Question· Question écrite18892open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of Solidarity and Health to the concerns of the MSA of Mayenne, Orne and Sarthe, regarding the financing of childcare structures for young children. This mission is at the heart of the MSA's concerns, particularly in rural areas, and it devotes significant human and financial resources to it. However, since 2017, its financial commitment far exceeds the envelope allocated to it, which requires drawing on its own health and social action fund, at the risk of ultimately compromising its entire family policy. This situation worries the MSA all the more as it notes a regular decrease in its FNASS allocation, particularly in 2019 (- 4.1%). In fact, this allocation no longer allows it to meet the needs of the families concerned and reduces its margin accordingly. of action, particularly in periods of crisis experienced by the agricultural world. This is all the more worrying as the MSA aims to intervene in rural areas, both as a player in territorial development, but also as an organization supporting families. The MSA's desire to offer services equivalent to those of the general system generates increases in expenses that must be taken into account. In the current context of discontent expressed by a number of French people, particularly those in rural areas, he asks her to please indicate what response she intends to provide so that the MSAs can have the necessary means to properly carry out their missions.
Question· Question écrite17862answered
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of Agriculture and Food to the concerns expressed by the network of health defense groups (GDS) regarding Ordinance No. 2019-59 of January 30, 2019 relating to the transfer and exercise, on an experimental basis, of certain missions carried out until now by the network of health defense groups (GDS) to the chambers of agriculture. In fact, this transfer means the attachment of these structures to the network of chambers of agriculture, which would result in the disappearance of health defense groups. Indeed, the essential purpose of these organizations is, at the farm level, the protection of the health status of animals, animal feed or food of animal origin. Their commitment is reflected in numerous actions (African swine fever by example). Among the transferred missions are general information, support, diagnosis and assistance missions on regulations relating to animal health and protection. The field of regulation in matters of health and animal protection being one of the bases of the action of these organizations, he asks them to kindly indicate to him what their intentions are concerning the future of defense groups. health (GDS).
Question· Question écrite18864open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of Labor to the continuing professional training of artisans. As of March 15, 2019, the Training Insurance Fund for Craft Business Managers (FAFCEA) will no longer be able to finance new training. This situation results from a transfer, by the finance law for 2018, of the competence to collect contributions to the URSSAF whereas the latter was previously devolved to the General Directorate of Public Finances (DGFIP). Artisans are worried about their 1,200,000 businesses which will no longer be able to benefit from support for their continuing training, even though this is sometimes compulsory and necessary to allow them to continue to practice certain professions. This is why he asks him to kindly indicate what measures the Government intends to implement so that artisans will be able to access professional training this year.
Question· Question écrite18862answered
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of the Economy and Finance to the concerns of local businesses (craftsmen, traders, independent professionals). These professionals are first of all disappointed with the apprenticeship reform which results in apprenticeship masters who have invested in training young people beyond the professional baccalaureate losing their long-acquired bonus. Regarding the apprentices' remuneration, they consider it an injustice to have to pay charges, to which they were not previously subject, for remuneration above 79% of the minimum wage. These professionals also feel victims of unfair tax and social rules, whether for seconded work or microenterprises. They also expect administrative simplifications and in particular the implementation of the “tell us once” principle which provides that a company which has already transmitted information to the administration should not be required to communicate it again. Finally, they believe that they should be granted a training course at the installation to validate a minimum level of qualification. This is why he asks him to kindly indicate the Government's position on these legitimate concerns.
Question· Question écrite15440open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of Agriculture and Food to the implementation of a note relating to the obligation to sanitize incoming materials, for collective agricultural methanization projects. Since the dissemination of the said note, several collective project leaders have been contacted by their departmental directorate for the protection of populations (DDPP), inviting them to get closer to their services in order to define the hygiene methods to be deployed on their site. The DDPP justifies this under cover of the implementation of the ministerial decree of April 9, 2018 establishing the national technical provisions relating to the use of animal by-products in methanization. It should be noted that the decree as it is written opens up the possibility of an exemption from the hygiene obligation, both for projects individual and collective, to the extent that they provide evidence of incoming materials from farms listed in a closed list and committing to an annual health assessment. The chambers of agriculture warn of the risk that the systematization of sanitation poses to collective projects and the probable questioning of the finalization and commissioning of projects in development, or even of the sustainability of the projects. functioning. Indeed, application of the new DGAL requirements requires, prior to methanization, crushing of incoming materials (12 mm) and raising the temperature to 70 degrees for one hour. The chambers of agriculture consider, on the one hand, that the upstream preparation of the material is inappropriate and incompatible with the typology of agricultural inputs and in particular manure, and on the other hand, that this treatment in upstream would imply liquefaction of materials leading to levels of recirculation or even water consumption, inducing volumes of materials to be managed and consequently oversized and too expensive digestion and storage works. Regarding the temperature and time couple, it should be remembered that all the energy required to meet these requirements will represent even less added value for the units (increase charges if purchase of natural gas or reduction in revenue if self-consumption of biogas for sanitation purposes). Ultimately, these requirements would lead to an increase in investments which could be estimated at 10% and a doubling of the unit's own heat requirements. Agricultural methanization projects as carried out by the agricultural world aim to recover energy from the by-products of their activity economic. Certainly slightly methanogenic, this resource is present in the territories and is a controlled long-term guarantee. If, however, the regulations aim to increasingly constrain projects, they will have no other prospects than to use non-agricultural materials. Also, stakeholders in the sector are contesting these requirements which compromise the growth of agricultural methanization, although it is central in terms of energy transition ambition. Also, he asks him what response he intends to give to these legitimate concerns.
Question· Question écrite14657open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of the Interior to the consequences, for residents of rural areas, of the speed limit of 80 km/h on secondary roads which constitute almost the majority of the road network. The scale of penalties for minor speeding offenses seems extremely severe since they are penalized with a fine of 135 euros and the loss of two points recoverable after three years. without offense. As the car is essential in rural areas, residents are obliged to use their vehicles daily, which consequently makes them more exposed to speeding and therefore license withdrawals than residents of urban areas with other means of transport. Added to this difference between motorists regarding the risk of loss of points on the driving license, the difference in the consequences of the increase in fuel prices. This is why he asks him to please indicate whether a relaxation of the penalty scale could be considered for small speeding violations, between 81 and 90 km/h.
Question· Question écrite14631answered
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of Labor to the situation of independent ambulance drivers with self-employed status who work occasionally for ambulance companies. He gives him the example of a self-employed person who carries out, using equipment from the ambulance company, a certain number of missions for ambulance companies in the department of Mayenne, in order to compensate for occasional shortages linked to sick leave or part-time therapeutic leave. Ambulance companies, in fact, call on self-employed entrepreneurs because, although they have a significant workload, they cannot benefit from additional approvals. This practice allows them to cope with on-call constraints linked to the legal necessity of respecting rest periods for all employees. However, Urssaf alerted some ambulance companies on the use of this practice which, although it is accepted, can, if it is regular, resemble disguised employment. This is why he asks him to please clarify to what extent the use of independent ambulance drivers by ambulance companies can be authorized. He also asks her what response she intends to give to the ambulance companies which are obliged to resort to this practice to meet this transport demand.
Question· Question écrite13859open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of Territorial Cohesion and Relations with Local Authorities to the policy applied by State services with regard to buildings identified by the PLUi with the change of destination to an agricultural and natural zone. Indeed, he is questioned by the elected officials of the community of communes of Pays-de-Loiron who question the interpretation made of the possibility extension of an agricultural building which became a residential building. Indeed, according to paragraph 2 of article L. 151-11 of the town planning code, the regulation can, in agricultural, natural and forestry zones, "designate, outside the sectors mentioned in article L. 151-13, buildings which may be subject to a change of destination, provided that this change of destination does not compromise agricultural activity or quality landscape of the site”. Under these conditions, the PLUi of the community of communes of Pays-de-Loiron has identified in an agricultural and natural zone, a certain number of abandoned agricultural buildings with an area of more than 80m2 and a certain architectural quality. The threshold of 80m2 was retained in order to ensure the rehabilitation of a building sufficiently large to accommodate housing, all with a consideration optimization of the existing territory. Secondly, under article 141-12 of the town planning code which provides that "in agricultural, natural or forestry zones and outside the sectors mentioned in article 151-13, existing residential buildings may be the subject of extensions or annexes, provided that these extensions or annexes do not compromise the agricultural activity or the landscape quality of the site", the community of municipalities wanted to launch a process of extending these buildings into residential buildings. But questions persist as to the date of characterization of residential buildings, since the process of change of destination allows identified agricultural buildings to become housing. The question for elected officials is therefore to know from what date the agricultural building becomes a building existing housing which allows an application for extension authorization to be submitted. Indeed, the State services of the department of Mayenne, Morbihan and Ille-et-Vilaine, which are based, on the one hand, on the ALUR law of March 2014 and on the future law for agriculture, food and forestry of October 2014 which modifies the regulations relating to change of destination and, on the other hand, on the judgment of the Council of State n° 291017 of November 21, 2007 requiring the identification of a reference date and on the judgment of the Council of State no. 307114 of September 25, 2009, which sets out the case of an POS limiting only existing buildings at the time of entry into force of the POS, the change of destination of agricultural buildings, declared the ban on the extension of the residential building, the result of a change of destination. According to state services, the absence of precision on this subject in the town planning code would reflect a rejection of this possibility, even though the principle is that “everything that is not prohibited is permitted”. As for the aforementioned case laws, they serve as a basis for the various services to impose the inclusion in the regulations that "existing residential buildings" of article L. 151-12 of the town planning code are understood as buildings to be vocation of habitat at the time of entry into force of the PLUi, even though the judge, in the aforementioned cases, only applies the specific regulations of the POS to situations which are different from the situation presented. This interpretation de facto prevents the possibilities of extension of a building having changed its destination into an agricultural or natural zone, even though the building has become a habitat and at the next PLUi, it will be considered as “residential building existing at the time of entry into force of the PLUi”, thus giving it the right to extend. The territory concerned aims to be exemplary in terms of putting an end to urban sprawl through optimization of existing buildings and already urbanized spaces. This is why the elected representatives of the community of communes of Pays-de-Loiron have drastically reduced potentially buildable land, to concentrate on all rural towns. Their agricultural policy, which has always been valued, is at the heart of their rural territory project. This is why the process of changing destination represented for this territory, a balanced solution, making it possible to offer, without contravening the objective of preserving agricultural and natural lands, housing possibilities for new arrivals. This mechanism also made it possible to maintain a certain dynamism in these territories and promote the vernacular built heritage, without allowing the urbanization of the land. It would indeed seem natural that a limited extension, governed by the PLUi regulations, could allow an adaptation of an old agricultural building so that it becomes a habitat. However, it seems entirely legitimate to establish a reference date to prevent successive extensions which would, without a doubt, lead to the eventual urbanization of large areas initially intended for agriculture. But the pure and simple ban on any extension seems counterproductive even though a strict framework, but nevertheless allowing a limited extension, seems possible. Indicating a reference date could be assessed when submitting the application for planning permission and the building housing, the result of the change of destination, could thus see its possibilities of extension strictly limited, as is already the case for the rest of the buildings intended for housing in agricultural and natural zones. The supervision of constructability in agricultural and natural zones should not focus on the temporality of the building becoming a habitat, but on the limits of growth in relation to the initial building. This is why he would be grateful if you could shed some light on the problem as well as provide details that would ensure more fairness between the different territories.
Question· Question écrite16976open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of Culture to the situation faced by the journalists of the editorial staff of France 3 Pays de la Loire who have been faced for several years with a problem of understaffing, which has worsened since the start of the 2018 school year, due to the non-replacement of staff in training or on sick leave. This situation has consequences for these personnel who are experiencing overload of work, but also for the editorial staff which encounters difficulties in properly fulfilling its public service mission. Following the redistribution of the regions in 2016, France 3 Pays de la Loire became an autonomous regional directorate, detached from Brittany, but the staff and resources did not follow to ensure this new autonomy. Today France 3 Pays de la Loire is one of the smallest regional offices (BRI) of France, under-resourced, which must process very rich information. This results in a drop in the number of reports on the ground, compensated by multiple rebroadcasts. The region has five departments, 3,800,000 inhabitants and varied news which often has national resonance. This lack of staff is all the more problematic at a time when the channel must be present on the media digital information. Consequently, the objective announced by the management of France 3 to triple the regional offer seems, for these staff, difficult to achieve with current resources. This is why he asks him to kindly indicate what response he intends to provide to the staff of France 3 Pays de la Loire who are asking for the necessary means to fulfill their public service mission with regard to the inhabitants of the Pays de la Loire region can be given to them.
Question· Question écrite15604answered
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of Action and Public Accounts to the situation faced by notaries regarding the VAT applicable in the event of resale, due to divorce, of houses built under the Pass-Foncier system. In fact, the Pass-Foncier was implemented in 2006 to facilitate access to property for low-income households. However, this device has had two successive versions. If the two versions aimed to avoid combining the financing of the purchase of the land and the financing of the construction, in the first version the buyers of the property were tenants of a building plot by means of a construction lease which authorized them to build. In the second version of the Pass-Foncier, buyers were owners of the land on which they built but payment of the purchase price of this land was financed by means of a bullet loan. In both systems, buyers benefited from a reduced rate VAT provided they remained owners and occupants as their main residence for a period of 15 years. However, today notaries must deal with resale transactions, due to divorce, before the expiration of the 15-year period. This resale calls into question the reduced VAT rate and the Buyers must repay part of the VAT savings made. The following problem arises: the tax administration in the BOFIP admits exceptions to this challenge to the reduced VAT rate but these exceptions are not identical depending on the type of Pass-Foncier in question and nothing justifies this difference in treatment between taxpayers, especially since this inequality seems to come from an error in drafting the BOI. THE The problem comes more precisely from the exceptions linked to the buyout and rehousing guarantee. In one case it specifies that the reduced rate is not called into question "in the event of the rehousing guarantee being called into play" and in another "when the conditions for implementing this guarantee are met" (which does not necessarily imply its effective implementation). For the second version of the Pass-Foncier (financing of the land means of a loan in fine) the administration specifies (in BOI-TVA-IMM-20-20-40-20140715 number 490) that the reduced VAT rate is not called into question in the event of marriage, conclusion of a PACS, birth of a child, issuance of a disability card and also when the conditions for implementing the buyout and rehousing guarantee are met (i.e. in the event of death, professional mobility, unemployment, issuance of a disability card, divorce, dissolution of a PACS). For the first version of the Pass-Foncier (construction lease) the administration specifies (in BOI-TVA-IMM-20-20-30-20140715 number 680) that the reduced VAT rate is not called into question in the event of marriage, conclusion of a PACS, birth of a child, issuance of a disability card and also in the event of implementation of the buyout guarantee or the rehousing guarantee such as recalled in I-C paragraph 130 to 180 are met. (NB: there is a detrimental editorial error because it is indicated “are met” without it having been specified that these are the conditions for implementing the guarantee which must be met, which suggests that the rehousing guarantee must be implemented so that the reduced VAT rate is not called into question). If the notary is in the second type of Pass-Foncier it seems that the reduced rate is not called into question even though it is in the first version of the Pass-Foncier. This difference in treatment is all the more regrettable since in the context of another social property accession scheme (rental accession) divorce does not call into question the reduced VAT rate. Also, he asks him to kindly tell him what his position is on the problem submitted.
Question· Question écrite13328open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of Solidarity and Health to research and treatment of pediatric cancers. Every year, nearly 2,500 children and adolescents are diagnosed with cancer, and 500, or 20% of them, will die from it. Cancer is therefore the leading cause of child mortality from disease. However, less than 3% of public funding for cancer research is allocated to pediatric cancers. Consequently, few researchers have the means to get involved in this fundamental research work which is essential to better understand childhood cancers and develop appropriate treatments. According to various studies, 20 million euros per year are missing from research into pediatric cancers. If the third cancer plan made the fight against pediatric cancers a priority, the The resources allocated are unfortunately not sufficient. This is why he asks him to kindly indicate his intentions in this area and in particular if a fourth cancer plan is envisaged when the current one comes to an end in 2019. In addition, many families of children suffering from cancer or serious illnesses find themselves in a difficult financial situation, during the child's illness or after their death. The association Eva for life, with the support of professionals and families, requests the maintenance and revaluation of the daily parental presence allowance (AJPP) during the actual duration of the illness (compared to 310 days currently, including when the illness lasts longer and the parent, sometimes alone, must accompany the child), the extension of public death benefit to the parents of a deceased child. Today, this amount of 3,415 euros paid by the CPAM to the beneficiaries of a deceased adult excludes the death of a child. He asks her what response she intends to give to these legitimate requests.
Question· Question écrite12166answered
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of the Economy and Finance to the need for traditional service stations to benefit from specific aid for the deployment of renewable energies as well as the diversification of the profession. Until its disappearance in 2014, the Professional Fuel Distribution Committee (CPDC) contributed to the investments that business leaders had to make for upgrading their installation to environmental standards as well as for the diversification of their activities. Between 2015 and 2017, a specific regulation backed by FISAC made it possible to process files submitted which had not been able to benefit from the aid allocated before the closure of the CPDC. The processing of the last files should take place at the end of 2018. In 2017, Parliament, through the finance bill, wanted support fuel distributors in the development of their profession, by supplementing the FISAC with 2 million euros, particularly with regard to the government's policy relating to fuel taxation which requires adapting the installations (the purchase of a new tank costs 80,000 euros). However, the FISAC eligibility criteria are unsuitable for the activity of service stations. In 2018, only around ten structures could be supported - mainly projects carried out by communities - while each year more than a hundred fuel sales points disappear in France: 33,000 in 1985; there are only 6,000 left today. This is why he asks what measures the Government intends to put in place within the framework of the finance bill for 2019 to provide a meaningful response. to the inadequacy of FISAC with respect to the financing needs of fuel distributors.
Question· Question écrite11402open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of Solidarity and Health to the practice of osteopathy in France. Article 75 of the 2002 law laid the foundations for the distinction between three types of osteopaths in France: osteopaths who are doctors of medicine (ODM), paramedical osteopaths (OPM) and finally osteopaths who are not health professionals (ONPS). If this distinction is well enshrined in the law, it is necessary to note that the situation is more confused in reality, as evidenced by numerous reports from the field. Often, patients do not know whether they are contacting a healthcare professional for a medical procedure or a non-health professional performing comfort procedures. Furthermore, the multiplication of the number of non-professional osteopaths - 26,222 practitioners in 2016, which is six times more than in the United Kingdom for a identical population - is one of the consequences of this confusing situation which reinforces the precariousness of young osteopaths who are not health professionals. Indeed, the latter follow expensive training for four years in private establishments and, once graduated, find themselves confronted with a situation where the supply is much greater than the demand for care. This is why he asks him if he intends to take measures to clarify this public health issue.
Question· Question écrite13403answered
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of Solidarity and Health to the consequences of the elimination of the CITS for home support services. It was in fact announced the removal of the “home help” exemption accompanied by a compensation mechanism which would involve maintaining the Fillon reduction up to 1.1 SMIC. However, this solution does not constitute full compensation for the CITS, unlike the commitments that had been made to representatives of this sector by the Government. Only an equivalent reduction in charges for employees paid up to 1.3 minimum wage would represent fair compensation for the “home help” exemption and the removal of the CITS. Home help representatives hope that a balanced solution, respectful of budgetary constraints, can be offered to them. Indeed, if this If this measure were to be maintained, this would seriously weaken the home help services which work with the elderly and people with disabilities. While the care of dependency has become a major issue, he asks her to please indicate the measures she intends to take to compensate for the CITS, which will enable the entire sector to provide aid and support to people in need. loss of autonomy to exist and to be a partner in future reforms.
Question· Question écrite1331open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of Action and Public Accounts to the consequences, for small and medium-sized French companies specializing in the sale and installation of windows, doors and closures, of the abolition in 2018 of renovation work on glass walls, insulating shutters and doors, of the energy transition tax credit (CITE) system. A review of this aid would cause a massive decline in renovation work and would inevitably lead to a drop in orders and the destruction of jobs. In addition, replacing windows makes it possible to reduce heating needs by 27% and remains an effective way of meeting the commitments made by France in terms of energy improvement in homes. If the companies concerned understand the Government's desire to reduce public spending, it is appropriate to measure the impacts of this reform for small businesses. This is why he asks him to please clarify his intentions in view of the discussion of the finance bill for 2018.
Question· Question écrite11339open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of Action and Public Accounts to article 199 sexdecies of the general tax code. This provides that a tax credit is granted to taxpayers domiciled in France for tax purposes who incur expenses relating to the direct employment of an employee, the use of an association, a company or a declared organization or the use of an authorized non-profit organization whose aim is to subject to home help for services rendered to their residence located in France or, under certain conditions, to those of their ancestors. Parents of a disabled adult child attached to their tax household who bear the same expenses under the same conditions cannot have this tax credit applied on the grounds that the services are provided at the residence of a descendant and not an ascendant. That's why he asks her if the Government intends to extend, under certain conditions, this provision in order to allow parents of disabled adult children to accompany their descendants in the same way as their ascendants.
Question· Question écrite10810open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of Solidarity and Health to the consequences for patients suffering from Lyme disease of the delay in the publication, by the High Authority of Health (HAS), of the new National Plan for the diagnosis and care of Lyme disease (PNDS), due to disagreement between the French-speaking Infectious Pathology Society (SPILF) and the National Borrelia Reference Center (CNR). He This is an obstacle to the methodology imposed by the High Health Authority, at the very beginning of the discussions, for the creation of the group in charge of drafting the text and on which everyone seemed to agree. The HAS has indicated that it is rewriting the text “for greater readability” but patient representatives strongly fear that these changes will be to the disadvantage of patients. This is why he asks him to do well want to tell him if the new PNDS will be published soon and if it includes real progress for patients.
Question· Question écrite13715answered
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of the Armed Forces to the incomprehension of the parents of a soldier who died in 2011, in an external operation, when faced with the following situation: these people wish that their son could, posthumously, receive the medal of recognition, as well as the combatant's cross. However, ONAC told them that the request should have been made during their son's lifetime. This is why he asks her to please tell her what response she intends to provide to the legitimate request of these parents whose son died in combat.
Question· Question écrite10788open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of Action and Public Accounts to the concerns that the next withholding tax raises for the heads of craft construction companies, who do not have the financial, administrative and human resources necessary to assume responsibility for collecting income tax from their employees. Indeed, according to their representatives, CAPEB and U2P (Union local businesses), the time required for the administrative processing of tax collection in a business with 2 or 3 employees, is estimated at one week per year on average, to the detriment of ongoing projects which will then fall behind schedule. At a time when activity is picking up again in the construction industry, 60% of craft business owners work more than 50 hours per week and withholding tax will impose a burden on them. extra work, even though they are not able to allocate the necessary time to it. This reform will also force them to incur expenses in order to adapt (new change in computer software, training). This is why the representatives of these small businesses are asking that a simplification of the system, as well as compensation for management costs, be granted to them. Furthermore, they estimate necessary for a toll-free number to be made available to VSE employees if they wish to be informed or to contest their tax rate. Consequently, he asks him what response he intends to give to these legitimate concerns.
Question· Question écrite17013open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of Action and Public Accounts to the “energy advantage” offered by EDF to its employees and ex-employees, which exempts them from subscriptions and taxes and provides them with electricity for approximately 4% of the base rate. These advantages enjoyed by active agents, as well as those in retirement who can demonstrate at least 15 years of service, represent, according to the latest annual report of the Court of Auditors, “an exorbitant cost” for the company, estimated at 295 million euros for 2017. Furthermore, the Court of Auditors adds that this “can lead to excessive consumption and does not encourage moderation, in contradiction with the political objective of energy transition”, formulated by EDF. Also, he asks him what his intentions are following this recommendation made by the Court of Auditors.
Question· Question écrite11373open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of National Education to the situation of private establishments under contract which welcome students with disabilities. For the 2018 school year, many private establishments under contract will welcome these students. However, these human-sized establishments, essential to the attractiveness of small rural communities, very often do not have the financial means to hire, at their own expense. alone, accompanying students with disabilities (AESH). This is why he asks him what response he intends to provide to the concerns of these establishments.
Question· Question écrite12158open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of Agriculture and Food to the consequences of the possible elimination of the exemption system for the employment of casual agricultural workers on January 1, 2019. Professional agricultural organizations have expressed their serious concern because this measure would have a financial impact for agricultural employers. Farms employing labor casual companies would then have to face an increase in their costs and, as a result, a loss of their competitiveness, jeopardizing their sustainability. This is why he asks what measures are being considered to respond to the legitimate concerns of the farmers concerned.
Question· Question écrite10772answered
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of Higher Education, Research and Innovation to the decree implementing the new student and campus life contribution (CVEC) of June 30, 2018 which creates the obligation for apprentices to pay this contribution, each year, during their training in higher education, even though they cannot benefit from all of the services offered due to their employee status. In addition to the significant obstacle that this contribution represents and which goes against the development of apprenticeship, it appears that there is clearly a contradiction with article L. 6221-2 of the labor code, resulting from article 14 of law no. of the termination of the apprenticeship contract, nor to the employer when registering the apprenticeship contract. This is why he asks her to please tell him if she intends to include apprentices on the list of people exempt from CVEC.
Question· Question écrite18939open
France · National Assembly
Mr. Yannick Favennec-Bécot draws the attention of the Minister of Labor to the concerns expressed by childminders regarding the reform of unemployment insurance. This reform project and in particular the combination of employment and unemployment raises serious concerns. The return to work assistance (ARE) system constitutes essential financial support to limit the precariousness of childminders and this issue is all the more stronger in a rural department. People practicing this profession who welcome young children wish to recall the specificity of their profession which can only be practiced after approval issued by the departmental council. They are subject to variable and sometimes flexible hours, being able to wait 13 hours per day. Terminations of contracts are beyond their control and occur due to moving of the family, or the child's entry into school or daycare. Depending on the geographic area and time of year, it can be very difficult to replace a lost contract. Also, it is essential not to forget the specificity of their situation in the context of future reforms. This is why he asks him to kindly indicate the Government's intentions regarding the legitimate concerns of the assistants. maternal.
Showing the 24 most recent records of 270. Browse the full list