Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · EU

Housing

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU

All countriesSearch this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62025CJ0188decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2026.#Štátny fond rozvoja bývania v GL and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Consumer protection – Unfair terms in consumer contracts – Directive 93/13/EEC – Article 2(c) – Concept of ‘seller or supplier’ – Loan and guarantee agreements – State Housing Development Fund – Task carried out in the public interest – Loans granted on preferential terms – Referral back for reconsideration following an appeal – Obligation to comply with the legal rulings of a higher court – Principle of the primacy of EU law – Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment.#Case C-188/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 July 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0494_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Emmanouil Peponis v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark CRETE HOMES REAL ESTATE CRETE PROPERTY and CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS SINCE 1990 – Relative ground for refusal – Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 40/94 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-494/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 April 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0494decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 22 April 2026.#Emmanouil Peponis v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark CRETE HOMES REAL ESTATE CRETE PROPERTY and CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS SINCE 1990 – Relative ground for refusal – Consent of the proprietor of the trade mark – Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Article 8(3) of Regulation No 40/94 – Obligation to state reasons – Article 94(1) and Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-494/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 April 2026

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-10-2026-000097answered

EU Affordable Housing Plan

European Union · European Parliament · 13 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0184_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#AF, en son nom propre et en qualité de personne exerçant la responsabilité parentale sur l’enfant mineur BF v Ministero dell’Interno - U.T.G. - Prefettura di Milano.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Applicants for international protection – Article 7 – Place of residence – Article 18 – Material reception conditions – Housing – Accommodation centres – Transfer – Applicant’s refusal – Article 20(1)(a) – Reduction of material reception conditions or withdrawal of that benefit in exceptional and duly justified cases – Abandonment of the place of residence without informing the competent authority or without permission – Article 20(4) – Serious breaches of the rules of the accommodation centre – Article 20(5) – Proportionality – Dignified standard of living – Article 21 – Applicants falling within the category of vulnerable persons – Article 23 – Minors – Power of a Member State to withdraw material reception conditions if the applicant refuses to be transferred to another accommodation centre.#Case C-184/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0417_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Slagelse Almennyttige Boligselskab Afdeling Schackenborgvænge and Others v MV and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin – Directive 2000/43/EC – Concepts of ‘ethnic origin’, ‘direct discrimination’ and ‘indirect discrimination’ – National legislation requiring the adoption of development plans designed to reduce the percentage of public family housing units in certain residential areas – Identification of those areas according to the proportion of ‘immigrants from non-Western countries and their descendants’ – Whether justified – Social cohesion and integration – Housing policy – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for the home – Proportionality.#Case C-417/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0417decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Slagelse Almennyttige Boligselskab Afdeling Schackenborgvænge and Others v MV and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin – Directive 2000/43/EC – Concepts of ‘ethnic origin’, ‘direct discrimination’ and ‘indirect discrimination’ – National legislation requiring the adoption of development plans designed to reduce the percentage of public family housing units in certain residential areas – Identification of those areas according to the proportion of ‘immigrants from non-Western countries and their descendants’ – Whether justified – Social cohesion and integration – Housing policy – Article 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to respect for the home – Proportionality.#Case C-417/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0184decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#AF, en son nom propre et en qualité de personne exerçant la responsabilité parentale sur l’enfant mineur BF v Ministero dell’Interno - U.T.G. - Prefettura di Milano.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Applicants for international protection – Article 7 – Place of residence – Article 18 – Material reception conditions – Housing – Accommodation centres – Transfer – Applicant’s refusal – Article 20(1)(a) – Reduction of material reception conditions or withdrawal of that benefit in exceptional and duly justified cases – Abandonment of the place of residence without informing the competent authority or without permission – Article 20(4) – Serious breaches of the rules of the accommodation centre – Article 20(5) – Proportionality – Dignified standard of living – Article 21 – Applicants falling within the category of vulnerable persons – Article 23 – Minors – Power of a Member State to withdraw material reception conditions if the applicant refuses to be transferred to another accommodation centre.#Case C-184/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Proposal· PCCELEX 52025PC0592open

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT pursuant to Article 294(6) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union concerning the position of the Council on the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European statistics on population and housing, amending Regulation (EC) No 862/2007 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 763/2008 and (EU) No 1260/2013

European Union · European Commission · 1 October 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0097_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#S.A. and R.J. v The Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Liability of a Member State in the event of infringement of EU law – Sufficiently serious infringement – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection – Significant influx of applicants for temporary or international protection – No access to material reception conditions – Basic needs – Temporary exhaustion of housing capacity.#Case C-97/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 August 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0097decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 August 2025.#S.A. and R.J. v Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Liability of a Member State in the event of infringement of EU law – Sufficiently serious infringement – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection – Significant influx of applicants for temporary or international protection – No access to material reception conditions – Basic needs – Temporary exhaustion of housing capacity.#Case C-97/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 1 August 2025

Report· CCCELEX 62024CC0097decided

Opinion of Advocate General Medina delivered on 10 April 2025.#S.A. and R.J. v Minister for Children, Equality, Disability, Integration and Youth and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland).#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Liability of a Member State in the event of infringement of EU law – Sufficiently serious infringement – Asylum policy – Directive 2013/33/EU – Standards for the reception of applicants for international protection – Significant influx of applicants for temporary or international protection – No access to material reception conditions – Basic needs – Temporary exhaustion of housing capacity.#Case C-97/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 April 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0594_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 November 2024.#Skatteministeriet v Lomoco Development ApS and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Supply of land that has only the foundations of residential housing structures in place – Classification – Article 12 – Concepts of ‘building land’ and ‘building or parts of a building’ – Criterion of the ‘first occupation’ of a building.#Case C-594/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0594decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 November 2024.#Skatteministeriet v Lomoco Development ApS and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Supply of land that has only the foundations of residential housing structures in place – Classification – Article 12 – Concepts of ‘building land’ and ‘building or parts of a building’ – Criterion of the ‘first occupation’ of a building.#Case C-594/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0670_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 October 2023.#BA v Finanzamt X.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Free movement of capital – Articles 63 to 65 TFEU – Inheritance tax – Movement of capital between Member States and third countries – Immovable property located in a third country – More favourable tax treatment for immovable property located in a Member State or in a State which is party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area – Restriction – Justification – Housing policy – Effectiveness of fiscal supervision.#Case C-670/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 October 2023

Record· CJCELEX 62021CJ0670decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 12 October 2023.#BA v Finanzamt X.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Free movement of capital – Articles 63 to 65 TFEU – Inheritance tax – Movement of capital between Member States and third countries – Immovable property located in a third country – More favourable tax treatment for immovable property located in a Member State or in a State which is party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area – Restriction – Justification – Housing policy – Effectiveness of fiscal supervision.#Case C-670/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 October 2023

Report· CCCELEX 62021CC0670decided

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 9 February 2023.#BA v Finanzamt X.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Köln.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Free movement of capital – Articles 63 to 65 TFEU – Inheritance tax – Movement of capital between Member States and third countries – Immovable property located in a third country – More favourable tax treatment for immovable property located in a Member State or in a State which is party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area – Restriction – Justification – Housing policy – Effectiveness of fiscal supervision.#Case C-670/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 9 February 2023

Page 1 of 2Next