Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

United States · Bill · HR

H.R. 21 (99th)

Continued Access to Group Health Insurance Act of 1985

referredUnited States· United States Congress· EN

Introduced

3 January 1985

Last action

4 March 1985 · Referred

Status

Referred to Subcommittee on Labor-Management Relations.

Sponsors

Rep. Stark, Fortney Pete [D-CA-13], Rep. Clay, William (Bill) [D-MO-1], Rep. Mitchell, Parren J. [D-MD-7], Rep. Bentley, Helen Delich [R-MD-2], Del. Fauntroy, Walter E. [D-DC-At Large], Rep. Edwards, Don [D-CA-10], Rep. Stokes, Louis [D-OH-11], Rep. Dixon, Julian C. [D-CA-32], Rep. Mrazek, Robert J. [D-NY-3], Rep. Owens, Major R. [D-NY-11], Rep. Kaptur, Marcy [D-OH-9], Rep. Towns, Edolphus [D-NY-10], Rep. Torres, Esteban Edward [D-CA-34], Rep. Penny, Timothy J. [D-MN-1], Rep. Lowry, Mike [D-WA-7], Rep. Bedell, Berkley W. [D-IA-6], Rep. Dymally, Mervyn M. [D-CA-31], Rep. Crockett, George W., Jr. [D-MI-13], Rep. Rangel, Charles B. [D-NY-15], Rep. Kolter, Joseph P. [D-PA-4], Rep. Williams, Pat [D-MT-At Large], Rep. Burton, Sala [D-CA-5], Rep. Hyde, Henry J. [R-IL-6], Rep. Martinez, Matthew G. [D-CA-31], Rep. Ackerman, Gary L. [D-NY-5], Rep. Levin, Sander M. [D-MI-12], Rep. Weiss, Ted [D-NY-17], Rep. Robinson, Tommy F. [D-AR-2], Rep. Udall, Morris K. [D-AZ-2], Sen. Durbin, Richard J. [D-IL], Rep. Atkins, Chester G. [D-MA-5], Rep. Lehman, William [D-FL-17], Rep. Howard, James J. [D-NJ-3], Rep. Kildee, Dale E. [D-MI-5], Rep. Fazio, Vic [D-CA-3], Sen. Daschle, Thomas A. [D-SD], Rep. Berman, Howard L. [D-CA-28], Rep. Seiberling, John F. [D-OH-14], Rep. Fuqua, Don [D-FL-2], Rep. Weaver, James H. [D-OR-4], Rep. Perkins, Carl C. [D-KY-7], Rep. Walgren, Doug [D-PA-18], Rep. Byron, Beverly B. [D-MD-6], Rep. Schneider, Claudine [R-RI-2], Rep. Oberstar, James L. [D-MN-8], Rep. Ford, Harold E. [D-TN-9], Rep. Andrews, Michael [D-TX-25], Rep. Morrison, Bruce A. [D-CT-3]

Subjects

Discovery layer

Source updated

23 March 2026

Summary

Continued Access to Group Health Insurance Act of 1985 - Amends the Internal Revenue Code and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to require continuation coverage under group health plans for certain spouses, former spouses, and dependent children of employees insured under such plans. Makes such continuation coverage a requirement for the allowance of a tax deduction for employer contributions to group health plans. Provides that the spouse and dependent children of an insured employee may be entitled to five years of continuation coverage under a group health plan if the insured employee: (1) dies; (2) becomes separated or divorced from his or her spouse; or (3) becomes entitled to Medicare. Makes such coverage available only if it is elected within a specified period by or on behalf of the spouse or child to be covered. Sets forth notification requirements. Sets forth a special rule relating to collective bargaining agreements.

This text is taken from the official record. PoliticalRepo does not editorialize.

Timeline

  1. 3 January 1985

    Introduced

    Referred to House Committee on Education and Labor.

    Source: IntroReferral

  2. 3 January 1985

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  3. 3 January 1985

    Introduced

    Introduced in House

    Source: IntroReferral

  4. 7 February 1985

    Referred

    Referred to Subcommittee on Health.

    Source: Committee

  5. 4 March 1985

    Referred

    Referred to Subcommittee on Labor-Management Relations.

    Source: Committee

Votes

No vote records are attached yet.

Versions

No version snapshots stored. Document URLs remain at the source.

Documents

1 official file

Leesvertaling

Vertaal dit document naar jouw taal. PoliticalRepo bewaart geen aparte kopie per EU-taal.

Documentvertaling op verzoek met downloadbare PDF (logo + link naar de officiële bron). Het bronbestand blijft leidend.

Sponsors

Showing 48 of 77 sponsors and actors.

Related records

No cross-record relationships stored yet.

Sources

PoliticalRepo is an index and interpretation layer, not the authoritative legal source.