintain a library of the advertisements. The Federal Trade Commission must also adopt rules concerning deceptive advertising. A platform's chief executive officer or other senior officer must certify compliance with disclosure requirements. Additionally, platforms may not (1) employ algorithms or other design features that result in discrimination or similar harms based on demographic or biometric factors, or (2) process information such that it impairs voting rights. Further, users of a platform may not violate civil rights laws using the platform's algorithms. The bill prohibits waivers or other methods that limit rights under the bill; provides whistleblower protections for individuals who report violations; and authorizes enforcement by specified federal agencies, states, and private individuals. The bill also provides funding for an interagency task force to study the discriminatory use of personal information by platforms' algorithms.

Bill· HRH.R. 3611 (117th)referred

Algorithmic Justice and Online Platform Transparency Act

United States · United States Congress · 21 January 2026

Algorithmic Justice and Online Platform Transparency Act This bill establishes requirements for certain commercial online platforms (e.g., social media sites) that withhold or promote content through algorithms and related computational processes that use personal information. The platforms must make disclosures about their collection and use of personal information and their content moderation practices; retain specified records that describe how the algorithms use personal information and assess whether the algorithms produce disparate outcomes based on race and other demographic factors in terms of access to housing, employment, financial services, and related matters; employ algorithms safely and effectively; and allow users to access and transfer their personal information. If a platform uses algorithms to publish or sell advertising, it must maintain a library of the advertisements. The Federal Trade Commission must also adopt rules concerning deceptive advertising. A platform's chief executive officer or other senior officer must certify compliance with disclosure requirements. Additionally, platforms may not (1) employ algorithms or other design features that result in discrimination or similar harms based on demographic or biometric factors, or (2) process information such that it impairs voting rights. Further, users of a platform may not violate civil rights laws using the platform's algorithms. The bill prohibits waivers or other methods that limit rights under the bill; provides whistleblower protections for individuals who report violations; and authorizes enforcement by specified federal agencies, states, and private individuals. The bill also provides funding for an interagency task force to study the discriminatory use of personal information by platforms' algorithms.

Bill· HRH.R. 9508 (117th)referred

ANTI-SOCIAL CCP Act

United States · United States Congress · 10 January 2026

Averting the National Threat of Internet Surveillance, Oppressive Censorship and Influence, and Algorithmic Learning by the Chinese Communist Party Act or the ANTI-SOCIAL CCP Act This bill requires the President to impose property-blocking sanctions on TikTok, its parent company ByteDance Ltd., and larger social media companies with ties to certain foreign countries. Specifically, the sanctions shall apply if the relevant property interests are (1) in the United States; or (2) in the possession or control of a U.S. person, if blocking the transaction is necessary to prevent the company's commercial operation in the United States. These sanctions shall also apply to larger social media companies involved with countries or persons (entities or individuals) of concern, generally defined as any foreign government or person engaged in activities adverse to U.S. security and safety and includes specific countries such as China, Russia, and North Korea. For the purposes of this bill, a person of concern also includes private companies and individuals domiciled in a country of concern and subject to the substantial influence of the government. Specifically, in addition to TikTok and ByteDance, the sanctions shall apply to any social media company that is based in or organized under the laws of a country of concern; where a country or person of concern owns 10% of its outstanding voting stock or shares; that uses software or algorithms controlled by a country or person of concern, including through export controls; or where a country or person of concern has substantial influence over the company's data sharing or content moderation practices.

Bill· SS. 5245 (117th)referred

ANTI-SOCIAL CCP Act

United States · United States Congress · 10 January 2026

Averting the National Threat of Internet Surveillance, Oppressive Censorship and Influence, and Algorithmic Learning by the Chinese Communist Party Act or the ANTI-SOCIAL CCP Act This bill requires the President to impose property-blocking sanctions on TikTok, its parent company ByteDance Ltd., and larger social media companies with ties to certain foreign countries. Specifically, the sanctions shall apply if the relevant property interests are (1) in the United States; or (2) in the possession or control of a U.S. person, if blocking the transaction is necessary to prevent the company's commercial operation in the United States. These sanctions shall also apply to larger social media companies involved with countries or persons (entities or individuals) of concern, generally defined as any foreign government or person engaged in activities adverse to U.S. security and safety and includes specific countries such as China, Russia, and North Korea. For the purposes of this bill, a person of concern also includes private companies and individuals domiciled in a country of concern and subject to the substantial influence of the government. Specifically, in addition to TikTok and ByteDance, the sanctions shall apply to any social media company that is based in or organized under the laws of a country of concern; where a country or person of concern owns 10% of its outstanding voting stock or shares; that uses software or algorithms controlled by a country or person of concern, including through export controls; or where a country or person of concern has substantial influence over the company's data sharing or content moderation practices.

Bill· SS. 347 (118th)referred

ANTI-SOCIAL CCP Act

United States · United States Congress · 9 January 2026

Averting the National Threat of Internet Surveillance, Oppressive Censorship and Influence, and Algorithmic Learning by the Chinese Communist Party Act or the ANTI-SOCIAL CCP Act This bill requires the President to impose property-blocking sanctions on TikTok, its parent company ByteDance Ltd., and larger social media companies with ties to certain foreign countries. Specifically, the sanctions shall apply if the relevant property interests are (1) in the United States; or (2) in the possession or control of a U.S. person, if blocking the transaction is necessary to prevent the company's commercial operation in the United States. These sanctions shall also apply to larger social media companies involved with countries or persons (entities or individuals) of concern, generally defined as any foreign government or person engaged in activities adverse to U.S. security and safety and includes specific countries such as China, Russia, and North Korea. For the purposes of this bill, a person of concern also includes private companies and individuals domiciled in a country of concern and subject to the substantial influence of the government. Specifically, in addition to TikTok and ByteDance, the sanctions shall apply to any social media company that is based in or organized under the laws of a country of concern; where a country or person of concern owns 20% of its outstanding voting stock or shares; that uses software or algorithms controlled by a country or person of concern, including through export controls; or where a country or person of concern has substantial influence over the company's data sharing or content moderation practices.

Bill· HRH.R. 1081 (118th)referred

ANTI-SOCIAL CCP Act

United States · United States Congress · 9 January 2026

Averting the National Threat of Internet Surveillance, Oppressive Censorship and Influence, and Algorithmic Learning by the Chinese Communist Party Act or the ANTI-SOCIAL CCP Act This bill requires the President to impose property-blocking sanctions on TikTok, its parent company ByteDance Ltd., and larger social media companies with ties to certain foreign countries. Specifically, the sanctions shall apply if the relevant property interests are (1) in the United States; or (2) in the possession or control of a U.S. person, if blocking the transaction is necessary to prevent the company's commercial operation in the United States. These sanctions shall also apply to larger social media companies involved with countries or persons (entities or individuals) of concern, generally defined as any foreign government or person engaged in activities adverse to U.S. security and safety and includes specific countries such as China, Russia, and North Korea. For the purposes of this bill, a person of concern also includes private companies and individuals domiciled in a country of concern and subject to the substantial influence of the government. Specifically, in addition to TikTok and ByteDance, the sanctions shall apply to any social media company that is based in or organized under the laws of a country of concern; where a country or person of concern owns 20% of its outstanding voting stock or shares; that uses software or algorithms controlled by a country or person of concern, including through export controls; or where a country or person of concern has substantial influence over the company's data sharing or content moderation practices.

Motion· Motie2025Z03208adopted

Motion by members Dral en Ceder over afspraken met platforms over verwijdering van schadelijke content en beperking van verslavende algoritmes

Original: Motie van de leden Dral en Ceder over afspraken met platforms over verwijdering van schadelijke content en beperking van verslavende algoritmes

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 22 December 2025

Translated from Dutch

Motion by members Dral en Ceder over afspraken met platforms over verwijdering van schadelijke content en beperking van verslavende algoritmes

Motion· Motie2023Z05433adopted

Motion by member Kathmann c.s. over onderzoeken in hoeverre de inzet van expertteams die volledige inzage hebben in een algoritme, succesvol kan zijn in het bestrijden van discriminerende algoritmes

Original: Motie van het lid Kathmann c.s. over onderzoeken in hoeverre de inzet van expertteams die volledige inzage hebben in een algoritme, succesvol kan zijn in het bestrijden van discriminerende algoritmes

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 16 December 2025

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Kathmann c.s. over onderzoeken in hoeverre de inzet van expertteams die volledige inzage hebben in een algoritme, succesvol kan zijn in het bestrijden van discriminerende algoritmes

Question· Schriftelijke vragen2025Z18301concluded

TikTok-algoritmes en extremisme

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 11 December 2025

TikTok-algoritmes en extremisme

Motion· Motie2025Z05849adopted

Motion by members Van Vroonhoven en Inge van Dijk over onderzoek naar algoritmes en gegevenssystemen die vergelijkbaar zijn met RAM

Original: Motie van de leden Van Vroonhoven en Inge van Dijk over onderzoek naar algoritmes en gegevenssystemen die vergelijkbaar zijn met RAM

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 5 December 2025

Translated from Dutch

Motion by members Van Vroonhoven en Inge van Dijk over onderzoek naar algoritmes en gegevenssystemen die vergelijkbaar zijn met RAM

Bill· HRH.R. 8160 (117th)referred

Political BIAS Emails Act of 2022

United States · United States Congress · 5 December 2025

Political Bias In Algorithm Sorting Emails Act of 2022 or the Political BIAS Emails Act of 2022 This bill makes it unlawful for commercial email service providers to use a filtering algorithm to apply a label to an email sent to an email account from a political campaign unless the owner or user of the account took action to apply such label.

Bill· SS. 4409 (117th)referred

Political BIAS Emails Act of 2022

United States · United States Congress · 5 December 2025

Political Bias In Algorithm Sorting Emails Act of 2022 or the Political BIAS Emails Act of 2022 This bill restricts email providers from applying filtering algorithms that label political campaign messages as spam and requires providers to publicly report on their email delivery practices.

Bill· HRH.R. 5921 (117th)referred

Filter Bubble Transparency Act

United States · United States Congress · 5 December 2025

Filter Bubble Transparency Act This bill establishes requirements for large online platforms that use algorithms applying artificial intelligence or machine learning to user-specific data to determine the manner in which content is displayed to users. Specifically, if an online platform applies such techniques to user-specific data that is not expressly provided by the user, the platform must (1) notify users that the platform uses such data, and (2) make a version of the platform available that uses only user-specific data that has been expressly provided by the user and which enables users to switch between the two platforms. These requirements do not apply to search engines operated by downstream providers with fewer than 1,000 employees and that have an agreement to access an index of web pages from an upstream provider. However, the bill requires such upstream providers to make their algorithm available to downstream providers as part of such an agreement.

Bill· SS. 2024 (117th)referred

Filter Bubble Transparency Act

United States · United States Congress · 5 December 2025

Filter Bubble Transparency Act This bill establishes requirements for large online platforms that use algorithms applying artificial intelligence or machine learning to user-specific data to determine the manner in which content is displayed to users. Specifically, if an online platform applies such techniques to user-specific data that is not expressly provided by the user, the platform must (1) notify users that the platform uses such data, and (2) make a version of the platform available that uses only user-specific data that has been expressly provided by the user and which enables users to switch between the two platforms. These requirements do not apply to search engines operated by downstream providers with fewer than 1,000 employees and that have an agreement to access an index of web pages from an upstream provider. However, the bill requires such upstream providers to make their algorithm available to downstream providers as part of such an agreement.

Bill· HRH.R. 2739 (118th)referred

Quantum Sandbox for Near-Term Applications Act of 2023

United States · United States Congress · 5 December 2025

Quantum Sandbox for Near-Term Applications Act of 2023 This bill requires the Department of Commerce, in coordination with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, to establish a public-private partnership to accelerate the deployment of quantum applications and algorithms with near-term use cases by supporting demonstration and testing.

Bill· SS. 1439 (118th)referred

Quantum Sandbox for Near-Term Applications Act of 2023

United States · United States Congress · 5 December 2025

Quantum Sandbox for Near-Term Applications Act of 2023 This bill requires the Department of Commerce, in coordination with the National Institute of Standards and Technology, to establish a public-private partnership to accelerate the deployment of quantum applications and algorithms with near-term use cases by supporting demonstration and testing.

Bill· SS. 2325 (118th)referred

Algorithmic Justice and Online Platform Transparency Act

United States · United States Congress · 5 December 2025

Algorithmic Justice and Online Platform Transparency Act This bill establishes requirements for certain commercial online platforms (e.g., social media sites) that withhold or promote content through algorithms and related computational processes that use personal information. The platforms must make disclosures about their collection and use of personal information and their content moderation practices; retain specified records that describe how the algorithms use personal information and assess whether the algorithms produce disparate outcomes based on race and other demographic factors in terms of access to housing, employment, financial services, and related matters; employ algorithms safely and effectively; and allow users to access and transfer their personal information. If a platform uses algorithms to publish or sell advertising, it must maintain a library of the advertisements. The Federal Trade Commission must also adopt rules concerning deceptive advertising. A platform's chief executive officer or other senior officer must certify compliance with disclosure requirements. Additionally, platforms may not (1) employ algorithms or other design features that result in discrimination or similar harms based on demographic or biometric factors, or (2) process information such that it impairs voting rights. Further, users of a platform may not violate civil rights laws using the platform's algorithms. The bill prohibits waivers or other methods that limit rights under the bill; provides whistleblower protections for individuals who report violations; and authorizes enforcement by specified federal agencies, states, and private individuals. The bill also provides funding for an interagency task force to study the discriminatory use of personal information by platforms' algorithms.

Bill· HRH.R. 4624 (118th)referred

Algorithmic Justice and Online Platform Transparency Act

United States · United States Congress · 5 December 2025

Algorithmic Justice and Online Platform Transparency Act This bill establishes requirements for certain commercial online platforms (e.g., social media sites) that withhold or promote content through algorithms and related computational processes that use personal information. The platforms must make disclosures about their collection and use of personal information and their content moderation practices; retain specified records that describe how the algorithms use personal information and assess whether the algorithms produce disparate outcomes based on race and other demographic factors in terms of access to housing, employment, financial services, and related matters; employ algorithms safely and effectively; and allow users to access and transfer their personal information. If a platform uses algorithms to publish or sell advertising, it must maintain a library of the advertisements. The Federal Trade Commission must also adopt rules concerning deceptive advertising. A platform's chief executive officer or other senior officer must certify compliance with disclosure requirements. Additionally, platforms may not (1) employ algorithms or other design features that result in discrimination or similar harms based on demographic or biometric factors, or (2) process information such that it impairs voting rights. Further, users of a platform may not violate civil rights laws using the platform's algorithms. The bill prohibits waivers or other methods that limit rights under the bill; provides whistleblower protections for individuals who report violations; and authorizes enforcement by specified federal agencies, states, and private individuals. The bill also provides funding for an interagency task force to study the discriminatory use of personal information by platforms' algorithms.

Motion· Motie2024Z10241concluded

Motion by member Teunissen over concrete energiebesparingsmaatregelen meenemen in het plan voor duurzaamheid en digitalisering

Original: Motie van het lid Teunissen over concrete energiebesparingsmaatregelen meenemen in het plan voor duurzaamheid en digitalisering

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 20 November 2025

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Teunissen over concrete energiebesparingsmaatregelen meenemen in het plan voor duurzaamheid en digitalisering

Motion· Motie2024Z10240adopted

Motion by member Teunissen on the milieueffecten van de digitale sector in brede zin meenemen in het integrale plan duurzaamheid en digitalisering

Original: Motie van het lid Teunissen over de milieueffecten van de digitale sector in brede zin meenemen in het integrale plan duurzaamheid en digitalisering

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 20 November 2025

Translated from Dutch

Motion by member Teunissen on the milieueffecten van de digitale sector in brede zin meenemen in het integrale plan duurzaamheid en digitalisering

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0760decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#„EVN Bulgaria Toplofikatsia“ EAD v OZ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Plovdiv.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Energy – Promotion of energy efficiency – Directive 2012/27/EU – Article 9(3) – Transparency and accuracy of accounting for the consumption of thermal energy by the common parts – Failure to take into account the actual amount of heat supplied to each dwelling – Algorithm for allocating the cost of thermal energy consumption in co-owned buildings.#Case C-760/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0760_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 23 October 2025.#„EVN Bulgaria Toplofikatsia“ EAD v OZ.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Energy – Promotion of energy efficiency – Directive 2012/27/EU – Article 9(3) – Transparency and accuracy of accounting for the consumption of thermal energy by the common parts – Failure to take into account the actual amount of heat supplied to each dwelling – Algorithm for allocating the cost of thermal energy consumption in co-owned buildings.#Case C-760/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 October 2025

PreviousPage 2 of 12Next