Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · EU

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

601 records in EU in 2026

All countriesSearch this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0245_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#Ella Hotels and Resorts monoprosopi AE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ELLA HOTELS AND RESORTS – Earlier EU figurative mark ELLE – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to repute – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark – Lack of due cause.#Case T-245/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0245decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#Ella Hotels and Resorts monoprosopi AE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark ELLA HOTELS AND RESORTS – Earlier EU figurative mark ELLE – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to repute – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark – Lack of due cause.#Case T-245/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0246decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#Ella Hotels and Resorts monoprosopi AE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark ELLA RESORTS – Earlier EU figurative mark ELLE – Relative ground for refusal – Detriment to repute – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Taking unfair advantage of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier mark – Lack of due cause.#Case T-246/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0046decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#Land Oberösterreich v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark Genussländer – Genuine use of the mark – Article 18(1)(a) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Nature of use of the mark – Form differing in elements that do not alter the distinctive character of the mark.#Case T-46/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ1052decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 28 January 2026.#UH v European Commission.#Public service contracts – Supporting higher legal education in a third State – Performance of a service contract – Contractor’s grave professional misconduct and significant deficiencies in complying with main obligations – Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – OLAF investigation – Exclusion from public procurement procedures for a period of two years – Existence of a consortium – Error of fact – Error of law – Legal certainty – Limitation – Non-retroactivity.#Case T-1052/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 28 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0271decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 January 2026.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Admissibility – Decision (EU) 2021/3 – Position to be taken, on behalf of the European Union, at the reconvened sixty-third session of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, established by the United Nations Economic and Social Council, on the scheduling of cannabis and cannabis-related substances under the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961, as amended by the 1972 Protocol, and the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971 – Position and vote of a Member State, both being contrary to that position of the European Union – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation – Effects of the alleged conduct as at the date of expiry of the deadline laid down in the reasoned opinion – Ongoing effects on the unity and consistency of the European Union’s international action – Article 3(2) TFEU – Exclusive external competence – Effect on common rules or alteration of their scope – Plea of illegality raised in the defence – Inadmissibility.#Case C-271/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0271_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 January 2026.#European Commission v Hungary.#Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Article 258 TFEU – Admissibility – Decision (EU) 2021/3 – Position to be taken, on behalf of the European Union, at the reconvened sixty-third session of the Commission on Narcotic Drugs, established by the United Nations Economic and Social Council, on the scheduling of cannabis and cannabis-related substances under the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs of 1961, as amended by the 1972 Protocol, and the Convention on Psychotropic Substances of 1971 – Position and vote of a Member State, both being contrary to that position of the European Union – Article 4(3) TEU – Principle of sincere cooperation – Effects of the alleged conduct as at the date of expiry of the deadline laid down in the reasoned opinion – Ongoing effects on the unity and consistency of the European Union’s international action – Article 3(2) TFEU – Exclusive external competence – Effect on common rules or alteration of their scope – Plea of illegality raised in the defence – Inadmissibility.#Case C-271/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 27 January 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0742_INFdecided

Order of the Vice-President of the Court of 26 January 2026.#Société d'exploitation des ports du Détroit v European Commission.#Appeal – Intervention – Application to intervene lodged after the expiry of the period of six weeks laid down in Article 143(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court – Article 47 of the Charter of the Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Admissibility.#Case C-742/25 P(I).

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 26 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0590decided

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#Criminal proceedings against AK Dlhopolec s.r.o. and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Public procurement procedures – Directive 2014/23 – Award of concession contracts – Directive 2014/24 – Grounds for exclusion – National legislation establishing a register of public sector partners – Requirement of impartiality on the part of the person authorised to enter the public sector partner in that register – Imposition of a fine for non-compliance with that requirement – Automatic exclusion from participation in public procurement procedures in the event of non-payment of that fine – Article 49 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Criminal nature of the penalty – Predictability and proportionality of that penalty – Principle of legal certainty.#Case C-590/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0413decided

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 January 2026.#Vlaams Gewest v P&O North Sea Ferries Limited and P&O Ferries Limited.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Ondernemingsrechtbank Gent, afdeling Oostende.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Regulation (EEC) No 4055/86 – Application of the principle of freedom to provide services to maritime transport between Member States and between Member States and third countries – Article 56 TFEU – Article 191 of the Trade and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part – Freedom to provide services – Restrictions – National legislation providing for the payment of a charge for the mandatory use of a vessel traffic services system (‘Verkeersbegeleidingssysteem’), depending on the length of the vessel concerned – Legislation applying to maritime traffic that is bound for ports of Vlaams Gewest (Flemish Region (Belgium)) covered by that system and that departs from a port of a Member State other than the Kingdom of Belgium, but not applying to the traffic between those Flemish ports – Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community (Brexit).#Case C-413/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 22 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0043_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 January 2026.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a curved stripe and an irregular triangle inside a black rectangle – Earlier EU figurative marks representing one or more white curved stripes ascending to the right – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-43/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 January 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0393(01)decided

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 January 2026.#Associazione proprietari alloggi dati in locazione turistica (Pro.Loca.Tur.) v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) rules for the digital age – VAT obligations in the short-term accommodation rental sector – Concept of ‘deemed supplier’ – Association protecting the interests of property owners renting out accommodation on a short-term basis – Legislative act – Act of general application – Lack of direct concern – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-393/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 January 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62025TO0394(01)decided

Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 January 2026.#Nomad Stays Co v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment – Taxation – Value added tax (VAT) rules for the digital age – VAT obligations in the short-term accommodation rental sector – Concept of ‘deemed supplier’ – Online platforms facilitating the supply of short-term accommodation rental services – Legislative act – Act of general application – Lack of direct concern – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility.#Case T-394/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0071_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 January 2026.#Casa Ermelinda Freitas - Vinhos, S. A. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative trade mark EF – Earlier EU word mark EF – ERMELINDA FREITAS – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-71/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0561decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 January 2026.#Universal Brand Group Pty Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU figurative mark Elton – Earlier national word mark ELON – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-561/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0043decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 21 January 2026.#Puma SE v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a curved stripe and an irregular triangle inside a black rectangle – Earlier EU figurative marks representing one or more white curved stripes ascending to the right – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-43/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 21 January 2026

Decision· DCELEX 32026D0222in force

Council Decision (EU) 2026/222 of 20 January 2026 authorising the opening of negotiations on behalf of the European Union for the conclusion of an agreement between the European Union, of the one part, and the Commonwealth of Australia, of the other part, on the participation of the Commonwealth of Australia in Union programmes and the association of the Commonwealth of Australia to Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2021-2027)

European Union · EUR-Lex · 20 January 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0598_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 19 January 2026.#Kurt Hesse v Ferrari SpA and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-598/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 January 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0597_INFdecided

Order of the Court of 19 January 2026.#Kurt Hesse v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-597/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 January 2026

Record· TOCELEX 62024TO0571decided

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 January 2026.#Pic Corp. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark PIC – Earlier EU word mark PIC – Relative ground for invalidity – Genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 64(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility of new evidence – Relevant periods – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Evidence submitted for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Discretion of the Board of Appeal – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-571/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 January 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0597decided

Order of the Court of 19 January 2026.#Kurt Hesse v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-597/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 January 2026

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0598decided

Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 19 January 2026.#Kurt Hesse v Ferrari SpA and European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-598/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0494_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#Issam Anbouba v Council of the European Union.#Appeal – Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria – List of persons subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – List of persons subject to restrictions on entry into and transit through EU territory – Maintenance of the appellant’s name on the list concerned.#Case C-494/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0075decided

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#XH v European Commission.#Appeal – Civil service – European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) – Allegations of psychological harassment during periods of sick leave – Rejection of the request for assistance and of the claim for compensation – Opening of an invalidity procedure – Action for annulment and for damages – Admissibility – Acts open to challenge – Obligation on the part of the General Court of the European Union to state reasons – Contradictory reasoning – Distortion of the facts and evidence.#Case C-75/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 January 2026

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0588decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 15 January 2026.#Imballaggi Piemontesi Srl v Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato (AGCM).#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Competition – Article 101 TFEU – Prohibition of restrictive practices – Procedures for infringement of the rules of competition law conducted by the national competition authorities – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – Time limit for closure of the investigation stage of the infringement proceedings – National legislation allowing the national competition authority unilaterally to postpone that time limit on account of circumstances which lead to an extension of the subject matter of those proceedings or of the number of undertakings concerned – General principle of the right to good administration – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Principle of effective judicial protection – Rights of defence of undertakings – Principle of effectiveness.#Case C-588/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 15 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0628_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Lego A/S v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a building block from a toy building set – Earlier EU design – Ground for invalidity – No individual character – No different overall impression – Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002.#Case T-628/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0517_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 14 January 2026.#Froneri Bulgaria EOOD v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#European Union design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a box with a lid – Grounds for invalidity – Individual character – Different overall impression – Novelty – Articles 5 and 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822.#Case T-517/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 January 2026

PreviousPage 12 of 13Next