Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

Defence

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

51 records in EU in 2025

All countriesUnited States · 41,745Ireland · 23,760United Kingdom · 15,991Germany · 5,706France · 4,098Netherlands · 3,840Austria · 3,566European Union · 2,430Belgium · 5Search this topic

Records

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0491_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM) v Amazon Italia Services Srl and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Prohibition of agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Empowering national competition authorities to enforce the rules on competition – Directive (EU) 2019/1 – Independence of national competition authorities – Article 4(5) – Setting priorities for the proceedings for the enforcement of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU – Fines on undertakings and associations of undertakings – Article 13 – Procedures for infringement of the rules of competition law – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – National legislation requiring the national authority to commence the inter partes investigation stage of the procedure within a time limit of 90 days, starting from the moment it has knowledge of the infringement – Annulment of the decision of that authority in the event of failure to comply with that time limit – Revocation of the power to penalise the practice concerned – Principle of effectiveness – Rights of defence of undertakings.#Case C-491/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0769_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Mara soc. coop. arl v Ministero della Difesa and Gruppo Samir Global Service Srl.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Mixed procurement involving defence aspects – Services directly linked to military equipment – Directive 2009/81/EC – Directive 2014/24/EU – Determining the applicable directive – Contract award criteria – Third subparagraph of Article 67(2) of Directive 2014/24/EU – Prohibition on using price as the sole award criterion – Proportionality – Public contracts for labour-intensive services.#Case C-769/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0769decided

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 December 2025.#Mara soc. coop. arl v Ministero della Difesa and Gruppo Samir Global Service Srl.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement – Mixed procurement involving defence – Services directly linked to military equipment – Directive 2009/81/EC – Directive 2014/24/EU – Determining the applicable directive – Contract award criteria – Third subparagraph of Article 67(2) – Prohibition on using price as the sole award criterion – Proportionality – Public contracts for labour-intensive services.#Case C-769/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 December 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0643decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 27 November 2025.#Manuel Costa Filhos, Lda. v Oü Wine Port of Paldiski.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Judicial cooperation in civil matters – Rights of the defence – Regulation (EC) No 805/2004 – European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims – Article 20 – Enforcement procedure – Jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State of enforcement – Articles 21 and 23 – Grounds for the refusal, stay or limitation of enforcement – Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007 – Service of judicial and extrajudicial documents – Article 8 – Refusal to accept the document – Failure to provide a translation into either a language which the addressee understands or the official language of the Member State of enforcement or, as the case may be, one of the official languages of the place where service of the document is to be effected – Omission of the standard form set out in Annex II to Regulation No 1393/2007 – Consequences – Assessment by the courts of the Member State of origin.#Case C-643/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 November 2025

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-10-2025-004706answered

Program Military Mobility

European Union · European Parliament · 26 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0607decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 26 November 2025.#SBK Art OOO v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘association’ – Article 2(1), in fine, of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1), in fine, of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Plea of illegality.#Case T-607/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0173_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#DI v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Member of the Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment and imposing a reprimand on a Member of the Parliament – Rights of the defence – Principle of sound administration – Procedural deadlines – Misuse of powers – Concept of ‘harassment’ – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Error of assessment.#Case T-173/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0223_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 15 October 2025.#VZ v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Members of the European Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decisions of the President of the Parliament finding that several accredited parliamentary assistants had been subjected to psychological harassment, and ordering the forfeiture of a Member’s right to the daily subsistence allowance and that the Member be suspended from taking part in the Parliament’s activities for thirty days – Procedural deadlines – Rights of the defence – Presumption of innocence.#Case T-223/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 October 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0582_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Claims Balkans d.o.o. Beograd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark CLAIMS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-582/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0582decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 September 2025.#Claims Balkans d.o.o. Beograd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for EU figurative mark CLAIMS – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-582/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 24 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0083_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#VP v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Members of the Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decision of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment by the applicant – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Concept of ‘harassment’ – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Error of assessment.#Case T-83/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1105_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Roman Arkadyevich Abramovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons operating in Russia’ – Concept of ‘businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Citizenship of the Union – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-1105/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0083decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#VP v European Parliament.#Law governing the institutions – Members of the Parliament – Psychological harassment – Decision of the Parliament finding that an accredited parliamentary assistant suffered psychological harassment by the applicant – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Principle of good administration – Concept of ‘harassment’ – Article 12a of the Staff Regulations – Error of assessment.#Case T-83/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1105decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 10 September 2025.#Roman Arkadyevich Abramovich v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on entry into the territory of the Member States – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources and subject to restrictions on entry into the territories of the Member States – Maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Concept of ‘leading businesspersons operating in Russia’ – Concept of ‘businesspersons involved in economic sectors providing a substantial source of revenue to the Government of the Russian Federation’ – Article 2(1)(g) of Decision 2014/145/CFSP – Article 3(1)(g) of Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 – Plea of illegality – Obligation to state reasons – Rights of the defence – Error of assessment – Proportionality – Citizenship of the Union – Right to property – Non-contractual liability.#Case T-1105/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 10 September 2025

Page 1 of 2Next