Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Transport

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2019

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0592_SUMdecided

Rozsudek Soudního dvora (devátého senátu) ze dne 19. prosince 2019.#Darie BV v. Staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Milieu.#Řízení o předběžné otázce – Nařízení (EU) č. 528/2012 – Článek 3 odst. 1 písm. a) a c) – Pojem ‚biocidní přípravek‘ – Pojem ‚účinná látka‘ – Výrobek s obsahem bakterií, který obsahuje druh bakterie Bacillus Ferment – Působení, které není pouhým fyzickým nebo mechanickým působením – Nepřímé působení – Doba působení výrobku.#Věc C-592/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0679_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#NL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti.#Request for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Controls of cash entering or leaving the European Union –Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 — Scope — Articles 63 and 65 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Transport of large amounts of cash entering or leaving the territory of a Member State — Obligation to declare — Sanctions — Fine and confiscation for the benefit of the State of an undeclared sum in excess of 10 000 euros — Proportionality.#Case C-679/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· COCELEX 62019CO0679decided

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#NL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Bucureşti.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Ilfov.#Request for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Controls of cash entering or leaving the European Union –Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 — Scope — Articles 63 and 65 TFEU — Free movement of capital — Transport of large amounts of cash entering or leaving the territory of a Member State — Obligation to declare — Sanctions — Fine and confiscation for the benefit of the State of an undeclared sum in excess of 10 000 euros — Proportionality.#Case C-679/19.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0592decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 December 2019.#Darie BV v Staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Milieu.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Article 3(1)(a) and (c) — Concept of ‘biocidal product’ — Concept of ‘active substance’ — Bacterial product containing the bacterial species Bacillus ferment — Mode of action other than mere physical or mechanical action — Indirect action — Period within which effect takes place.#Case C-592/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0496decided

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 21 November 2019.#HUNGEOD Közlekedésfejlesztési, Földmérési, Út- és Vasúttervezési Kft. and Others v Közbeszerzési Hatóság Közbeszerzési Döntőbizottság.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Törvényszék.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Review procedures concerning the award of public supply and public works contracts – Directive 89/665/EEC – Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors – Directive 92/13/EEC – Public procurement – Directives 2014/24/EU and 2014/25/EU – Review of the application of public procurement rules – National legislation which allows certain bodies to initiate a procedure of their own motion where there has been an unlawful amendment to a contract which is in the course of being performed – Time-barring of an authority’s right to initiate a procedure of its own motion – Principles of legal certainty and proportionality.#Case C-496/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0379decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 November 2019.#Deutsche Lufthansa AG v Land Berlin.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Air transport — Directive 2009/12/EC — Articles 3 and 6 — Article 11(1) and (7) — Airport charges — Protection of airport users’ rights — Whether it is possible for the airport managing body to agree charges lower than those approved by the independent supervisory authority — Remedies available to an airport user — Collateral challenge before a civil court giving judgment on the basis of equitable criteria.#Case C-379/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0203decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 November 2019.#Deutsche Post AG and Klaus Leymann v Land Nordrhein-Westfalen.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 — Road transport — Social legislation — Vehicles used to deliver items as part of the universal postal service — Exceptions — Vehicles partly used for such delivery — Directive 97/67/EC — Article 3(1) — ‘Universal service’ — Concept.#Case C-203/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 November 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0589open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the signing, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Protocol amending the Ancillary Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the first part, Iceland, of the second part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the third part, on the application of the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America, of the first part, the European Union and its Member States, of the second part, Iceland, of the third part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the fourth part, signed on 16 and 21 June 2011, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia

European Union · European Commission · 14 November 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0585open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Protocol amending the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America and the European Community and its Member States signed on April 25 and 30, 2007 as amended by the Protocol to amend the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America and the European Community and its Member States, signed on April 25 and 30, 2007, signed by the United States of America and the European Union and its Member States on 24 June 2010, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia

European Union · European Commission · 14 November 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0590open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Protocol amending the Ancillary Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the first part, Iceland, of the second part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the third part, on the application of the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America, of the first part, the European Union and its Member States, of the second part, Iceland, of the third part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the fourth part, signed on 16 and 21 June 2011, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia

European Union · European Commission · 14 November 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0588open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Protocol amending the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America, of the first part, the European Union and its Member States, of the second part, Iceland of the third part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the fourth part, signed on June 16 and 21, 2011, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia

European Union · European Commission · 14 November 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0586open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the signing, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Protocol amending the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America, of the first part, the European Union and its Member States, of the second part, Iceland of the third part, and the Kingdom of Norway, of the fourth part, signed on June 16 and 21, 2011, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia

European Union · European Commission · 14 November 2019

Proposal· PCCELEX 52019PC0584open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the signing, on behalf of the European Union and its Member States, of the Protocol amending the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America and the European Community and its Member States signed on April 25 and 30, 2007 as amended by the Protocol to amend the Air Transport Agreement between the United States of America and the European Community and its Member States, signed on April 25 and 30, 2007, signed by the United States of America and the European Union and its Member States on 24 June 2010, to take account of the accession to the European Union of the Republic of Croatia

European Union · European Commission · 14 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0349_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Nationale Maatschappij der Belgische Spoorwegen (NMBS) v Mbutuku Kanyeba and Others.#References for a preliminary ruling — Rail transport — Passengers’ rights and obligations — Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 — Article 3(8) — Transport contract — Concept — Passenger without a ticket at the time of boarding a train — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 1(2) and Article 6(1) — General conditions of carriage of a railway undertaking — Mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions — Penalty clause — Powers of the national court.#Joined Cases C-349/18 to C-351/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0396decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Gennaro Cafaro v DQ.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Air transport – Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 – Annex I, Point FCL.065 – Scope ratione temporis – Directive 2000/78/EC – Equal treatment in employment and occupation – Discrimination on grounds of age – Article 2(5) – Article 4(1) – National legislation providing for the automatic termination of the employment relationship at the age of 60 – Aircraft pilots – Protection of national security.#Case C-396/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0349decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 November 2019.#Nationale Maatschappij der Belgische Spoorwegen (NMBS) v Mbutuku Kanyeba and Others.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Vredegerecht te Antwerpen.#References for a preliminary ruling — Rail transport — Passengers’ rights and obligations — Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007 — Article 3(8) — Transport contract — Concept — Passenger without a ticket at the time of boarding a train — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 93/13/EEC — Article 1(2) and Article 6(1) — General conditions of carriage of a railway undertaking — Mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions — Penalty clause — Powers of the national court.#Joined Cases C-349/18 to C-351/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 November 2019

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0756_SUMdecided

Ordonnance de la Cour (huitième chambre) du 24 octobre 2019.#LC et MD contre easyJet Airline Co. Ltd.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Règlement de procédure de la Cour – Article 99 – Transport aérien – Règlement (CE) no 261/2004 – Retard important d’un vol – Droit des passagers à une indemnisation – Preuve de la présence du passager à l’enregistrement – Réservation confirmée par le transporteur aérien.#Affaire C-756/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· COCELEX 62018CO0756decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#LC and MD v easyJet Airline Co. Ltd.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d'instance d'Aulnay-sous-Bois.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 99 — Air transport — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Long delay of a flight — Passengers’ right to compensation — Proof of the passenger’s presence for check-in — Reservation confirmed by the air carrier.#Case C-756/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0515decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 24 October 2019.#Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato v Regione autonoma della Sardegna.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Sardegna.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Public passenger transport services — Rail transport — Public service contracts — Direct award — Obligation to publish a prior information notice in relation to the direct award — Scope.#Case C-515/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 October 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0592decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 17 October 2019.#Darie BV v Staatssecretaris van Infrastructuur en Milieu.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het Bedrijfsleven.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Article 3(1)(a) and (c) — Concept of ‘biocidal product’ — Concept of ‘active substance’ — Bacterial product containing the bacterial species Bacillus ferment — Mode of action other than mere physical or mechanical action — Indirect action — Period within which effect takes place.#Case C-592/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 October 2019

Report· CCCELEX 62018CC0401decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 3 October 2019.#Herst s.r.o. v Odvolací finanční ředitelství.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Krajský soud v Praze.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 2(1)(b) — Intra-Community acquisition of goods — Article 20 — Acquisition of the right to dispose of goods as owner — Chain of transactions for the purchase and resale of goods with a single intra-Community transport — Right to take decisions capable of affecting the legal situation of property — Transaction to which the transport should be ascribed — Transport under an excise duty suspension arrangement — Temporal effect of judgments by way of interpretation.#Case C-401/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 3 October 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0600decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 September 2019.#UTEP 2006. SRL v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal Hatósági Főosztály, Hatósági, Építésügyi és Oktatási Osztály.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Szombathelyi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Road transport — Articles 91 and 92 TFEU — Regulation (EU) No 165/2014 — Article 32(3), Article 33(1) and Article 41(1) — Infringement of the rules on the use of tachographs — Duty of Member States to make provision for effective, dissuasive and non-discriminatory penalties — Resident and non-resident small and medium-sized enterprises — Differential treatment.#Case C-600/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 September 2019

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-9-2019-002853answered

Air Transport Sector Data

European Union · European Parliament · 18 September 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0741_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2019.#Trasys International EEIG and Axianseu - Digital Solutions SA v European Aviation Safety Agency.#Public service contracts – Tender procedure – IT application and infrastructure management services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to other tenderers – Obligation to state reasons – Assessment of the existence of abnormally low tenders – Characteristics and relative merits of the tenders accepted – Request for a statement of reasons made by a tenderer who is not in an exclusion situation and whose tender is compliant with the procurement documents.#Case T-741/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2019

Record· TJCELEX 62017TJ0741decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2019.#Trasys International EEIG and Axianseu - Digital Solutions SA v European Aviation Safety Agency.#Public service contracts – Tender procedure – IT application and infrastructure management services – Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to other tenderers – Obligation to state reasons – Assessment of the existence of abnormally low tenders – Characteristics and relative merits of the tenders accepted – Request for a statement of reasons made by a tenderer who is not in an exclusion situation and whose tender is compliant with the procurement documents.#Case T-741/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62018CJ0354decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 July 2019.#Radu Lucian Rusu and Oana Maria Rusu v SC Blue Air - Airline Management Solutions SRL.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Bacău.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Air transport — Denied boarding — Concepts of ‘compensation’ and ‘further compensation’ — Type of damage for which compensation is available — Material or non-material damage — Deduction — Further compensation — Assistance — Information provided to passengers.#Case C-354/18.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 July 2019

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0659_SUMdecided

Arrêt de la Cour (deuxième chambre) du 29 juillet 2019.#Istituto nazionale della previdenza sociale (INPS) contre Azienda Napoletana Mobilità SpA.#Renvoi préjudiciel – Aides d’État – Aides à l’emploi – Exonération de charges sociales liées à des contrats de formation et de travail – Décision 2000/128/CE – Régimes d’aide portant mesures pour l’emploi mis à exécution par l’Italie – Aides en partie incompatibles avec le marché intérieur – Applicabilité de la décision 2000/128/CE à une entreprise fournissant de manière exclusive des services de transport public local lui ayant été directement attribués par une commune – Article 107, paragraphe 1, TFUE – Notion de “distorsion de la concurrence” – Notion d’“affectation des échanges” entre États membres.#Affaire C-659/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 29 July 2019

Page 1 of 2Next