Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

451 records in EU in 2022

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293United States · 141Austria · 93Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0170decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#FJ and Others v European External Action Service (EEAS).#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – European External Action Service (EEAS) – Updating of the correction coefficients – Repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court of the European Union – Lack of clarity and precision of the pleas – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-170/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0168decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#Magnetec GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a shade of light blue – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Limitation of goods designated by the trade mark application – Article 49(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Requirements of clarity and precision – Article 33(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-168/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0168decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#FT and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – European Commission staff posted to a third country – Updating of the correction coefficients – Repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court of the European Union – Lack of clarity and precision of the pleas – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-168/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0172decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#FZ and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – European Commission staff posted to a third country – Updating of the correction coefficients – Repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court of the European Union – Lack of clarity and precision of the pleas – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-172/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0171decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#FJ and Others v European External Action Service.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – European External Action Service (EEAS) staff – Updating of the correction coefficients – Repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court of the European Union – Lack of clarity and precision of the pleas – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-171/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0711_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark CMS Italy – Earlier international figurative marks representing a feline bounding towards the left and earlier international figurative mark PUMA – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – Similarity of the signs – Proof of reputation – Overall assessment.#Case T-711/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0599_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#bett1.de GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Body-Star – Earlier EU word mark Bodyguard – Relative ground for refusal – Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001, read in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of that regulation.#Case T-599/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0696_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#Les Bordes Golf International v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark LES BORDES – Earlier international figurative mark consisting of inter alia a stag’s head – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-696/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0539_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#the airscreen company GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative mark airframe – Absolute grounds for refusal – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-539/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0168_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#FT and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – European Commission staff posted to a third country – Updating of the correction coefficients – Repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court of the European Union – Lack of clarity and precision of the pleas – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-168/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0172_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#FZ and Others v European Commission.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – European Commission staff posted to a third country – Updating of the correction coefficients – Repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court of the European Union – Lack of clarity and precision of the pleas – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-172/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0168_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#Magnetec GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for an EU trade mark consisting of a shade of light blue – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Limitation of goods designated by the trade mark application – Article 49(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Requirements of clarity and precision – Article 33(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-168/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0171_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#FJ and Others v European External Action Service.#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – European External Action Service (EEAS) staff – Updating of the correction coefficients – Repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court of the European Union – Lack of clarity and precision of the pleas – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-171/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0170_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#FJ and Others v European External Action Service (EEAS).#Appeal – Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Civil service – Officials – Remuneration – European External Action Service (EEAS) – Updating of the correction coefficients – Repetition of the pleas and arguments put forward before the General Court of the European Union – Lack of clarity and precision of the pleas – Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-170/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0696decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#Les Bordes Golf International v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark LES BORDES – Earlier international figurative mark consisting of inter alia a stag’s head – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-696/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0539decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 5 October 2022.#the airscreen company GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – Figurative mark airframe – Absolute grounds for refusal – No descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-539/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 October 2022

Decision· DCELEX 32022D1846in force

Council Decision (EU) 2022/1846 of 29 September 2022 on the conclusion, on behalf of the Union, of the Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius concerning the extension of the Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities and the financial contribution provided for by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius

European Union · EUR-Lex · 29 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0597_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 September 2022.#Polskie Linie Lotnicze 'LOT' SA v Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 16 – Compensation and assistance to passengers – Task of the national body responsible for the enforcement of that regulation – National legislation conferring on that body the power to order an air carrier to pay compensation due to a passenger – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to seek remedy before a tribunal.#Case C-597/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 September 2022

Report· CCCELEX 62020CC0640decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 29 September 2022.#PV v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – Psychological harassment – Medical opinions – Unjustified absences – Remuneration – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Article 11a – Conflict of interests – Article 21a – Manifestly illegal order – Article 23 – Compliance with laws and police regulations – Disciplinary procedure – Removal from post – Withdrawal of removal – New disciplinary procedure – Fresh removal from post.#Case C-640/20 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 September 2022

Record· CJCELEX 62020CJ0597decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 September 2022.#Polskie Linie Lotnicze 'LOT' SA v Budapest Főváros Kormányhivatala.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 – Article 16 – Compensation and assistance to passengers – Task of the national body responsible for the enforcement of that regulation – National legislation conferring on that body the power to order an air carrier to pay compensation due to a passenger – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to seek remedy before a tribunal.#Case C-597/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0663decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#Tanja Zegers v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Retirement pension – Transfer of national pension rights – Condition requiring acquisition before entry into the service of the European Union – Recognition by the national authority of a period after entry into the service of the European Union.#Case T-663/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0058decided

Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 28 September 2022.#Miroslav Labaš v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU figurative mark FRESH – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-58/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0663_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#Tanja Zegers v European Commission.#Civil service – Officials – Retirement pension – Transfer of national pension rights – Condition requiring acquisition before entry into the service of the European Union – Recognition by the national authority of a period after entry into the service of the European Union.#Case T-663/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0627_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#Libyan African Investment Co. (LAICO) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Retention of the applicant’s name on the list – Error of assessment.#Case T-627/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0454_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#G-Core Innovations Sàrl v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark G CORELABS – Earlier EU figurative mark CORE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).#Case T-454/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2022

Record· COCELEX 62022CO0320_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeal may proceed) of 28 September 2022.#the airscreen company GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal not allowed to proceed.#Case C-320/22 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0058_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 28 September 2022.#Miroslav Labaš v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU figurative mark FRESH – Absolute grounds for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) and (2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-58/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62020TJ0627decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#Libyan African Investment Co. (LAICO) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Libya – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Retention of the applicant’s name on the list – Error of assessment.#Case T-627/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2022

Record· TJCELEX 62021TJ0572_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 28 September 2022.#Copal Tree Brands, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark COPAL TREE – Earlier national figurative mark COMPAL – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Similarity of the signs – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-572/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 September 2022

PreviousPage 9 of 10Next