Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

1,751 records in EU

All countriesUnited States · 41,750Ireland · 23,761United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,721France · 4,100Netherlands · 3,841Austria · 3,578European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0247decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber), 20 May 2014.#Argo Group International Holdings Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).#Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark ARIS — Earlier Community figurative mark ARISA ASSURANCES S.A. — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Coexistence of earlier marks on the market — Principle of American law known as the ‘Morehouse defense’ — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T‑247/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 May 2014

Record· CJCELEX 62012CJ0414decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 8 May 2014.#Bolloré v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Cartels — Market in carbonless paper — Attributability of liability to the parent company for the infringement committed by its subsidiary — Direct participation of the parent company in the infringement — Equal treatment — Duration of the administrative procedure and legal proceedings — Reasonable period of time — Rights of the defence.#Case C‑414/12 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 8 May 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62008TJ0468decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 30 April 2014.#Tisza Erőmű kft, formerly AES-Tisza Erőmű kft v European Commission.#State aid — Aid awarded by the Hungarian authorities to certain electricity generators — Power purchase agreements concluded between a public undertaking and certain electricity generators — Decision declaring the State aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Obligation to state reasons — Concept of State aid — Advantage — Selective nature — State resources — Imputability to the State — Effect on trade between Member States — Rights of the defence — Legal certainty — Legitimate expectations — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Misuse of powers — Article 10 of the Energy Charter Treaty.#Case T‑468/08.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0637decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 30 April 2014.#Euris Consult Ltd v European Parliament.#Public service contracts — Tender procedure — Provision of translation services into Maltese — Rules relating to the procedure for the submission of tenders — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Failure to comply with the rules on submission designed to ensure the confidentiality of the contents of tenders before opening — Plea of inapplicability — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence — Obligation to state reasons — Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 98(1) of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 — Article 143 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002.#Case T‑637/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 30 April 2014

Report· XGCELEX 52014XG0417(01)open

The following information is brought to the attention of ‘Hizballah Military Wing’ (a.k.a. ‘Hezbollah Military Wing’ , a.k.a. ‘Hizbullah Military Wing’ , a.k.a. ‘Hizbollah Military Wing’ , a.k.a. ‘Hezballah Military Wing’ , a.k.a. ‘Hisbollah Military Wing’ , a.k.a. ‘Hizbu’llah Military Wing’ a.k.a. ‘Hizb Allah Military Wing’ , including the ‘Jihad Council’ (and all units reporting to it, including the External Security Organisation)), included on the list provided for in Article 2(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism listed in Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 125/2014

European Union · Council of the European Union · 17 April 2014

Record· TOCELEX 62012TO0263decided

Order of the General Court (First Chamber) of 14 April 2014.#Manufacturing Support & Procurement Kala Naft Co., Tehran v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Iran with the aim of preventing nuclear proliferation — Freezing of funds — Res judicata — Obligation to state reasons — Obligation of individual communication — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to property — Proportionality — Competence of the Council — Misuse of powers — Error of law — Definition of support given to nuclear proliferation — Error of assessment — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T‑263/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 April 2014

Report· CCCELEX 62011CC0578decided

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 27 March 2014.#Deltafina SpA v European Commission.#Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Italian market for the purchase and first processing of raw tobacco — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Immunity from fines — Obligation to cooperate — Rights of the defence — Limits of judicial review — Right to fair legal process — Hearing of witnesses or of parties — Reasonable time — Principle of equal treatment.#Case C‑578/11 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 March 2014

Record· CJCELEX 62012CJ0612decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 27 March 2014.#Ballast Nedam NV v European Commission.#Appeal — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Netherlands market in road pavement bitumen — Setting of the gross price for road pavement bitumen — Setting of a rebate for road builders — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 27 — Rights of the defence — Reduction of the fine.#Case C‑612/12 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 March 2014

Record· CJCELEX 62013CJ0029decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber), 13 March 2014.#Global Trans Lodzhistik OOD v Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Stolichna.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Community Customs Code — Articles 243 and 245 — Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 — Article 181a — Decision amenable to review — Admissibility of legal proceedings where a prior administrative complaint has not been made — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence.#Joined Cases C‑29/13 and C‑30/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 March 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0202decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 12 March 2014.#Bouchra Al Assad v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Inclusion of an individual on the lists of targeted persons — Personal connections with members of the regime — Rights of defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy.#Case T‑202/12.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 March 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0128decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 27 February 2014.#(publication by extracts) LG Display Co. Ltd and LG Display Taiwan Co. Ltd v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Worldwide market for liquid crystal display (LCD) panels — Agreements and concerted practices concerning prices and production capacity — Internal sales — Rights of the defence — Fines — Partial immunity from fines — Single and continuous infringement — Ne bis in idem principle.#Case T‑128/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 February 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0256decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber), 27 February 2014.#Ahmed Abdelaziz Ezz and Others v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Egypt — Freezing of funds — Legal basis — Obligation to state reasons — Error of fact — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to property — Freedom to conduct a business.#Case T‑256/11.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 February 2014

Report· CCCELEX 62013CC0129decided

Opinion of Advocate General Wathelet delivered on 25 February 2014.#Kamino International Logistics BV and Datema Hellmann Worldwide Logistics BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden.#Recovery of a customs debt — Principle of respect for the rights of the defence — Right to be heard — Addressee of the recovery decision not heard by the customs authorities before its adoption, but only during the subsequent objection stage — Infringement of the rights of the defence — Determination of the legal consequences of non-observance of the rights of the defence.#Joined Cases C‑129/13 and C‑130/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 February 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0040decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 February 2014.#Elf Aquitaine SA v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European markets in tin heat stabilisers and ESBO/esters heat stabilisers — Decision finding two infringements of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Fines — Application for annulment — Rights of the defence — Late notification of Commission’s investigation — Duration of the administrative procedure — Liability of a parent company for infringements of competition rules committed by its subsidiaries — Presumption of actual exercise of decisive influence — Duration of the infringements — Limitation — Legitimate interest in finding that an infringement was committed — Fines imposed on a parent company differing in amount from those imposed on a subsidiary — Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T‑40/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 February 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62010TJ0027decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber), 6 February 2014.#AC-Treuhand AG v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Markets in tin heat stabilisers and ESBO/esters heat stabilisers — Decision finding two infringements of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Consultancy firm not operating on the relevant markets — Fines — Action for annulment — Concept of undertaking — Principle that offences and penalties must be defined by law — Duration of the infringement — Limitation — Duration of the administrative procedure — Reasonable time — Rights of the defence — Late notification of the investigation procedure — Maximum amount of 10% of turnover — Penalising of two infringements in a single decision — Concept of single infringement — Application for variation — Amount of the fines — Duration of the infringements — Duration of the administrative procedure — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Value of sales — Symbolic fine — Unlimited jurisdiction.#Case T‑27/10.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 6 February 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62012TJ0174decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber), 4 February 2014.#Syrian Lebanese Commercial Bank SAL v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures against Syria — Freezing of funds — Amendment of the form of order sought — Time-limit — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Right to effective judicial protection — Rights of the defence.#Joined Cases T‑174/12 and T‑80/13.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 February 2014

Record· TJCELEX 62009TJ0384decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 23 January 2014.#SKW Stahl-Metallurgie Holding AG and SKW Stahl-Metallurgie GmbH v European Commission.#Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for calcium carbide and magnesium for the steel and gas industries in the EEA, with the exception of Ireland, Spain, Portugal and the United Kingdom — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price fixing and market sharing — Rights of the defence — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Obligation to state reasons — Fines — Equal treatment — Mitigating circumstances — Cooperation during the administrative procedure — Proportionality — Joint and several liability for payment of the fine — 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines.#Case T‑384/09.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 23 January 2014

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0239decided

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 December 2013.#Siemens AG and Others v European Commission.#Appeals — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market in gas insulated switchgear projects — Market sharing — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Proof of the infringement — Single and continuous infringement — Distortion of the evidence — Probative value of statements which run counter to the interests of the declarant — Fines — Starting amount — Reference year — Deterrent multiplier — Powers of unlimited jurisdiction — Equal treatment — Rights of the defence — Duty to state reasons.#Joined Cases C‑239/11 P, C‑489/11 P and C‑498/11 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 December 2013

Record· CJCELEX 62011CJ0448decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 December 2013.#SNIA Spa in amministrazione straordinaria v European Commission.#Appeal — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European market for hydrogen peroxide and sodium perborate — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputation of liability in the field of competition — Economic continuity test — Infringement of the rights of defence — Duty to state reasons.#Case C‑448/11 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 December 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0107decided

JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (Appeal Chamber) 4 December 2013.#European Training Foundation (ETF) v Gisela Schuerings.#Appeal — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Decision terminating the contract — Jurisdiction of the Civil Service Tribunal — Articles 2 and 47 of the CEOS — Duty of care — Concept of interests of the service — Prohibition on ruling ultra petita — Rights of defence.#Case T‑107/11 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 December 2013

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0108decided

JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (Appeal Chamber) 4 December 2013.#European Training Foundation (ETF) v Gustave Michel.#Appeal — Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Contract for an indefinite period — Decision terminating the contract — Jurisdiction of the Civil Service Tribunal — Articles 2 and 47 of the CEOS — Duty of care — Concept of interests of the service — Prohibition on ruling ultra petita — Rights of defence.#Case T‑108/11 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 4 December 2013

PreviousPage 35 of 36Next