Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,001 records in EU in 2024

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0015_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 May 2024.#Criminal proceedings against CH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2013/48/EU – The right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings – Art. 3(6)(b) – Temporary derogation from the right of access to a lawyer in exceptional circumstances – Article 9 – Waiver of the presence or assistance of a lawyer – Conditions – Article 12(2) – Respect for the rights of the defence and the fairness of the proceedings – Admissibility of evidence – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. – Written waiver of an illiterate suspect’s right of access to a lawyer – No explanation as to the possible consequences of waiving that right – Implications for subsequent investigative acts – Decision on an appropriate restraint measure – Assessment of evidence obtained in breach of the right of access to a lawyer.#Case C-15/24 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 May 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0015decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 May 2024.#Criminal proceedings against CH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2013/48/EU – The right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings – Art. 3(6)(b) – Temporary derogation from the right of access to a lawyer in exceptional circumstances – Article 9 – Waiver of the presence or assistance of a lawyer – Conditions – Article 12(2) – Respect for the rights of the defence and the fairness of the proceedings – Admissibility of evidence – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. – Written waiver of an illiterate suspect’s right of access to a lawyer – No explanation as to the possible consequences of waiving that right – Implications for subsequent investigative acts – Decision on an appropriate restraint measure – Assessment of evidence obtained in breach of the right of access to a lawyer.#Case C-15/24 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 May 2024

Decision· DCELEX 32024D1954in force

Council Decision (EU) 2024/1954 of 13 May 2024 establishing the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Joint Committee established by the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community as regards the amendment of Decision No 1/2023 of the Joint Committee of 24 March 2023 laying down arrangements relating to the Windsor Framework

European Union · EUR-Lex · 13 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0501decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#Listan GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark Silent Loop – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-501/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0734_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#Republik Österreich v GM.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Own resources of the European Union – National programme co-financed by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Aid granted by contract pursuant to that programme – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Regulation (EC) No 2988/95 – Scope – Proceedings concerning irregularities – Article 3 – Limitation period for proceedings – Concept of ‘act interrupting the limitation period’ – Principle of proportionality – Claims for repayment of aid wrongly paid, based on the private law of a Member State.#Case C-734/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0314_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#Tiendanimal Comercio Electronico de Articulos para Mascotas, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU figurative mark CRIADORES – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of legality – Principle of good administration – Legitimate expectation.#Case T-314/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0091_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#Ofree Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark gamindo – Earlier EU word mark gamigo – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-91/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0501_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#Listan GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark Silent Loop – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-501/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0234decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#Gulbakhor Ismailova v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1), in fine, of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Right to property and freedom to conduct a business – Freedom of movement – Proportionality.#Case T-234/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0757decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 May 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a shoe – Earlier Community designs – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-757/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0091decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#Ofree Srl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark gamindo – Earlier EU word mark gamigo – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 41(2)(c) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-91/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0758decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 May 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a shoe – Earlier Community designs – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-758/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0757_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 May 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a shoe – Earlier Community designs – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-757/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0314decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#Tiendanimal Comercio Electronico de Articulos para Mascotas, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU figurative mark CRIADORES – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment – Principle of legality – Principle of good administration – Legitimate expectation.#Case T-314/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0320decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#The Not Company SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark NOT MILK – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-320/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0758_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber, Extended Composition) of 8 May 2024.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a shoe – Earlier Community designs – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Article 25(1)(b) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-758/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0234_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#Gulbakhor Ismailova v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1), in fine, of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Right to property and freedom to conduct a business – Freedom of movement – Proportionality.#Case T-234/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0734decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#Republik Österreich v GM.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Own resources of the European Union – National programme co-financed by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) – Aid granted by contract pursuant to that programme – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Regulation (EC) No 2988/95 – Scope – Proceedings concerning irregularities – Article 3 – Limitation period for proceedings – Concept of ‘act interrupting the limitation period’ – Principle of proportionality – Claims for repayment of aid wrongly paid, based on the private law of a Member State.#Case C-734/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0320_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2024.#The Not Company SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark NOT MILK – Absolute grounds for refusal – No distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Equal treatment – Principle of sound administration.#Case T-320/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0004decided

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 7 May 2024.#M.-A.A. v Direcţia de Evidenţă a Persoanelor Cluj and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Judecătoria Sectorului 6 Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Citizenship of the Union – Articles 20 and 21 TFEU – Articles 7 and 45 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States – Union citizen who has lawfully acquired, during the exercise of that right and his residence in another Member State, a change of his first name and gender identity – Obligation on the part of that Member State to recognise and enter in the birth certificate that change of first name and gender identity – National legislation which does not permit such recognition and entry, obliging the party concerned to bring new judicial proceedings for a change of gender identity in the Member State of origin – Effect of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union.#Case C-4/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 May 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0395_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2024.#'Trade Express-L' OOD and 'DEVNIA TSIMENT' AD v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia 'Darzhaven rezerv i voennovremenni zapasi'.#References for a preliminary ruling – Energy – Directive 2009/119/EC – Supply of stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products – Article 3 – Obligation for Member States to maintain emergency stocks – Article 8 – Economic operators – Regulation (EC) No 1099/2008 – Energy statistics – National legislation making it possible to impose an obligation on an economic operator to build up and maintain emergency stocks of a petroleum product, including where that product is unrelated to the economic activity of that operator – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 16 – Freedom to conduct a business – Article 17 – Right to property.#Joined Cases C-395/22 and C-428/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0470_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 30 April 2024.#La Quadrature du Net and Others v Premier ministre and Ministère de la Culture.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector – Directive 2002/58/EC – Confidentiality of electronic communications – Protection – Article 5 and Article 15(1) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) – National legislation aimed at combating, through action by a public authority, counterfeiting offences committed on the internet – ‘Graduated response’ procedure – Upstream collection by rightholder organisations of IP addresses used for activities infringing copyright or related rights – Downstream access by the public authority responsible for the protection of copyright and related rights to data relating to the civil identity associated with those IP addresses retained by providers of electronic communications services – Automated processing – Requirement of prior review by a court or an independent administrative body – Substantive and procedural conditions – Safeguards against the risks of abuse and against any unlawful access to or use of those data.#Case C-470/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0470decided

Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 30 April 2024.#La Quadrature du Net and Others v Premier ministre and Ministère de la Culture.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État (France).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector – Directive 2002/58/EC – Confidentiality of electronic communications – Protection – Article 5 and Article 15(1) – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Articles 7, 8 and 11 and Article 52(1) – National legislation aimed at combating, through action by a public authority, counterfeiting offences committed on the internet – ‘Graduated response’ procedure – Upstream collection by rightholder organisations of IP addresses used for activities infringing copyright or related rights – Downstream access by the public authority responsible for the protection of copyright and related rights to data relating to the civil identity associated with those IP addresses retained by providers of electronic communications services – Automated processing – Requirement of prior review by a court or an independent administrative body – Substantive and procedural conditions – Safeguards against the risks of abuse and against any unlawful access to or use of those data.#Case C-470/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0178_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 April 2024.#Criminal proceedings against Procura della Repubblica presso il Tribunale di Bolzano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Confidentiality of communications – Providers of electronic communications services – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Articles 7, 8, 11 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Access to those data requested by a national authority having competence to prosecute offences of aggravated theft – Definition of the concept of ‘serious offence’ the prosecution of which is capable of justifying serious interference with fundamental rights – Competence of the Member States – Principle of proportionality – Scope of prior review by a court of the requests to access the data retained by providers of electronic communications services.#Case C-178/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0178decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 30 April 2024.#Criminal proceedings against Unknown individuals.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice delle indagini preliminari presso il Tribunale di Bolzano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data in the electronic communications sector – Confidentiality of communications – Providers of electronic communications services – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Articles 7, 8, 11 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Access to those data requested by a national authority having competence to prosecute offences of aggravated theft – Definition of the concept of ‘serious offence’ the prosecution of which is capable of justifying serious interference with fundamental rights – Competence of the Member States – Principle of proportionality – Scope of prior review by a court of the requests to access the data retained by providers of electronic communications services.#Case C-178/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0395decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 30 April 2024.#'Trade Express-L' OOD and 'DEVNIA TSIMENT' AD v Zamestnik-predsedatel na Darzhavna agentsia 'Darzhaven rezerv i voennovremenni zapasi'.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad - Varna.#References for a preliminary ruling – Energy – Directive 2009/119/EC – Supply of stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products – Article 3 – Obligation for Member States to maintain emergency stocks – Article 8 – Economic operators – Regulation (EC) No 1099/2008 – Energy statistics – National legislation making it possible to impose an obligation on an economic operator to build up and maintain emergency stocks of a petroleum product, including where that product is unrelated to the economic activity of that operator – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 16 – Freedom to conduct a business – Article 17 – Right to property.#Joined Cases C-395/22 and C-428/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2024

PreviousPage 20 of 21Next