Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,051 records in EU in 2022

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293Austria · 191United States · 141Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0112_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#John Numbi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-112/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0109_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Kalev Mutondo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-109/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0103_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-103/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0210_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark LOPEZ DE HARO – Earlier EU word mark LOPEZ DE HEREDIA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-210/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0105decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Célestin Kanyama v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-105/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0119decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Emmanuel Ramazani Shadary v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-119/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0104decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Alex Kande Mupompa v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-104/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0110decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Ilunga Kampete v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-110/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0112decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#John Numbi v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-112/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0107decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Gabriel Amisi Kumba v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-107/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0109decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Kalev Mutondo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-109/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0106decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Jean-Claude Kazembe Musonda v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-106/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0103decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Évariste Boshab v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-103/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0181decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#LG Electronics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark SmartThinQ – Earlier national figurative mark SMARTTHING – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Translation of the list of goods covered by the earlier mark into the language of the proceedings – Genuine use of the earlier mark.#Case T-181/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0120decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Éric Ruhorimbere v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-120/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0710decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 27 April 2022.#Robert Roos and Others v European Parliament.#Public health – Requirement to present a valid EU digital COVID-19 certificate to access the Parliament’s buildings – Legal basis – Freedom and independence of Members of the European Parliament – Obligation to ensure the health of staff in the service of the European Union – Parliamentary immunity – Processing of personal data – Right to respect for private life – Right to physical integrity – Right to security – Equal treatment – Proportionality.#Joined Cases T-710/21 and T-722/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0327decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Group Nivelles v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Community design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered Community design representing a shower drainage channel – Earlier design produced after the filing of the application for a declaration of invalidity – Article 28(1)(b)(v) of Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Scope – Article 63(2) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Oral proceedings and measures of inquiry – Articles 64 and 65 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 – Ground for invalidity – Individual character – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 – Identification of the earlier design – Earlier whole design – Determination of the features of the contested design – Global comparison.#Case T-327/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0436decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Leon Leonard Johan Veen v European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation.#Non-contractual liability – Cooperation of the police authorities and other law enforcement agencies of the Member States – Fight against crime – Communication of information by Europol to a Member State – Alleged unauthorised data processing – Regulation (EU) 2016/794 – Article 50(1) – Non-material harm.#Case T-436/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0181_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#LG Electronics, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark SmartThinQ – Earlier national figurative mark SMARTTHING – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Translation of the list of goods covered by the earlier mark into the language of the proceedings – Genuine use of the earlier mark.#Case T-181/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0210decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Vintae Luxury Wine Specialists SLU v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark LOPEZ DE HARO – Earlier EU word mark LOPEZ DE HEREDIA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-210/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0108decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Ferdinand Ilunga Luyoyo v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territory of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-108/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0104_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2022.#Alex Kande Mupompa v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – Freezing of funds – Restriction on admission to the territories of the Member States – Retention of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons covered – Right to be heard – Proof that inclusion and retention on the lists is well founded – Manifest error of assessment – Continuation of the factual and legal circumstances which led to the adoption of the restrictive measures.#Case T-104/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 April 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0401_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Directive (EU) 2019/790 – Article 17(4), point (b), and point (c), in fine – Article 11 and Article 17(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom of expression and information – Protection of intellectual property – Obligations imposed on online content-sharing service providers – Prior automatic review (filtering) of content uploaded by users.#Case C-401/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0654_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#Criminal proceedings against Apelativna prokuratura - Sofia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Transport – Directive 2006/126/EC – Driving licences – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 49 – Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties – Driving of a vehicle during the period of suspension of the driving licence – Penalties – Factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-654/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0654decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#Criminal proceedings against Apelativna prokuratura - Sofia.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Apelativen sad - Sofia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Transport – Directive 2006/126/EC – Driving licences – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 49 – Principles of legality and proportionality of criminal offences and penalties – Driving of a vehicle during the period of suspension of the driving licence – Penalties – Factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-654/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0508decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#RM v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Steiermark.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Freedom to provide services – Article 56 TFEU – Games of chance – Provision of prohibited lotteries – Penalties – Proportionality – Minimal fines – Overlapping – Lack of a cap – Alternative custodial sentence – Proportional contribution to procedural costs – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 49(3).#Case C-508/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62019CJ0401decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Directive (EU) 2019/790 – Article 17(4), point (b), and point (c), in fine – Article 11 and Article 17(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom of expression and information – Protection of intellectual property – Obligations imposed on online content-sharing service providers – Prior automatic review (filtering) of content uploaded by users.#Case C-401/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0508_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 April 2022.#RM v Landespolizeidirektion Steiermark.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Freedom to provide services – Article 56 TFEU – Games of chance – Provision of prohibited lotteries – Penalties – Proportionality – Minimal fines – Overlapping – Lack of a cap – Alternative custodial sentence – Proportional contribution to procedural costs – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 49(3).#Case C-508/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 April 2022

Decision· DCELEX 32022D0644in force

Council Decision (EU) 2022/644 of 12 April 2022 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the International Maritime Organization’s Maritime Safety Committee during its 105th session and within the International Maritime Organization’s Facilitation Committee during its 46th session as regards the adoption of amendments to the resolutions on performance standards in relation to equipment used in the Global Maritime Distress and Safety System and of amendments to the Annex to the Convention on Facilitation of International Maritime Traffic (FAL)

European Union · EUR-Lex · 12 April 2022

Decision· DCELEX 32022D0656not in force

Council Decision (EU) 2022/656 of 11 April 2022 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Technical Committees on Customs Valuation and on Rules of Origin, established under the auspices of the World Customs Organization, with regard to the adoption of advisory opinions, commentaries, explanatory notes, case studies, studies and similar acts concerning the valuation of imported goods for customs purposes under the Agreement on Implementation of Article VII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, and the adoption of advisory opinions, information and advice, and similar acts, concerning the determination of the origin of goods under the Agreement on Rules of Origin

European Union · EUR-Lex · 11 April 2022

Decision· DCELEX 32022D0655in force

Council Decision (EU) 2022/655 of 11 April 2022 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Partnership Council established by the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Armenia, of the other part, as regards the adoption of the Rules of Procedure of the Partnership Council and those of the Partnership Committee, subcommittees and other bodies set up by the Partnership Council, and the establishment of the list of Sub-Committees, for the application of that Agreement

European Union · EUR-Lex · 11 April 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0447_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Instituto de Financiamento da Agricultura e Pescas IP (IFAP) v LM and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 – Own resources of the European Union – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – Proceedings relating to irregularities – Article 4 – Adoption of administrative measures – Article 3(1) – Limitation period for proceedings – Expiry – Whether it may be relied on in the context of the enforced recovery procedure – Article 3(2) – Period for implementation – Applicability – Starting point of the limitation period – Interruption and suspension – Discretion of the Member States.#Joined Cases C-447/20 and C-448/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2022

Record· COCELEX 62021CO0801_SUMdecided

Order of the Court of 7 April 2022.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v Indo European Foods Ltd.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-801/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62020TO0679decided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Dr. August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark Vagisan – Cross-claim – Subject matter of the action – No interest in bringing proceedings – Inadmissibility.#Case T-679/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62021TO0645decided

Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#Bloom v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Common fisheries policy – Regulation (EU) 2021/1139 – European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund – Financial support granted under shared management with the Member States – Ineligible operations or expenditure – Derogations from ineligibility – Association for the protection of the marine environment – Legislative act – No individual concern – No direct concern – Right to effective judicial protection – Inadmissibility.#Case T-645/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0521_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 April 2022.#J.P. v B.d.S.L.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 1999/62/EC – Charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures – Tolls – Non-payment – Penalties – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Ne bis in idem principle – Article 94(c) of the Rules of Procedure – Lack of sufficient information – No link between the interpretation of EU law that is sought and the actual facts of the main action or its purpose – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-521/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0019decided

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 7 April 2022.#I and S v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Article 8(2) and Article 27(1) – Unaccompanied minor with a relative legally present in another Member State – Refusal by that Member State of that minor’s take charge request – Right to an effective remedy of that minor or of that relative against the refusal decision – Articles 7, 24 and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Best interests of the child.#Case C-19/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 April 2022

PreviousPage 21 of 22Next