Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · EU

Energy

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

95 records in EU in 2018

Records

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0238decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 12 July 2018.#UAB ,,Renerga“ v AB „Energijos skirstymo operatorius“ and AB „Lietuvos energijos gamyba“.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus miesto apylinkės teismas.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2009/72/EC — Article 3(2), (6) and (15) and Article 36(f) — Internal market in electricity — Hypothetical nature of the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-238/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 July 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0305decided

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 5 July 2018.#FENS spol. s r.o. v Slovenská republika – Úrad pre reguláciu sieťových odvetví.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava II.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of goods — Customs duties — Charges having equivalent effect — Levy on the transmission of electricity generated within the national territory and intended for export — Compatibility of such legislation with the principle of free movement of goods.#Case C-305/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 5 July 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0090decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 June 2018.#Turbogás Produtora Energética SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa - CAAD).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/96/EC — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Third subparagraph of Article 21(5) — Entity producing electricity for its own use — Small producers of electricity — Article 14(1)(a) — Energy products used for the production of electricity — Obligation to exempt.#Case C-90/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 June 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62016CJ0005decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2018.#Republic of Poland v European Parliament and Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment — Decision (EU) 2015/1814 — Determination of legal basis — No taking into account of the effects of a measure — Article 192(1) TFEU — Article 192(2)(c) TFEU — Measures significantly affecting a Member State’s choice between different energy sources and the general structure of its energy supply — Principle of sincere cooperation — Article 15 TEU — Powers of the European Council — Principles of legal certainty and protection of legitimate expectations — Principle of proportionality — Impact assessment.#Case C-5/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 June 2018

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2018-002487answered

Bulgarian Energy Holdings

European Union · European Parliament · 4 May 2018

Proposal· PCCELEX 52018PC0258open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union, in the Association Committee meeting in trade configuration established by the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other, concerning the update of Annex III (Approximation) concerning rules applicable to standardisation, accreditation, conformity assessment, technical regulation and metrology, and Annex XVI (Public Procurement) to the Agreement

European Union · European Commission · 4 May 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0152decided

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 April 2018.#Consorzio Italian Management and Catania Multiservizi SpA v Rete Ferroviaria Italiana SpA.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and postal services sectors — Directive 2004/17/EC — Obligation to review prices after the award of the contract — No such obligation in Directive 2004/17/EC or arising from the general principles underlying Article 56 TFEU and Directive 2004/17/EC — Cleaning and maintenance services linked to railway transport operations — Article 3(3) TEU — Articles 26, 57, 58 and 101 TFEU — Lack of sufficient information concerning the factual context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for a reply to the questions referred — Inadmissibility — Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Provision of national law not implementing EU law — Lack of jurisdiction.#Case C-152/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 April 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62016CC0561decided

Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 12 April 2018.#Saras Energía SA v Administración del Estado.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2012/27/EU — Article 7(1), (4) and (9) — Article 20(4) and (6) — Promotion of energy efficiency — Energy efficiency obligation scheme — Other policy measures — Energy Efficiency National Fund — Establishment of such a fund as the main measure implementing energy efficiency obligations — Contribution obligation — Designation of the obligated parties — Energy distributors and/or retail energy sales companies.#Case C-561/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 April 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62011TJ0542(01)decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 March 2018.#Alouminion tis Ellados VEAE, formerly Alouminion AE v European Commission.#State aid — Electricity — Decision declaring the aid unlawful and incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Preferential electricity tariff granted by a contract entered into with the incumbent supplier — Termination of the contract by the incumbent supplier — Judicial suspension, by way of interim measures, of the effects of termination of the contract — Annulment of the Commission’s decision by the General Court — Judgment of the General Court set aside by the Court of Justice — Referral of the case back to the General Court — Scope of the action after being referred back — Classification of the order granting interim measures as constituting new aid — Competence of the Commission — Effective judicial protection — Classification of the preferential tariff as State aid — Advantage — Legitimate expectations — Rights of defence of the recipient — Obligation to recover — Obligation to state reasons.#Case T-542/11 RENV.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 March 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0103decided

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 7 March 2018.#Messer France SAS v Premier ministre and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonisation of fiscal legislation — Directive 92/12/EEC — Article 3(2) — Directive 2003/96/EC — Articles 3 and 18 — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Excise duties — Existence of another indirect tax — Conditions — National legislation providing for a contribution to the public electricity service — Definition of ‘specific purposes’ — Compliance with a minimum level of taxation.#Case C-103/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 March 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0090decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 7 March 2018.#Turbogás Produtora Energética SA v Autoridade Tributária e Aduaneira.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Arbitral Tributário (Centro de Arbitragem Administrativa - CAAD).#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/96/EC — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Third subparagraph of Article 21(5) — Entity producing electricity for its own use — Small producers of electricity — Article 14(1)(a) — Energy products used for the production of electricity — Obligation to exempt.#Case C-90/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 7 March 2018

Record· CJCELEX 62017CJ0117decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 February 2018.#Comune di Castelbellino v Regione Marche and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per le Marche.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Environment — Directive 2011/92/EU — Article 4(2) and (3) and Annexes I to III — Environmental impact assessment — Authorisation to carry out work in a plant for the production of electricity from biogas without preliminary examination of the need for an environmental impact assessment — Annulment — Regularisation after the event of the authorisation on the basis of new provisions of national law without preliminary examination of the need for an environmental impact assessment.#Case C-117/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 February 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62016CC0135decided

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 27 February 2018.#Georgsmarienhütte GmbH and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — State aid — Scheme for the support of renewable electricity sources and energy-intensive users — Decision (EU) 2015/1585 — Validity in the light of Article 107 TFEU — Admissibility — Failure by the applicants in the main proceedings to bring an action for annulment.#Case C-135/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 February 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62016CC0632decided

Opinion of Advocate General Saugmandsgaard Øe delivered on 22 February 2018.#Dyson Ltd and Dyson BV v BSH Home Appliances NV.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van koophandel te Antwerpen.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Retail of vacuum cleaners — Energy class label — Directive 2010/30/EU — Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 — Vacuum cleaners — Display of other symbols — Unfair commercial practices — Consumer protection — Directive 2005/29/EC — Article 7 — Failure to state the conditions under which energy efficiency is measured — Misleading omission.#Case C-632/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0049decided

Opinion of Advocate General Szpunar delivered on 22 February 2018.#Koppers Denmark ApS v Skatteministeriet.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Østre Landsret.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/96/EC — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Article 21(3) — Chargeable event giving rise to taxation — Consumption of energy products produced within the curtilage of an establishment producing energy products — Energy products used for purposes other than as motor fuels or as heating fuels — Consumption of solvent as fuel at the coal tar distillation plant.#Case C-49/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2018

Report· CCCELEX 62017CC0031decided

Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev delivered on 22 February 2018.#Cristal Union, the legal successor to Sucrerie de Toury SA v Ministre de l'Économie et des Finances.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État.#Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2003/96/EC — Taxation of energy products and electricity — Article 14(1)(a) — Energy products used for the generation of electricity — Obligation to exempt — Article 15(1)(c) — Energy products used for combined heat and power generation — Option to exempt or reduce the level of taxation — Natural gas intended for use in the cogeneration of heat and electricity.#Case C-31/17.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 February 2018

Decision· DCELEX 32019D0433in force

Council Decision (EU) 2019/433 of 20 February 2018 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Association Committee meeting in Trade configuration established by the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part, concerning the update of Annexes XXVIII-A (Rules applicable to financial services), XXVIII-B (Rules applicable to telecommunication services) and XXVIII-D (Rules applicable to international maritime transport) to the Agreement

European Union · EUR-Lex · 20 February 2018

Record· QUESTION_WRITTEN_PRIORITYP-8-2018-000559open

Bitcoin energy consumption

European Union · European Parliament · 31 January 2018

Question· QUESTION_WRITTENE-8-2018-000510answered

Renewable energy

European Union · European Parliament · 30 January 2018

Record· TJCELEX 62016TJ0561decided

Sentencia del Tribunal General (Sala Quinta) de 25 de enero de 2018.#Yosu Galocha contra Empresa Común Europea para el ITER y el Desarrollo de la Energía de Fusión.#Función pública — Agentes contractuales — Procedimiento de selección de la Empresa Común Fusion for Energy — Listas de reserva — Irregularidad del procedimiento de selección — Actos posteriores destinados a terceros — Interés de los terceros — Interés del servicio.#Asunto T-561/16.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 25 January 2018

Decision· DCELEX 32018D0156in force

Council Decision (EU) 2018/156 of 22 January 2018 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Association Council established by the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part, as regards supplementing Annex I-A to Chapter 1 of Title IV of that Agreement, and within the Association Committee in Trade configuration, as regards recalculating the schedule of export duty elimination set out in Annexes I-C and I-D to Chapter 1 of Title IV of that Agreement

European Union · EUR-Lex · 22 January 2018

Record· COCELEX 62016CO0678decided

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 January 2018.#Monster Energy Company v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).#Appeal — Rules of Procedure — Article 181 — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘HotoGo self-heating can technology’ — Composite mark — Application for registration — Opposition — Rejection — Appeal manifestly inadmissible.#Case C-678/16 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 January 2018

PreviousPage 2 of 2