Skip to content
PoliticalRepoPoliticalRepo

Subjects · EU

European Union

Records whose title is actually about this topic. Use a country filter if the list is still too broad.

201 records in EU in 2025

All countriesSearch this topic

Records

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0401_RESdecided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Staten genom Sjöfartsverket v Stockholms Hamn AB.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Agreement concluded before the accession of the Kingdom of Sweden to the European Union – Compensation for the loss of revenue arising from the abolition of passage fees for a lock – Concept of aid – Concept of undertaking – Economic activity – Existing or new aid.#Case C-401/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 November 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0401decided

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 November 2025.#Staten genom Sjöfartsverket v Stockholms Hamn AB.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Stockholms tingsrätt.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – State aid – Agreement concluded before the accession of the Kingdom of Sweden to the European Union – Compensation for the loss of revenue arising from the abolition of passage fees for a lock – Concept of aid – Concept of undertaking – Economic activity – Existing or new aid.#Case C-401/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 20 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0641_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Heinrich Sieber & Co. GmbH & Co. KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU design – Invalidity proceedings – Registered EU design representing a shopping bag – Ground for invalidity – Lack of unicity of the design – Articles 3(a) and 25(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 in the version prior to Regulation (EU) 2024/2822 – Consistency of views.#Case T-641/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0556_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Amphora Wineries AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark CHAMPAGNE LOUIS LAMAR REIMS – Standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Genuine use of a mark – Article 18 and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-556/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0003decided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Zündapp Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a stylised shield with horizontal bars – International registration of the earlier figurative mark representing two extended wings around a rectangle – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity of the signs at issue.#Case T-3/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0564_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Lav – Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of the evidence – Unreasonable or excessive burden of proof – Principle of good administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-564/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0563decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Làv – Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of the evidence – Unreasonable or excessive burden of proof – Principle of good administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-563/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0556decided

Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Amphora Wineries AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark CHAMPAGNE LOUIS LAMAR REIMS – Standing to bring proceedings before the Board of Appeal – Genuine use of a mark – Article 18 and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.#Case T-556/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0003_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Zündapp Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for an EU figurative mark representing a stylised shield with horizontal bars – International registration of the earlier figurative mark representing two extended wings around a rectangle – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Similarity of the signs at issue.#Case T-3/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0563_RESdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Làv – Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of the evidence – Unreasonable or excessive burden of proof – Principle of good administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-563/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0564decided

Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#Gürok Turizm ve Madencilik AŞ v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU figurative mark Lav – Article 18(1) and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Proof of genuine use – Assessment of the evidence – Unreasonable or excessive burden of proof – Principle of good administration – Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.#Case T-564/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62024TJ0645_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 19 November 2025.#+pharma arzneimittel GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark PlusQuam +PHARMA – Earlier national word mark +PHARMA – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark through use – Reputation – Proof of use.#Case T-645/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 19 November 2025

Proposal· PCCELEX 52025PC0713open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Committee of the Parties to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, at its 19th meeting, on the recommendations and conclusions addressed to certain Parties on their implementation of that Convention, with regard to matters related to institutions and public administration of the Union

European Union · European Commission · 19 November 2025

Proposal· PCCELEX 52025PC0712open

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union in the Committee of the Parties to the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, at its 19th meeting, on the recommendations and conclusions addressed to certain Parties on their implementation of that Convention, with regard to matters related to judicial cooperation in criminal matters, asylum and non-refoulement

European Union · European Commission · 19 November 2025

Record· COCELEX 62025CO0411decided

Order of the Court of 18 November 2025.#European Union Intellectual Property Office v Versiontech, Inc.#Appeal – EU trade mark – Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed – Article 170b of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Request demonstrating that an issue is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law – Appeal allowed to proceed.#Case C-411/25 P.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 18 November 2025

Decision· DCELEX 32025D2362in force

Council Decision (EU) 2025/2362 of 13 November 2025 establishing the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Joint Committee established by the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community as regards the adoption of a decision adding a newly adopted Union act to Annex 2 to the Windsor Framework

European Union · EUR-Lex · 13 November 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0563_SUMdecided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v PB Vi Goods GmbH.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Definition, description, presentation, labelling and protection of spirit drinks – Regulation (EU) 2019/787 – Article 10(7) – Prohibition on using legal names for any beverage that does not comply with the requirements of the relevant categories – Gin – Beverage named ‘non-alcoholic gin’ – Article 12(1) – Allusions – Validity of Article 10(7) – Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom to conduct a business – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-563/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2025

Record· CJCELEX 62024CJ0563decided

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 November 2025.#Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v PB Vi Goods GmbH.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Potsdam.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Definition, description, presentation, labelling and protection of spirit drinks – Regulation (EU) 2019/787 – Article 10(7) – Prohibition on using legal names for any beverage that does not comply with the requirements of the relevant categories – Gin – Beverage named ‘non-alcoholic gin’ – Article 12(1) – Allusions – Validity of Article 10(7) – Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Freedom to conduct a business – Principle of proportionality.#Case C-563/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 13 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0034_INFdecided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 November 2025.#Centex SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark OWN – Earlier national word mark my own – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence adduced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-34/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 November 2025

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0475_SUMdecided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 November 2025.#Fashion TV RO SRL and Maestro SPRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Galaţi - Serviciul Soluţionare Contestaţii - Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Constanța and Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Galați - Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Constanța – Activitatea de Inspecţie Fiscală.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 168 – Right to deduct VAT – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial – Article 50 – Principle ne bis in idem – Discontinuance of criminal proceedings in respect of natural persons – Administrative procedure relating to a company having the status of taxable person – Examination of evidence obtained during the criminal proceedings – (Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Questions the answer to which may be clearly deduced from the Court’s existing case-law.#Case C-475/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62025TJ0034decided

Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 November 2025.#Centex SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU figurative mark OWN – Earlier national word mark my own – Relative grounds for refusal – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Evidence adduced for the first time before the Board of Appeal – Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Article 27(4) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 – Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark – Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001.#Case T-34/25.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 November 2025

Record· COCELEX 62024CO0475decided

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 November 2025.#Fashion TV RO SRL and Maestro SPRL v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Galaţi - Serviciul Soluţionare Contestaţii - Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Constanța and Direcția Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice Galați - Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Constanța – Activitatea de Inspecţie Fiscală.#Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Constanţa.#Reference for a preliminary ruling – Taxation – Common system of value added tax (VAT) – Directive 2006/112/EC – Article 168 – Right to deduct VAT – Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Article 47 – Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial – Article 50 – Principle ne bis in idem – Discontinuance of criminal proceedings in respect of natural persons – Administrative procedure relating to a company having the capacity of taxable person – Examination of evidence obtained during the criminal proceedings – Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Answer which may be clearly deduced from the existing case-law.#Case C-475/24.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0535decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 November 2025.#CEE Bankwatch Network z.s. and Ökobüro - Allianz der Umweltbewegung v Council of the European Union.#Environment – Regulation (EU) 2022/2577 laying down a framework to accelerate the deployment of renewable energy – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Refusal of request – Act adopted on the basis of Article 122(1) TFEU – Act not capable of being the subject of a request for internal review – Article 2(1)(g) of Regulation No 1367/2006 – Concept of ‘administrative act’ – Article 9(3) of the Aarhus Convention – Article 2(2) of the Aarhus Convention – Act adopted in a ‘legislative capacity’.#Case T-535/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 November 2025

Record· TJCELEX 62023TJ0534decided

Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 12 November 2025.#Föreningen Svenskt Landskapsskydd and Others v Council of the European Union.#Environment – Regulation (EU) 2022/2577 laying down a framework to accelerate the deployment of renewable energy – Request for internal review – Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 – Refusal of request – Act adopted on the basis of Article 122(1) TFEU – Act not capable of being the subject of a request for internal review – Article 2(1)(g) of Regulation No 1367/2006 – Concept of ‘administrative act’ – Article 9(3) of the Aarhus Convention – Article 2(2) of the Aarhus Convention – Act adopted in a ‘legislative capacity’.#Case T-534/23.

European Union · Court of Justice of the European Union · 12 November 2025

PreviousPage 4 of 5Next