Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · European Union

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

851 records in EU in 2024

All countriesEuropean Union · 19,773Ireland · 5,714United Kingdom · 1,357Netherlands · 778France · 494Germany · 293Austria · 174United States · 141Belgium · 1Search this topic

Records

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0831_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 19 June 2024.#TO v European Union Agency for Asylum.#Civil service – Temporary staff – Fixed-term contract – Termination of the contract – Article 47(b)(ii) of the CEOS – Breakdown in the relationship of trust – Right to be heard – Principle of good administration – Duty of care – Misuse of powers – Manifest error of assessment – Principle of proportionality.#Case T-831/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 June 2024

Decision· DCELEX 32024D1775in force

Council Decision (EU) 2024/1775 of 18 June 2024 on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe on proposals for modifications to UN regulation Nos 13, 13-H, 22, 30, 41, 49, 51, 54, 63, 78, 79, 83, 85, 96, 100, 101, 108, 109, 117, 120, 129, 134, 138, 150, and 155, on a proposal for a new UN regulation on snow grip performance and traction tyre classification for retreaded tyres, on proposals for modifications to UN global technical regulation Nos 9, 13, 21, 22, and 24, and on a proposal for an amendment of UN mutual resolution No 1

European Union · EUR-Lex · 18 June 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0753decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2024.#QY v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(a) – No possibility for the authorities of a Member State to reject an application for asylum as inadmissible on the ground that refugee status was previously granted in another Member State – Article 4 of the Charter of the Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment in that other Member State – Examination by those authorities of that application for asylum despite the granting of refugee status in that other Member State – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 4 – Individual examination.#Case C-753/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0352decided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2024.#A.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Hamm.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 21(1) – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 9(2) and (3) – Definitive grant of refugee status by a Member State – Refugee residing in another Member State after that grant – Request for extradition submitted by the third State of origin of that refugee to the Member State of residence – Effect of the decision granting refugee status on the extradition procedure concerned – Article 18 and Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Protection of that refugee against the extradition sought.#Case C-352/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0352_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2024.#Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Hamm v A.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 21(1) – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 9(2) and (3) – Definitive grant of refugee status by a Member State – Refugee residing in another Member State after that grant – Request for extradition submitted by the third State of origin of that refugee to the Member State of residence – Effect of the decision granting refugee status on the extradition procedure concerned – Article 18 and Article 19(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Protection of that refugee against the extradition sought.#Case C-352/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62022CJ0753_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 18 June 2024.#QY v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 33(2)(a) – No possibility for the authorities of a Member State to reject an application for asylum as inadmissible on the ground that refugee status was previously granted in another Member State – Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Risk of being subjected to inhuman or degrading treatment in that other Member State – Examination by those authorities of that application for asylum despite the granting of refugee status in that other Member State – Directive 2011/95/EU – Article 4 – Individual examination.#Case C-753/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 June 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0599_INFdecided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 June 2024.#QP v Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 95/46/EC – Processing of personal data in the context of enforcement proceedings – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-599/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 June 2024

Record· COCELEX 62023CO0599decided

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 17 June 2024.#QP v Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad Aytos.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Directive 95/46/EC – Processing of personal data in the context of enforcement proceedings – Requirement to present the factual and regulatory context of the dispute in the main proceedings – Requirement to state the reasons justifying the need for a reply from the Court and the link between the provisions of European Union law whose interpretation is sought and the applicable national legislation – Lack of sufficient information – Manifest inadmissibility.#Case C-599/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 17 June 2024

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0165decided

Order of the Court of 14 June 2024.#OmniActive Health Technologies Ltd v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request failing to demonstrate that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Refusal to allow the appeal to proceed.#Case C-165/24 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 14 June 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0380_INFdecided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#UN v État belge.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 19 TEU – Article 45 TFEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Income tax – Convention for the avoidance of double taxation – Mutual agreement procedure provided for under such a convention – Member State, at the end of that procedure, making the right to restitution of tax already paid in another Member State conditional upon the withdrawal by the taxpayer of his or her actions brought before the courts of that first Member State – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-380/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0229_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#Criminal proceedings against HYA and Others.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Telecommunications sector – Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Restriction of the confidentiality of electronic communications – Judicial decision authorising listening, tapping and storage in respect of telephone conversations of persons suspected of having committed a serious intentional offence – National legislation requiring that that decision must itself contain an express statement of reasons in writing, irrespective of the existence of a reasoned application made by the criminal authorities – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-229/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0118decided

Opinion of Advocate General Richard de la Tour delivered on 13 June 2024.#Rada Nadzorcza Getin Noble Bank S.A. and Others v Bankowy Fundusz Gwarancyjny.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Recovery and resolution of credit institutions – Directive 2014/59/EU – Decision to take a crisis management measure in respect of a credit institution – Article 85(3) – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to an effective remedy of all persons affected by that decision – Compliance with a reasonable time limit – Requirement of an expeditious judicial review – Provision of national law requiring that all the actions be joined – Article 3(3) – Combining of functions by the resolution authority – Guarantee of operational independence.#Case C-118/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0229decided

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#Criminal proceedings against HYA and Others.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski gradski sad.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Telecommunications sector – Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 15(1) – Restriction of the confidentiality of electronic communications – Judicial decision authorising listening, tapping and storage in respect of telephone conversations of persons suspected of having committed a serious intentional offence – National legislation requiring that that decision must itself contain an express statement of reasons in writing, irrespective of the existence of a reasoned application made by the criminal authorities – Second paragraph of Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligation to state reasons.#Case C-229/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2024

Record· CJCELEX 62023CJ0380decided

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#UN v État belge.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de première instance du Luxembourg.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 19 TEU – Article 45 TFEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Income tax – Convention for the avoidance of double taxation – Mutual agreement procedure provided for under such a convention – Member State, at the end of that procedure, making the right to restitution of tax already paid in another Member State conditional upon the withdrawal by the taxpayer of his or her actions brought before the courts of that first Member State – Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.#Case C-380/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0134decided

Opinion of Advocate General Pikamäe delivered on 13 June 2024.#Somateio 'Elliniko Symvoulio gia tous Prosfyges' and Astiki Mi Kerdoskopiki Etaireia 'Ypostirixi Prosfygon sto Aigaio' v Ypourgos Exoterikon and Ypourgos Metanastefsis kai Asylou.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Granting of international protection – Directive 2013/32/EU – Article 38 – Article 18 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Concept of ‘safe third country’ – Classification of the Republic of Türkiye as a ‘safe third country’ – Readmission of applicants for international protection in third countries – Refusal.#Case C-134/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2024

Report· CCCELEX 62023CC0146decided

Opinion of Advocate General Collins delivered on 13 June 2024.#XL and Others v Sąd Rejonowy w Białymstoku and Lietuvos Respublika.#Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Białymstoku and Vilniaus apygardos administracinis teismas.#References for a preliminary ruling – Freezing or reduction of remuneration in the national public administration – Measures specifically aimed at judges – Article 2 TEU – Article 19(1), second subparagraph, TEU – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Obligations on Member States to provide remedies sufficient to ensure effective judicial protection – Principle of judicial independence – Powers of the legislatures and executives of the Member States to set the detailed rules for determining judges’ remuneration – Possibility of derogating from those rules – Conditions.#Joined Cases C-146/23 and C-374/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0274_INFdecided

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#Taha Karadeniz v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Acapulco – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-274/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2024

Record· TOCELEX 62023TO0274decided

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 13 June 2024.#Taha Karadeniz v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark Acapulco – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Article 59(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-274/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 June 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0288_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 June 2024.#State Development Corporation "VEB.RF" v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Exclusion of SWIFT services – Obligation to state reasons – Article 2(1)(b) and (d) of Decision 2014/512/CFSP – Article 1e of Decision 2014/512/CFSP – Error of assessment – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to effective judicial protection – Misuse of powers.#Case T-288/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0649_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2024.#Issam Shammout v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Criterion of ‘leading businessperson operating in Syria’ – Presumption of a link with the Syrian regime – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to choose an occupation and right to engage in work – Freedom to conduct a business – Admissibility of evidence.#Case T-649/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0343_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 12 June 2024.#Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark Beyond Chocolate – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-343/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0604_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 June 2024.#Société du Tour de France v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TOUR DE X – Earlier national word mark and earlier international registration of a figurative mark TOUR DE FRANCE – Earlier EU and national word marks LE TOUR DE FRANCE – Earlier EU figurative mark LE TOUR DE FRANCE – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-604/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0170_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 June 2024.#Amstel Brouwerij BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark ULTRA – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – EUIPO’s Guidelines for examination.#Case T-170/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0288decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 June 2024.#State Development Corporation "VEB.RF" v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine – Freezing of funds – List of persons, entities and bodies subject to the freezing of funds and economic resources – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the list – Exclusion of SWIFT services – Obligation to state reasons – Article 2(1)(b) and (d) of Decision 2014/512/CFSP – Article 1e of Decision 2014/512/CFSP – Error of assessment – Equal treatment – Proportionality – Right to property – Right to effective judicial protection – Misuse of powers.#Case T-288/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0170decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 June 2024.#Amstel Brouwerij BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU figurative mark ULTRA – Absolute ground for invalidity – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – EUIPO’s Guidelines for examination.#Case T-170/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0649decided

Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 June 2024.#Issam Shammout v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy – Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Syria – Freezing of funds – Restrictions on admission to the territory of the Member States – Inclusion and maintenance of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned – Criterion of ‘leading businessperson operating in Syria’ – Presumption of a link with the Syrian regime – Error of assessment – Rights of the defence – Right to effective judicial protection – Obligation to state reasons – Proportionality – Right to property – Freedom to choose an occupation and right to engage in work – Freedom to conduct a business – Admissibility of evidence.#Case T-649/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0343decided

Judgment of the General Court (Single Judge) of 12 June 2024.#Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark Beyond Chocolate – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-343/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0130_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 June 2024.#Nike Innovate CV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark FOOTWARE – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility of new evidence – Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-130/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62022TJ0604decided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 12 June 2024.#Société du Tour de France v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark TOUR DE X – Earlier national word mark and earlier international registration of a figurative mark TOUR DE FRANCE – Earlier EU and national word marks LE TOUR DE FRANCE – Earlier EU figurative mark LE TOUR DE FRANCE – Relative grounds for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) – No damage to reputation – Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001).#Case T-604/22.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2024

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0130decided

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 12 June 2024.#Nike Innovate CV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark FOOTWARE – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptiveness – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility of new evidence – Article 95(1) and (2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.#Case T-130/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 June 2024

PreviousPage 17 of 18Next