Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

301 records in EU in 2026

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 93Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0528_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#LQ and Others v Minister for Justice and Equality.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part – Surrender of a person to the United Kingdom for the purpose of criminal prosecutions – Article 524(2) – Article 604(c) – Real risk to the protection of fundamental rights – Article 625 – Speciality rule – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-528/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0882decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#AL v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Remuneration – Dependent child allowances – Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Conditions for granting – Withdrawal of entitlement to the allowance – Recovery of overpayments under Article 85 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Action for annulment – Article 91 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Distortion – Assessment of the legality of an act at the date of its adoption – Retroactive scope of a judgment delivered by a national court – Res judicata.#Case C-882/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62026CJ0024decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#Criminal proceedings against Procuratore generale presso la Corte d’Appello.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Urgent preliminary ruling procedure – Area of freedom, security and justice – Judicial cooperation in criminal matters – Directive 2012/29/EU – Minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime – Articles 6, 10 and 18 – Right to receive information about the case and right to be heard – National legislation providing for an extraordinary remedy, whereby a person convicted in absentia may have a conviction which has become final quashed – No recognition of the right of the victim to be informed of the application for that extraordinary remedy and of the right to participate in the related proceedings – Directive (EU) 2016/343 – Presumption of innocence and right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings – Articles 8 and 9 – Right to a new trial or to another legal remedy which allows a fresh determination of the merits of the case – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to a fair trial – Article 54 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Prohibition of abuse of rights.#Case C-24/26 PPU.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0528decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 23 April 2026.#LQ and Others v Minister for Justice and Equality.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part – Surrender of a person to the United Kingdom for the purpose of criminal prosecutions – Article 524(2) – Article 604(c) – Real risk to the protection of fundamental rights – Article 625 – Speciality rule – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy.#Case C-528/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 April 2026

Proposal· PCCELEX 52026PC0149open

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT pursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the position of the Council on the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the production and marketing of forest reproductive material, amending Regulations (EU) 2016/2031 and 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 1999/105/EC (FRM Regulation)

European Union · European Commission · 23 April 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0528_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Viktor Arkadievich Chevtsov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Error of assessment.#Case T-528/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 April 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0056_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Rose Bikes GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark ROSE – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Objective characteristics inherent to the nature of the goods and services – Sufficiently direct and concrete link.#Case T-56/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 April 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0494_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Emmanouil Peponis v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark CRETE HOMES REAL ESTATE CRETE PROPERTY and CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS SINCE 1990 – Relative ground for refusal – Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 40/94 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-494/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 April 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0494decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Emmanouil Peponis v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark CRETE HOMES REAL ESTATE CRETE PROPERTY and CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS SINCE 1990 – Relative ground for refusal – Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 40/94 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-494/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 April 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0056decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Rose Bikes GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark ROSE – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Objective characteristics inherent to the nature of the goods and services – Sufficiently direct and concrete link.#Case T-56/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 April 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0528decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Viktor Arkadievich Chevtsov v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Error of assessment.#Case T-528/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 April 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0228decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Crocs, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a shoe – Ground for invalidity – Failure to comply with the requirements for protection – Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 – No individual character – Article 6 of Regulation No 6/2002.#Case T-228/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 April 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0349decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Mariano Barranco Rodriguez and Pablo Barranco Schnitzler v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark G MOTION – Earlier EU figurative mark GM Germany Motions – Relative grounds for invalidity – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-349/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0769_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 21 April 2026.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – National legislation introducing restrictions in relation to deviation from the self-identity corresponding to the sex assigned at birth, gender reassignment, or homosexuality, with a view to protecting children – Directives 2000/31/EC, 2006/123/EC, 2010/13/EU – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Restrictions on sex education – Principle of non-discrimination – Values of the European Union as enshrined in Article 2 TEU – Reliance on a breach of those values in an action for failure to fulfil obligations – Articles 1, 7, 11 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Protection of personal data.#Case C-769/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0155_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 April 2026.#Nederlandse Voedsel- en Warenautoriteit and Others v Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products and related products – Directive 2014/40/EU – Article 3(1) – Maximum emission levels for tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide – Article 4(1) – Measurement methods – Measurement of emission levels on the basis of the ISO standards referred to in Article 4(1) – Standards not published in the Official Journal of the European Union – Enforceability of those ISO standards – Article 2 TEU – Value of the rule of law – Requirement of free access to such standards.#Case C-155/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0769decided

Judgment of the Court (Full Court) of 21 April 2026.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – National legislation introducing restrictions in relation to deviation from the self-identity corresponding to the sex assigned at birth, gender reassignment, or homosexuality, with a view to protecting children – Directives 2000/31/EC, 2006/123/EC, 2010/13/EU – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Restrictions on sex education – Principle of non-discrimination – Values of the European Union as enshrined in Article 2 TEU – Reliance on a breach of those values in an action for failure to fulfil obligations – Articles 1, 7, 11 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Protection of personal data.#Case C-769/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0155decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 April 2026.#Nederlandse Voedsel- en Warenautoriteit and Others v Stichting Rookpreventie Jeugd.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products and related products – Directive 2014/40/EU – Article 3(1) – Maximum emission levels for tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide – Article 4(1) – Measurement methods – Measurement of emission levels on the basis of the ISO standards referred to in Article 4(1) – Standards not published in the Official Journal of the European Union – Enforceability of those ISO standards – Article 2 TEU – Value of the rule of law – Requirement of free access to such standards.#Case C-155/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 April 2026

Decision· DCELEX 32026D1414in force

Council Decision (EU) 2026/1414 of 21 April 2026 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Lebanon, in the form of an Exchange of Letters, amending and supplementing the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Union and the Republic of Lebanon, setting out the terms and conditions for the participation of the Republic of Lebanon in the Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Mediterranean Area (PRIMA)

European Union · EUR-Lex · 21 April 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0234_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 April 2026.#Deutsche Transnational Trustee Corporation, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark GUSTO – Earlier EU word mark GUSTONI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Impartiality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-234/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 April 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0234decided

Order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 20 April 2026.#Deutsche Transnational Trustee Corporation, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark GUSTO – Earlier EU word mark GUSTONI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Impartiality – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-234/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0328decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 April 2026.#Constantin Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși v European Public Prosecutor’s Office.#Appeal – Institutional law – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) – Article 42(1) – Procedural acts of the EPPO intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties – Judicial review carried out by the national courts – Plea of illegality – Admissibility – Exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union to review the legality of EU acts – Article 86(2) and (3) TFEU – Exercise of the functions of prosecutor in the national courts – Power of the EU legislature to determine the rules applicable to the judicial review of procedural acts of the EPPO – Derogation not authorised in Article 263 TFEU – None – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to effective judicial protection – Infringement – None – Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court.#Case C-328/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0328_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 April 2026.#Constantin Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși v European Public Prosecutor’s Office.#Appeal – Institutional law – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) – Article 42(1) – Procedural acts of the EPPO intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties – Judicial review carried out by national courts – Plea of illegality – Admissibility – Exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union to review the legality of EU acts – Article 86(2) and (3) TFEU – Exercise of the functions of prosecutor in the national courts – Power of the EU legislature to determine the rules applicable to the judicial review of procedural acts of the EPPO – Derogation not authorised in Article 263 TFEU – None – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to effective judicial protection – Infringement – None – Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court.#Case C-328/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 April 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0343decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 April 2026.#Jean-Marc Colombani v European External Action Service (EEAS).#Appeal – Civil Service – Officials – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 24 – Request for assistance – Article 12a – Concept of ‘psychological harassment’ – Passive or collective harassment – Rejection of a request for assistance – Action for annulment and for compensation.#Case C-343/23 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 16 April 2026

Proposal· PCCELEX 52026PC0163open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union at the 18th meeting of the Committee of Technical Experts (CTE) of the Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail (OTIF) with regard to the revision of the Rules of Procedure of the CTE, to the revision of Uniform Technical Prescriptions (UTP) applicable to the subsystem “rolling stock – freight wagons (UTP WAG) and to the subsystem “rolling stock – locomotives and passenger rolling stock” (UTP LOC&PAS), to the adoption of a Uniform format of certificates, to the revision of the UTP applicable to the subsystem Telematics applications for freight services (UTP TAF), and of the Handbook for the implementation and application of the APTU and ATMF Uniform Rules

European Union · European Commission · 16 April 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0461_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 April 2026.#Instanta sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark LEONHART – Earlier national figurative mark EL LEON – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-461/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 April 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0824_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 14 April 2026.#Frutaria Innovation SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-824/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0867_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 14 April 2026.#Homestar sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-867/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0824decided

Order of the Court of 14 April 2026.#Frutaria Innovation SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-824/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0867decided

Order of the Court of 14 April 2026.#Homestar sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-867/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2026

PreviousPage 6 of 7Next