Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · EU

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,051 records in EU in 2023

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0267_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 17 May 2023.#Consulta GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark ACASA – Absolute ground for invalidity – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-267/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 May 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0267decided

Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 17 May 2023.#Consulta GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark ACASA – Absolute ground for invalidity – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-267/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 May 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0177_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 17 May 2023.#Alexander Chambers and Others v European Commission.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Members of the contract staff – Reimbursement of expenses – Travel expenses – Consequences of the departure of the United Kingdom from the European Union – Place of origin located in a third country – Withdrawal of entitlement to annual flat-rate payment for travel expenses – Error of assessment – Equal treatment.#Case T-177/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 May 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0046decided

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 17 May 2023.#Liam Jenkinson v Council of the European Union and Others.#Appeal – Arbitration clause – Staff of international missions of the European Union – Consecutive fixed-term contracts – Claim that all the contractual relationships should be re-categorised as a ‘contract of indefinite duration’ – Claim for compensation for unfair dismissal – Actions for damages – Principle of non-discrimination – Principle of ne ultra petita – Obligation to state reasons – Distortion of national law – Costs.#Case C-46/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 May 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0176decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 May 2023.#Criminal proceedings against BK and ZhP.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union – Article 23, first paragraph – Stay of the main proceedings by a national court which has submitted a request for a preliminary ruling to the Court of Justice under Article 267 TFEU – Possibility of a partial stay of proceedings.#Case C-176/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 May 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0656_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 May 2023.#moderne Stadt Gesellschaft zur Förderung des Städtebaues und der Gemeindeentwicklung mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark DEUTZER HAFEN – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equal treatment.#Case T-656/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 May 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0657_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 17 May 2023.#moderne Stadt Gesellschaft zur Förderung des Städtebaues und der Gemeindeentwicklung mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark DEUTZER HAFEN KÖLN – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Equality of treatment.#Case T-657/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 May 2023

Decision· DCELEX 32023D0983in force

Council Decision (EU) 2023/983 of 15 May 2023 on the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union within the Group of Experts of the European Agreement concerning the work of crews of vehicles engaged in international road transport (AETR), within the Working Party on Road Transport of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe and, if relevant, in relation to a communication by the United Nations Secretary-General pursuant to Article 21(1) of the AETR, as regards an amendment to introduce a ‘force majeure’ clause

European Union · EUR-Lex · 15 May 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0015decided

Order of the Court of 11 May 2023.#Arne-Patrik Heinze v L’Oréal and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-15/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 May 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0066decided

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 11 May 2023.#Infraestruturas de Portugal, SA and Futrifer Indústrias Ferroviárias, SA v Toscca - Equipamentos em Madeira Lda.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts – Directive 2014/24/EU – Point (d) of the first subparagraph of Article 57(4) – Award of public contracts in the transport sector – Directive 2014/25/EU – Article 80(1) – Facultative grounds for exclusion – Obligation to transpose – Economic operator entering into agreements aimed at distorting competition – Competence of the contracting authority – Impact of an earlier decision of a competition authority – Principle of proportionality – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy – Principle of sound administration – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-66/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 May 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0266decided

Opinion of Advocate General Rantos delivered on 11 May 2023.#CRRC Qingdao Sifang Co. Ltd and Astra Vagoane Călători SA v Autoritatea pentru Reformă Feroviară and Alstom Ferroviaria SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement in the European Union – Directive 2014/24/EU – Article 25 – Economic operators of a third country which has not concluded an international agreement with the European Union which guarantees access to public procurement in a reciprocal and equal manner – No right for those economic operators to ‘no less favourable treatment’ – Exclusion of such an economic operator from a public procurement procedure, pursuant to national legislation – Exclusive competence of the Union.#Case C-266/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 May 2023

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0015_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 11 May 2023.#Arne-Patrik Heinze v L’Oréal and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-15/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 May 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0437_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 May 2023.#Vanhove v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark bistro Régent – Earlier national word mark REGENT – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-437/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 May 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0437decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 May 2023.#Vanhove v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark bistro Régent – Earlier national word mark REGENT – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), and Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctive character.#Case T-437/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 May 2023

Decision· DCELEX 32023D0940in force

Council Decision (EU) 2023/940 of 4 May 2023 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Specialised Committee on Law Enforcement and Judicial Cooperation established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, as regards the establishment of a standard form for requests for mutual assistance referred to in Article 635(1) of that Agreement

European Union · EUR-Lex · 4 May 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0618decided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#Amazonen-Werke H. Dreyer SE & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Mark consisting in a combination of the colours green and orange – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-618/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 May 2023

Record· TOCELEX 62022TO0618_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#Amazonen-Werke H. Dreyer SE & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Mark consisting in a combination of the colours green and orange – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-618/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 May 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0451decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 4 May 2023.#Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – State aid – Article 107(1) TFEU – Tax rulings adopted by a Member State – Aid declared incompatible with the internal market – Obligation to recover that aid – Concept of ‘advantage’ – Determination of the reference framework – ‘Normal’ taxation under national law – Review by the Court of Justice of the interpretation and application of national law by the General Court of the European Union – Direct taxation – Strict interpretation – Powers of the European Commission – Obligation to state reasons – Legal classification of the facts – Concept of ‘abuse of law’ – Ex ante assessment by the tax authorities of the Member State concerned – Principle of legal certainty.#Joined Cases C-451/21 P and C-454/21 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 May 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62022CC0206decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 4 May 2023.#TF v Sparkasse Südpfalz.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Ludwigshafen am Rhein.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the safety and health of workers – Organisation of working time – Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 7 – Right to paid annual leave – SARS-Cov-2 virus – Quarantine measure – Impossible to carry over the paid annual leave granted for a period coinciding with a period of quarantine.#Case C-206/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 May 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0819decided

Opinion of Advocate General Emiliou delivered on 4 May 2023.#Staatsanwaltschaft Aachen v M.D.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Aachen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Recognition of judgments imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in another Member State – Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA – Article 3(4) and Article 8 – Refusal to enforce – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Fundamental right to a fair trial before an independent and impartial tribunal previously established by law – Systemic or generalised deficiencies in the issuing Member State – Two-step examination – Revocation of the suspension attached to a custodial sentence imposed by a Member State – Enforcement of that sentence by another Member State.#Case C-819/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 May 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0100_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#KY v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Appeal – Civil service – Officials – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 77 – Pension – Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations – Transfer of national pension rights to the pension scheme of the European Union institutions – Crediting of additional pensionable years – Article 2 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations – Pension calculation – Fourth paragraph of Article 77 of the Staff Regulations – The ‘minimum subsistence figure’ rule – Request for reimbursement of the portion of the transferred pension rights not reflected in the EU pension amount – Unjust enrichment.#Case C-100/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 May 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0097decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#MV - 98 v Nachalnik na otdel 
 'Operativni deynosti' – Sofia v Glavna direktsia 'Fiskalen kontrol' pri Tsentralno upravlenie na Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad - Blagoevgrad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 273 – Failure to issue a fiscal cash register receipt – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 50 – Principle ne bis in idem – Cumulation of administrative penalties of a criminal nature for the same act – Article 49(3) – Proportionality of penalties – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy – Scope of judicial review relating to the provisional enforcement of a penalty.#Case C-97/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 May 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0040_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#T.A.C. v Agenția Națională de Integritate (ANI).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Decision 2006/928/EC – Mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in Romania to address specific benchmarks in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 15(1) – Article 47 – Article 49(3) – Elective public office – Conflict of interests – National legislation prohibiting the holding of elective public office for a predetermined period – Penalty additional to the termination of the term of office – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-40/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 May 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0040decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#T.A.C. v Agenția Națională de Integritate (ANI).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Timişoara.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Decision 2006/928/EC – Mechanism for cooperation and verification of progress in Romania to address specific benchmarks in the areas of judicial reform and the fight against corruption – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 15(1) – Article 47 – Article 49(3) – Elective public office – Conflict of interests – National legislation prohibiting the holding of elective public office for a predetermined period – Penalty additional to the termination of the term of office – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-40/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 May 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0529decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#OP and Others v Glavna direktsia 'Pozharna bezopasnost i zashtita na naselenieto' kam Ministerstvo na vatreshnite raboti.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad - Kula.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Organisation of working time – Directive 2003/88/EC – Article 1(3) – Scope – Article 8 – Article 12 – Health and safety of night workers at work – Level of protection for night workers appropriate to the nature of their work – Directive 89/391/EEC – Article 2 – Public sector workers and private sector workers – Article 20 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Equal treatment.#Joined Cases C-529/21 to C-536/21 and C-732/21 to C-738/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 May 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0100decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 May 2023.#KY v Court of Justice of the European Union.#Appeal – Civil service – Officials – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 77 – Pension – Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations – Transfer of national pension rights to the pension scheme of the European Union institutions – Crediting of additional pensionable years – Article 2 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations – Pension calculation – Fourth paragraph of Article 77 of the Staff Regulations – The ‘minimum subsistence figure’ rule – Request for reimbursement of the portion of the transferred pension rights not reflected in the EU pension amount – Unjust enrichment.#Case C-100/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 May 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0060decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Chambre de commerce et d'industrie territoriale de la Marne en Champagne v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark TEHA – Earlier national figurative mark tema – Relative ground for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Lack of genuine use of the mark – Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) – Use in a form which differs in elements which alter the distinctive character of the trade mark – Article 15(1), second subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 18(1), second subparagraph, point (a), of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-60/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 May 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0303decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Dicofarm SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark Vitis pharma Dicofarm group – Earlier national figurative mark viti DREN – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Weak similarity of the goods and services – No likelihood of confusion.#Case T-303/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 May 2023

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0168decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 3 May 2023.#Foundation for the Protection of the Traditional Cheese of Cyprus named Halloumi v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark GRILLOUMI – Earlier EU collective word mark HALLOUMI – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-168/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 May 2023

PreviousPage 21 of 22Next