Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects

Rule of law

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

251 records in 2022

Records

Question· Question écrite44062answered

Question 44062 — fonctionnaires et agents publics

France · National Assembly · 1 August 2022

Mme Laetitia Saint-Paul attire l'attention de Mme la ministre de la transformation et de la fonction publiques sur la mobilité internationale des fonctionnaires, son développement et sa coordination dans un objectif stratégique. En l'état, la mobilité internationale des fonctionnaires n'est obligatoire qu'au cours de la formation des fonctionnaires stagiaires de l'ancienne École nationale d'administration. Pour les autres agents de l'État, il s'agit d'une possibilité au cours de leur carrière, comme l'indique le guide pratique développé conjointement en 2019 par le secrétariat général aux affaires européennes et la direction générale de l'administration et de la fonction publique. La veille de la vacance des postes dans les organisations internationales effectuée par la délégation aux fonctionnaires internationaux permet une promotion de la mobilité, en particulier vers un public de jeunes fonctionnaires. Cependant, bien que ces dispositifs permettent une publicité de l'information, la mobilité des fonctionnaires reste freinée : ceux-ci ont par exemple pour obligation d'alerter leur hiérarchie lorsqu'ils prétendent à un concours d'accès à une organisation internationale. Alors que la réussite à ces concours est très incertaine, ils en sont trop souvent pénalisés dans la suite de leur carrière. En cas de mobilité, l'établissement de liens permanents entre les fonctionnaires nationaux présents dans les organisations internationales et la fonction publique française reste complexe. Elle l'interroge donc sur la stratégie de gestion de la mobilité des fonctionnaires français détachés dans les organisations internationales, tant dans un objectif de développement de carrière que de soutien à la présence et l'influence françaises au sein des institutions européennes et internationales.

Question· Question écrite44022open

Question 44022 — dépendance

France · National Assembly · 1 August 2022

M. André Villiers interroge Mme la ministre déléguée auprès du ministre des solidarités et de la santé, chargée de l'autonomie, sur la maltraitance dans les Ehpad ainsi que la prise en charge du grand âge et de la perte d'autonomie. La publication de l'ouvrage Les Fossoyeurs du journaliste indépendant Victor Castanet a mis au jour les dérives lucratives de certains Ehpad du secteur privé, avec des méthodes managériales contestables et une volonté manifeste de rogner sur les dépenses. Attention, bien sûr, aux généralisations hâtives et à « l'Ehpad bashing » : tous les Ehpad ne sont pas des mouroirs où les aînés seraient maltraités ; la majorité des aidants et des soignants de ces établissements font preuve d'un dévouement et d'un professionnalisme exemplaires qu'il convient de saluer. Au-delà de la situation de tel ou tel établissement particulier, c'est un choix collectif de société qui mérite d'être interrogé : celui d'un modèle de l'accompagnement du grand âge qui continue d'être fondé sur l'Ehpad, fonctionnant suivant une logique hospitalière, plutôt que sur le maintien à domicile des personnes âgées, option pourtant souhaitée par la majorité des Français et en filigrane sur la relégation de toutes les vulnérabilités, à commencer par le grand âge. Il lui demande quelles mesures le Gouvernement compte prendre et suivant quel calendrier pour renforcer à court terme les modalités et les autorités de contrôle de tous les Ehpad (inspection du travail, assurance maladie, agences régionales de santé) et préparer à moyen terme l'inscription à l'ordre du jour du Parlement d'une réforme du modèle de la prise en charge du grand âge et de la perte d'autonomie, qui retienne enfin l'orientation domiciliaire et qui devra être résolument conduite dès le début du prochain quinquennat.

Bill· SS. 4688 (117th)referred

Reproductive Freedom for All Act

United States · United States Congress · 1 August 2022

Reproductive Freedom for All Act This bill establishes a general right of all persons to make certain reproductive decisions without undue government interference. It specifically provides statutory authority for the Supreme Court's prior holdings in Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey . In Roe , the Court held that the Constitution protects a woman's decision to terminate her pregnancy. In Casey , the Court reaffirmed this holding and additionally held that state abortion regulations may not place a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion before fetal viability (i.e., an undue burden). However, a state may (1) restrict abortions after viability, except when a pregnancy endangers the life or health of the woman; and (2) enact regulations to further the health or safety of a woman seeking an abortion, except for unnecessary health regulations that present a substantial obstacle to a woman seeking an abortion. Additionally, the bill provides statutory authority for the Court's holdings in Griswold v. Connecticut (the right of married couples to obtain contraception), Eisenstadt v. Baird (the right of single persons to obtain contraception), Carey v. Population Services International (the right of minors to obtain contraception), and Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt (that certain state restrictions on abortion facilities and providers created an undue burden). The bill allows the Department of Justice or any person adversely affected by a state law that violates this bill to seek injunctive relief. It also specifies that the bill does not affect laws regarding conscience protection.

Resolution· HRESH.Res. 1294 (117th)referred

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States should negotiate strong, inclusive, and forward-looking rules on digital trade and the digital economy with like-minded countries as part of its broader trade and economic strategy in order to ensure American values of democracy, rule of law, freedom of speech, human and worker rights, privacy, and a free and open internet are at the very core of digital governance.

United States · United States Congress · 28 July 2022

This resolution expresses the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States should negotiate and enforce rules on digital trade and the digital economy with like-minded countries as part of its broader trade and economic strategy.

Bill· SS. 4681 (117th)referred

Supreme Court Review Act of 2022

United States · United States Congress · 28 July 2022

Supreme Court Review Act of 2022 This bill requires the Government Accountability Office to notify Congress of a covered Supreme Court decision and sets forth expedited procedures for the consideration of legislation related to the decision. A covered Supreme Court decision is a decision by the Supreme Court that interprets a federal statute for the first time, reinterprets a federal statute that it previously interpreted, or interprets or reinterprets the Constitution in a manner that diminishes an individual right or privilege that is or was previously protected by the Constitution.

Resolution· SRESS.Res. 727 (117th)referred

A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate that the United States should negotiate strong, inclusive, and forward-looking rules on digital trade and the digital economy with like-minded countries as part of its broader trade and economic strategy in order to ensure that the United States values of democracy, rule of law, freedom of speech, human and worker rights, privacy, and a free and open internet are at the very core of digital governance.

United States · United States Congress · 28 July 2022

This resolution expresses the sense of the Senate that the United States should negotiate and enforce rules on digital trade and the digital economy with like-minded countries as part of its broader trade and economic strategy.

Bill· HRH.R. 8517 (117th)referred

COCOA Act of 2022

United States · United States Congress · 26 July 2022

Confirmation Of Congressional Observer Access Act of 2022 or the COCOA Act of 2022 This bill requires states to provide designated congressional election observers with full access to observe the administration procedures of federal elections. The bill prohibits such an observer from handling ballots or elections equipment, advocating for a position or candidate, taking any action to reduce ballot secrecy, or otherwise interfering with the elections administration process. Designated congressional election observer refers to an individual who is designated in writing by specified congressional committees to gather information with respect to an election, including in the event that the election is contested in the House of Representatives or the Senate and for other purposes permitted by Article I, Section 5 of the U.S. Constitution.

Record· TOCELEX 62021TO0254decided

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 July 2022.#Armadora Parleros, SL v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Common fisheries policy – Failure by the Commission to exercise its powers of control covered by the applicable legislation – Engine power of boats – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Damage – Causal link – Limitation period – Action manifestly inadmissible.#Case T-254/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 July 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62021TO0254_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 25 July 2022.#Armadora Parleros, SL v European Commission.#Non-contractual liability – Common fisheries policy – Failure by the Commission to exercise its powers of control covered by the applicable legislation – Engine power of boats – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Damage – Causal link – Limitation period – Action manifestly inadmissible.#Case T-254/21.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 July 2022

Bill· SS. 4587 (117th)referred

Benjamin Berell Ferencz Congressional Gold Medal Act

United States · United States Congress · 21 July 2022

Benjamin Berell Ferencz Congressional Gold Medal Act This bill provides for the award of a Congressional Gold Medal to Benjamin Berell Ferencz in recognition of his service to the United States and the international community during the post-World War II Nuremberg trials and his lifelong advocacy for international criminal justice and the rule of law.

Record· TOCELEX 62018TO0200_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 July 2022.#Fersher Developments LTD and Vladimir Lisin v European Commission and European Central Bank.#Action for damages – Economic and monetary policy – Stability support programme for Cyprus – Memorandum of Understanding of 26 April 2013 on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Equal treatment – Principle of proportionality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-200/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 July 2022

Record· TOCELEX 62018TO0200decided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 July 2022.#Fersher Developments LTD and Vladimir Lisin v European Commission and European Central Bank.#Action for damages – Economic and monetary policy – Stability support programme for Cyprus – Memorandum of Understanding of 26 April 2013 on Specific Economic Policy Conditionality concluded between Cyprus and the European Stability Mechanism – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals – Equal treatment – Principle of proportionality – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-200/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 July 2022

Bill· SS. 4573 (117th)open

Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act of 2022

United States · United States Congress · 20 July 2022

Electoral Count Reform and Presidential Transition Improvement Act of 2022 This bill revises the process of casting and counting electoral votes for presidential elections. The bill also revises provisions related to the presidential transition process. The bill specifies that the choice of electors must occur in accordance with the laws of the state enacted prior to election day. Additionally, the bill identifies each state's governor (unless otherwise identified in the laws or constitution of a state in effect on election day) as responsible for submitting the certificate of ascertainment identifying the state's electors. Further, the bill provides for expedited judicial review for any action brought by an aggrieved presidential or vice-presidential candidate arising under the U.S. Constitution or U.S. laws with respect to the issuance or transmission of such a certificate. The bill revises the framework for the joint session of Congress to count electoral votes and make a formal declaration of which candidates have been elected President and Vice President. Among other changes, the bill (1) specifies that the role of the Vice President during the joint session shall be ministerial in nature, and (2) raises the objection threshold in Congress to at least one-fifth of the duly chosen and sworn members of both the House of Representatives and the Senate. The bill also revises the presidential transition process, including to (1) allow more than one candidate to receive federal transition resources under certain circumstances, and (2) require additional reporting by the General Services Administration.

Bill· HRH.R. 8453 (117th)referred

Upholding the Dayton Peace Agreement Through Sanctions Act

United States · United States Congress · 20 July 2022

Upholding the Dayton Peace Agreement Through Sanctions Act This bill imposes visa- and property-blocking sanctions on foreign persons (i.e., individuals or entities) that are involved in certain actions that threaten the peace, stability, or democracy of Bosnia and Herzegovina. The President must impose such sanctions on certain foreign persons, including those that are responsible for or engaged in corruption or certain acts or policies that seek to (1) threaten the peace, security, stability, or territorial integrity of Bosnia and Herzegovina; (2) undermine democratic processes or institutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina; or (3) undermine the Dayton Peace Agreement or certain authorities related to the agreement. (The agreement brought an end to the Bosnian War, and Bosnia and Herzegovina's constitution stems in part from the agreement.) The Department of the Treasury may impose certain prohibitions and restrictions on a foreign financial institution that knowingly conducts or facilitates a significant transaction for a foreign person subject to sanctions under this bill.

Resolution· HCONRESH.Con.Res. 101 (117th)referred

Calling an Article V Convention for proposing amendments to the Constitution of the United States and stipulating the ratification of such amendments by State conventions, a vote of We the People, and for other purposes.

United States · United States Congress · 19 July 2022

This concurrent resolution calls for a convention for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution, with any proposed amendment to be ratified by a vote in three-quarters of the states via state convention delegates.

Bill· HRH.R. 8419 (117th)referred

To amend title 1, United States Code, to direct the Archivist of the United States to authenticate, count, and publish applications of States calling for a Convention for proposing amendments to the Constitution of the United States, to publish a certification when two-thirds of the States submit applications calling for such a Convention, and to notify Congress of the requirement under Article V of the Constitution to call such a Convention when such a certification is published, and for other purposes.

United States · United States Congress · 19 July 2022

This bill directs the National Archives and Records Administration to authenticate, count, and publish applications of states calling for a Convention for proposing amendments to the U.S. Constitution, to publish a certification when two-thirds of the states submit applications calling for such a convention, and to notify Congress of that requirement when such a certification is published.

Resolution· HRESH.Res. 1228 (117th)referred

Expressing support for the Supreme Court's decision on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.

United States · United States Congress · 14 July 2022

This resolution expresses support for the Supreme Court's holding in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (that there is no constitutional right to abortion). The resolution also applauds the courage of the Justices for standing by their allegiance to the Constitution and the legitimacy of the Supreme Court, and it expresses a commitment to supporting policies that continue to protect all life.

Resolution· HRESH.Res. 1222 (117th)referred

Celebrating 25 years of strategic partnership between the United States and Romania.

United States · United States Congress · 12 July 2022

This resolution celebrates the 25th anniversary of the strategic partnership between the United States and Romania, congratulates Romania on this important milestone, and thanks the Romanian people for their steadfast friendship and contribution to the progress of our bilateral relationship. The resolution also reaffirms the close bonds between the United States and Romania, based on a common commitment to freedom, democracy, rule of law, and economic prosperity. Finally, the resolution calls on the executive branch of the federal government to continue to strengthen the strategic partnership between the United States and Romania and to find new ways to leverage, support, and develop the friendship and cooperation between our two nations.

Record· scrutin public solennel1rejeté

la motion de censure déposée en application de l'article 49, alinéa 2, de la Constitution par Mme Mathilde Panot, MM. Boris Vallaud et Julien Bayou, Mme Cyrielle Chatelain, M. André Chassaigne et 145 de leurs collègues.

France · National Assembly · 11 July 2022

la motion de censure déposée en application de l'article 49, alinéa 2, de la Constitution par Mme Mathilde Panot, MM. Boris Vallaud et Julien Bayou, Mme Cyrielle Chatelain, M. André Chassaigne et 145 de leurs collègues.

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0710_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 July 2022.#Criminal proceedings against AM.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Field of application – Article 51 – Legislative procedure for the adoption of a resolution relating to the revocation of an amnesty – Judicial procedure for review of the compliance of that resolution with the national Constitution – Failure to implement EU law – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-710/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 July 2022

Record· COCELEX 62020CO0710decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 July 2022.#Criminal proceedings against AM.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava II.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Field of application – Article 51 – Legislative procedure for the adoption of a resolution relating to the revocation of an amnesty – Judicial procedure for review of the compliance of that resolution with the national Constitution – Failure to implement EU law – Clear lack of jurisdiction of the Court.#Case C-710/20.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 July 2022

Question· Written questionUIN 900881answered

British Constitution: Reform

United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 6 July 2022

To ask the Secretary of State for Wales, whether he has had recent discussions with devolved Administrations on potential constitutional reform.

Report· Ausschussbericht1637 d.B.ausschussbericht

Parteiengesetz 2012, Mediengesetz und Verfassungsgerichtshofgesetz 1953

Austria · National Council · 5 July 2022

Bericht des Verfassungsausschusses über den Antrag 2487/A der Abgeordneten Andreas Ottenschläger, Sigrid Maurer, BA, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Bundesgesetz über die Finanzierung politischer Parteien (Parteiengesetz 2012 – PartG), das Mediengesetz und das Verfassungsgerichtshofgesetz 1953 (VfGG) geändert werden <br><br>sowie über den Antrag 34/A und Zu 34/A der Abgeordneten Mag. Beate Meinl-Reisinger, MES, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Bundesgesetz über die Finanzierung politischer Parteien (Parteiengesetz 2012 – PartG) geändert wird, <br><br>über den Antrag 35/A und Zu 35/A der Abgeordneten Mag. Beate Meinl-Reisinger, MES, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Bundesgesetz über die Finanzierung politischer Parteien (Parteiengesetz 2012 – PartG) geändert wird und <br><br>über den Antrag 454/A der Abgeordneten Mag. Beate Meinl-Reisinger, MES, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Bundesgesetz über die Finanzierung politischer Parteien (Parteiengesetz 2012 – PartG) geändert wird

Report· Ausschussbericht1642 d.B.ausschussbericht

Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz und Geschäftsordnungsgesetz 1975

Austria · National Council · 5 July 2022

Bericht des Verfassungsausschusses über den Antrag 2509/A der Abgeordneten Mag. Jörg Leichtfried, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz und das Bundesgesetz über die Geschäftsordnung des Nationalrates (Geschäftsordnungsgesetz 1975) geändert werden

Report· Ausschussbericht1641 d.B.ausschussbericht

Parteiengesetz 2012 – PartG

Austria · National Council · 5 July 2022

Bericht des Verfassungsausschusses über den Antrag 181/A der Abgeordneten Dr. Nikolaus Scherak, MA, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesverfassungsgesetz, mit dem das Bundesgesetz über die Finanzierung politischer Parteien (Parteiengesetz 2012 – PartG) geändert wird

Question· writtenPQ 309asked

309. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the degree to which he continues to support the rule of law throughout Europe, as appropriate, with European Union colleagues and through the United Nations General Assembly, throughout the developed work; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36109/22]

Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 5 July 2022

309. Deputy Bernard J. Durkan asked the Minister for Foreign Affairs the degree to which he continues to support the rule of law throughout Europe, as appropriate, with European Union colleagues and through the United Nations General Assembly, throughout the developed work; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [36109/22]

Law· Initiatiefwetgeving2022Z14096adopted

Voorstel van wet van het lid Leijten houdende verklaring dat er grond bestaat een voorstel in overweging te nemen tot verandering in de Grondwet, strekkende tot opneming van bepalingen inzake het correctief referendum

Netherlands · House of Representatives · 5 July 2022

Voorstel van wet van het lid Leijten houdende verklaring dat er grond bestaat een voorstel in overweging te nemen tot verandering in de Grondwet, strekkende tot opneming van bepalingen inzake het correctief referendum

Report· Ausschussbericht1623 d.B.ausschussbericht

Allgemeines Sozialversicherungsgesetz, Gewerbliches Sozialversicherungsgesetz u.a.

Austria · National Council · 4 July 2022

Bericht des Ausschusses für Arbeit und Soziales über den Antrag 2636/A der Abgeordneten Josef Muchitsch, Kolleginnen und Kollegen betreffend ein Bundesgesetz, mit dem das Allgemeine Sozialversicherungsgesetz, das Gewerbliche Sozialversicherungsgesetz, das Bauern-Sozialversicherungsgesetz, das Kriegsopferversorgungsgesetz 1957, das Opferfürsorgegesetz, das Impfschadengesetz, das Verbrechensopfergesetz, das Heimopferrentengesetz, das Pensionsgesetz 1965, das Bundestheaterpensionsgesetz und das Bundesbahn-Pensionsgesetz geändert werden

PreviousPage 5 of 6Next