Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

951 records in EU in 2024

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773France · 6,057Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778Germany · 295Austria · 218United States · 141Belgium · 1Estonia · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0130decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 May 2024.#Vialto Consulting Kft. v European Commission.#Appeal – Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance – Subsidies – Investigations by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Administrative penalties – Exclusion from public procurement procedures and from procedures for the award of grants financed from the general budget of the European Union – Publication of the exclusion on the website of the European Commission – Proportionality of the penalties – Failure to indicate the absence of a final judgment or a final administrative decision.#Case C-130/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 May 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0432decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 30 May 2024.#F SCS and Ordre des avocats du Barreau de Luxembourg v Administration des contributions directes.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Administrative cooperation in the field of taxation – Directive 2011/16/EU – Exchange of information on request – Decision ordering a lawyer to communicate information – Legal professional privilege – Article 7 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-432/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0079_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Chiquita Brands LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark CHIQUITA QUEEN – Earlier EU figurative mark Red Queen – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-79/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0116_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Belavia – Belarusian Airlines AAT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken because of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources applies – Registering and maintaining the applicant’s name on the lists – Organisation of activities of the Lukashenko regime facilitating the illegal crossing of the external borders of the European Union or contribution to those activities – Benefit derived from the Lukashenko regime – Error of assessment.#Case T-116/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0766decided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024.#Maria Canel Ferreiro v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Reprimand – Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service – Articles 12 and 21 of the Staff Regulations – Competence of the author of the act – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Impartiality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-766/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0766_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 29 May 2024.#Maria Canel Ferreiro v Council of the European Union.#Civil service – Officials – Disciplinary proceedings – Disciplinary penalty – Reprimand – Acts contrary to the dignity of the civil service – Articles 12 and 21 of the Staff Regulations – Competence of the author of the act – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Impartiality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-766/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0116decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Belavia – Belarusian Airlines AAT v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken because of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources applies – Registering and maintaining the applicant’s name on the lists – Organisation of activities of the Lukashenko regime facilitating the illegal crossing of the external borders of the European Union or contribution to those activities – Benefit derived from the Lukashenko regime – Error of assessment.#Case T-116/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0079decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Chiquita Brands LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark CHIQUITA QUEEN – Earlier EU figurative mark Red Queen – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – No similarity between the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-79/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0363decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 29 May 2024.#Farkhad Teimurovich Akhmedov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businessperson’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Error of assessment.#Case T-363/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 May 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0219open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe on proposals for modifications to UN regulation Nos 13, 13-H, 22, 30, 41, 49, 51, 54, 63, 78, 79, 83, 85, 96, 100, 101, 108, 109, 117, 120, 129, 134, 138, 150, and 155, on a proposal for a new UN regulation on snow grip performance and traction tyre classification for retreaded tyres, on proposals for modifications to UN global technical regulation Nos 9, 13, 21, 22, and 24, and on a proposal for an amendment of UN mutual resolution No 1

European Union · European Commission · 28 May 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0207_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 23 May 2024.#Levantur, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-207/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 May 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0208_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 23 May 2024.#Levantur, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-208/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 May 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0217open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the 16th meeting of the Committee of the Parties to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence on the adoption of a recommendation and conclusions addressed to five State Parties on their implementation of that Convention, with regard to matters related to judicial cooperation in criminal matters, asylum and non-refoulement

European Union · European Commission · 21 May 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0218open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the 16th meeting of the Committee of the Parties to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence on the adoption of a recommendation and conclusions addressed to five State Parties on their implementation of that Convention, with regard to matters related to institutions and public administration of the Union

European Union · European Commission · 21 May 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0185decided

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 16 May 2024.#protectus s.r.o. v Výbor Národnej rady Slovenskej republiky na preskúmavanie rozhodnutí Národného bezpečnostného úradu.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší správny súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Decision 2013/488/EU – Classified information – Facility Security Clearance – Withdrawal of the clearance – Non-disclosure of classified information on which the withdrawal was based – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons – Access to the file – Principle of an adversarial process – Article 51 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Implementation of EU law.#Case C-185/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 May 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0156decided

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 16 May 2024.#K and Others v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Roermond.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Immigration policy – Return of third-country nationals staying illegally in a Member State – Directive 2008/115/EC – Article 5 – Principle of non-refoulement – Enforcement of a return decision adopted in the context of a procedure for international protection, as a result of the illegal stay of the third-country national concerned arising from the rejection of an application for a residence permit provided for by national law – Obligation for the administrative authority to assess whether the enforcement of such a decision complies with the principle of non-refoulement – Article 13 – Remedies against decisions related to return – Obligation, for the national court, to raise of its own motion infringement of the principle of non-refoulement when enforcing a return decision – Scope – Article 4, Article 19(2) and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.#Case C-156/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 May 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0188decided

Opinion of Advocate General Ćapeta delivered on 16 May 2024.#Land Niedersachsen v Conti 11. Container Schiffahrts-GmbH & Co. KG MS 'MSC Flaminia'.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht München.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Environment – Shipment of waste – Directive 2006/12/EC – Directive 2008/98/EC – Concept of ‘waste’ – Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal – Article 1(4) – Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 – Waste subject to the prior written notification and consent procedure – Shipments of waste within the European Union – Article 1(3)(b) – Validity – Interpretation in conformity with the Basel Convention – Waste generated on board a ship following damage sustained by it on the high seas – Concept of ‘offloading of waste’ – Partial offloading of waste in a safe port.#Case C-188/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0235_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 May 2024.#Russian Direct Investment Fund v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on investing in, participating in or otherwise contributing to projects co-financed by the applicant – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Plea of illegality – Manifest error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Freedom to conduct a business – Proportionality.#Case T-235/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0316_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 May 2024.#Hanns Pfriem v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark UC – Earlier EU figurative mark UC – Right to be heard – Principle of impartiality – Extent of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal – Article 27(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-316/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0471_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 May 2024.#Issam Anbouba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies – Criterion of ‘association with the Syrian regime’ – Criterion of ‘a leading businessperson operating in Syria’ – Presumption of a link with the Syrian regime – Error of assessment – Admissibility of the evidence.#Case T-471/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0471decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 May 2024.#Issam Anbouba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies – Criterion of ‘association with the Syrian regime’ – Criterion of ‘a leading businessperson operating in Syria’ – Presumption of a link with the Syrian regime – Error of assessment – Admissibility of the evidence.#Case T-471/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0235decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 15 May 2024.#Russian Direct Investment Fund v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine – Prohibition on investing in, participating in or otherwise contributing to projects co-financed by the applicant – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Action for annulment – Locus standi – Admissibility – Plea of illegality – Manifest error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Freedom to conduct a business – Proportionality.#Case T-235/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0316decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 15 May 2024.#Hanns Pfriem v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark UC – Earlier EU figurative mark UC – Right to be heard – Principle of impartiality – Extent of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal – Article 27(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-316/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 May 2024

Proposal· PCCELEX 52024PC0210open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the 16th meeting of the Committee of Technical Experts of the Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail (OTIF) with regards to the revision of the Uniform Technical Prescription applicable to the subsystem “rolling stock – freight wagons” (UTP WAG), to the subsystem “rolling stock – noise” (UTP Noise), to train composition and route compatibility checks (UTP TCRC), and to the subsystem Telematics applications for freight services (UTP TAF)

European Union · European Commission · 15 May 2024

PreviousPage 19 of 20Next