The world's political record
Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.
8,119 records
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, a) what AI training her Department provides, b) how many hours of AI training her Department provides and c) what topics and skills are covered.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what steps her Department has taken with the Information Commissioner’s Office on the development of an Age Appropriate Design code for Artificial Intelligence applications.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what training his Department provides on AI; and (a) how many hours and (b) what topics and skills are covered by such training.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps her Department is taking to help reduce disinformation from AI generated deepfakes.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, if she will provide details of conditions attached to awards, including a) commitments regarding UK headquarters and office presence, b) commitments regarding UK-based hiring and job cr
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the level of dependency on overseas AI providers.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what training her Department provides on AI; and (a) how many hours and (b) what topics and skills are covered by such training.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps her Department is taking to help protect intellectual property rights in the training of AI models.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what training her Department provides on AI; and (a) how many hours and (b) what topics and skills are covered by such training.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, a) what AI training her Department provides, b) how many hours of AI training her Department provides and c) what topics and skills are covered.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how individuals are informed that decisions have been taken in (a) whole and (b) part by automated means in the context of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, a) what AI training her Department provides, b) how many hours of AI training her Department provides and c) what topics and skills are covered.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, whether significant Automated Decision-Making is taking place or planned within his Department, and if he will make a statement.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what internal guidance his Department has issued on the potential impact of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 on automated decision-making.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what safeguards he has implemented to ensure compliance with statutory requirements relating to automated decision-making, including rights to information, human review and challenge in the context of the Data (U
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how individuals are informed that decisions have been taken in (a) whole and (b) part by automated means in the context of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what processes are in place to enable individuals to seek human review and to challenge decisions made by automated systems in the context of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what training his Department provides on AI; and (a) how many hours and (b) what topics and skills are covered by such training.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what training his Department provides on AI; and (a) how many hours and (b) what topics and skills are covered by such training.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, given the passage of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, what guidance has the Department issued internally to ensure compliance with the provisions of the 2025 Act in relation to automated decision-making.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, given the passage of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, how does the Department define and ensure meaningful human involvement in decisions supported or made by automated systems.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what steps has the Department taken to assess and help prevent bias and discrimination following the use of automated decision-making systems.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, given the passage of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, under what statutory authority are significant Automated Decision-Making being made or intended to be made.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, given the passage of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, what safeguards have been implemented to ensure compliance with statutory requirements relating to automated decision-making, including rights to informat
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, given the passage of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, how individuals are informed that decisions affecting them have been taken, in whole or in part, by automated means.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, given the passage of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, what processes are in place to enable individuals to seek human review and to challenge decisions made by automated systems.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, given the passage of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, what measures are in place to ensure that human oversight is substantive and effective.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the use of artificial intelligence to support air traffic control operations.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the use of artificial intelligence to support astronomical research and the analysis of data from scientific observatories.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the role of youth organisations in supporting the development of artificial intelligence literacy and online safety skills among young people.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether the Department maintains a public register or internal inventory of automated decision-making systems.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the use of artificial intelligence chatbots and other artificial intelligence tools to provide mental health and wellbeing support.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what consultation has taken place with recognised trade unions regarding the introduction or use of automated decision-making systems affecting staff.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 1 July 2026
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how are automated decision-making systems used in relation to civil service employment, including recruitment, performance management, discipline and allocation of work.
Germany · German Bundestag · 1 July 2026
Germany · German Bundestag · 1 July 2026
Risikolage im deutschen Finanzsystem: makrofinanzielles Umfeld, vom Unternehmenssektor und vom Immobilienmarkt ausgehende Risiken, Risiken im Banken-, Versicherungs- und Investmentfondssektor, makroprudenzielle Instrumente, weitere Themen (Cyberrisiken und hybride Bedrohungen, Stablecoins und KI), Zusammenarbeit mit dem Europäischen Ausschuss für Systemrisiken
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 1 July 2026
Voortgang Nederlandse AI-fabriek
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 1 July 2026
Brief aan de Stas. EZK inzake kabinetsreactie op de initiatiefnota van het lid Dassen over kunstmatige intelligentie
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 30 June 2026
Question put:
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 30 June 2026
Amendment put:
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 30 June 2026
Joint Committee on Artificial Intelligence
France · National Assembly · 30 June 2026
M. Sébastien Chenu alerte Mme la ministre de la santé, des familles, de l'autonomie et des personnes handicapées sur la situation de pénurie de médecins dermatologues. En effet, malgré la reconnaissance par l'OMS des maladies de peau comme une priorité mondiale de santé publique, le Gouvernement peine à mettre en place des mesures qui accordent à ce sujet la place qui lui est due. En premier lieu, l'insuffisance du nombre de spécialistes, 3,25 pour 100 000 habitants contre 6 recommandés, avec une projection de 2,28 dermatologues pour 100 000 habitants d'ici 2030, classe la France en bas de l'échelle européenne (29e sur 30) en matière de prise en charge dermatologique. L'absence de renouvellement des personnels avec 50 % des dermatologues âgés de plus de 60 ans et le délai d'attente moyen de 4 à 6 mois pour un habitant d'une zone rurale ou semi-urbaine, pouvant atteindre 470 jours dans certains départements, sont autant de défis qui affectent les citoyens dans leur parcours de soins. Ces situations découlent en grande partie d'une formation insuffisante de nouveaux spécialistes. Seuls 102 internes ont été formés en 2025 pour une estimation de 150 par an nécessaires, afin de compenser les départs à la retraite. Cet écart structurel ne pourra être résorbé par les seuls dispositifs incitatifs à l'installation et appelle un engagement clair sur le nombre de postes ouverts ainsi que sur les moyens accordés aux CHU pour l'encadrement de ces internes. Par ailleurs, le développement par des sociétés commerciales de centres de dépistages avec le concours de médecins généralistes et d'infirmiers pose des risques médicaux, déontologiques et économiques. Le dépistage massif, non recommandé et sans preuve scientifique d'une amélioration de prise en charge, génère un coût significatif pour l'assurance maladie et un reste à charge pour les patients, dans un contexte où des signalements feraient état de doubles facturations. Par ailleurs, ces centres recourent à des outils d'intelligence artificielle pour le dépistage cutané, parfois sans présence de dermatologue, alors que leur usage devrait rester strictement réservé aux spécialistes et encadré par les recommandations internationales en vigueur. Face à cette situation, il souhaiterait connaître les mesures que souhaite mettre en place le Gouvernement, notamment quant à la formation des professionnels de dermatologie et les actions mises en place pour limiter les dérives liées à l'essor majeur des sociétés commerciales qui, profitant de la pénurie, s'enrichissent avec les fonds publics au mépris des recommandations scientifiques, au détriment des patients ainsi que les contrôles que l'assurance maladie exerce sur ces établissements.
France · National Assembly · 30 June 2026
Mme Fanny Dombre Coste attire l'attention de Mme la ministre déléguée auprès du Premier ministre, chargée de l'égalité entre les femmes et les hommes et de la lutte contre les discriminations, sur les suites que le Gouvernement entend donner à la nouvelle campagne nationale de testing à l'embauche actuellement conduite dans une vingtaine de secteurs d'activité. Alors que cette campagne doit permettre de mesurer l'ampleur des discriminations dans l'accès à l'emploi, de nombreux constats continuent de montrer que celles-ci demeurent une réalité pour de nombreux candidats, notamment en raison de leur origine supposée, de leur sexe, de leur âge ou encore de leur lieu de résidence. Dans ce contexte, elle souhaite attirer l'attention du Gouvernement sur la question du CV anonyme, dont le débat semble avoir progressivement disparu alors même que les objectifs poursuivis demeurent pleinement d'actualité. Prévu par la loi du 31 mars 2006 pour l'égalité des chances, ce dispositif n'a jamais réellement été déployé. Le décret d'application attendu n'a jamais été publié et les évolutions législatives intervenues par la suite ont conduit à faire du recours au CV anonyme une simple faculté laissée à l'appréciation des employeurs. Pourtant, les transformations récentes des pratiques de recrutement invitent à reposer différemment ce débat. La généralisation des plateformes numériques, le développement des outils de présélection et l'essor de l'intelligence artificielle dans les ressources humaines interrogent à nouveau les conditions dans lesquelles certaines données personnelles interviennent dès les premières étapes de sélection des candidatures. Des travaux récents soulignent ainsi que les principes historiquement associés au CV anonyme, consistant à différer l'accès à certaines données identifiantes afin de recentrer l'évaluation sur les compétences et les parcours, retrouvent aujourd'hui une actualité nouvelle dans un environnement marqué par l'automatisation croissante des recrutements. Elle souhaite donc savoir si, à la lumière des résultats de cette nouvelle campagne nationale de testing , le Gouvernement entend rouvrir la réflexion sur les dispositifs permettant de réduire les discriminations lors des premières étapes du recrutement et s'il envisage d'encourager des expérimentations visant à objectiver davantage les procédures de sélection des candidatures.
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 30 June 2026
310. Deputy Emer Currie asked the Minister for Enterprise, Tourism and Employment his strategy for ensuring that AI works to the benefit of Irish SMEs; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [49607/26]
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 30 June 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, with reference to the Answer of 30 July 2024 to Question 920, on Civil Service: Artificial Intelligence, what trials have taken place on AI and public service productivity.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 30 June 2026
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the full scope is of Project FRONTIER.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 30 June 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact of investment in artificial intelligence data centres on inflationary pressures in the UK economy.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 30 June 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the need to update legislation to address the malicious use of artificial intelligence-generated voice and likeness cloning.
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 30 June 2026
To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the resilience of supply chains for memory components used in artificial intelligence computing.
United States · United States Congress · 30 June 2026