Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

451 records in EU in 2025

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0557decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Confrasilvas - Construções S. A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Confrasilvas – Earlier sign Confrasilvas – Relative ground for refusal – Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-557/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0557_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Confrasilvas - Construções S. A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark Confrasilvas – Earlier sign Confrasilvas – Relative ground for refusal – Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-557/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0390decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Barry’s Bootcamp Holdings LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark representing two horizontal black chevrons – Action for annulment – Time limits for instituting proceedings – Admissibility – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-390/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0196decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Digi International, Inc. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark DIGI – Earlier EU figurative mark DIGI – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-196/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0326decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Tamasu Butterfly Europa GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark BTFY – Earlier EU word mark Butterfly – Earlier national trade names Butterfly and BTY – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – No use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance – Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001 – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-326/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0409decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Al-Aqeelah Takaful Insurance Company v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures adopted against Syria – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Action for annulment – Time limit for bringing proceedings – Partial inadmissibility – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment – Right to property – Freedom to conduct a business – Proportionality.#Case T-409/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1101decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#AQ v European Chemicals Agency.#Access to documents – Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 – Document relating to notifications for the export of dangerous chemicals which are prohibited or severely restricted within the European Union – Decision of ECHA to grant access to a third party – Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests – Proportionality.#Case T-1101/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0238decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Bogoljub Karić v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources or to restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Obligation to state reasons – Error of assessment.#Case T-238/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0406decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Manufaktur Jörg Geiger GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark PriSecco – Earlier PDO ‘Prosecco’ – Relative ground for invalidity – Article 8(4) and Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Article 103(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 – Concept of ‘evocation’ of a PDO.#Case T-406/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0031decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Barry’s Bootcamp Holdings LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing two chevrons pointing to the right – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark.#Case T-31/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0032decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2025 (Extracts).#Barry’s Bootcamp Holdings LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing eight inverted black chevrons – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark – Cross-claim – Subject matter of the action – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility.#Case T-32/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0032_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2025 (Extracts).#Barry’s Bootcamp Holdings LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing eight inverted black chevrons – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark – Cross-claim – Subject matter of the action – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility.#Case T-32/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0413_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Issam Shammout v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘leading businessperson operating in Syria’ – Presumption of a link with the Syrian regime – Error of assessment.#Case T-413/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0415decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Cham Wings Airlines LLC v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘association with the Syrian regime’ – Error of assessment – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality.#Case T-415/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0413decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Issam Shammout v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restriction on entry into the territory of the Member States – Lists of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists – Concept of ‘leading businessperson operating in Syria’ – Presumption of a link with the Syrian regime – Error of assessment.#Case T-413/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0032_EXTdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 24 September 2025 (Extracts).#Barry’s Bootcamp Holdings LLC v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark representing eight inverted black chevrons – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark – Cross-claim – Subject matter of the action – Interest in bringing proceedings – Admissibility.#Case T-32/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0483decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 24 September 2025.#Sanofi BV, anciennement Genzyme Europe BV v European Commission.#Public health – Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Nexviadyme (avalglucosidase alfa) – Non-recognition of avalglucosidase alfa as a new active substance – Directive 2001/83/EC – Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 – Commission document ‘Notice to Applicants, Volume 2A, Procedures for marketing authorisation, Chapter 1, Marketing Authorisation’ – Standard of proof – Obligation to state reasons – Principle of good administration – Right to be heard – Decision to remove the medicinal product from the European Union Register of Orphan Medicinal Products – Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 – Regulation (EC) No 847/2000 – Significant benefit – Standard of proof – Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-483/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TOCELEX 62024TO0684_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 September 2025.#Tone Watch, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark MUNICH10A.T.M. – Admissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal – Late filing of the statement of grounds of appeal – Request for continuation of proceedings – Article 105(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-684/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 September 2025

Decision· DCELEX 32025D1947in force

Council Decision (EU) 2025/1947 of 18 September 2025 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Association Council established by the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part, with regard to a decision amending Protocol 4 to that Agreement concerning the definition of the concept of ‘originating products’ and methods of administrative cooperation

European Union · EUR-Lex · 18 September 2025

Decision· DCELEX 32025D1957in force

Council Decision (EU) 2025/1957 of 18 September 2025 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Association Committee in Trade Configuration established by the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, and their Member States of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, as regards the reduction and elimination of customs duties

European Union · EUR-Lex · 18 September 2025

Decision· DCELEX 32025D1948in force

Council Decision (EU) 2025/1948 of 18 September 2025 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the EU-CTC Joint Committee established by the Convention on the simplification of formalities in trade in goods and within the EU-CTC Joint Committee established by the Convention on a Common transit procedure as regards the adoption of decisions inviting the Republic of Moldova and Montenegro to accede to those Conventions and as regards the adoption of decisions amending the Convention on a common transit procedure following the Republic of Moldova’s and Montenegro’s accession to that Convention

European Union · EUR-Lex · 18 September 2025

Proposal· PCCELEX 52025PC0498open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Specialised Committee on Road Transport established by the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part, on the amount and modalities of the UK's financial contribution to road transport information systems managed by the Union and amending Decision No 1/2022 of the Specialised Committee on Road Transport

European Union · European Commission · 18 September 2025

Decision· DCELEX 32025D1966in force

Council Decision (EU) 2025/1966 of 16 September 2025 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the extension of the deadline for accession of Kazakhstan to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, with regard to matters related to institutions and public administration of the Union

European Union · EUR-Lex · 16 September 2025

Decision· DCELEX 32025D1967in force

Council Decision (EU) 2025/1967 of 16 September 2025 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the extension of the deadline for accession of Kazakhstan to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, with regard to matters related to judicial cooperation in criminal matters, asylum and non-refoulement

European Union · EUR-Lex · 16 September 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0802_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Ministerio Fiscal v MSIG.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle ne bis in idem – Concept of ‘same acts’ – Member of a terrorist association found guilty, in a Member State, of involvement in that association with a view to preparing an act of terrorism – Prosecution in another Member State for the same terrorist acts.#Case C-802/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0152_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 11 September 2025.#Hecht Pharma GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-152/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0802decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 September 2025.#Ministerio Fiscal v MSIG.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Nacional.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement – Article 54 – Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle ne bis in idem – Concept of ‘same acts’ – Member of a terrorist association found guilty, in a Member State, of involvement in that association with a view to preparing an act of terrorism – Prosecution in another Member State for the same terrorist acts.#Case C-802/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 11 September 2025

PreviousPage 9 of 10Next