Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Energy

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU

Records

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0688decided

Определение на Общия съд (трети състав) от 6 август 2026 г.#Albos-Energy EOOD срещу Европейска комисия.#Иск за установяване на неправомерно бездействие — Държавни помощи — Българска схема за подпомагане на производството на енергия от възобновяеми източници — Информация, предоставена в жалба, третирана като обща пазарна информация — Заобикаляне на изтичането на срока за подаване на жалба за отмяна — Недопустимост.#Дело T-688/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 August 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0562decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 15 July 2026.#XXX v Hauptzollamt München.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Concept of ‘energy products used for purposes other than as motor fuels or as heating fuels’ – First indent of Article 2(4)(b) of Directive 2003/96/EC – Propane used for the testing of burners.#Case T-562/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 July 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0872decided

Order of the Court of 30 June 2026.#European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators v Swissgrid AG.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-872/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 June 2026

Proposal· PCCELEX 52026PC0293open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION amending Council Decision 2021/1765 of 5 October 2021 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union, for the period 2021-2026, in the Specialised Committee on Fisheries established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part

European Union · European Commission · 23 June 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0850decided

Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-850/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0851decided

Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-851/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0350_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 May 2026.#HJ v Crédit agricole Corporate & Investment Bank.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 50 TEU – Article 288 TFEU – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Court of a Member State seised before the end of the transition period provided for in that agreement – Application by the courts of the forum of the law of another State – United Kingdom legislation transposing a directive – Directive 2006/54/EC – Applicability of EU law – Principle of mutual trust – Principle that national law must be interpreted in conformity with EU law.#Case C-350/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0350decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 May 2026.#HJ v Crédit agricole Corporate & Investment Bank.#[Text rectified by order of 8 July 2026](Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 50 TEU – Article 288 TFEU – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community – Court of a Member State seised before the end of the transition period provided for in that agreement – Application by the courts of the forum of the law of another State – United Kingdom legislation transposing a directive – Directive 2006/54/EC – Applicability of EU law – Principle of mutual trust – Principle that national law must be interpreted in conformity with EU law).#Case C-350/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 May 2026

Decision· DCELEX 32026D1069in force

Council Decision (EU) 2026/1069 of 12 May 2026 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union vis-à-vis the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland regarding the determination under Article 540(2) of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, of the date from which personal data relating to vehicle registration data as referred to in Article 537 of that Agreement may be supplied by Member States to the United Kingdom

European Union · EUR-Lex · 12 May 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0849decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 May 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Second paragraph of Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Appeal brought by a party which was not unsuccessful in its submissions at first instance – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-849/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 May 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0528_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#LQ and Others v Minister for Justice and Equality.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part – Surrender of a person to the United Kingdom for the purpose of criminal prosecutions – Article 524(2) – Article 604(c) – Real risk to the protection of fundamental rights – Article 625 – Speciality rule – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-528/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0528decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#LQ and Others v Minister for Justice and Equality.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part – Surrender of a person to the United Kingdom for the purpose of criminal prosecutions – Article 524(2) – Article 604(c) – Real risk to the protection of fundamental rights – Article 625 – Speciality rule – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-528/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 April 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0682_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 22 April 2026.#Red Bull GmbH and Others v European Commission.#Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Abuse of dominant position – Energy drinks sector – Inspection ordered by the Commission – Article 20(4) of Regulation No 1/2003 – Inspection continued at the Commission’s premises – Commission refusal to reimburse part of the costs resulting from that inspection – Concept of ‘additional costs incurred solely as a result of the continuation of an inspection on the Commission’s premises’.#Case T-682/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 April 2026

Page 1 of 2Next