Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Energy

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU

All countriesIreland · 26,443United States · 19,960United Kingdom · 12,401Austria · 9,899Germany · 5,376France · 4,568European Union · 3,791Netherlands · 3,281Belgium · 112Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0468decided

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 5 novembre 2026.#SR contre Netz Niederösterreich GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des personnes physiques à l’égard du traitement des données à caractère personnel – Directive 2002/58/CE – Article 5, paragraphe 3 – Notion d’“équipement terminal” – Directive 2014/32/UE – Article 2, paragraphe 1 – Règlement (UE) 2016/679 – Directive (UE) 2019/944 – Article 22 – Énergie – Fourniture d’électricité – Instruments de mesure – Compteurs intelligents – Client final souhaitant l’absence d’installation d’un tel compteur – Sécurité des données transférées par les compteurs intelligents.#Affaire C-468/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 November 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0118decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 5 November 2026.#Nord Stream 2 AG v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Energy – Internal market in natural gas – Directive (EU) 2019/692 – Admissibility – Second paragraph of Article 61 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Judgment of 12 July 2022, Nord Stream 2 v Parliament and Council (C‑348/20 P, EU:C:2022:548) – Errors of law – Distortion of the facts and evidence – Measures of inquiry and of organisation of the procedure – Misuse of powers.#Case C-118/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 November 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0468_RESdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (quatrième chambre) du 5 novembre 2026.#SR contre Netz Niederösterreich GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Protection des personnes physiques à l’égard du traitement des données à caractère personnel – Directive 2002/58/CE – Article 5, paragraphe 3 – Notion d’“équipement terminal” – Directive 2014/32/UE – Article 2, paragraphe 1 – Règlement (UE) 2016/679 – Directive (UE) 2019/944 – Article 22 – Énergie – Fourniture d’électricité – Instruments de mesure – Compteurs intelligents – Client final souhaitant l’absence d’installation d’un tel compteur – Sécurité des données transférées par les compteurs intelligents.#Affaire C-468/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 November 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0468decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 4 November 2026.#Victron Energy BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition procedure – Application for EU word mark BMV – Earlier EU word mark BMW – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity of signs – Proximity or connection between the goods – Risk of unfair advantage being taken of the reputation of the earlier mark – Due cause for the use of the mark applied for.#Case T-468/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 November 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0098decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 November 2026.#Ypothalassios Agogos Fysikou Aeriou Elladas – Italias – Poseidon AE (YAFA Poseidon) v European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency.#Energy – Connecting Europe Facility – Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 347/2013 – Calls for proposals – Cross-border energy infrastructure projects – Proposal for the construction of a pipeline in the eastern Mediterranean Sea – Rejection of the proposal as inadmissible – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Right to be heard – Liability.#Case T-98/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 November 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0348decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 October 2026.#PGI Spain, SL and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Energy crisis – National measures to reduce wholesale electricity prices in the Iberian market – Decision not to raise objections – No serious difficulties – Principle of non-discrimination – Evidence subsequent to the adoption of the decision – Relevance – Request for the production of documents – Standard of proof required – Request for the production of the sound recording of the hearing before the General Court of the European Union.#Case C-348/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 October 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0187decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 October 2026.#„EVN Bulgaria Renewables“ EOOD v Direktor na Teritorialna direktsia Plovdiv na Natsionalnata agentsia za prihodite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Plovdiv.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market in electricity – Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 – Emergency intervention to address high energy prices – Article 6(1) – Article 8(1)(a) and Article 8(2) – Cap on market revenues obtained by producers of electricity using certain energy sources – National cap lower than EUR 180 per megawatt hour (MWh) of electricity produced – Whether permissible – Differentiated cap depending on whether or not, on 8 October 2022, there was a contract for compensation by way of premiums binding the relevant producer – Proportionality and non-discrimination – Lack of sufficient information – Inadmissibility.#Case C-187/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 October 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0327decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 October 2026.#„VETS Svoge“ EOOD v Predsedatel na Upravitelnia savet na Fond „Sigurnost na elektroenergiynata sistema“.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market for electricity – Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 – Emergency intervention to address high energy prices – Article 6(1) – Cap on market revenues obtained by producers of electricity using certain energy sources – Article 8 – Earlier national measure – National contribution calculated on the total revenues of electricity producers, levied in order to finance a public entity responsible for ensuring financial stability and the security of the energy market – Measure not coming within the scope of Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 – Directive (EU) 2018/2001 – Promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources – Article 3(1), (3) and (4) – Regulation (EU) 2019/943 – Article 3(a), (b), (h) and (p) and Article 10(1), (4) and (5) – Directive (EU) 2019/944 – Common rules for the internal market for electricity – Article 5(1), (3) and (4) – Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 – European Climate Law – Articles 2 and 4 – Non-discrimination – Proportionality – Article 63 TFEU – Lack of sufficient information – Inadmissibility – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – No implementation of EU law – No jurisdiction on the part of the Court.#Case C-327/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 October 2026

Proposal· PCCELEX 52026PC0550open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Specialised Committee on Social Security Coordination established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, as regards the adoption of a decision to amend Annex SSC-7 to the Protocol on Social Security Coordination

European Union · European Commission · 15 October 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0120decided

Arrêt de la Cour (première chambre) du 15 octobre 2026.#Verband Wirtschaft im Wettbewerb, Verein für Lauterkeit in Handel und Industrie e.V. contre PAYBACK GmbH.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Énergie – Étiquetage énergétique – Règlement (UE) 2017/1369 – Article 2, point 13 – Notion de “revendeur” – Notions d’“exposition” et d’“activité commerciale” – Article 2, point 16 – Notion de “client” – Article 6, premier alinéa, sous a) – Obligation de faire référence à la classe d’efficacité énergétique d’un produit et à la gamme des classes d’efficacité figurant sur l’étiquette dans les publicités visuelles – Notion de “publicité visuelle” – Jeu-concours en ligne – Organisateur d’un jeu-concours en ligne promettant un téléviseur en tant que prix à gagner – Règlement délégué (UE) 2019/2013 – Article 4, sous d).#Affaire C-120/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0199decided

Arrest van het Hof (Vierde kamer) van 15 oktober 2026.#Fluvius Halle-Vilvoorde, anciennement Sibelgas e.a. tegen De Vlaamse Nutsregulator, anciennement de Vlaamse Regulator van de Elektriciteits-en Gasmarkt (VREG).#Prejudiciële verwijzing – Interne markt voor elektriciteit – Verordening (EU) 2019/943 – Artikel 18, lid 1 – Richtlijn (EU) 2019/944 – Artikel 9, artikel 57, leden 4 en 5, en artikel 59, lid 1, onder a) – Tarieven voor de toegang tot netwerken, het gebruik van netwerken en versterkingen – Ongerelateerde kosten ter ondersteuning van ongerelateerde beleidsdoelstellingen – Nationale regeling die bepaalt dat de kosten voor de aan distributiesysteembeheerders opgelegde openbaredienstverplichtingen in de nettarieven worden opgenomen – Onafhankelijkheid van de nationale regulerende instantie bij de uitvoering van haar taken en de uitoefening van haar bevoegdheden – Tariefmethodologie voor de distributie van elektriciteit waarbij een historische kostentrendmethode wordt gebruikt.#Zaak C-199/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0688decided

Определение на Общия съд (трети състав) от 6 август 2026 г.#Albos-Energy EOOD срещу Европейска комисия.#Иск за установяване на неправомерно бездействие — Държавни помощи — Българска схема за подпомагане на производството на енергия от възобновяеми източници — Информация, предоставена в жалба, третирана като обща пазарна информация — Заобикаляне на изтичането на срока за подаване на жалба за отмяна — Недопустимост.#Дело T-688/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 August 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0562decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber, Extended Composition) of 15 July 2026.#XXX v Hauptzollamt München.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Excise duties – Taxation of energy products and electricity – Concept of ‘energy products used for purposes other than as motor fuels or as heating fuels’ – First indent of Article 2(4)(b) of Directive 2003/96/EC – Propane used for the testing of burners.#Case T-562/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 July 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0872decided

Order of the Court of 30 June 2026.#European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators v Swissgrid AG.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-872/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 June 2026

Proposal· PCCELEX 52026PC0293open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION amending Council Decision 2021/1765 of 5 October 2021 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union, for the period 2021-2026, in the Specialised Committee on Fisheries established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part

European Union · European Commission · 23 June 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0850decided

Order of the Court of 9 June 2026.#Swissgrid AG v European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators.#Appeal – Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 – European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-850/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 June 2026

Page 1 of 2Next