Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.
Records
Question· Written questionUIN 246997answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 24 April 2019
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will take steps to implement the recommendations in the report by the all-party parliamentary group on Heart and Circulatory Diseases entitled Putting patients at the heart of artificial inte
Question· Written questionUIN 246446answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 23 April 2019
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what recent steps he has taken to support research into advanced computing and artificial intelligence.
Bill· HRH.R. 2231 (116th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 10 April 2019
Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2019 This bill requires specified commercial entities to conduct assessments of high-risk systems that involve personal information or make automated decisions, such as systems that use artificial intelligence or machine learning. Specifically, high-risk automated decision systems include those that (1) may contribute to inaccuracy, bias, or discrimination; or (2) facilitate decision-making about sensitive aspects of consumers' lives by evaluating consumers' behavior. Further, an automated-decision system, or information system involving personal data, is considered high-risk if it (1) raises security or privacy concerns, (2) involves the personal information of a significant number of people, or (3) systematically monitors a large, publicly accessible physical location. Assessments of high-risk automated-decision systems must (1) describe the system in detail, (2) assess the relative costs and benefits of the system, (3) determine the risks to the privacy and security of personal information, and (4) explain the steps taken to minimize those risks, if discovered. Assessments of high-risk information systems involving personal information must evaluate the extent to which the system protects the privacy and security of such information.
Bill· HRH.R. 2202 (116th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 10 April 2019
Growing Artificial Intelligence Through Research Act or the GrAITR Act This bill requires certain federal activities related to artificial intelligence, including implementation by the President of a National Artificial Intelligence Initiative. The initiative must invest in artificial intelligence research and support the development of an artificial intelligence science and technology workforce pipeline, among other activities. The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) shall establish or designate a National Artificial Intelligence Advisory Committee to advise the OSTP on matters related to the initiative; a National Artificial Intelligence Coordination Office to provide technical and administrative support to the advisory committee and serve as the point of contact on federal artificial intelligence activities; and an Interagency Committee on Artificial Intelligence to coordinate the artificial intelligence and technology research and education activities and programs of the federal agencies, among other activities. The National Institute of Standards and Technology shall, among other things carry out initiative activities, including by awarding contracts as necessary; support the development of measurements and standards necessary to advance commercial development of artificial intelligence applications; and establish collaborative ventures or consortia. The National Science Foundation shall implement a research and education program on artificial intelligence and engineering, and award grants to establish up to five Multidisciplinary Centers for Artificial Intelligence Research and Education to conduct activities in support of the initiative. The Department of Energy shall carry out an artificial intelligence research program.
Bill· SS. 1108 (116th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 10 April 2019
Algorithmic Accountability Act of 2019 This bill requires specified commercial entities to conduct assessments of high-risk systems that involve personal information or make automated decisions, such as systems that use artificial intelligence or machine learning. Specifically, high-risk automated decision systems include those that (1) may contribute to inaccuracy, bias, or discrimination; or (2) facilitate decision-making about sensitive aspects of consumers' lives by evaluating consumers' behavior. Further, an automated-decision system, or information system involving personal data, is considered high-risk if it (1) raises security or privacy concerns, (2) involves the personal information of a significant number of people, or (3) systematically monitors a large, publicly accessible physical location. Assessments of high-risk automated-decision systems must (1) describe the system in detail, (2) assess the relative costs and benefits of the system, (3) determine the risks to the privacy and security of personal information, and (4) explain the steps taken to minimize those risks, if discovered. Assessments of high-risk information systems involving personal information must evaluate the extent to which the system protects the privacy and security of such information.
Question· Written questionHL HL15171answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 9 April 2019
To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to remain aligned with EU guidelines on the ethical development of artificial intelligence following the UK's departure from the EU.
Question· writtenPQ 298asked
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 9 April 2019
298. Deputy Jack Chambers asked the Minister for Business, Enterprise and Innovation the work she has undertaken with regard to the way in which Ireland plans to change secondary and tertiary education in order to prepare for the impact of artificial intelligence on the services industry job market in the future in view of the fact changes will only show impacts in the medium to long term; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [16324/19]
Question· writtenPQ 297asked
Ireland · Dáil Éireann · 9 April 2019
297. Deputy Jack Chambers asked the Minister for Business, Enterprise and Innovation the work she has undertaken to prepare for the impact of artificial intelligence on employment and the workforce in the services industry; and if she will make a statement on the matter. [16323/19]
Record· QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITYP-8-2019-001717open
European Union · European Parliament · 9 April 2019
Report· DCCELEX 52019DC0168open
European Union · European Commission · 8 April 2019
Record· Commissie2018-2019-102held
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 27 March 2019
Wttewaall van Stoetwegenzaal
Question· Written questionHL HL14881answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 27 March 2019
To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to implement a long-term strategy to address ethical issues raised by artificial intelligence.
Bill· Rapport d'information sans missionDLR5L15N37338open
France · National Assembly · 21 March 2019
Record· Brief van lid/fractie/commissie2019Z05499concluded
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 20 March 2019
Verzoek om het Rathenau Instituut onderzoek te laten doen naar de effecten van digitalisering en kunstmatige intelligentie op de arbeidsverhoudingen
Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2019-001399answered
European Union · European Parliament · 19 March 2019
Question· Mündliche Frage19/8433open
Germany · German Bundestag · 15 March 2019
Originaltext der Frage(n):<br />
<br />
Hält es die Bundesregierung auch nach dem jüngsten europapolitischen Appell von Frankreichs Präsident Emmanuel Macron (vgl. DIE WELT vom 5. März 2019) nach wie vor für angemessen, sowohl ihre KI-Strategie als auch die geplante Agentur für Sprunginnovationen national und nicht von Anfang an gemeinsam mit Frankreich oder europäisch auszurichten, und welche konkreten Kooperationsprojekte mit Frankreich befinden sich in diesen beiden Feldern der Künstlichen Intelligenz und der Sprunginnovationen in Planung?
Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2019-001325answered
European Union · European Parliament · 13 March 2019
Record· Brief commissie2019Z04978concluded
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 13 March 2019
Verzoek om een reactie op het advies van de Raad Volksgezondheid & Samenleving 'Waarde(n)volle zorgtechnologie. Een verkennend advies over de kansen en risico's van kunstmatige intelligentie in de zorg'
Report· HearingS.Hrg.116-502published
United States · United States Senate · 12 March 2019
Report· DCCELEX 52018DC0795R(03)open
European Union · European Commission · 4 March 2019
Question· Written questionUIN 227135answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 28 February 2019
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps the Government is taking to ensure that human biases are not replicated in artificial intelligence technologies used in public services.
Resolution· HRESH.Res. 153 (116th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 27 February 2019
This resolution supports the development of guidelines for the ethical development of artificial intelligence, with aims including engagement among industry, government, academia, and civil society.
Record· Rondvraagpunt procedurevergadering2019Z03767concluded
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 25 February 2019
Verzoek van het lid Hijink (SP) om een reactie op het advies van de Raad Volksgezondheid & Samenleving 'Waarde(n)volle zorgtechnologie. Een verkennend advies over de kansen en risico's van kunstmatige intelligentie in de zorg'
Question· Schriftliche Frage19/7797open
Germany · German Bundestag · 15 February 2019
Originaltext der Frage(n):<br />
<br />
Wann und wie soll der in der KI-Strategie (KI – Künstliche Intelligenz) der Bundesregierung angekündigte "international besetzte Beirat" zur Evaluation und Weiterentwicklung der KI-Kompetenzzentren und -Cluster besetzt werden?
Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2019-000863answered
European Union · European Parliament · 14 February 2019
Question· Kleine Anfrage19/7731open
Germany · German Bundestag · 13 February 2019
(insgesamt 16 Einzelfragen)
Question· Written questionUIN 218822answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 8 February 2019
To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps his Department has taken to ensure that the use of artificial intelligence complies with equalities legislation.
Question· Schriftliche Frage19/7585open
Germany · German Bundestag · 8 February 2019
Originaltext der Frage(n):<br />
<br />
Wie und durch wen werden die Hochschulstandorte und Lehrstühle der mindestens 100 Professuren, die in der Strategie Künstliche Intelligenz (KI) der Bundesregierung erwähnt werden, ausgewählt, um eine regionale und thematische Vielfalt, interdisziplinäres Arbeiten und den Transfer in Gesellschaft und Praxis sicherzustellen? <br />
<br />
Wie ist der Zeitplan für die Besetzung der 100 Professuren, die in der KI-Strategie der Bundesregierung erwähnt werden? <br />
<br />
Wie erfolgte bzw. erfolgt die Kooperation mit den Ländern zur Umsetzung der 100 Professuren aus der KI-Strategie der Bundesregierung? <br />
<br />
Wie hoch sind die Haushaltsmittel für die mindestens 100 Professuren, die in der KI-Strategie der Bundesregierung erwähnt werden, und aus welchem Haushaltstitel werden sie bereitgestellt?
Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2019-000737answered
European Union · European Parliament · 6 February 2019
Bill· HRH.R. 1025 (116th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 6 February 2019
Uighur Intervention and Global Humanitarian Unified Response Act of 2019 or the UIGHUR Act of 2019 This bill imposes sourcing restrictions and export controls related to China's mass detention of the Uyghurs, a predominantly Muslim Turkic ethnic group in Xinjiang province. Executive agencies shall not procure goods or services from foreign persons who in the last three years substantially facilitated or knowingly assisted such mass detention. When procuring goods or services from U.S. persons, executive agencies shall provide adverse consideration to awarding contracts to those involved with such mass detention, and assess the availability of other sources. The President may waive these restrictions for national security or national interest purposes. The Department of Commerce shall deny applications to export to China various technologies, including those related to artificial intelligence or biometrics, unless the applicant certifies that the technology will not be knowingly used to facilitate the mass detention of Turkic Muslims. The Department of State shall ensure that certain U.S. diplomatic facilities in China can provide services in the Uyghur language. The State Department shall establish a website for reporting harassment or surveillance of persons in the United States by Chinese representatives or agents, and procedures for sharing such reports with law enforcement agencies. This bill directs various agencies to report on specified topics, including China's development of technologies related to mass detection and surveillance.
Question· Question écrite18297answered
France · National Assembly · 3 February 2019
Mme Graziella Melchior interroge Mme la ministre du travail sur le retard français en gestion prévisionnelle de l'emploi pour s'adapter aux mutations technologiques. Une récente étude du cabinet de conseils Mercer pointe le retard de la France en gestion prévisionnelle de l'emploi pour s'adapter aux mutations technologiques. Bien que de nombreux métiers soient appelés à disparaître au gré des mutations technologiques, les entreprises françaises anticipent trop peu l'évolution de leurs besoins en emploi. Le constat de Mercer est étayé par les conclusions du World Economic Forum , selon lequel les salariés français sont les plus mal armés face à l'avènement de l'intelligence artificielle. Ils comptent aussi au sein des pays de l'Organisation de coopération et de développement économiques (OCDE) parmi les actifs les moins nombreux à avoir suivi une formation au cours des douze derniers mois. Elle aimerait connaître les solutions prévues par le Gouvernement pour combler le retard pointé par ce rapport.
Resolution· proposition de résolutionppr18-280passed
France · Senate · 31 January 2019
Bill· HRH.R. 827 (116th)referred
United States · United States Congress · 28 January 2019
Artificial Intelligence Job Opportunities and Background Summary Act of 2019 or the AI JOBS Act of 2019 This bill expresses the sense of Congress that technology can improve the lives of individuals, but can also disrupt jobs, and for this reason, innovation should be encouraged while training and retraining American workers. The Department of Labor shall prepare and submit to Congress a report on artificial intelligence and its impact on the workforce.
Question· Schriftliche Frage19/7341open
Germany · German Bundestag · 25 January 2019
Originaltext der Frage(n):<br />
<br />
Von welchen bestehenden Kompetenzzentren für KI-Forschung (KI – Künstliche Intelligenz) geht die Bundesregierung bei dem in ihrer "Strategie Künstliche Intelligenz" festgehaltenen Vorhaben aus, mit weiteren einzurichtenden Zentren ein Netzwerk von mindestens zwölf Zentren und Anwendungshubs zu schaffen?
Record· Brief regering2019Z01354concluded
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 25 January 2019
Fiche: Gecoördineerd actieplan Kunstmatige Intelligentie (AI) voor Europa
Question· Written questionHL HL13075answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 23 January 2019
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Williams of Trafford on 21 January (HL12620), what is the definition of vulnerability in relation to the National Data Analytics Solution project; and how many people on any databa
Question· Written questionHL HL13076answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 23 January 2019
To ask Her Majesty's Government how many individuals' data are included on the databases that are used by the National Data Analytics Solution project; and of those, how many have been found guilty of committing a crime.
Question· Written questionHL HL13077answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 23 January 2019
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they require consent from individuals whose data are held on any database that is used as part of the National Data Analytics Solution project for their data to be held.
Question· Written questionHL HL13078answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 23 January 2019
To ask Her Majesty's Government when, and how, the evaluation of the National Data Analytics Solutions project will be made public.
Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0639_SUMdecided
European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 January 2019
Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0639decided
European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 January 2019
Bill· HRH.R. 617 (116th)open
United States · United States Congress · 16 January 2019
Department of Energy Veterans' Health Initiative Act This bill directs the Department of Energy (DOE) to establish a research program in artificial intelligence and high-performance computing that is focused on the development of tools to (1) solve big data challenges associated with veterans' health care, and (2) support the Department of Veterans Affairs in identifying potential health risks and challenges. DOE shall carry out a pilot program to develop tools for big data analytics in order to advance artificial intelligence technologies to solve complex big data challenges.
Bill· SS. 143 (116th)open
United States · United States Congress · 16 January 2019
Department of Energy Veterans' Health Initiative Act This bill directs the Department of Energy (DOE) to establish a research program in artificial intelligence and high-performance computing that is focused on the development of tools to (1) solve big data challenges associated with veterans' health care, and (2) support the Department of Veterans Affairs in identifying potential health risks and challenges. DOE shall carry out a pilot program to develop tools for big data analytics in order to advance artificial intelligence technologies to solve complex big data challenges.
Question· Schriftliche Frage19/6961open
Germany · German Bundestag · 11 January 2019
Originaltext der Frage(n):<br />
<br />
Wie setzt sich die deutsch-französische Arbeitsgruppe zu Künstlicher Intelligenz zusammen, und bis wann sollen erste Zwischenergebnisse der vereinbarten Fokusthemen (siehe "Franco-German press release following the interview be- tween Ministers La Maire and Altmaier", www. bmwi.de/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/F/franco- german-press-release.pdf?__blob=publicationFile &v=6 vom 18. Dezember 2018) vorliegen?
Record· Brief regering2019Z00270concluded
Netherlands · House of Representatives · 11 January 2019
Reactie op het verzoek van het lid Alkaya, gedaan tijdens de Regeling van Werkzaamheden van 1 november 2018, over personeelsgegevens en kunstmatige intelligentie op de werkvloer
Question· Question écrite23306open
France · National Assembly · 9 January 2019
Mme Marie Tamarelle-Verhaeghe interroge M. le ministre de l'Europe et des affaires étrangères sur la possibilité de se doter d'un instrument juridique international, posant les principes fondamentaux en matière de biomédecine. Actuellement, « la convention pour la protection des droits de l'Homme et de la dignité de l'être humain à l'égard des applications de la biologie et de la médecine » plus communément appelée « convention d'Oviedo », adoptée en 1997 par le conseil de l'Europe est le seul texte à portée internationale sur le sujet. Dans son rapport intitulé « Le recours aux nouvelles technologies génétiques chez les êtres humains » examiné en octobre 2017 par le conseil de l'Europe, la sénatrice belge Petra de Sutter, estimant que les dispositions de la « convention d'Oviedo » étaient désormais insuffisantes, recommandait la mise en place d'une nouvelle réglementation internationale pour se prémunir de toute dérive éthique. Les avancées technologiques récentes, notamment la technologie Crispr-Cas9, des ciseaux génétiques permettant de modifier des gènes choisis, et dont le potentiel serait encore à 90 % inexploité, font craindre que l'absence de cadre international ne conduise certains pays à devenir des déserts réglementaires. Dans le même temps, les risques de marchandisation du corps humain, via le commerce de gamètes par des organismes privés, sont accentués par les différences de législation entre les pays. C'est pourquoi elle lui demande si une révision de la « convention d'Oviedo » ou la création d'un nouvel instrument juridique international pouvait être à l'étude.
Record· QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITYP-8-2019-000037open
European Union · European Parliament · 8 January 2019
Question· Written questionHL HL12620answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 7 January 2019
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether prescription data could be legally mined as part of the National Data Analytics Solution.
Question· Written questionHL HL12619answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 7 January 2019
To ask Her Majesty's Government which types of non-criminal matters the National Data Analytics Solution could be used for.
Question· Written questionHL HL12621answered
United Kingdom · UK Parliament · 7 January 2019
To ask Her Majesty's Government which departments are taking part in the National Data Analytics Solution.